Video

Forget these fictitious copper aged virgin births events. Go straight to the source of origins of virgin births, the golden & silver ages of Bharat. The viceless pure gods & goddesses, the deities of heaven all conceived through the power of yoga. All were viceless and pure, it was the viceless kingdom of heaven. Later in the copper age, impure kings & queens would worship pure kings & queens. All religions remember heaven on earth.

Alpha john astrada Daniel de Bernardi viola West Mays steve Anderson banker david green

Fact, all septuagint versions deny the diety of Jesus the kjb does not . Thats all i need to know so you can take all your prideful education to hell with you .

James White destroys his testimony all by himself! If you admire rudeness, arrogance, condescension, straw-man, and OUT OF CONTEXT Scripture references, seek out James White

which English Septuagint is known to be the most accurate?

Jesus is not the Most High nor he is divine no matter how Dr. White slices it. John 20:30-31 is clear, John wrote his gospel to prove Jesus is the Messiah, the son of God. Jesus being the son of God means several things, one is that Jesus was a creation of the Almighty and we can see it in Luke 1:26-35 where Luke tells us why Jesus is called the son of God, the other is because Jesus was renewed in his Spirit by the Spirit of the Father, so he became spiritually son of God, and the third one, after his resurrection because he became immortal Just as the Almighty is. Jesus is a human, the Messiah predicted in 2 Samuel 17.

lol Amen, Dr. White. Hyper preterism is absurdly ridiculous.

Mary was obviously born into sin by her parents, so she couldn't be considered sinless.

While I was in Bible college I witnessed another student drop kick the NIV across the room.

Thank you.

9:50 I've said this to many of my Presbyterian friends....gotta be both or neither. 😆

right because 40,000 denominations later sola scriptura has a great way of removing that cloudy lense lol

Remember christians, james white is our fellow christian, but he doesnt know the real world, what david had done in polemics sphere and what he ia achieved no one will ever could do it, including the quran tearing and eating, two days back he did the same thing, we have to always be on attacking mode while we are arguing, which is what david ,CP is doing and every successfull in it

I found this even less helpful than the more common arguments. Like hmmm let me use another assumption to defend eternal conscious torment. The amount of arrogance in the statement “I wish they were right” is crazy. As if you know for sure lol…. There are church fathers who were brilliant and closer to the time scripture was written that even argue universal reconciliation. ECT is definitely the least likely in all of the theories and least in line with the gracious and merciful nature of God.

Bunch of closet homosexuals in this chat

Tim Staples sounds like a used car salesman.

Here to shamelessly plug ELCA Lutheranism.

Did no one even notice that St. James NEVER says that a man is justified by both works and faith together at the same time, but rather James says a man is justified by Works Alone at the beginning of this verse? Yet false prophets who can't even read just presume he said "justified by both works and faith at the same time" when James actually said a man is justified by Works Alone in the first half of verse 24, and not only by Faith Alone in the second part of verse 24.

If micheal keeps saying father,son,holy Spirit as being different from one another than he saying 3 Spirits ,if all of them are GOD yet all distinct from one another then there are 3 GOD SPIRITS according to mike white,and yet he will say but one God,.false gospel the trinity is false

God Is ONE!

David k Benard believes in one Spirit of GOD,Never said he believes in 3 Spirits,He always quote ephesians 4:4

Very misleading video.. No mention of what Ignatius says about the importance of the bishops, the one Eucharist as the fountain of immortality, how one should avoid false Eucharists. And the part at the end about the priests vs the high priest was from the chapter on the old testament. The reality is that the letters of Ignatius are a double edged sword that can be used Islam and Protestantism alike. Seems James is well aware of that, with this reading.

How can God choose a world based on what humans autonomously would do? That would require humans to be self-existent, making us little yhvhs. That is a doctrine of demons.

Prayer makes a real difference, because God is pleased to use the answering of prayers as a means, so God chooses to make a difference through prayers and the answering thereof.

I totally agree with Mac. We DIE morons. 😅😅😅😅Duhhhhhhhh Simple as that. How he can stay pre millennial blows my mind that's the prosperity gospel and a righteousness outside of Christs BLOOD. And how can Durbin say we win when and be post or a mill that says the world gets worse and worse. Crazy to me their views are opposite yet conflicting with their own eschatology.

"In love, He predestined "US" to adoption...". A group has been chosen.. You have to have eyes and ears, to see it and hear it.. "You hath He chosen for salvation.. Thes. 1:13..

Dr James White reminds me of the fox that stole my chickens.

To the praise of HIS glorious grace

By who? The church.

It can be in the thoughts of God, or in the nature of God. Another example could be the law of non condradiciton. "Its not biblical" is a super weak argument. The trinity is only biblical with some degree of combinatory talent as well. Doesnt mean its not true. Most theologians have managed to justify their believes "biblically". Otherwise, there would only be one reasonable nomination.

@10:55 “I don’t know if bishop Irenaeus would pass any hermeneutics class today” what a hilarious statement 😂😂 White isn’t serious is he? Lol

Dr. White. God bless you and your ministry my brother.

ACTS 20:28 THE VERSE THAT KILLED THE TRINITY

This is the same James White that got his can handed to him by Catholic apologist Trent Horn

St. Paul taught about standing firm and holding on to the Oral/Verbal Traditions and Written Scriptures including Epistles, in the condition that both must not have CONTRADICTION with each other. (ref. 2 Thessalonians 2:15)... However, if there were contradictions, the WRITTEN Traditions must supersede (overrule) the ORAL Traditions... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus. Amen.

Most of the teachings of Christ Jesus were SPIRITUAL Metaphors and Symbolism by nature and NOT LITERAL... For example, the PARABLES, Water BAPTISM, to be BORN AGAIN, to Eat His FLESH and Drink His BLOOD, washing of the FEET, the KEYS to the Kingdom of Heaven, to Shake off the DUST from their feet, the LAMB of God, the WORD of God, the ROCK of God's Church, WOLF in SHEEP Clothing, many MANSIONS in Heaven, etc... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.

Christ Jesus truly said at His Last Supper, "Do this ALL of you in REMEMBRANCE of ME." (ref. Mark 14:22 / Luke 2:18-20 / 1 Corin. 11:23-25)... Logically speaking, it was just a METAPHOR or SYMBOLISM which means to "BELIEVE" and to have "FAITH" in HIM (Christ Jesus) through God's GRACE when Christ said, "Whoever EATS MY Flesh and DRINKS MY Blood has Eternal Life." (ref. John 6:54)... If that was a literal FLESH and literal BLOOD of Christ Jesus through the R.C.C. Doctrine of TRANSUBSTANTIATION, then, Christ Jesus himself had VIOLATED the Scripture, the Prohibition from Drinking Literal BLOOD of Animals and Humans including Eating Literal Human Flesh. (ref. Leviticus 17:13-15). Christ clearly said, "I did not come to abolish/destroy the LAW but to Fulfill." (ref. Matt. 5:17)... Will Christ teach that LITERALLY?... NOPE. Aside from that, if TRANSUBSTANTIATIONP is TRUE, why does during the R.C.C. Mass, the Priest/Bishop/Pope was the only one drinking from the Cup of Wine that was Miraculously turned into Literal Blood of Christ?... it should be for all the R.C.C. Congregation/Parishioners to drink from One Cup... Christ clearly said, "Drink from "MY CUP" (singular), logically from ONE CUP only... (ref. Matt. 20:23)... Will the Miraculous Blood of Christ be contaminated by the SALIVAS of the Parishioners drinking from ONE CUP?... Obviously, God will not allow it to happen even to contaminate the CUP (Container/holder/vessel) that holds the Literal BLOOD of Christ Jesus if the Transubstantiation is TRUE... However, when the Pandemic arises, it proves, that TRANSUBSTANTIATION is not TRUE... Even if you ask just 100 priests to line up and drink from ONE CUP, the last half of the priests will voluntarily sure not drink from ONE CUP... Facts and Truth of the Matters, Biblically and Logically speaking Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen...

Ok....this is so obvious. Who gave the last supper? Jesus. Jesus was there. That means He was NOT IN THE BREAD AND THE WINE. This argument is so stupid.

When it comes to TRANSUBSTANTIATION and MARIAN DOGMAS, I agreed 100% with Pastor James White... However, when it comes to FAITH ALONE, I disagreed 100% with Pastor James White... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen...

When it comes to TRANSUBSTANTIATION and MARIAN DOGMAS, I agreed 100% with Pastor James White... However, when it comes to FAITH ALONE, I disagreed 100% with Pastor James White... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen...

When it comes to TRANSUBSTANTIATION and MARIAN DOGMAS, I agreed 100% with Pastor James White... However, when it comes to FAITH ALONE, I disagreed 100% with Pastor James White... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen...

Pope Clement I “Through countryside and city [the apostles] preached, and they appointed their earliest converts, testing them by the Spirit, to be the bishops and deacons of future believers. Nor was this a novelty, for bishops and deacons had been written about a long time earlier. . . . Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of bishop. For this reason, therefore, having received perfect foreknowledge, they appointed those who have already been mentioned and afterwards added the further provision that, if they should die, other approved men should succeed to their ministry” Hegesippus “When I had come to Rome, I [visited] Anicetus, whose deacon was Eleutherus. And after Anicetus, Soter succeeded, and after him Eleutherus. In each succession and in each city there is a continuance of that which is proclaimed by the law, the prophets, and the Lord” Cyprian of Carthage “The Church is one, and as she is one, cannot be both within and without. For if she is with [the heretic] Novatian, she was not with Cornelius. But if she was with Cornelius, who succeeded the bishop [of Rome], Fabian, by lawful ordination, and whom, beside the honor of the priesthood the Lord glorified also with martyrdom, Novatian is not in the Church; nor can he be reckoned as a bishop, who, succeeding to no one, and despising the evangelical and apostolic tradition, sprang from himself. For he who has not been ordained in the Church can neither have nor hold to the Church in any way” Augustine “[T]here are many other things which most properly can keep me in [the Catholic Church’s] bosom. The unanimity of peoples and nations keeps me here. Her authority, inaugurated in miracles, nourished by hope, augmented by love, and confirmed by her age, keeps me here. The succession of priests, from the very see of the apostle Peter, to whom the Lord, after his resurrection, gave the charge of feeding his sheep, up to the present episcopate, keeps me here” Jerome “Far be it from me to speak adversely of any of these clergy who, in succession from the apostles, confect by their sacred word the Body of Christ and through whose efforts also it is that we are Christians” Irenaeus “[I]t is incumbent to obey the presbyters who are in the Church-those who, as I have shown, possess the succession from the apostles; those who, together with the succession of the episcopate, have received the infallible charism of truth, according to the good pleasure of the Father. Dr. James White, do I really have to mention more?

I just love how much White has to add and take away from these scriptures in order for it to fit within his worldview. Truly amazing! How about we take what the Bible has to say for what it actually says and not for what you want it to say. Please quit twisting scripture!

Turek's answer makes God a reactive force, as if He was surprised by the actions of David's brothers. God had to come in behind them to save...not sure what , because the free will of man wasn't known at the time. But how can this be? How can God intend it for good if He didn't intend it from the beginning? Turek makes no sense. Ex post facto can't be intended ex ante. It's after the fact. IF it was God’s intention to clean up the mess, it would be logical to say, "You meant it for evil, but now God will turn it to good. " but it can't be intended after the thing has already occured.

If progonosko (spelling is wrong,.im sure) means foresaw, that is a problematic view. It is an attack on the omniscience of God because it says God allegedly, to use the popular terms, looked down the corridor of time to see what happens. God, in His omniscience, doesnt need to do that. He is eternal past and eternal future. What then would He glean from looking forward? Is He not already forward of us mortals???

These provisionists just really think they're better than everyone else, plain and simple.

*Soli Deo Gloria?* But... Are you sure you're not giving the glory to yourself? *Calvinist* friend, why did God choose you? You are smart, you know well that it wasn’t a draw. The idea is just… ridiculous. Therefore… there is only one logical option left, right? And your heart knows it very well. God must have seen something special in you. But there is a BIG problem with that “god” of yours: It’s *UNBIBLICAL.* We know that God doesn’t have favorites. He is no respecter of persons. (Romans 2:11). Therefore, it is *impossible* that God chose you because of something in you. You are not worth a cent more than anyone else. The only reason He did, it's because He knew your response to his call. (Romans 8:29). Just like you wouldn't go out to the streets to force a woman to be your wife without her consent, Jesus isn't going to do it. (Free will). "... Many are called, but few *chosen.* " (Matthew 20:16) How terrible is that you don't care distorting God's character just so you can feel “special”, better than others, chosen! Because… let's be reasonable, a “god” who, being able to choose, chose the vast majority of human beings to be destroyed in hell, without any option for salvation, *is not loving, merciful, or good* . It’s not the God of the Bible. Therefore, let us be *VERY CAREFUL* ,lest while trying to give glory to God, we are found to be liars. “ *For the heart is wicked and deceitful above all things.* ” (Jeremiah 17:9).

There were some thoughtful points, but I do have to say I find it interesting that at 7:09-7:29 Dr. White, while declaring that the way he thinks of Molinism would deny true free will, seems to agree that his view produces the same result in that regard, while also saying that he still thinks we have a freewill. The fact that many agree on seems to have been tacitly acknowledged, Calvinism denies free will.

How can James White sit there and say that he doesn't understand that God can know what someone will do before they are created? Umm, maybe because he is God, you know, the omniscient being who lives outside of time. And he calls it magical, White, do you not know who God even is????

I am brown and I think you are not “privileged”, an idiot most probably.