- 1 189
- 2 549 458
Anthony Marinac
Registrace 20. 01. 2008
Industrial Development Consultants v Cooley (Directors obtaining personal advantage)
In this corporations law case, a Director was not allowed to keep the profits made as a result of opportunities which he obtained in direct consequence of his position as a Director (and based on knowledge obtained as a director). The fact that he lied his way out of his contract probably didn't help much either.
If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee!
www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee!
www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
zhlédnutí: 28
Video
Peso Silver Mines v Cropper (Director obtaining personal advantage)
zhlédnutí 37Před 4 hodinami
In this corporations law case, the court determined that if a company director obtains a personal benefit, but does so with full transparency and without relying on confidential information obtained through their position as a company director, then this does not breach their duty to the company. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
ASIC v Cassimatis No 8 (Directors Duty of Care)
zhlédnutí 42Před 7 hodinami
In this Corporations Law case, the court considers a company where there were only two shareholders, who were also the Directors. The court found that even under these circumstances, the directors had a duty of care to the company itself. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
ASIC v Vines (Directors Duty of Disclosure to the Market)
zhlédnutí 55Před 9 hodinami
In this corporations law case, the Directors of a company facing a takeover bid failed to keep shareholders and the market informed of matters affecting the share price. This was found to be a breach of those Directors' duties. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
ASIC v MacDonald (No 11) (Breach of Directors Duties)
zhlédnutí 58Před 12 hodinami
In this corporations law case, arising from the national tragedy of asbestos, the Court considered the standard, and the factors, to be used when determining whether a Director has breached their duties under the Corporations Act. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
ASIC v Rich (Duties of non-executive Directors)
zhlédnutí 67Před 19 hodinami
This case made clear that depending on the circumstances of their appointment and the nature of their position, non-executive directors can still have significant duties under the Corporations Act. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
National Exchange v ASIC (Fair dealing in shares)
zhlédnutí 43Před 21 hodinou
This case emphasised that while people are free to deal in shares outside the usual market, this is not an excuse for ripping off the vulnerable. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
NRMA v Parker (General Meetings cannot direct the Board)
zhlédnutí 54Před dnem
When a company's constitution gives powers to the Board of Directors, the General Meeting of the company cannot then just over-ride the execution of those powers by the board. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
Gambotto v WCP Ltd (Oppression of minority shareholders)
zhlédnutí 48Před dnem
Courts are generally reluctant to intervene in a corporation's management of its own internal affairs. However it may well intervene if majority shareholders use their power to oppress or disadvantage minority shareholders. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
ASIC v Healey (Duties of non-executive directors)
zhlédnutí 58Před dnem
In this case, the court considered the duties of non-executive directors, and in particular the extent to which they can rely on reports provided by the officers of the company. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
Daniels v Anderson (Duties of Non-executive Directors)
zhlédnutí 57Před 14 dny
In this corporations law video, the court found that non-executive directors do have a duty of care, but the content of that duty varies according to the complexity of the firm and the expectations of their specific appointment. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
Burland v Earle (Dividends and shareholders)
zhlédnutí 61Před 14 dny
In this case the court determined that it is not compulsory for a corporation to distribute its surplus as dividends: whether to do so is a matter for the company and not for the courts. If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/Anthslawschool
Eley v Positive Government Security Life Assurance (Articles of Association)
zhlédnutí 46Před 14 dny
Eley v Positive Government Security Life Assurance (Articles of Association)
Saltoon v Lake & Ors (Equity; ethics; property; animal law)
zhlédnutí 58Před 14 dny
Saltoon v Lake & Ors (Equity; ethics; property; animal law)
Wentworth Securities v Jones (Inferring words into statutes)
zhlédnutí 57Před 14 dny
Wentworth Securities v Jones (Inferring words into statutes)
Green v Bestobell (Lifting the Corporate Veil)
zhlédnutí 79Před 21 dnem
Green v Bestobell (Lifting the Corporate Veil)
Stoneman v Lyons (Trespass and subsoil)
zhlédnutí 103Před 21 dnem
Stoneman v Lyons (Trespass and subsoil)
Week 6 Scene 2: The Council of Dad Jokes
zhlédnutí 30Před 21 dnem
Week 6 Scene 2: The Council of Dad Jokes
Foxcroft v Ink Group (Protection of company under administration)
zhlédnutí 30Před 21 dnem
Foxcroft v Ink Group (Protection of company under administration)
Lehman Bros v City of Swan (Deeds of Company Arrangement)
zhlédnutí 60Před 21 dnem
Lehman Bros v City of Swan (Deeds of Company Arrangement)
Graham v KD Morris & Sons (Trespass of airspace)
zhlédnutí 71Před 28 dny
Graham v KD Morris & Sons (Trespass of airspace)
Appreciate what you do!
They dont teach US war crimes in school to keep bootlicking patriotism high. Luckily, the internet never forgets.
Could we assume (based on USA v Nicaragua decision that invitation by rebels could not be considered a legitimate invite) that the support provided by Rwanda and Uganda on overthrowing the dictatorship by helping Laurent Kabila was in itself unlawful and an act of use of force?
Hi, are you able to do an explanation about Equity? Thank you
This is so helpful, I'm doing Corporations Law this semester (started a week ago) so the timing of your video is perfect! :)
Cameroon has never dragged France to the UN for cutting off parts of German Kamerun and adding them to former French territories like Chad, Gabon, the Central African Republic, and Congo Brazzaville!
Im convinced, people do and say anything for clout. They need a hug not attention.
Nice one, Anthony.
She's right. You should be fined for that. Is this for a class on punitive provisions?
Thank You Great Dr. & Great Shepherd !"❤👍
My lecturer started talking about soccer and tried to use it as an examples 🤦♀️ this is so much better thanks
😅
The audio is awful I couldn't listen to the lecture
This is phenomenally helpful. Thanks.
Great stuff, thanks Doc!
reading all this from Kenya.... good lecturer indeed
I am currently a scientist working out of QE2 medical center in Perth and just this semester have enrolled to study law which lead me to this very video. Those suspended ceilings aren’t nearly as impressive as your videos, keep up the excellent work Anthony!
"And what that means is the losses must lie where they fall" and what that means is.........😂😂😂
Will you be making a 2 minute case note on Pusey v The King [2024]?
I hadn't planned to. It was a poorly articulated, poorly argued attempt at an appeal in the Court of Appeal, which made no new law, and which did not even get over the time bar. All that really happened is that Mx Pusey (I use Mx because I believe they now identify as a Trans person but I am not certain) attempted to parrot submissions made by their own counsel in the earlier matter. From what I can tell they didn't even make the basic submissions necessary to have a conviction overturned on a plea of guilty. Ultimately it is an inconsequential judgment, which didn't live up to the bold predictions Pusey made while trolling this page some months ago. It really doesn't justify a casenote. All that needs to be said is this quote from the judgment: "It would be sincerely hoped that no person would ever engage in the outrageous and repulsive form of conduct indulged in by [Pusey]" I do think there is room for some level of empathy for Pusey, who seems to have unravelled financially, socially, emotionally and psychologically since the incident. While they present as being bold and angry and out to change the world, I suspect that they are simply experiencing an ongoing trauma reaction from the events of the night, and from their own poor conduct.
Thank you for taking the time Anthony :)
Such a wonderful video
Ok, but where is the gold?
There were recent amendments to the WHS Acts (model and state/territory) introducing new offences by bodies corporate, expanding both physical and fault elements.
Despite "weathervaning" being the safest way to leave a crane to avoid it collapsing onto houses below if, for example, a strong wind sprung up and the crane arm was locked into position, it still has the capacity to cause anxiety to the people below. For those not familiar with the term "weathervaning", they should search "weather vane" in Google images. A weather vane spins to indicate the direction of the wind. Now, Google "crane collapse" and you'll understand the Plaintiff's anxiety.
definitely enjoyed the classes anthony!! thankyou so much for absolutely everything, you were an amazing lecturer!! hope to see you again sometime soon in the future!
Hi Jacobee, You are an impressive person. With your level of intelligence, maturity beyond your years, and your quiet dignity, I am confident that you will be successful whichever path you choose to take. I'm so glad you found the week to be helpful!
❤❤❤
:-) Aren't they all awesome?
Nice one, Anthony.
Cheers mate
Amazing work! Well done to all the students, JCU and ATSILS. I'm so sorry I couldn't make!!
Give some of these guys a couple of years and they will probably be working for you :-)
Al-Kateb is now over ruled by the Highcourt in NZYQ of 2023 where the Highcourt departed from is Al-Kateb decision and determined that unless the Commonwealth is actively looking for another country for a detainee to be removed too, it is Unconstitutional to keep them in immigration detention.
That's almost correct; the HCA actually ruled in NZYQ that the specific provisions in the Migration Act were beyond the constitutional power of the Commonwealth Government in circumstances where there was no real prospect of the person being removed. However in this video, al-Kateb was not cited on the question of constitutionality of the provision; it was cited to show the enduring importance of habeas corpus. And given that the applicants in NZYQ were released on a writ of habeas corpus, NZYQ really just enhances the point I was making by citing al-Kateb. You'll appreciate I hope that an immense amount of work goes into these two hour videos, so I can't amend them every time the High Court changes its mind about stuff :-) Hopefully people will note the upload date and understand that the video represents the law as I understood it at that date.
In 1998 Britain passed the Human Rights Act. Article 8.1 says, "Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence." I'm not sure if this covers hospital patients.
Hi there, certainly the Human Rights Act has an impact, but rights of that nature are generally asserted against lawmakers. The HRA doesn't really imply that someone whose rights are infringed has a separate cause of action, almost a super-tort. I'm not sure that it overcomes the principle in Kaye v Robertson.
Super helpful Anthony, your explanations and delivery fill in the gaps where our other sources don't cover.
Thank you - just what I needed! I appreciate your easy explanations of the cases. Cheers
Helped so much on my international law exam, thank you so much!
Thank you!
Thanks Anthony appreciate it a lot
Hi Anthony, I’ve recently started a JD and have been very overwhelmed. As an educator I am shocked at the little prep they have for JD students and the introduction course is not enough. The change in style in writing and thinking is significant enough to have its own subject in many cases. All I kept think was that would make the job of reading student work a lot more enjoyable for the lecturers. I was unhappy with my performance but I know next term will be different. I learnt the hard way and wish I’d come across this vid, but watching this vid has made me more excited about next term. Thank you so much for your videos they have been such a treasure and you are an incredible educator and I’m grateful to have at least access to you online. 😊
going into my exam in two hours pray for me 🤣🤣
💡 💡💡
Thank you so much Sir! I've got my ethics exam in a week at QUT and this is the video I've been searching for!
International Law made easier... Thank you for explaining and simplifying the cases.
professor, what is a good source to read for trusts for USA bar exam(s) in general (NY, NJ & NV)?
Thank you for sharing
Slay Anthony! Thanks for helping me understand Aus Law. You're a life life saver!!!
well and perfectly explained😍😍😍
No sir, international law may not be a law yet it is enforceable between the parties. Moreover, the jus cogens are never violated by ,almost, any state . There are a few states the independence of which is questionable or not accepted by many states. Therefore , based on their intransigence to the international law it cannot be said that it's out and out unenforceable. Lastly, I completely agree with your stance that it's not a law at all but this fact is not univerally acceptable too
coffee
Thankyou appreciate this
This helped me a lot with my exam I have tomorrow thank you ❤ can you do jurisprudence next? 🫡
Bravo 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Thank youuuu.... You just simplified the whole thing.
ur a life saver I literally have an exam tomorrow and i knew nothing lmao