Video

I guess my fear is the same fear many people have is that transhumanism will be seen as so good, that it will be imposed by force. Anyone who doesn't like it will be written off as an idiot and forced into it. I always had a live and let live way of thinking, but know such ideas aren't enough. I say that if this is what laissez faire economics are, it will just lead to even more shit being made in Chinese cancer villages. I also went "Live and let live" because people shilled the Christpill as a cure all. It was absolute bullshit for me. Good luck having Christpill salespeople actually face the fact that there are no one size fits all solutions.

Loved it. I recently watched Prof Anant Agarwals MIT 6.002 Circuits and Electronics, Spring 2007 and it was something of a revelation too. We work with abstractions these geniuses gave us.

His best one liner

Let me give you a good example of a paradigm shift. I used to love Dishonored the video game. I played it every day. I haven't played it in years now, but the other day I started again. And I began realizing how truly horrible this world would be, to actually live in, where as before I just loved the story for what it was, and the characters for what they were. Emily Kaldwin beautiful character, Corvo Attano beautiful character. Now everytime I play (particularly the first one) I can't help but realize how terrible this world truly is, but it's great to pretend. That is a paradigm shift. Isn't it? Are you guys dishonored fans?

You guys look way different. Did you guys have a Mystikal experience perhaps? An enlightenment? A new paradigm.. Wigs are so 18th century.... Aren't they?

Is it 10 To the minus 33 cm, I need a t-shirt with this

Good interview!

likewise extra dimensions, thinking "time" is a "dimension" … and other superstitious woo ;)

@30:00 "wrap it to a point"!!! 😂😂😂😂

Before I forget, you guys always talk about ethics in science, specifically in genetics and the nano world. Try to get Dr. JAMES GIORDANO on. You will not be disappointed. 😉

I can tell she really cares about the Truth and being accurate! Great interview, you two! Although, she lost me at reducing the population. 😔 😟

this guy is a thinker of the highest caliber

He learned all of this in federal prison.

What is charge? It’s time to learn. See Reading The Electron Clock by David Hestenes

Philosopher of computer metaphor. Pretty pathetic.

I bether IQ is less than 100

She has zero selfawareness.

Federal reserve notes come from the government, until it doesn't. Money is the medium of exchange agreed by the parties.

Knowledge is an incredibly important element, but I think there needs to be a cost element too. I bet in states in the US where they charge for plastic bags at the grocery store (even if it’s pennies) you see WAY lower plastic bag consumption. That’s a great combination of both factors

21:27 (The KEYS, to a Positive Trip) “You mentioned psychology earlier…not interested or the BEST thing…people opposed, express trepidation with aspects of themselves…BAD TRIP…” The keys I’ve learned, For a successful and positive trip… 1.) You HAVE to KNOW, You’re NOT going to die. And, if you were, there’s nothing you can do about it…so enjoy it. 🤣 2.) You HAVE to KNOW, To do it with people, With experience. 3.) You HAVE to KNOW, The people you’re with, WELL enough, To NEVER worry about their perceptions or judgments…at ALL. 4.) You HAVE to KNOW, That you have to be DOING something, While you WAIT for the trip to come on. Preoccupy your mind with an activity… Until it CAN’T keep your attention. 🤣 (You can’t sit there and THINK, while you WAIT on it…terrible mindset.) 5.) You HAVE to KNOW, Whatever you FEEL… You have to EMBRACE it, Or DISTRACT it, But NEVER FIGHT IT. That’s what I learned…🤣👍

Very interesting talk, we do often build mind prisons and its hard to get out of them, refreshing to see different ideas at a paradigm level

Radical change is the antithesis of harmony, compounded in an economic system that is inclined to expel people who’s productivity has been made obsolete by technology rather than deliberately organizing to further their education to improve the productivity of technology

Lukacs makes a lot of good points, but misses a few critical things. One is that if he is _deeply_ correct, then (to my mind at least) odds are anyone gadgeting themselves up as a "transhuman" (meaning techno-human or cyborg) is going to eventually lose consciousness. Why? Because I reckon the thesis of Physicalism is just false, and we might even get glimpses of evidence soon. If human mental quaila and moral sensitivity are fundamentally nonphysical, and transcendent, then (a) it's easy to see how they can interact with our physical world (they are _transcendents!)_ and (b) the shoe is then on the other foot, we have no moral compulsion to treat a machine as conscious. The borderline of a cyborg is an interesting thing, but it is that person's choice to get gadgeted up and lose consciousness. Maybe people should be allowed that sort of death, but they should not be allowed to infringe upon other ordinary human rights that we as a collective society deem to be basic rights. Just as human civilization should not infringe upon the lives of other species by extincting them through utter ignorance of ecology. My bet is that Kurtzweil and co. are just wrong and delusional. We will never see an Ai superintelligence. I cannot prove we will not, it is just a bet. Or to be exact, I *_can_* prove we will not get conscious machines, but that'd be based on _reasonable_ metaphysical axioms, not purely scientific data. Axioms are always open to dispute. Hence I bet, rather that assert. Any takers? Email me in 40 years time (Kurtzweils' timeframe he practically guarantees).

He's talking about bringing the religious notion of 'nonattachment' to science.

Really enjoyed this episode .... plus, I think I have a crush :)

A maybe stupid question, but if CMB is the first light, do we see second, third, and so on later and later light? Does it fit too? Should be a couple of degrees hotter then, shouldnt it?

There are two very fundamental identities in economics which are not a theory but simple accounting facts. Spending = Income and Savings = Investment. One entities spending is another entities income and one entities debt is another entities savings and that is by definition the case. They don't happen to be equal by some mechanism that keeps it balanced but in fact they are THE SAME THING viewed from two perspectives. They are two sides of the same coin. People often don't realize that the only reason they can spend less than their income (i.e. save) is because some other entity spends more than their income (i.e. invest by going into debt). Ignoring this fundamental truth is called a fallacy of composition. A single person might think that they can save some money without affecting anybody else but this is only because they are so insignificant compared to the whole economy that they do not realize it directly affects someones income. In fact their saving is only possible because someone else was willing to go into debt by exactly the same amount. It is impossible for every entity in the economy to earn more than they spend at the same time (which is known as the paradox of thrift). And because of that fact the economy is very prone to fluctuations in investment. Every additional penny saved comes from some net investment in the same period so basically all savings in the economy are the result of past investments by going into debt that have not yet been paid back. This can either be government spending that has not yet been taxed away or private debt by taking loans that are outstanding. The whole economy is driven by credit. Our money is outstanding debt.

I believe Mass doesnt exist. Robert Distini's work replaces Mass with Inertia, which is something like the strength of the coupling between charged particles and the Ether that resists their change in acceleration. This is a lot more intuitive when talking about how an objects' "Mass" changes at relativistic speeds. The coupling (inertia) changes, the object doesnt gain protons. Its interesting when asking the question "if i push an object (force) and it pushes back (inertia), whats it against to push back?(Ether?)" If im standing on earth and im accelerating at 9.8m/s2, my bathroom scale is measuring my bodies particles resistance (inertia) as ether is wizzing down past me (acceleration). Mass is a required construct if the ether is truly dead.

@1:24:50 What Gopi says about losing evidence that opposes your theory is a really good point. Sometimes those phenomena could come back later as anomalies but sometimes they are completely glossed over. A good example of this is the "null result" of the Michelson Morley experiment. Although the measurements were smaller than expected and required for the static ether model, they were non-zero. That doesn't fit the "no ether" model either. This is an instance of choosing between two wrong options in the adversarial sense he mentioned. Nowadays, many physicists do not know that the MM result was not null. For them, it's lost knowledge.

Continuous experience made metastable by default, relative-timing sync-duration reference-framing containment positioning. Nomenclature optional.

Half way through and blown away by this “magical” discussion 🧲 Absolutely brilliant insights - for instance, “electricity is your measuring tool, and by nature it is one dimensional.” So many questions. So many new perspectives/points of view. Yes, Anastasia, I immediately had the same question: what is that something else? @55:45

Think about psychedelics...you can try to bring something back from the experience, information, or artistic expression, but it'll never be like the thing itself, which was a complete illusion to begin with. If you can have the same experience of psychedelics without psychedelics via meditation, then it doesn't really matter if fungi developed a vehicle to enter into the pathway of human's serotonin receptor sites.

Typical rude Russian

Dr. Vijaya says, can we try to understand this without imposing a model on it. My first association was the quote by Albert Einstein: “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.' The quote emphasizes the need for a shift in mindset, a departure from conventional thinking, and the adoption of new perspectives to tackle our problems effectively. Einstein's words urge us to recognize the limitations of our current approaches and embrace the willingness to explore different avenues. This quote embodies the essence of innovation and progress - a reminder that real solutions often lie beyond the boundaries of familiar thinking My second association when he was talking about force was How it’s possible for an ordinary person to lift a car in a life-threatening situation. You can't really design an experiment to do this in a lab. In 2012, Lauren Kornacki, a 22-year-old woman in Glen Allen, Virginia, raised a BMW 525i off her father when the car toppled from a jack. Seven years earlier, a man named Tom Boyle hoisted a Chevy Camaro, freeing a trapped cyclist in Tucson, Arizona. The events don't always involve vehicles, like when Lydia Angyiou went toe-to-toe with a polar bear in northern Quebec to protect her son and his friends while they played hockey.

There’s a documentary on CZcams about Viktor Schauberger called comprehend and copy nature

I'm not the same person after this interview 🤯 What did you guys do to me!

30 years trying and failing to explain what is his idea. Anyway, waste of time. You want to learn about MMT go to someone else and avoid this guy.

Spectacular ears.

you guys have the same ears!

The more I keep asking what a charge is the more I think we are living in a fantasy novel and don't yet know it 😂 This guy's killing me 😍

22:20 Good point with the star wars analogy! If Calculus is the "Dark side" of Newtonian Mechanics then what is the Light side? 😅 38:20 I have hyperphantasia but even that isn't as bad as mainstream fantasy! 🤣 (Better Lore in video games guys!) 1:15:40 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 "We don't need it" But I do!!!!! 😭😭😭😭😭

Simple and brilliant opening 👏

THIS GUY CONDEMNS ONLY FANS , AGAIN CAPITALISM

This was a great discussion. I always felt like that there was more than what my teachers taught me and what I read in text books. Asking too many questions and especially challenging the narrative was not encouraged and lead to poor marks. Still. I asked and challenged. I still do. 😊

THIS GUY HATES POST MODERN ART BUT FAILS TO CONNECT IT TO CAPITALISM

THE IDEA OF KILLING CHILDREN FOR FUN SIDESTEPS THAT THE BIBLE CONDONES KILLING CHILDREN AS DOES MADELINE ALBRIGHT AND GEORGE BUSH

FUNNY THAT HE WOULD POINT TO SOVIET MAN WHEN TODAY ITS THE CAPITALISTS THAT ARE THE MOSY EXTREME TRANSHUMANISTS

The Ether is a metaphysical reality that would at once discredit a lot of the social ideas, religious, and the scientific ones. So bye bye ether.

Great discussion, I hope young minds heed this and start to really reconsider things.

1:59:50 (Money DOES, for MONEY) “Pay your employees more…quality goes up…Walmart could pay more, but profits would drop…” What is PAID, Is in RELATIONSHIP to… What is paid by others, And what is being ACCEPTED by Employees. Compassion is IRRELEVANT, Because you CAN’T sell a pair of shoes, To someone shopping for shoes, And say, “Pay THIS for the shoes, THIS for me, And THIS, extra for THEM… Instead of paying THIS much less, to someone else, for the SAME thing.” What is paid to YOU, Is through what is paid to THEM, In relation to, What is being paid…AROUND you. 🤣 People DO with their money, What is COMPASSIONATE for them. All else…is random, societal residuals. 🤣