Video

Hi Sir, could you please share the research paper (pdf file) with us for studying in details? Many thank you for your useful explanation.

I want a lewk😂 on co-occurance - keywords chart.. where can I find that ??

dear sir why is the R-squared of random effect is .z?

All this is a post facto hand waving for people in the humanities, of no value whatsoever for people actually engaged in research.

Sir share this copy

Then why you dont choose the most imporatnt one , such as if Style is more important then price . Then the best criteria should be Style.

Thank u sir

Thank you

Thank you so much for this. It's indeed helpful sir.. I'll greatly appreciate your idea on how to choose a training algorithm apart from the ones on the available options. Best regards

Helpful video

Thanks so much..

I'd like to know what was the purpose saving the unstandardized predicted values. I didn't see them used in the second regression so, what should we do with them? Could anyone help me with this information? thank you

How reliable and valid are the questionnaires? Do I use the rated questions and just find alpha value?

But we didn't understand what the heteroskedasticity indicate for! for example, if we have a model that make a prediction for the house price based on the three variables: area, age, location. then what does it mean to have heteroskedasticity?

Good presentation

How to use free matlab please add matlb link here

Can we use maximum likelihood even if the variables are not normaly distributed?

not able to download the dataset from the above link page not found is coming

can i get ppt used and excel sheet computation done

Nicely explained

Very well explained

If text data exists in input data then we have to convert it into numerical value??... what should we do in that type of case?

Thank you.

Bro you saved me!! Thanks a lot! 💪

This video is about how to conduct a literature review and what the most valuable part of a literature review is. The speaker argues that simply presenting descriptive statistics and correlation tables is not enough for a literature review. A good literature review should synthesize the information from the literature and develop a new framework or research agenda. The most valuable part of a literature review is the ability to transform these descriptive statistics into a new framework or research agenda. The speaker suggests four possible outcomes of a literature review: a taxonomy, a research agenda, a conceptual framework, or a meta-theory. A taxonomy is a classification system that can be used to group related articles together. A research agenda is a plan for future research. A conceptual framework is a model that shows how different concepts are related to each other. A meta-theory is a theory that integrates different theoretical domains. The speaker concludes by saying that the worst thing a student can do in a literature review is to simply present descriptive statistics. The most important part of a literature review is to synthesize the information from the literature and develop a new framework or research agenda. Follow or connect with the speaker Prof. Ilan Alon on linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/ilanalon

According to the video, entering and contributing to a scientific field involves listening and learning about the field before you can start introducing your own ideas. The speaker uses a party analogy to illustrate his point. Imagine being at a party where there are groups of people already talking amongst themselves. If you just walk in and start talking about yourself, people will likely ignore you. The same is true in science. Newcomers need to listen and learn about the field before they can start introducing their own ideas. The speaker suggests that the first thing newcomers should do is listen to the conversations that are already happening. This can be done by reading the scientific literature in the field. Once you have a good understanding of the field, you can start to build on the work of others. This is how science progresses: by building on the shoulders of giants. The speaker concludes by saying that he often receives submissions from people who have not read any of the papers in his journal. These people are like the person who walks into a party and starts talking without listening to anyone else. They are not part of the scientific conversation, and their work is not likely to be well-received. Follow or connect with Alon on linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/ilanalon

can we load the bibliometrix file and process for analytics?

very helpful to find the journal which indexed in scopus or not

Hi. How did you do that selection for the best and the worst one in google forms? That personalised field.

Thank you

Good one

Very well explained. Thank you for making this video.

Very nice session

Can u pl email excel

Can you provide excel of this

Sir i am unable to use the dimension database CSV file. I was following you conversion steps but citespace is not reading it. HELP ME

timbul tenggelam suaranya, sayang sekali..

Sir , how do we decide the weights as 0.8 and 0.2 ? Is there any specific way to determine this ? also , loving your videos , highly informative.

so, how to forecast for the next period? example Jan 2000

This is truly helpful and fruitful for us. Thank you so much sir

Is there any time limitation for recording on Zoom

thanks so much, clear explanation, how we can find more of your videos,...

Thank You

Excellent!

Thanks u

❤

❤

thank youu

thank you, how do we make the nftool predict greater volumes of data at once instead of one value at a time as demonstrated in the video?

Thankyou for the explanation, what if forecasts comes negative and how could we verify whether this model for our data is correct or not?