- 5
- 23 989
Planes Planes Planes
United Kingdom
Registrace 11. 05. 2024
My channel is all about planes. I love aviation and I am an avid flight simmer. In my channel I talk about all types of planes,. New one, old ones, in development or obsolete. I will also talk about the best content available, where you can learn about aviation. Let me know in the comments section, whatever type of content you wish me to explore. I have a day job so it will not be possible to do daily videos. I plan to publish videos atleast once a month. Once I get a full handle on the editing stuff then it will change to every 2 to 3 weeks.
Did Pilot deserve JAIL for this PLANE CRASH?
This is the story of AFL1492. We tell the story as to how this Captain and Pilot in command ended up receiving a jail sentence
00:01 Introduction
03:08 Pilot error 1
03:34 Pilot error 2
04:00 Pilot error 3
05:04 Pilot error 4
05:32 Pilot error 5
05:57 Pilot error 6
06:57 Pilot error 7
08:46 Pilot error 8
09:50 Pilot error 9
11:31 Jail sentence
12:10 Conclusion
Longer videos worth watching
Заявление о халатности. Катастрофа SSJ 100 в Шереметьеве 05.05.19 (youtube.com)
Вынесен приговор по делу о жесткой посадке Superjet 100 в Шереметьеве - Россия 24 - смотреть видео онлайн от «Россия 24» в хорошем качестве, опубликованное 20 июня 2023 года в 17:18. (rutube.ru)
Суд приговорил пилота сгоревшего в Шереметьево Superjet к шести годам - Россия 24 - смотреть видео онлайн от «Россия 24» в хорошем качестве, опубликованное 20 июня 2023 года в 12:51. (rutube.ru)
Вынесен приговор командиру SSJ-100 Денису Евдокимову, по ошибке которого сгорел самолёт с людьми - смотреть видео онлайн от «Телеканал 360 и Михаил Онуфриенко» в хорошем качестве, опубликованное 20 июня 2023 года в 14:14. (rutube.ru)
Вынесен приговор по делу о жесткой посадке Superjet 100 в Шереметьеве - Россия 24 - смотреть видео онлайн от «Россия 24» в хорошем качестве, опубликованное 20 июня 2023 года в 17:18. (rutube.ru)
rutube.ru/video/6310f17d3e5608f05d30388697e9635a/
czcams.com/video/VKibtVzXO7U/video.html
00:01 Introduction
03:08 Pilot error 1
03:34 Pilot error 2
04:00 Pilot error 3
05:04 Pilot error 4
05:32 Pilot error 5
05:57 Pilot error 6
06:57 Pilot error 7
08:46 Pilot error 8
09:50 Pilot error 9
11:31 Jail sentence
12:10 Conclusion
Longer videos worth watching
Заявление о халатности. Катастрофа SSJ 100 в Шереметьеве 05.05.19 (youtube.com)
Вынесен приговор по делу о жесткой посадке Superjet 100 в Шереметьеве - Россия 24 - смотреть видео онлайн от «Россия 24» в хорошем качестве, опубликованное 20 июня 2023 года в 17:18. (rutube.ru)
Суд приговорил пилота сгоревшего в Шереметьево Superjet к шести годам - Россия 24 - смотреть видео онлайн от «Россия 24» в хорошем качестве, опубликованное 20 июня 2023 года в 12:51. (rutube.ru)
Вынесен приговор командиру SSJ-100 Денису Евдокимову, по ошибке которого сгорел самолёт с людьми - смотреть видео онлайн от «Телеканал 360 и Михаил Онуфриенко» в хорошем качестве, опубликованное 20 июня 2023 года в 14:14. (rutube.ru)
Вынесен приговор по делу о жесткой посадке Superjet 100 в Шереметьеве - Россия 24 - смотреть видео онлайн от «Россия 24» в хорошем качестве, опубликованное 20 июня 2023 года в 17:18. (rutube.ru)
rutube.ru/video/6310f17d3e5608f05d30388697e9635a/
czcams.com/video/VKibtVzXO7U/video.html
zhlédnutí: 561
Video
12.07.2024 Sukhoi Superjet Plane Crash: Sanctions or something else? A brief update.
zhlédnutí 345Před 14 dny
Today a Sukhoi superjet Aircraft crashed in Moscow. I bring you the latest news
The uncertain future of the Sukhoi Superjet plane
zhlédnutí 1,8KPřed měsícem
In this video and look at the Sukhoi superjet SSj100, Russian's first modern aircraft whose future is in danger due to western sanctions. Timestamps: 00:01 Introduction 00:41 SU57 Display 01:09 Development problems 02:02 2019 Accident 02:49 SSJ specification 03:09 Foreign make up of plane 04:37 More problems 06:21 Sale of Sukhoi superjet to new company 07:06 New Russified jet 07:28 Conclusion H...
Does the new Russian IL96-400M aircraft have a future??
zhlédnutí 16KPřed měsícem
The IL96-400M is Russia's solution on overcoming westerns sanctions due its airlines not having access to western long haul jets. We look at the IL96-400M project with some great videos. I hope to eventually create a discord channel to share all kinds of clips. Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 01:20 History of IL96 03:25 ILS6-400M beast 05:29 Cockpit of IL96-400M 06:57 Engine options 08:11 Hopes ...
Can the Russian MC21Aircraft beat Western Sanctions???
zhlédnutí 6KPřed 2 měsíci
The MC21 Aircraft is the russian attempt to build brand new modern aircraft. It is an attempt to have an independent aircraft manufacturer. Timestamps 0.00 Introduction Most footage from OAK rutube channel and from the following. Check out their wider content @aerospaceandautomotivecomm1287 @TuboletFly
IL-96 is a very beautiful aircraft --- of course it needs modern turbofans and a modern glass cockpit, but aesthetically, it would be hard to find faults with it.
The result of russian technology : czcams.com/video/tXZrRIKkEdU/video.html
3000 metres is closer to 10 thousand feet, not 6 thousand feet.
Fair point. I strive to improve and avoid silly mistakes.,
Western countries they sanction them self
If the Russian get it right, yes.
All I saw was your fear of competing with Russian planes.When the USSR was, 40 % of all air traffic in the world was carried out by Russian Aeroflot.
Any news on what is happening with this hird? Its been long since its maiden flight, and then medi silence!
It's now not expected to enter into service until 2025. Limited information has been given as regards the reasons. It has still not received full certification from the Russian authorities.
Yes china better start buying them before the new USA sanctions
Why did this happen and how it’s so sad
Soviet made garbage
Just a short video on today's crash in Moscow. I am working on a main video which I hope to publish tomorrow or Sunday.
Pigs will fly…
Current-day Russia is still the fetal alcohol syndrome afflicted offspring of a failed Soviet Union. They can't even build an exportable automobile.
Stupid propaganda salad 1. The PS-90 engine has gone through three stages of modernization over 30 years of operation on many aircraft. Now the third version of the PS-90A3 modernization is working on the IL-96-400. Of course there was no information about this about Pratt & Whitney's work on this engine because you are limited to information in English only. But this company completed the work and sold the license for the modernized engine. 2. The new double cabin being developed with new avionics for the MC-21 will easily make it possible in a few years to move on to the creation of the IL-96 with two crew members. This is an obvious thing and an obvious advantage of sanctions, which pushes the nation and business to develop. 3. The PD-35 jet engine is confidently in line for development by 2027, not much time left. Work on PD-8 for SuJet-100 will be completed this year. Work on the PD-35 version will be improved.
The Western rotten “exceptionalist” mentality does not allow you to look at things sensibly and correctly assess the potential of this bird. Firstly, Belarus is not another state for Russia, we have been one state for a long time, Monaco and France have the same analogy. Secondly, the fact that the release may be delayed by 1 or 2 years indicates that aircraft engineers are not in a hurry to develop the aircraft. People in Russia are not worried, because they are confident in their designers and test pilots in such difficult times. Third, and MOST IMPORTANTLY, a completely independent aircraft platform, separated from prohibitions on the part of airframe, avionics or engine manufacturers from the “West”, makes this aircraft non-toxic from American-European sanctions. The first foreign customer will most likely be Iran and other countries of the global south. Due to the foreign Sam-146 engines, export bans/sanctions were imposed on the Sukhoi Jet-100 aircraft during the planned sale to Iran. Addition: I am correcting obvious errors in the video. The aircraft was initially planned with two optional engines, at the customer's choice (American and Russian). Geopolitical problems were calculated, and Westerners were not trusted from the very beginning. There have never been any problems with the wing, this is stupid propaganda. The State Department announced in 2019 a ban on the export of Japanese carbon fiber, which was replaced a few months later by Russian-made carbon fiber from the huge nuclear corporation Rosatom. This is a huge technological conglomerate famous for the highest quality of work. Typically, Western critics also mention the problem of the lack of winglets on the wings of the Sukhoi Jet-100 and MS-21. In this case, they will forget about the presence of a single carbon “black” wing over the long one (in the west there is a wing made up of parts). The presence of excess weight at the end of the wing was also calculated by the engineers, and has its own huge problems. Correctly write the name of the aircraft in English MS-21. MC is in Russian.
I have a strong dislike of Russia - particularly now - but I think most of their aircraft are aesthetically interesting and attractive.
I find them interesting. I particularly like the IL76, beast of a plane. Ugly and attractive at the same time.
All Russia 🇷🇺 has to do is stop selling Titanium to the West and its game set match. Western aircraft and engines manufacturers go out of business..
Don't see them doing that. They seem to want to do business with whomsoever wants to do business with them. Anyway the airline industry will be the ultimate loser and higher prices for the traveller.
Must admit i do find these russian widebodies good looking planes, certainly different in style!
They even stole Airbus' typography and color code. What a shame! These people have no self-esteem.
Frommy experience of flying in russian aircraft i would say they are cruder but tougher and lacked the sophisticated avionics and engines. The do seem to be very good airframed designers.
Western aircraft are robust, sophisticated, cheap to operate and reliable.
Cute wheelbarrow. Who's going to buy this junk?
Russian airlines, by order from Kremlin.
Toujours la condescendance occidentale. Respectez les gens. Vous pourrez être étonnés. Il y 2 fois plus d'ingénieurs Russes qui sortent d'école qu'en France. La Russie se transforme...
@@jacquy2188 Toujours le même complexe d'infériorité des russes vis à vis de l'occident. Votre comparaison sur le nombre d'ingénieurs prête à sourire, Russie = 144 millions d'habitants et la France 67 millions ... Quand à la qualité des ingénieurs on peut en parler : - Le SSJ-95 = un échec cuisant. - La mission Phobos Grunt de 2011 = échec cuisant. - La mission Luna 25 en août 2023 = échec cuisant. Vous en voulez d'autres?
It may have a limited market in Russia - although probably more western planes will find their way into Russia through Iran, Turkey or other states than will ever produced in Russia. Who will buy an A340 these days?
Maybe Iran's aviation industry under sanctions is perhaps the best example though they don't have the historic know-how of the Russians. I should add that I personally love the A340-600
And even the A340-300 is better!
The problem is indeed the engine issue. If I am not mistaken the IL 96-400 has 4 engines, each providing some 180kN thrust. As a comparison, the RR Trent engines mounted on the Airbus A350 XR has 330 to 380 kN thrust, allowing the plane to run on two engines only. I am ready to bet that the A350 is already more fuel efficient than is the IL 96...
Quite agree. PD35 is still years away.
Definitely it has,make it lighter,fuel efficient,long range,has a greater cargo and passenger capacity and owners friendly.
Upgraded engines would also help.
3000M is not 6353’ … cant even get the basics right .
Yes all it would take is a little calculation 😂 More like 9842 ft
Without access to any western planes or parts, this is the only real option for a widebody plane they have, in a country with 11 time zones.
The A330 NEO is an evolution of the A300, wich was developed in the 60´s…..
You've missed some steps, after the A300 we have the A310, then the A330 Ceo and then only the A330 Neo.
@@stabilo3170 is an evolution, the basic desing is the same in all of these!!!! All are the A300!!
@@javic3458 Maybe you think they are all from the same mold, but no. For example the avionics and the slats of the A310 are 100% different from the A300 not mentioning the trim tank system. For the A330 we are in an another world, new wing, new landing gears, flybywire, new avionics, new engines and so on. The fuselage diameter is not the determining factor to consider that an A330 is an "evolution" of the A300.
@@stabilo3170 I work for Airbus, I flew all From A300 to 330 NEO, and all a340 family wich is also from de A300, you are almost right, but still is a base design from the 60,s, a lot of systems and the frame are from the 60,s, the A350 is a whole new aircraft with not even a single nut from any other aircraft. As I said it comes from the A300 which was developed in the 60,s…
@@javic3458 You are probably an Airbus flight test team member? If I understand your pow, the fuselage width and nose section community are only to be considered.
As the first Flight test Jet engine mechanic for the MC-21-300 in Zhukovsky 2017 and Siberia. It is the Airframe that Boeing should have built. 😊 I have a Degree in Aviation maintenance Technologies from the National Aviation Academy in Clearwater FL 4.0 GPA Second in my class. While living homeless in my pickup truck. So I do not think that anyone wanted to be an Aircraft Mechanic more than I did. ❤ I had changed BOTH main engine oil pumps and the first 6 hour flight was the first test flight after my work. All the trolls would love to spam this except for the fact that I put up a video of the Dump hotel Russia put me in in Moscow . 😅 To my Russian friends that last sentence is American smart assed sarcasm 😂 The Moscow Hilton is as fine as a Hotel can be. 😊❤
The MC 210 / 310 like the IL96 range are still in the teething stage and more upgrades will happen. Unlike Boeing and Airbus these aircraft are designed to operate in harsh conditions so they are more robust than western aircraft. Moreover, as far as upgrades are concerned, how many parts of the original B 737 or B747 would fit in a new aircraft ( except maybe tyres ) 20 % or less? Give the Russians a chance to develop their own planes.
Indeed. They do build to operate in harsh conditions.
This is a comment from someone who do not know how planes are tested and certified. Boeing and Airbus do test their planes in very adverse conditions, from extreme heat to extreme cold.
@@yvesd_fr1810 Maybe I know more about planes than you think. Adverse conditions do not only mean cold or heat but the condition of runaways and other factors too. Every plane flying at 3000 feet experiences temperatures of -60 degrees Celsius but it is also true that they have problems taking off if it
@@yvesd_fr1810 sorry I pressed the wrong button. The last words should be : if it gets to hot. Does that answer your doubt?
Tell me please how Airbus and Boeing airliners are behaving in the Russian harsh conditions? In 2021 russian airlines fleet were composed by 3/4 of western aircrafts. Russian aerospace industry has no chance to succeed within the actual political situation, western sanctions and endemic corruption. Tell Putin to stop stealing his own country.
The aircraft will have a temporary place in Russia during sanctions. However, once sanctions are lifted, the aircraft will be parked as too expensive. It may have a post sanction future as a cargo carrier.
I do doubt a return to normality anytime soon. I suspect for security reasons they would want to be self reliant going forward.
No.
Once the MC-21 in full service, Russia from then on should just prohibit any Boeing or Airbus from flying over Russian territory.
Don't think they will as doing so would prohibit even Belarus' Belavia, who use a B738.
Good luck!
😂😂😂
In fact, Russian aircraft have had a bright future for a long time, but western fools believe that Boeing has never crashed😂😂
No one claims that Boeing planes or Airbus, Embrear, and previously Bombardier planes never crash. Russia's aircraft industry is just as bleak as it was in the early 90s when the USSR collapsed, no one in the goddamn 2020s would buy a four-engined widebody that requires three people to operate. There's a reason why Russian airlines and those of former Warsaw Pact countries ditched Ilyushin, Antonov, and Tupolev once they had the ability to purchase Western aircraft.
It's the only 4-engine widebody passenger jet still in production. Very niche, but the small demand will be there.
Ultimately they may have no option if they have to replace their widebodies during sanctions.
Outdated!
Obsolete already! Pure junk
Exactly! Perhaps they'd have *some* luck if they developed the twin-engined IL-90 variant of the plane, but there's no guarantee it would appeal to those outside of Russia.
The number of planes would be exact number to those confiscated in Russian Federation to a bunch of Leasing western companies, and they were about 700 or 750 units consisting in many A 320-319-321 among a huge amount of B 737 NG 800-900 series as well. This MC 21 it`s the main competitor, a natural aircraft replacement equipment, but it depends on the efficiency on the assembly line, how fast they could produce in a day once they get the ultimate Worthiness Certifications documents. There are many Euro Asia and South Pacific-Oceania potential costumers, needing for a 2.500 to 3.000 nautical miles range, because this model promises to be 15 to 20 million dollars lower price tag sales list. Something to consider in today`s economy global situation.
The number of planes they would be able to produce in a year is where I have doubts.
@@PlanesPlanesPlanes yes indeed, there is when magic has to appear.
Probably this plane does not appeal to a any Western airlines at all, but considering sanctions over Heavy long haul aircrafts wich are still in operations over Russian territory, it makes sense that this IL96-400M will be the natural local made airplane replacement to all that Airbus-Boeing material in order to serve with new planes the vast territory needing for a long range-one flight equipment. The costumers or clients would be the same 3 or 4 Russians well established companies, and surely, the foreing candidate to operate a bunch of them would be Cubana de Aviaciòn, Cuba`s national Airline. In my own humble opinion, I do prefer in long distance schedule, 4 engine model rather than 2 big ones, considering the latest blowns-out and fire issues in flight or taking-off, decribed by media and footage coming from the passengers aboard those flights. What about if delays-trouble assembly lines from Boeing and Airbus continue or get worst? Here is the another good and reliable player.
The Airbus/Boeing production delays would increasingly have an adverse effect on passenger capacity and growth.
Absolutely
I think it will take them 10 years to supply the Russian market alone
That's quite possible though it seems a bit too long.
Boeing doors are blowing off mid air and ssj future is certain
Within Russian maybe as the certification process is still in the early days for the Russified version. Awaiting more information about what the the new Emirates owners ( for European part) are going to do going forward.
Alaska.
To tell the truth, I have more trust on engineers than business executives; quite never understood their obsession with two engines, cause I am confident to go to sleep in a B747, or AB340 with 4 engines in a long haule flight than a B777 or AB350 with 2 huge engines, the Il96 of Cubana has been a work horse for many years hasn't killed anyone that should be the most important factor. As many old soviets planes they have been flying for decades with no incidents, with the unfortunate accidents with the 747 max one would assume that people in the industry should have learned a thing or two; the lessons of those events and their consequences on the industry is; it's better to have higher costs incroching on maximal profits in exchange of maximum reliability and uncompromize safety; than pursuing short sighted profits with a minimum acceptable level of risks, because when that minimal risks materializes the cost is abyssimal; I predict that if Boieng doesn't do a drastic move they are on their way to bankruptcy because of their decision to sick a compromize balance between risks and profits with their MCast system, that's how being reckless in that industry punishes you because no one want to board a plane that can potentially kill them no matter what business people say.
I do think you make excellent points. The aversion to risks with old soviet planes is to be lauded. When we think about the engineering stations and all the gauges that had to be monitored, someone was responsible for a key aspect of an aircraft. The IL76 engineering station is a thing of wonder. In modern western places, these have been reduced to a few indicators. The common view is that Boeing's problems started when corporates took over from the engineers. The drive for profit will always end up in risk taking as this culture is at the heart of many businesses. There is always a level of risk that some business are prepared to take especially when they know that the worse that had happen is to lose their jobs with a great payoff.
nafo copium
I would fly on MC-21 rather than a Boeing 737MAX. The MC-21 has been tested a lot. The only problem, the MC-21 does not have winglets.
When it does come into service I would be prepared to go to Russian to experience what it is like. Winglets would be cool.
Let's wait for the EIS and the real figures. And do not forget the reliability / avaibility issues with russian made parts.
Russians are not suffering. Sanctions do little. They're manufacturing their own goods. Employment is high.
The 8 off that have been built for flight test have Pratt & Whitney engines and British built wheels, brakes and braking system. This means the aircraft will need to be redesigned as it will not met the specification it current has for its type approval. So far the changes have left the aircraft over weight, under powered and it can't meet its flight ceiling.
Thanks for that. They have more than 8 test planes at the moment. The last information I saw last night from a Russian channel suggests that it will definitely not come into service this year, that full scale production has not started and they are behind on recruiting maintenance staff. The plane has still not received certification by the Russian authorities. At this rate we will be lucky to see this plane in service in 2025.
Great looking aircraft, very modern looking, if it can ever join the world fleets it should give Airbus and Boeing a real challenge, I wish them luck with this aircraft, it's just too bad Putin started a war.
Yes it does look beautiful. Since the Russians can sent people to space, they will succeed in getting this plane into service.
But why did he start it? Because NATO is getting closer and closer to Russia. I understand that.
@@glaubdonix7282 Alot of nations live neighbor to neighbor all their life's and are best of friends and trade with each other, Putin started the war because he is paranoid, nothing more, he doesn't trust anyone or any country, he is KGB and is living in the past, and refuses to realize that no one wants to take over Russia, because of his paranoia, this is all on him and him alone.
@glaubdonix7282 because Putin is KGB, and kgb were all paranoid and didn't trust anyone, because he is so paranoid and refuses to believe that no one is trying to take over Russia or kill him, so instead he desides to attack to con the Russian people that they need him to protect them and he stays in power and money, he wants to live in the old days when Russia was alot more powerful in the world, in otherwords Putin wants the old USSR back, communism, with him in power.
It's a flagship product so I don't expect the market to boom 💥 immediately. The sanctions caused Russia to do alot locally. So I believe that the plane needs to work on local Russian routes for awhile before it breaks into the international market even by friendly countries but recall that considering Russians landmass they'll definitely have a ton of flights to give the plane credibility.. if they can archive that.. then considering it's price..which is way cheaper than Boeing & Airbus. They could get a market in China & friendly countries expecially those limited by sanctions too
I quite agree. The country is big enough and they should just concentrate on the local market. If its a success others will show an interest.