Video

Windräder sind Kontraproduktiv + bringen fast nichts! Dabei brauchten nur die Subventionen Kerosin fürs Jetflugwesen abkanzelt werden + die Schutzschicht Tropopause geschützt werden um die Klimaerwärmung zu bremsen + zu beseitigen! Genauso wie 1990 die Ozon Schutzschicht, vor dem FCKW geschützt wurde! Propeller sind absolut Ökologisch! Wer hochwertigen Kraftstoff verbrennt um Vortrieb zu erzeugen = in dem endlichen Rohstoffzeitalter absolut verbrecherisch, verantwortungslos!!!!

Windräder sind Kontraproduktiv + bringen fast nichts! Dabei brauchten nur die Subventionen Kerosin fürs Jetflugwesen abkanzelt werden + die Schutzschicht Tropopause geschützt werden um die Klimaerwärmung zu bremsen + zu beseitigen! Genauso wie 1990 die Ozon Schutzschicht, vor dem FCKW geschützt wurde! Propeller sind absolut Ökologisch! Wer hochwertigen Kraftstoff verbrennt um Vortrieb zu erzeugen = in dem endlichen Rohstoffzeitalter absolut verbrecherisch, verantwortungslos!!!!

Klimaneutral - 2045 = unmöglich, solange der einzige globale Klimaverursacher, das ICAO, weiter die SCHUTZschicht Tropopause mit 1000° heißen Jetabgasen + 11Facher Schallgeschwindigkeit, seit 1950 weiter mit steigender Tendenz aufheizt! Bitte, wieviel milli° Klimaverbesserung haben die Grünen, seit 1994 im Bundestag, schon auf ihrer Habenseite? Ohne CO², auch keine Flora und Fauna! Wer den kostbaren CO² verteufelt, will sein Volk ersticken!

wie komme ich auf die Präsentation von Frank Kermamm?

'Promo SM'

The earth surface can not radiate a temperature gain at a ratio higher than the sun surface radiates to earth. We are not even close to that hot. The 33K (accurate) figure in all the climate hysteria models is only half as “warm” as liquid nitrogen. A level of heat energy that low does NOT increase heat in anything above that temperature. Period

Of the 1,609 scientists who have signed the declaration, two signatories are Nobel Prize laureates. The most recent to sign is Nobel Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser, winner of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. In an announcement from CLINTEL, Clauser is quoted as saying “Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists.”

Remember when these types were mostly on the street corners wearing the, "The End is Near" signs? Front and back collecting change in their , End is near, black little buckets. Ah, the good old days. Now the left and academia seeks them out, calls 'em science guys and are paidfor propagandists with our precious tax dollars. You gotta laugh.

Extinction-Level Event The Era of honest scientific studies is dead. It died by political grant. These paid for productions are right up there with the Salem witch climate crisis or don't fall off the earth flat earthers. You'd think being wrong 100% of the time would bring at least a pause , a question, But no....... Shame on you Oddly the cure for what ever flavor of todays climate crisis happens to be is always the same, more taxes , wealth redistribution and liberty lost

Beichtpflicht.

So many statements that wring hands with the end being near... cmon folks.. don't buy this rerun of faked up data, charts and scenarios.. oh my!. Better to spend your time watching any video posted by Tom Nelson. Educate yourself on how to spot propaganda for some Agenda that isn't pro-himankind.

the temp in 1850 was the COLDEST in the last 10,000 years

see the work of Princeton Prof William Happer and MIT prof Richard Lindzen.......this lecturer seems not to have the data

this guy promotes blocking sceptics and truth seeking also promoted pandemic lunacies and authorirarian practices it's nazi style of doing science 😂

...should have mentioned the loss of the *majority* of the rice-producing deltas (southeast asia) on the planet long before cities are lost.

Yong Tuition

Superb explanation by Kanish Negi

There is no climate crisis.

Pretty sure our local tide gauge hasn't accelerated, the Maldives and Tuvalu are getting bigger, and the great barrier Reef which is relatively temperate is doing fine. And the temperature is levelling off as you would expect from band saturation. And our met bureau says cyclones are not increasing in frequency or intensity. Why can't there be some negative feedbacks (dampers) like cloud cover. Why is it just all catastrophic positive feedbacks that are always just another half a degree away! This is looking more and more like Communist psy ops.

Stefan, you lost me at showing RCP 8.5 in your graph, that's clearly political fear mongering. Even your brothers climate alarmists screamed recently against the use of RCP 8.5 in any meaningful predictions. Then you lost me again saying The Great Barrier Reef has been dying off. Dr.Peter Ridd would disagree with you, and he spent 25 years studying the reef. He claims GBR had 30-year record high coverage last year. Oh, and talking about "insightful GW predictions 30 years prior to Jim Hansen" you failed to mention that up until 1979 prominent scientists were alarming the world about the imminent Global Cooling.

. Die die andere für Schwurbler und Klimaleugner bezeichnen sind genau die die es selbst sind. WELT Artikel von 2007 😊 • WISSENSCHAFT ERDERWÄRMUNG fo ABO Nordpol bereits in fünf Jahren eisfrei Veröffentlicht am 13.12.2007 | Lesedauer: 2 Minuten Das Eis der Arktis schmilzt offenbar viel rasanter als bisher angenommen: Ein Team internationaler Klimaforscher und Wissenschaftler der Nasa behaupten, dass der arktische Sommer bereits 2013 eisfrei sein wird. Grund: Die bisherigen Berechnungen seien falsch gewesen. Ist es nicht erschreckend wie die Klimaapokalyptiker auf Luftschlösser bauen und uns seit Jahrzehnten die Hölle versprechen. Der menschengemachte Klimawandel ist die größte Propaganda aller Zeiten. Luftschlösser auf die ein Wirtschaftlicher Totalumbau erfolgt. So wie bei des Kaisers neue Kleider wird uns täglich stündlich von den Medien der Klimawandel eingehämmert. Und die Prognosen der Pseudowissenschaftler sind allesamt Müll , weil sie von ahnungslosen modelliert werden. Aber sie werden entlarvt. Es ist mir völlig unverständlich wie man diese klimaaktivisten ohne Widerspruch und wissenschaftliche Gegendarstellungen einfach gewähren lässt. Nur einige Namen die von den Mainstream Medien nie Erwähnung finden. Prof. Richard Lindzen Athmosphärenphysiker, Dr.Stefan Kröpelin Paläogeolontologe, Dr. Peter Ridd Australien Barrier reef, Dr.Christian Schlüchter Glaciologe. Prof. Dr. Jörn Thiede etc. Wo werden diese Leute erwähnt. Alles Wissenschaftler die keine Computersimulationstheoretiker sind die der Welt von Klimaapokalypse ändern erzählen. Anstatt dass diese Fridays for future Aktivisten auf die Straße gehen sollten sie in der Schule mehr über Wissenschaft lernen. Warum gehen sie nicht Samstags oder Sonntags auf die Straße. Warum ist dieser violente Klimaaktivismus ein deutsches Phänomen. Die Jungen lassen sich vor einen medial propagandistischen Klimakarrenbspannen und merken es nicht. Daten zeigen eindeutig dass die Zahl der Dürren Überschwemmungen Waldbrände , Hurricanes , Klimakatastrophen eindeutig Rückgängig sind. Warum wird nicht erwähnt dass u.b. Der Jetstream ebenfalls keineswegs schwächer sondern stärker wird. Und auch der Meeresspiegel ist keineswegs seit Jahrzehnten stärker gestiegen. Was ist mit dem Einfluss von El Niño und El Ninja. Warum erwähnt niemand die Grönländischen Eisbohrkerne die Klimaveränderungen innerhalb nur 1-5 Jahre hervorbringen.

Global warming is a hoax or if you prefer a satanic ideology. This video is a caricature of this ideology.

So here we are once again. Yes the earth is warming - a little. Yes some ice is melting -a little. Yes the ocean/sea levels are rising -a little. You are right about those things. You are wrong about all other things. Such as what is causing these things to happen. You understand the ocean is the biggest source of CO2 in our atmosphere. CO2 is not an effective enough greenhouse gas to be the control knob. Water vapor is by far the more impactful item. The temperature feedback loop is a result of increased greenhouse of mostly water vapor. In any case, the whole cycle is just Planet Earth / Mother Nature at work. We are not enough of a factor to count. So for now a warming period. Get ready for the cooling (COLD) period that will surely undoubtedly definitely follow. Too bad you guys are spreading this nonsense around, it is harmful. If only there are not more strong fascist governments who agree with me. But their current approach to this is based on power, control, and $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

Climategate, hide the decline, CO2 lag, atmospheric CO2 is saturated, cherry picking data, 235 yr cooling cycles, Milankovitch cycles, I could go on. The graphs in this presentation are largely wrong. Where is the medieval warm period and the little ice age? I didn't see either in the temperature curve. Watch the scale in the x and y axis too. You wouldn't want to exaggerate the natural increase would you? The Keeling Curve was unaffected by the pandemic-induced world-wide shutdown. 80% of CO2 is natural mostly from the oceans at the water-atmosphere interface. The often-quoted 280 ppm pre-industrial value for atmospheric CO2 is low as the data yielding it are mean values over 4000 years from the ice cores. It does not take into account peaks. It also is low because CO2 is soluble in water, ie the water at the edges of the bubble before the bubble freezes. The first 850 feet of Antarctic ice is "new ice" and loses air and gains it until it freezes in place. More recent science says that you have to add something like 35 to 40 % to the legendary 280ppm bringing that value to essentially where we are now. The current CO2 rise is due to the 800 year lag after the medieval warm period as it is known that temperature causes CO2 to rise not the other way around. Farming on Greenland and forests in Northern Quebec where there is now frozen tundra. The Laurentide Ice Sheet which covered N America to what is now the middle of the US has come and gone at least 45 times that we know of. The earth warms and it cools. The poles warm and cool first. The Arctic had the coldest spring-summer on record a year or two ago and the Antarctic had the coldest winter on record in 2021. We are likely at the start of the 235 yr cooling cycle. We are currently in a several million year cooling trend and we have been in an ice age for the past 2.5M years. Global warming is a religion to some and an economic windfall to others. The globalists love it as they wish to usher in their utopia using it as an excuse for government to take control over every aspect of human life. They will be in charge and we will be in chains.

Showing graphs of doctored data which come from different sources combined into one graph is, frankly, worse than bullshit, it's criminal misinformation. This guy and his cronies have been riding the grant gravy train for decades. The radiative model used by the IPCC and washed into the brains of the young ad nauseum is completely wrong wrong wrong. The normal scientific method says if the data doesn't fit your theory then the theory is wrong. This bunch of charlatans change the observed data to fit their hypothesis instead. He belongs in jail along with Gore, Hansen, Mann et al.

There is no climate crisis. There is a stupid leftist crisis.

Paleoclimate data that shows 8k years of flat global temperature is unbelievable. To purposefully hide data that shows Roman warm period, medieval warm period, or little ice age just to keep people from seeing the variability of natural changes to our temperature record is inexcusable and is manipulation by dishonest scientists.

This is not scientific analysis based on fundamental physics, climatology and meteorology, this is drama climate activism and propangada

10,000 years of temperature data is nothing for a planet that is 4.5 billion years old. What was the temperature like for the 250,000+ years modern humans have been on earth. I'm pretty sure most of the northern hemisphere was covered in ice up until about 40,000 years ago. I guess that's probably the ideal state for the planet. Right?

Thanks for the very interesting two presentations and tools! well done!

great talk, thanks! "The future of our planet is still a choice we can make. So make a good one." - loved this

This is all described as being irrefutable fact. That is not the case. I could provide evidence against most of the climate points here. Just one example will suffice: The whole of East and West Antarctica is cooling, and has been for 40 years. East Antarctica has cooled by an impressive 0.7°C per decade. Resulting in an overall substantial and statistically significant decline of 2.8°C since 1980. That's brrrrr-illant 🥶! Get it! So much for "Global" warming. I am referring to a paper by Zhu et al (2021) that looked at the reanalysed ERA5 dataset.

Lost me with the debunked hockey stick graph. You can't merge ice core data seamlessly with instrumented data. Ice core data averages over hundreds and even thousands of years due to co2 diffusion. Stomata data shows many spikes in co2 similar to today. And stomata data averages to agree with ice core data. So this is a terrible example of both cherrypucking and misrepresenting the data.

I guess Obama will be selling his beach-front resort then.

You criticise the German Government’s approach as insufficient in reducing GHGs, however they have spent €500Bn on renewables and yet they are being forced to reopen coal power stations. Should we not spend more on R&D into better renewables rather than wasting wealth on current systems that are unreliable in generating reliable power. Is there not a new German word - Dunkleflouter- meaning dark stillness? Derived from windless winter days and nights without sun. What other countries can afford to spend such vast amounts on technologies that do not and will not provide the energy solution long term.

Climate change is a frickin hoax... you guys are being played like a fiddle... 😂😂😂

very good,

🔥 『p』『r』『o』『m』『o』『s』『m』

p̶r̶o̶m̶o̶s̶m̶ ✅

great,we are in China,how can i connect with u,thanks

God bless everyone

Greenwashing

Wer bezahlt sie? Das ist die erste Frage die sich mir stellt , man kauft Zertifikate 🤔und setzt sie nicht ein, damit sind sie weg vom Markt und es treibt die Preise in die Höhe. Fragen über Fragen 😐😐