Video

Leftovers from experiments with materials that didn’t stick well on PEI. 😘

Nope, the X1-series are the same on those components =).

@@3DPrintTechDesign Thanks for the response! So if I buy an X1 Carbon and install a heater to bring the chamber up to 70 degrees, would I get the performance of an X1E? It only makes sense for the protected connection at this point.

@@Fancy3D Oh, I think there are more components, cooling and sensors that help with controling the tempeature and secure the longevity of the components inside the machine, so it's not as simple as just heating an regular X1. If you wanna tinker, and add heating etc... The X1 could be the one for you. Just don't expect the same reliability as the X1E with it's tuned profiles for some materials. Never the less, Pre-heating the chamber does a lot for printing complex materials, no matter the printer :).

I think you should see my video on the moose 3D scanner, it’s cheaper and basically performs the same. Or, you can wait for the Raptor that I’ve written about (but not yet have a video on) from creality. It’s expensive, but performs 5x its price or something.

@@3DPrintTechDesign Yes I will be trying the Raptor. If it performs that well it is a bargain!

@martiansunrise7168 here’s my thoughts so far; www.antonmansson.com/3d-printing-blog/creality-raptor-3d-scanner-the-only-prosumer-3d-scanner

Hi! I think you would be able to scan a hoof quite well actually. Specially if you only need to underside and not much up on the sides.

Flashprint can be a bit tricky yes. But you are able to run Orca as well if that suits you better :)

That is the standard camera/tripod diameter of "1/4-20 UNC" =)

Yeah, it's more expensive than a standard nozzle, but it also provides better extrusion reliability thanks to the design. And the change process is much easier than an old nozzle design for example, where you heat up, use a wrench and accidently break your wires etc. But yeah, it's a higher running cost for reliability and ease of operation.

Awesome to hear! I hope more Get to explore the 5M!

You can hear it in this video. The first value it tries for the y axis resonates through the table and you hear a loud bassy hum, the second value it tries removes the hum

@@evancoberley2650 I'm ngl I don't hear the difference. Even while mine did the calibration it sounded absolutely the same to me.

@@Mephora if you set it on a stable surface like concrete there won't be much noise to begin with

@@evancoberley2650 it's definitely noisy. It's on a hollow cabinet after all. So I wouldn't call that quiet depending on the frequencies. But as far as I know it's also only supposed to Actively cancel the noise of the motors not the resonance of the surroundings

@@Mephora it listens to how the frequencies of the motors affect the surroundings and reverberate through the table, because those reverberations go back into the printer and require input shaping to dampen

I wouldnt say that! Its actually quite some scanner for the money. But it’s not a high-end scanner and you don’t get perfect results in real life scanning. Still incredible cheap for what many users need; reference surfaces, and not perfect copies.

Bra ögonmått ;). Nä men som jag säger så litar jag inte 100% på det skjutmåttet... Jag har inte kört någon budget-scanner via mobil ännu. Tycker det verkar otroligt osmidigt och bara problem med Apple telefon. För många skanners behöver du absolut ett nvidia-kort och en PC, det är svårt att komma runt så fort du ska behandla datan. Då har jag åtminstone inte sett något som inte kräver PC. Moose lite är billig och superbra sätt att komma in i 3D-skanning. Den kommer vara svår på större och vissa ytor med lite detaljer på, men då får man vara kreativ och hitta sätt att låta skannern tracka. Noggrannheten gör den ändå OK för mycket hemma-pill för den som skal bygga och meka och behöver information in i ett CAD system. För skruvhål så hade jag skruvat i skruvar/3D-print jiggar för att få saker som sticker ut (och därmed enklare att tracka/mäta i efterhand). Men ja, den är så pass billig att jag köpt en om jag inte redan haft andra skanners :). Den är däremot inte fantastisk på att ge dig en ren, färdig-städad mesh. Men för mått, referensytor och det du beskriver så gör det egentligen ingenting. Jag tror många kommer önska sig något "större" med tiden, för att ta in större modeller. Men då kommer de troligtvis också behöva betala mer, eller bara få lägre upplösning på delarna, då är det fint att "ha kvar" sin Moose/Moose lite för de små projekten.

@@3DPrintTechDesign tack för ditt svar. Om jag inte läser fel så ska Moose fungera på mac också så det är ju bra. Det är inte så att du har en enklare modell som du kan dela. Hade varit intressant att få upp den i fusion och se hur det ser ut.

Thank you Marc! Hope you enjoy it and find 3D scanning helpful and interesting :) Remember it can be a bit frustrating in the beginning until you get the hold of tracking objects :D Good luck!

Not if your items are low detail. This scanner has a narrower field of view and is focused on smaller items. Have a look at this one instead: geni.us/lynx3D. But with low detail objects you might have to prepare them anyways to track, it depends a bit. Send me an email from my website if you need more specific tips for your parts

Sorry, those files are long gone :/

Thanks! And sorry to your wallet 🤪. The enclosure definitely helps with dust. And I suggest you run a dust filter if you use external spool!

I understand. But I see it as a win win. In the case where I’ve made a difference, showing you the real value and features of a product, with good and bad, and you still wish to buy it, it’s a win win. It’s almost harder for you the viewer to click an affiliate link than it is to google the product anyway :). By being upfront and honest about the links and that they allow me to buy products to review, So you’re not only seeing what companies send out, we achieve better coverage. I hope to earn your trust, but I understand you might think my positives are biased when I use affiliate links. My mission is to be honest no matter what and I take inspiration from the big tech CZcamsrs who, for good or bad, all use affiliate and sponsorships

@@3DPrintTechDesign either I miss the part in your video where you mentioned the affiliation / sponsorship of this product in your video or it wasn't in the video. If it was in the video it would help with providing transparency if you included at the beginning of your video. Don't think this isn't the wrong way as you did bring up some constructive criticism on the device It issues it has. But your reality is probably all software related since most of these scanners to needs very similar hardware but in the end it's the software that will make them for break them

You’re right, the software is critical and that’s why I’m quite harsh on this scanner and trying my best to put in the expectations. You see it on the Mole scanner review as well, where the hardware and software both operate worse than the moose. The review unit is a loaner, so it’s not a sponsored video in any ways. I will probably end up giving it away as they rarely want to return it to china due to shipping costs, even tho it’s in my terms. And I do call out that I have affiliate links to the product in the description. Thank you for the feedback, I’ll try to see what I can do to be even more transparent in the end :)

I wish I had tried the Einstar myself! But I haven’t had the opportunity to do that yet. I have good connections that recommend it very well, but I don’t think they’ve tried budget scanners like revopoint and 3Dmakerpro to compare it either. The software for Einstar is probably better, but how the scan/track differs is probably not much of the field-of-view and etc. is similar. If I recall, the einstar is a bit more medium-format

@@3DPrintTechDesign I have one but the Moose looks to be much faster. My Einscan get "lost" very easily and hates most dark colors. It is also very slow even though I got the company to buy me a $4500 laptop to support it. I might just have to put in a requisition for the Moose pro and upload a comparison of my own LOL. I just want to make sure that I am using my "buy me this gizmo tokens" for work for a worthy cause.

Haha, yeah the dark scanning is actually mighty impressive on the moose lite. But with the other type of light on the “PRO” moose, you might have a different result. The tracking is probably not remarkable better. It could just be user experience and object, really. Scanning speed is probably better then if you feel so. I’m using a good Pc, but usb 3 port on the front, so no crazy usb speeds either.

Thank you so much! The Formula 1 car is my buddy Daniel Noree's "Open RC F1" project. You can just search Open RC F1 on Thingiverse, Pinshape or printables and you should find it =).

@@3DPrintTechDesign Thank's

You compared that to the "Moose Lite" when the Ferret SE's accuracy is only "Up to 0.1mm" compared to the Moose's set accuracy of "0.05mm @ 0.10mm Resolution"... and amazon has the Ferret SE Priced @ $319 compared to the pre order sale of Moose Lite @ $255 (prices vary with discount codes.) These 2 items are in different categories my friend.. not even comparable in software either.

try KIRI. It's an inexpensive subscription & uses your phone camera. First scan very clear with good instructions & editing features. I tried the Moose lite. Very garbled image, poor instructions & a hassle. Website grammar is atrocious. An uphill learning curve, too. They think everyone is adept and lightning fast like they are; and other techies.

I only have the regular iPhone 13, any particular app you recommend I use?

The live view is just sparse data, it often looks very blurry but helps you see what’s been covered. Since it’s 3D-data, the filtration of the raw data can then transform it to much more detailed (but also sometimes noisier) data.

Sie verwechseln da wahrscheinlich etwas; das "live view" besteht überwiegend aus einem Bild, nicht aus "3D-Daten".

If you just print PLA and want to save money, the adv5 is superb! But the 5M pro isn’t much more expensive and a great option!

Yeah there is still a gap between what Einstar and the others (Revopoint / 3Dmakerpro) can offer and what EinScan Pro, Artec EVA etc. offers at a higher price rate. I would love to see Shining3D release something around $2-4000 that is similar to their Pro 2X. It would make a dent in the market.