Video

this is great, thanks

M it worked and got 5

I subscribed to you on six different accounts to try to get you to 10k 😂 it didnt work, sorry

Nice plot!

2pi/lambda(x)=k(x) and 2pi/lambda*v(t)=w

Thank you sooo much,

Dirac was guessing and tinkering and found something closer to truth than standard quantum mechanics. However, this is only an approximation to the true Hamiltonian.

You explained it so well, thank you!

Reflection of reflections

what if its not a constant speed but trying to find the acceleration

Where are you?

Great channel

Kinda creepy

Outstanding

Thanks

Thanks so much for this video. I received a defective Kaleidoscope overseas (shipping dislodged the mirror inside. This helped me understand how to fix it.

🎉

Nice teaching

What effect would positive and negative ions have on the current generation?

Dear Sir, this is absolutely brilliant. Thank you very much for the crystal clear explanation.

com'n keep it goin' doc

😮

Thanks for sharing the valuable knowledge.

clear explanation. great tutorial.

Why isn’t the a squared as well ?

Seeing this while Dussehra

Conservation of Spatial Curvature: (Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .

Conservation of Spatial Curvature (Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .

how did this happen?

at 3:35 is this x(t) = xbar(t) + eta(x) same as x(t) = xbar(t) + eta(x(t))? well if i add some small amplitudes in some functions, i do this is x(t) = xbar(t) + eta(t) and not eta(x). the rest lecture is just math, but i still dont get how to establish eta() correctly. example f(t) = t + 0.00001*sin(3t) is understandable but f(t) = t + 0.00001*sin [ 3* f(t) +0.00003* f(t) ] not this one.

helpful in quantum mechanics

Very good explanations covering essential matrix algebra. The explanation of "Special Groups" of matices is most appreciated. Surprised that there are so few "likes".

I didn’t realize I was alive when he was alive. Just one year when he passed.

Pseudo-differential operators?

During his era, his intuition in discovering the Dirac equation was truly brilliant.

las dos formulas son iguales solo cambia v y c y da lo mismo sustituir v por c que c por v P=m*c=h/λ Copmtom P=m*v=h/λ Broglie E=m*c^2=h*fCopmton E=m*v^2=h*f Broglie Si no existiera ninguna restricciòn de velocidad relativista para las particulas con masa, obtendriamos un coeficiente de correlacion, entre c y v igual a 1, ya que ambas ecuaciones son identicas. Solo cambia C y V Pero que pasa si aplicaramos esta ecuaciòn a la inversa para particulas sin masa como un fotòn. Se sabe que la luz cuando atraviesa un medio de mayor densidad, su velocidad se vera reducida, pero su frecuencia(hf) permanecera igual, esto repercutira en su longitud de onda que aumentara proporcionalmente una cantidad.λ=v/f=λdB=h/mv Podemos representar c como la velocidad de la luz en el vacio y v como la velocidad de la luz en un medio de mayor densidad. f=es la costante=hipotenusa V= es la variable=seno o el coseno V/f=c.opusto/hiponusa=seno=sin⁻¹(θ) λ=v/f es la longitud de onda de la luz cuando pasa a un medio de mayor densidad. λ=V/f=225000000/3,8178733E50= 5,893333E−43 λdB= h/mv=((6,63×10^(−34))÷(225000000×5)= 5,893333E−43 f=((5×225000000^2)÷((6,63×10^(−34))= 3,8178733E50 Creo que la ecuacion de klein gordon describe muy bien la realidad constantemente se ha dicho que esta ecuacion no era valida por presentar energias y probabilidades negativas. La primera pregunta inmediata, es cual fue el verdadero motivo para que esta esta ecuaciòn fuera desechada y cuya densidad y corriente de probabilidad solo se utiliza para cargas eléctricas. Pero nada que ver con la realidad. Esas energias y probabilidades negativas son parte de nuestra realidad. Toda raiz cuadrada lleva un signo ± delante. Los matematicos nunca han sabido como interpretar esto interpretando los resultados negativos como adsurdos o nulos.Y todo numero imaginario al elevarlo al cuadrado se convierte en un nùmero real negativo -x ò i^2=-1 y al elevarlo nuevamente al cuadrado se convierte en un numero real del mismo signo x, i^4=1. i^0=1, i^1=i, i^2=-1, i^3=-i, i^4=1 i^5=i, i^6=-1, i^7=-i, i^8=1.… este proceso es cicloco se repite una y otra vez. Somos luzomos luz. es.quora.com/profile/Jose-1004/El-primer-problema-que-se-planteo-dirac-fue-cuanto-tiene-que-valer-%CE%B1-y-%CE%B2-para-que-esto-sea-verdad-E-x%C2%B2-y%C2%B2-%CE%B1x-%CE%B2y

Your third filter looks like a 380-450nm violet filter.

How we write -iħ∆ as (ħ/i)*∆?

ahahahaha, şaka gibi

Nothing like the original hp15c, the New versions are better for his high speed calculations (about 100x), What hurry are you in this beautiful world?

Anyone out there in the void wanna educate me. I'm probably going to hit Khan Academy Physics right quick and Chatgpt for my education. But this is exactly the sort of stuff I'm curious about right now. More specifically unit analysis and the polar graphs to some degree. This exampe in the video is a polar graph, so you got a clean set of rules for integration in 2d and apparently 3d. I like it. I'm looking at 2d graphs where the unit analysis of the area under the curve seems to be x*y (Force * m=Nm, m/s^2 * s=m/s). So Chat gpt tells me there are 4 kinds of graphs for 3d where x and y are independent and z is dependent. For the unit type of the volume under the curve I would just multiply the three axis units together? I just added this from Chatgpt, it's nothing. Just examples I guess. Electric Field: In electromagnetism, the electric field is a vector quantity that can be represented by a three-dimensional graph. The x and y axes can represent spatial dimensions, while the z axis represents the magnitude or strength of the electric field at each point in space. (A/m)*m*m=A*m Magnetic Field: Similar to the electric field, the magnetic field is another vector quantity that can be represented in a three-dimensional graph. The x and y axes represent spatial dimensions, and the z axis represents the magnitude or strength of the magnetic field at each point. (A/m)*m*m=A*m Wave Propagation: Graphs depicting the propagation of waves, such as sound waves or electromagnetic waves, often use three dimensions. The x and y axes represent spatial dimensions, while the z axis can represent the amplitude, intensity, or other characteristics of the wave at each point in space and time. J/s·m^2*m*m=J/s·m^4 or W/m^2*m*m= W Potential Energy Landscape: In various physical systems, potential energy landscapes can be visualized using three-dimensional graphs. The x and y axes represent spatial dimensions, while the z axis represents the potential energy of the system as a function of the positions in space. J*m*m=J*m^2, or (kg⋅m^2/s^2)*m*m=kg⋅m^4/s^2

bur but blue is a primary color!,!!!

Easy trick. Where you put your finger when flipping…

Thanks alot sir.. sir pls do this experiment with cyan yellow magenta light . What color output plzz😢😊l

Dear Professor In 2D, If there are two balls colliding, how do I calculate the angle produced by the collision, given that the resulting angle of both balls is unknown? That is, if ball 1 goes at coordinate (x1,y1) with y1=0 and ball 2 which is at rest, is at coordinate (x2,y2) with y2 non-zero, but close enough to zero for both balls to collide. Thank you very much

wow this was magic

1:15 sir you are wrong, because at 60° 5 images should be formed according to this formula (360/Theta) - 1 = no. Of images Here, (360/60) -1 = 5

good video, professor

Great physics videos, DoctorpPhys! Will you make any on E&M?

운동량을 0으로 놓고 해석할 경우, 돌파구에 대한 힌트를 얻을 수 있는 것 같다. 영감을 주는 영상.