Video

You're Lost, Life is Creator, it is Not possible to create Life.

Since the probability field of QM is nothing more than the time-space sector in Larson's Reciprocal System -- meaning, the probability field is time in three dimensions, the inverse of space -- the cat is in fact existing in different time dimensions at once. It would be helpful if you knew what space and time were. That would shed some, uh, _light_ on the _matter_

If increasing gravity slows the passage of time, then the speed of light cannot be everywhere constant but is ruled by the principles of relativity

Presentism vs eternalism is an interesting idea but difficult to precisely define. I would describe it as analogy to technology. Where eternalism would be like a video tape, where everything just exists in the tape and the machine moves between the frames in the way that we move in time. Presentism would say time is more like computer memory, where there is only a present contents in RAM and this changes as programs run and modify the contents according to algorithms and operations. But the previous and future state don't really exist they're just history or potentials. I am not convinced that general relatively rules out presentism. What GR rules out is a single universal absolutely simultaneous conception of now. But a local now that is not universal may still be consistent with GR.

Aristotle was right Copernicans were equivalent with flat earthers today

2:03:30 - Constants of Nature.

Is the 'birth of life' still ongoing on Earth ?

What a brilliant discussion. I have profound regard for a person with so much knowledge, with a real understanding of what lines of reasoning from a large array of different fields are articulating, to draw connections, and to flow seamlessly through a chain of thoughts while constructing a point. From Dr . Brown's gestures I got the sense of a huge matrix of of concepts and information, which from his depth of knowledge and humility he can openly explore and inter-relate in a fascinating, credible and enjoyable manner. Thanks for this experience.

I bet Sheldon had and still has some wild Times

I really really enjoyed this talk🙃😊

This guy looks like he's only in his 50s

"a general phenomenon that creates life" ... :)))) ... and that's why life emerged only once 3.5 billions year ago ... and then never again ... (according to Darwinists) ... so this "general phenomenon that creates life"-theory makes lot of sense :)))) what's wrong with Cronin ? _

A lost soul??

What do they mean when they say QM is reversable? Do they mean probability is reversed?

Chemeros work has always been on my radar as a 4E enthusiast but I have not read any of his papers/books - so this has been an excellent conversation. Deeply appreciate his epistemic humility and intellectual agility.

Not velocity, but acceleration which is per second, per second, or per second square. That is what makes motion time reversible. The idea is protect statistical thermodynamics which requires that the motion of heated molecules is individually reversible

You are completely misteken

You need a model for what you think it works befor you can discuss what it is, othervise you are just waistingvyour time. E.g. gravity compress space ( solve Einsteins eq without time) and since time is generated by the space it is going slower where the space is compressed. Say in quanta or just in random fluctuations. Then discuss it.

Schrødinger's cat is in a state that is indeterminate. Thats it, anything else is rubbish

Can I develop self-esteem by being counter to the dominant culture and seeing myself as superior to it/them?

I wonder if Lee Cronin can tell us how glycolysis, the "oldest" process of ATP production, evolved. Since it needs 10 enzymes that must have been encoded by DNA. The problem would be that the replication fork of DNA uses ATP, so how did DNA replicate before glycolysis? Well, biologists will just regress into the fantasy of a "simpler" system. The problem is theres no organism, even bacteria, that doesn't use glycolysis for energy production. THIS leaves the realm of science, and enters the realm of fable.

Nice that biologists borrow life to "prove" evolution, but haven't proved how the life they borrow came to be.

Delusional. He reminds me of the Monte Python episode where John Cleese describes how to play a flute ... "You blow in this end and move your fingers up and down the other end. Next week we will solve the war in Indochina."

charlatan and grifter

Excellent conversation! The questions you posed helped me learn far more about Alex's views than I thought I could have by just listening to a conversation. :3 Thank you very much for making this!

Wonderful ❤

Any theory of consciousness must be able to explain how anesthetic and hallucinogenic compounds work.

It reminds me a bit to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis applied to Mathematics and Physics. The kind of language you use determines your thinking or what you are able to think.

Maudlin is a giant !

19:00 what's the German word there?

Kinda irrelevant. See: "The Death of Space-Time and the Birth of Conscious Agents" czcams.com/video/oadgHhdgRkI/video.html Arkani Hamed: End of Space-Time czcams.com/video/GL77oOnrPzY/video.html Hoffman: "spacetime is not fundamental reality" czcams.com/video/3eZVOHHcZDA/video.html Full talk: "Reality is not as it seems" czcams.com/video/3MvGGjcTEpQ/video.html "The Reality Behind SpaceTime" Everything you see is NOT fundamental reality; merely the result of evolutionary necessity. "Evolution tells us that all we are seeing is just an interface; it's there to guide adaptive behavior, period; not to tell us the truth." Fundamental Reality is now found to exist as a real realm beyond the 'reality' we've erroneously, albeit understandably, believed real. That reality was only 'real' to us in terms of our interface, and not the fundamental Real. czcams.com/video/t_ZrwdSYu-A/video.html Massive overview: czcams.com/video/vhGYsUitgNk/video.html Does consciousness survive death? czcams.com/video/hbWGJeKq4tU/video.html (Quora Admn. [12\31\23]): "The amplituhedron is a geometric structure in theoretical physics that simplifies calculations in quantum field theory. It's an abstract geometric object used to compute particle interactions in a more elegant way compared to traditional methods. Imagine simplifying complex particle interactions into a geometric shape with facets, edges, and vertices, where the volume and geometry of this shape encode information about particle interactions. Rather than using lengthy calculations involving thousands of terms, the amplituhedron allows physicists to determine probabilities of particle interactions by exploring the space and the relationships within this geometric object. It provides a new perspective, emphasizing the geometric aspects of particle interactions, offering a more streamlined approach to complex calculations in quantum field theory." [12\31\23]

Didn't Kastrup blow this guy out of the water?

The squirrel case does not answer the hard problem of qualia, at least there is experiences of color. Where as the squirrel is more of psychology case. Believe in something is not the same as experiencing color. Even if the color is the brain mistake, you still need to explain how the color arises in experience.

Well if you look at the bell inequality paper and see the ABC representaion of why entagled particles cannot be local ... Thats actually a pure logical argument, that can be shown in a diagram....

the universe does not make assumptions. it confirms the state of mass with light. until the cat is observed . its state is unverified.

1:24:25 so string theory expenditure is fine but going to mars is a problem because you don't like musk. Stop talking now.

1:17:19 just jumped the shark I love hearing brilliant minds justifying government corruption.

I'm actually quiet annoyed I believed the news story about birds using quantum yadda yadda to navigate, and that they printed it.

Man the interviewer could use a bass equalizer in his larynx

"There is no theory of everything " Awesome! Very true. Hope Carl Jay- mowgly would understand this. 😄

*13:00** - **19:30** Cronin should Stop making claims about Physics or any science he know nothing about. There are two forms of Time. A] The concept we apply linear process in life that clocks are based on. and B] the real physics science and demonstrable evidence of Space Time which is created and dictated by gravity and gravitational fields and lensing effect distance. ...Cronin is ignorantly using the A] concept, to explain the B] physics position.*

this fellow doesn't even know what he's looking for (min 7-8) but claims he's hot on the trail of finding abiogenic factors that will demonstrate how life 'evolved' from random chemicals...too ridiculous to even be ridiculous

Here is what is at stake with the block universe proposal. Is the universe open-ended? is it indeterminate? Is it incomplete? Is Laplace demon impossible in principle, not just actually? Or not? If the block universe is "metaphysically real," then not. And if not, then any conception of freedom is ultimately irrational and in actuality impossible. That is what is at stake in that (meta)physical debate. This also gives insight into the significance some thinkers place on Godels incompleteness theorem. It suggests that logic or mathematics itself is incompletable and open ended.

When your premise is a lie, all you can ever do is lie to defend it. Life only ever comes from……..life! Scientific fact 101. Checkmate darwinoatheists!

I couldn't understand what the argument is. I don't see how this invalidates the hard problem. I think the hard problem might be fundamentally unsolvable

I wonder what (if any) might be of value in Max Weber's (first, not habilitation) dissertation and first book for the topic.

I suggest you explore Dr. Hector Zenil's blog and videos on Assembly Theory. They offer a comprehensive perspective on the difficulties faced by Cronin's group, ranging from methodological errors to significant misappropriations.czcams.com/video/078EXZeS8Y0/video.htmlsi=sQH652zkOWO_njvP

assembly theory is nothing but a scam. we do not have the slightest bit of an explanation, let alone understanding of biogenesis. the concepts presented here are not science, but bad philosophy motivated by idological bias.

Have the following problems been solved: Homochirality of the building blocks Solve the water paradox problem Biopolymer reproduction Nucleotide sequences forming useful code Means of gene regulation Means of repairing polymers Selectively permeable membranes Harnessing energy Interdependency of RNA , DNA and proteins Coordinated cellular purpose

We’re seeded.