Video

Thank you for educating me on this … as a 57 year old Brit … I am now beginning to question everything we were taught at school … Some very important things were deliberately missed out !

Advancing a theory that has fundamental & inescapable flaws is an exercise in stupidity.

A superior objective is an Eastern and Western Indo European and allies alliance. Extreme individualism and extreme collectivism each have their own problems. More or less authoritarian and libertarian monarchies and republics can be allied. Further all Indo Europeans have ancient ties and cultural ties. Things like family values, merit and understanding of cycles are universal. I agree that "progressivism" is delusional and destructive. The West needs some Eastern influence and vice versa. Islamic states are inherently totalitarian, they will never be ideal allies. The CCP will never be a reliable ally either. The spread of both need to be reversed in Russia and in the West. An Indo European or East West Eurasian and Anglo Sphere allimace would benifit all involved and once established would logically provide greater stability to all nations. It would include all Western countries, including Mexico, etc. and all of Eastern Europe and Russia, India and allies like Japan, Indonesia and so on. Diplomatic pressure can also be put on Iran to return more to their Zoroastrian roots and be part of the trade alliance. This alliance would make any issues from China or the Islamic states managable. They should be left to have their own spheres but be contained and allowed to evolve internally. The same generally would go for Africa in a friendly way and trade should still be welcome internationally with national and regional priorities at the forefront. If the Indo European people do not make peace then it makes the whole world more dangerous. If they do not they will also gradually be over run and submerged, as we are already seeing. Globalist uniculturalism is also a problem to be defeated like any other totalitarian ideology, with better ideas and better practice. I say this as an American who is proud of my country and also one who knows the depth of my roots. It is wise to make peace where possible, especially among brothers and work towards peace more widely from there, leading by example. We can start doing this by making peace in Russia and Ukraine, with a reasonable agreement and a reconciliation of some kind. If this is possible then it sets the tone for all.

I thought the European Union was the party that rejected the idea of Ukraine being a part of both the EU and the EEU? As far as I was aware, Russia accepted this proposition.

A very good analysis, examining the downfall of rome.

I hate Dugin like you wouldn’t believe

its called the strategy of having hebrew bankers on your side

This is why thry push for "diversity" . To fragment the people so they cant unify.

czcams.com/video/wCp-k5Glo8E/video.html

Eurasianism: Civilizations derive values from the unique aspects of their environment and one set of values from one area cannot necessarily translate to others. Also Eurasianism: These four unique environments all have the same values and thus should be one civilization called Eurasia.

You should be ashamed to promote this kind of content. Russia is and always was the enemy of the Western world. They hate and despise us. Don't be naive.

What you described in this video is mostly Metapolitics - strategies of Cultural Hegemony, that would be properly formulated some time later by Antonio Gramsci (Italian communist). His tactics can be applied to any ideology, even completely separate from communism

Are you Chinese? So this is a China centric view of the world? ROFL...... really? Call this history? From Manchu and CCP perspective? No more Beijing propaganda please!

I ought too know how Bengal region could produce ship freights 10 times larger than entire North America in 16th century

Holkar had to give up some territory in the treaty of peace or no ?

British thieves looted everything from my country.

Tno horde has invaded this video

Passion and power Binding the continent Glory to Gumilyov!

西羅馬被多外族侵破而亡。東羅馬(拜占庭)最後被鄂圖曼攻克而亡。此後再無羅馬帝國。

有我及我族在，華夏一定延續下去。蒙古人很快便被明朝朱家，劉伯温軍師利用月餅傳訊趕走，在永樂指揮下，逃北元。 小日本，遲些被戚家軍趕走去数小島四散。

8:56 Still applies to today's pirates off houthis and Somalia areas.

Your Chinese are good

Hyderabad was not an indigenous power, it was a vassal state of the mughal empire, another invasive power that conquered India. The British conquest of India was not of Europeans conquering poor innocent natives...

I wonder why Germany is deindustrializing while Russia is ramping up? Imagine what Europe would look like if Russia supplied Germany with all the industrial input it needed to dominate capital markets.

So India was conquered not because it was backward, as some suggested. One of the most important reasons was that it was divided and British used old " divide and conquer" tactics.

1:42 Why not just call him Wellesley ?

Now, I'm beginning to understand the strategy of the FST and NGN organizations clearly.

Though this book offered some insight, there are some serious flaws in its assumptions and derivation. F irstly, for peninsular war, the French can reinforce Spain/Portugal by land through the Pyrenees. The major reason French did not do that is because on the Eastern Front it has to keep massive army to cater the threat from Austria (in 1809) and Russia, instead of blockage by British. The British also attempted a landing to support Austria in the fifth coalition, but without the support of land forces of other powers, failed. For WWI, the British did try the 'limited war' approach in the Dardanelles expedition operation but failed miserably. It was difficult to British to not mobilize fully as a continental power does if it wants to protect/show support to its allies. If france fails it is clear that British cannot threaten Germany on its own (as proven in WWII after France lost before intervention by US & USSR). In the peninsular war and WWII, the British strategically retreated after initial failure in battle on land in Spain (1808) and France (1940), then re-landed and won the war the the help of local Spanish/ US troops. It can be concluded that Britain as a seapower will have to rely on a continental power to threaten other continental power, thought the 'limited warfare' approach did offer a cost-effective way to protect its homeland, and wait for the appropriate timing (i.e. alliance with other continental power) to beat its enemy, in addition to tie down more enemy troops and facilitate expedition actions.

The mic improvement is outstanding

thanks

Superior firepower and industry to mantain the war effort

The only way I can describe Eurasianism is Russia saying "We have almost nothing to offer and have historically been your overlords, but this time it'll be different! Please accept our hegemony without us having to fight. Pretty please?"

Corbett's "theory" only works if you ALREADY have defensive depth. Then it is not a theory, but DUH, defense = time to pick battles.

Britain was light years ahead of India in terms of political organization, financial institutions and technology, at this point.

a look into mauyan empire will also be of great help

Well explained! Thank you mate 😊

Love the research analysis and insights here. The turbulent politics of the interwar years are now starting to come into focus. Well done!

I think Mahan strategy is more relevant now then compared to 20th Century with the rise of the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) to challenged the dominance of the United States Navy (USN) in the Pacific and living in a country that is part of this region. I think his thesis is also relevant to non-US Allies, especially rebuilding a navy from scratch after decades of neglect and being over reliant on Allies rather then maintaining if not expanding the navy of my country.

Thanks

Love this video, it's so impartial and informative without being judgemental

Lessons of central control failing once again. You cannot run a nation on the whimz of a clique. China and orkland prove that today. Humans are soooo reptitive and sorta stupid I suppose.

Nice map, but Africa has an area almost twice as big as Russia (1.77). You're using a map that exaggerates the areas more and more as they approach the northern pole.

Why the US told Japan to end its operations in China and disregarded the treaty with Korea made in 1898 with the Taft Katsuya agreement of 1905

Russia-Ukraine war was just inevitable. Great Information. Could you suggest any book regarding this?

Agenda 2030 : de-industrialization of west in the name of LOCKDOWNS , CLIMATE CHANGE , CYBER ATTACKS and etc ! Wow ! The central bankers have chosen russia the whole time !

Wow so you went over all the inter-american relations from the second world war II, and you don't mention that Argentina was the first country to come up with a proposal to the UK (which rejected it), and then to the US on Apr/1940, for the whole American continent to declare war on the axis... Which was also rejected by FDR! The video is nice, but it clearly has been influenced by post WWII anti Argentine propaganda

Well 22:45 Russia declared in 2023 that Eurasianism is now, indeed, Part of Russian Foreign Policy.

Excellent work, well done.

If history rhymes,today, the US and allies are Athens and Russia and its friends are Sparta.

The Chinese rarely appear to be really good at defending their country.