Video

@@xaviermaillard Regen works great both when you squeeze the break handles (saves your breaks) and when going downhill for longer periods you can activate regen and now set a cruise control speed . Example if you don’t want to go faster than 30mph you can set that in the display.

Thank you so much for the encouragement and feedback. Still not comfortable being on camera but thats part of it I guess.. Glad I was able to add value. Let me know if you ever have any questions.

Hi .. Thanks for watching and commenting.. It is a special bike for sure.

Hi.. !! 70 miles that is incredible and inspiring. And thanks for the info about Bikes and Care. :) All places I want to visit now. Thanks for watching.

Congratulations. You will love it. The rid is not as hard as I expected and almost better than my 2021 MYLR, and the seats seem more comfortable as well.

Hi ... I would say that is not normal, and you should definitely have the bike looked at by your dealer. I would consider that wobble dangerous at speed.

Thank you for the compliment and for watching.. I am using the apple fitness app and I select outdoor cycle.. You can the page (swipe left) to a display that shows your GPS speed .. distance etc..

Thank you so much… The goal for me is just to share experiences and maybe help people along the way.. I have no idea what I am doing on CZcams but it’s a fun hobby. (Except for the trolls … that is new experience as well :) ) but thank you so much for the encouragement.

I can’t get the Berlin bag to clip in with the Antwerp bags on .. That would be cool if it did

Thank you

Glad this helped..thank you for watching

Hi, I use this SP Connect universal phone mount: amzn.to/3KPrJjS. The Stromer comes with an SP Connect adapter; you just need to match whether it's the original mount or the newer + mount. They make a universal mount for both systems.

Hi, thanks for watching. This is my first e-bike, so my initial expectations were that this thing was going to launch uphill. That is not the case on super steep hills. It is still faster than a regular bike, but there is a ton of effort on super steep hills, and your speed goes down to maybe 4-5mph. You can speed through the video on the Red Rock Canyon ride and see the speed drop while going up a really steep climb. Watching other e-bike videos with 1K+ watt motors that seem to be expected on really steep hills.

@@jasonlynch9979 thanks! I have a 75 nm Bosch mid and that's kinda the same story. Looking into Stromer because I hate the noise from these mid drives, and Stromer is super quiet.

@@cadriver2570 The Stromer is silent... you will love it.

Hi Tex. Thanks for watching for 20 minutes and taking the time to respond... Get some rest.

Congratulations!! Yes, I have the Performance and the Hankook tires. They are super quiet. You will love the MYP. I just traded in my 2021 Y Long Range and was concerned about the ride quality on the MYP. Let me tell you, this car rides better than my Long Range. Enjoy.

The bag has clips at the bottom that snap or lock onto the rack. You can see how that system works on the Racktime website.The Stromer comes with a Racktime-compatible rack, so any of their bags will work. If you have a newer Stromer, it should say on the rack itself. If you have an older one you may want to check with your bike shop.

@@jasonlynch9979 Thx!!! This is so cool/helpful! I thought I was going to have to get a trunk bag with velcro straps, which would have sucked. It also seems this snapit system allows for a pannier to be used along with a trunk bag. I purchased the Bern pannier, but there may be times where I want to use a trunk bag as well.

@@truthseeker6377 Glad this was helpful...

I agree there needs to be some improvement to really get this to work correctly.

Thank you so much for watching and commenting. I am 54 and was not in the best shape either. Congratulations on your bike! As long as you get out of the house and move, you are going to have a blast. I lost 30 lbs this past 12 months. The keto diet and biking every day when I can have helped a ton. I feel so much better, and I have so much fun. I did not want the temptation of throttle, so went with a bike that I had to pedal. If you use it as needed, you are going to do fantastic.

@@jasonlynch9979 .. I used Google's speech to text and it flubbed up about the missing "full" independent suspension. I only use the throttle when I need it to rush across an intersection or I feel threatened by whatever situation. Regarding weight, I weighed over 260 lbs and I'm down to 203 lbs with a goal of "as soon as I'm not fat" or about 190-195 lbs. I've been stuck at 203 lbs for at least a month and everyone has plateaus. My diet changes are simpler, I cut out 6 or so cans of Cokes, stopped stuffing my face with cookies and candy, reduced my salt (none is added), and stopped eating after 6:00 PM. Then I eat a couple of eggs with sausage or bacon for breakfast, bike 20+ miles on PAS 2 (20-24 MPH) and dinner. Currently all I do is manage my stock holdings and self-induced stress. I recently had a 20%+ fast gain with a good year overall and I'm looking at $15K eBikes. Because after ~45 years away from biking I'm hooked. So yeah I get it and I get your eBike. You just skipped the middle man eBike.

Thank you for watching..

Thank you .. I have since updated the firmware.

It's hard to update the remote via the app.. it never gets detected...

@@danielpark1990 Make sure the camera is turned off and let the remote connect to the app on your phone

About a 5 to 10 min drive by car.. it's close. To the Las Vegas Strip it is about a 30min drive.

Hi.. Thanks for watching and commenting. The Stromer is not really a mountain bike, or built for off roading in the desert.

The GoPro up to 11 has a gps in the camera and you can display that in your videos..I’ve upgraded to the AcePro and insta 360 X4 both you need to buy a separate Gps remote that will work with both and give you the overlay data. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks for watching

@@jasonlynch9979 Thank you very much, I see now, it's very useful for me. 👍👍

Hi …Thanks for watching and your perspective…I haven’t had that happen yet..but it’s not full summer temps in Las Vegas yet. But something I’ll keep an eye out for and let you know if anything happens.

Thank you so much for watching-Ride Safe

Hi… Thanks for watching and commenting.. I am sorry you had so many issues with your bike.. I have heard of other people that have had their bikes replaced etc.. So far any issue I have had Stromer has been super responsive..

I have not tested the old remote with the new cameras

Found a reddit post where someone from insta says they will try and work on it but that was a month and a half ago. And it still isnt working as of week ago according to to some users posting in there

@@pootinplays My X4 arrived yesterday. Unfortunately I couldn't pair it with the GPS. It's very frustrating.

Hi John.. As you can see from the video, the car still needs to make good human decisions..(Making a left turn where there is no road) at some point. Maybe it will (I hope so). Keep in mind the car does not think humans make rational decisions as well (IE, steering wheel nag, and even when that goes away, the system will need to see your eyes for that to work, etc. ) Here are my thoughts on what a human driver might do differently and why this matters: 1. Communication and Intention: A human driver constantly communicates their intentions, either verbally or through predictable actions like using turn signals well in advance. Similarly, the FSD system should provide clear and timely alerts about its actions to keep the driver informed. 2. Predictability: A human driver typically follows a logical and predictable path, especially when navigating without a specific destination. They are less likely to take unexpected turns or drive aimlessly. The FSD system should strive for similar predictability to ensure safety and maintain driver trust. 3. Adaptability: Humans can quickly adapt to changing conditions and provide immediate feedback on their intentions. While the FSD system is designed to make autonomous decisions, it needs to communicate these decisions effectively to allow the driver to supervise and intervene when necessary. 4. Safety: Human drivers rely on their judgment and awareness of the surroundings to make safe decisions. The FSD system, while advanced, should prioritize clear communication and predictable behavior to ensure the driver can maintain oversight and intervene if needed.

Hi John, I am hopeful that this will work. Elon has designed rockets that land themselves and have made electric vehicles mainstream, and FSD keeps improving. This software is in beta, and it will make mistakes, but it has tons of potential. I can't entirely agree with Elon on every issue; he has very optimistic and somewhat delusional timelines, but nothing is working better yet.

@jasonlynch9979 I hope it works for you because you have invested money in it, but I have lost faith in Musk. He is not an engineer or a rocket scientist, but has been able to con enough people ( and the government) out of enough money to hire people who know what they are doing. I had some faith in him many years ago, but like many of his present and former employees, I've lost that faith. I still think electric drive trains are the future, but it's going to require a quantum leap in batteries and charging capabilities to make that happen. Toyota is heavily betting on hydrogen electric, and I have still have great respect for them to carry out their plans. I do wish you the best going forward.

As a teenager, I always had a purpose: Tower Records, Food, or even cruising the Boulevard to be seen, to name a few. :)

@jasonlynch9979 why do people think that everybody has the same experiences? Does the term joy ride mean anything?

I understand your point that the FSD system keeps driving straightforwardly until it has to make a decision, similar to how basic cruise control operates. However, there are a few key differences and additional considerations for FSD compared to both basic cruise control and Tesla’s standard Autopilot that I’d like to highlight: 1. Advanced Capabilities: Unlike basic cruise control, FSD is an advanced system that handles complex driving tasks, including making turns and navigating intersections. This level of autonomy requires more sophisticated communication with the driver to ensure safety and transparency. 2. Autopilot vs. FSD: Tesla’s Autopilot, when engaged, is designed to keep the car centered in its lane, maintain a set speed, and adjust based on traffic conditions. It generally doesn’t make autonomous navigation decisions like taking turns at intersections unless it’s on a highway with clear exit instructions. FSD, on the other hand, is intended to handle a wider array of driving situations, including urban environments with intersections, stop signs, and traffic lights. This complexity requires clearer communication with the driver about its actions. 3. Driver Awareness: While the car will continue driving, it’s crucial for the system to inform the driver of its intentions, especially when making turns or changing routes. This ensures the driver remains aware and can take control if needed. 4. Unexpected Behavior: The concern isn’t just about the car driving straight or making turns but about the lack of communication regarding these decisions. For example, if the FSD system takes a freeway entrance without informing the driver, it could lead to unexpected and potentially dangerous situations. 5. Safety Standards: Autonomous systems have higher safety standards than basic cruise control. Clear communication and predictable behavior are essential to meet these standards and ensure driver and passenger safety. 6. User Trust: Building and maintaining user trust is crucial for adopting autonomous systems. Ensuring the system communicates its actions and intentions clearly can help build this trust and improve the overall user experience. While I understand the comparison to basic cruise control, the advanced nature of FSD, and its differences from standard Autopilot, require a higher level of communication and predictability to ensure safety and user confidence.

​@@jasonlynch9979 "This ensures the driver remains aware and can take control if needed." The driver is aware, and can take control anytime. That's why the nags on the steering wheel, to ensure the driver is aware of what is going on. If you're not aware that the car is gonna drive itself the moment you turn on FSD, and is only gonna stop the moment you acknowledgedly turn it off, you shouldn't turn it on in the first place. It is a feature, it's not a bug or anything. The fact you don't like it, doesn't make it illogical. What is illogical to me is disengage FSD when you do something that's not related to it at all. That would be much unsafe.

Nothing supports your assumptions that any of the actions are functioning as designed. According to the Tesla Owner’s Manual, here are some key points regarding the car’s behavior when using Full Self-Driving (FSD): 1. FSD Capabilities: The manual states that FSD includes navigating intersections, stopping at traffic lights and stop signs, and handling complex driving scenarios (Owner’s Manual, page 125). These features are typically mentioned in the context of having a set destination. 2. Autopilot Features: The manual describes Autopilot features, which assist with steering within a clearly marked lane and traffic-aware cruise control. However, it does not specifically address behaviors when no destination is set (Owner’s Manual, page 109). 3. Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control: This feature will stop at all detected traffic lights and stop signs, even if no destination is set, based on road rules (Owner’s Manual, page 118). While the manual explains that FSD can handle various driving tasks, it doesn’t explicitly mention that driving without a destination and making autonomous turns is an intended behavior. The focus is more on the system’s capabilities when a destination is set. This suggests that while the car can continue to drive without a destination, the manual does not specifically endorse this behavior as a designed feature. I am saying that 1. the system should revert to AutoPilot behavior type behavior and 2. Communicate to the driver that FSD is disengaged, or if it remains on, then communicate the intentions. Regulators are not going to want the car to be able to roam. And yes, at any time, I could have turned the system off. And did twice. All I am advocating for is a change to the software to make the experience better, safer and a higher likelihood that it passes regulatory approval.

@@jasonlynch9979 Why revert to AutoPilot changes anything?

@@jasonlynch9979 How does reverting to AutoPilot makes it safer?

I do not understand the reasoning behind your comment.

@@jasonlynch9979 Read the comments this is 100% user error. If you don't want it on your turn it off. Saying its just RANDOMLY driving around is not true, YOU turned it on, this is what its designed to do and if you don't want it to drive then turn it OFF... simple.

@@TheTReed78 I do not think you are seeing the big picture. I want FSD to be successful; however, I have concerns about the current state of the system that I believe regulators would also find troubling: 1. Driver Communication: Regulators typically require that drivers be fully informed about autonomous systems' actions and intentions. The lack of clear communication and alerts about the vehicle’s actions could be seen as a safety risk. 2. Predictability and Control: Autonomous systems need to be predictable and allow drivers to take control easily. If the FSD system makes autonomous decisions without clear communication or predictability, it could undermine the driver’s ability to maintain control. 3. Safety Standards: Regulators have stringent safety standards for autonomous driving systems. Unpredictable behavior or insufficient driver alerts could be considered noncompliant. 4. Liability Issues: In the event of an incident, unclear communication from the FSD system about its actions could complicate determining liability. This lack of clarity might concern regulators who focus on accountability and safety. 5. User Trust and Adoption: Autonomous systems need to be trustworthy for widespread adoption. Any behavior that erodes driver confidence might attract regulatory scrutiny to ensure the technology is reliable and safe for public use. While I understand the system’s logic when no navigation data is provided, improving real-time communication, managing user expectations, and considering a reversion to standard Autopilot mode can significantly enhance safety and the overall user experience. Addressing these points will benefit all users and align with regulatory expectations.

@@jasonlynch9979did you just copy paste that from consumer reports? Lol that has no bearing on anything in this video. It’s performing exactly how it should be, 100% driver error , the sw isn’t perfect and that’s why you need to be paying attention fully at all times, this is what you signed on for. This is essentially still a beta. Again YOU decide if it’s on or off, doesn’t matter for a moment if it takes you somewhere you don’t want to go.. do you understand this?

@@TheTReed78@TheTReed78 I don't understand your inability to have a constructive conversation. Why are you so salty? We obviously have a difference of opinion, and that is fine. I understand that you believe the FSD system works as designed and that driver attention is paramount. However, my concern isn’t about whether the system is in beta or needs driver attention-it’s about ensuring the system provides clear communication and maintains predictability, which is critical for safety. Here are my key points: 1. Driver Communication: Clear and timely alerts about the vehicle’s actions are essential. Even if FSD is engaged without a navigation destination, the system should provide the driver with more explicit information about its intended actions to avoid confusion and ensure safety. 2. Predictability and Control: An autonomous system must be predictable for it to be safe. If the car makes autonomous decisions without informing the driver, it can lead to unexpected and potentially dangerous situations. 3. Regulatory Compliance: Autonomous systems are subject to regulatory scrutiny to ensure they meet safety standards. Lack of clear communication and predictability could be seen as non-compliance with these standards. 4. Beta Software: While the system is in beta, identifying and addressing potential safety issues is even more crucial. User feedback is vital to improve the system and ensure it evolves to meet safety requirements. I appreciate the importance of driver attention and control, but improving communication and predictability will enhance the overall safety and user experience of the FSD system and hopefully ensure its success. .The entire video is about the car driving on its own and yes.. I see potential problems with the car behaving in that way.

You would think that Insta would want to make the remote universal

Thank you so much for watching and for your feedback… if there is anything else you would like to know please don’t hesitate to ask

Me too however I have never had it behave this way.. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system is designed to navigate and make driving decisions, it should always provide the driver with clear information about its actions and intended route. The fact that the car was driving aimlessly without any navigation set and without informing you is problematic. Safety and transparency are crucial in autonomous driving systems. If the system’s behavior was unexpected and it didn’t communicate its actions, it’s reasonable to consider this a problem, regardless of what others on social media might say. Autonomous systems should enhance safety and driver confidence, not create confusion or unpredictability. Here are my thoughts on the matter: 1. Short-Term Alerts: Even if the system can only predict and communicate its actions a few seconds ahead due to the lack of navigation data, real-time alerts are still essential. While signaling and the blue path visualization are helpful, explicit alerts about immediate actions (e.g., “Preparing to turn right” or “Continuing straight”) could significantly enhance driver awareness and confidence. 2. Driver Engagement: Continuous engagement with the driver through short-term alerts ensures that the driver remains informed and can take control if necessary. This is particularly important in complex driving environments or unexpected situations. 3. User Expectations: Managing user expectations is crucial. Clear communication about the system’s behavior, especially in the absence of a set destination, should be included in the user manual and during system setup to help users better understand and trust the technology. 4. Feedback Mechanism: Providing a straightforward way for users to report unexpected behaviors can help Tesla refine the system and address any safety concerns promptly.Yes you can do it after the take-over but there is no way to escalate to Tesla. 5. Reverting to Standard Autopilot: Without a set destination, it would be logical for FSD to revert to a mode similar to standard Autopilot. This would involve maintaining lane position, adjusting speed based on traffic, and following the flow of traffic without making autonomous navigation decisions. This approach ensures predictability and transparency, providing a safer and more controlled driving experience. While I understand the system’s logic when no navigation data is provided, improving real-time communication, managing user expectations, and considering a reversion to standard Autopilot mode can significantly enhance safety and the overall user experience.

Fingers Crossed

Hi Sean.. thanks for watching.. and Greetings from Las Vegas. Yes this bike is expensive but if you are considering any e-bike you will have so much fun. I highly recommend it especially given you have beautiful places to ride.

Here are my thoughts on the matter: 1. Short-Term Alerts: Even if the system can only predict and communicate its actions a few seconds ahead due to the lack of navigation data, real-time alerts are still essential. While signaling and the blue path visualization are helpful, explicit alerts about immediate actions (e.g., “Preparing to turn right” or “Continuing straight”) could significantly enhance driver awareness and confidence. 2. Driver Engagement: Continuous engagement with the driver through short-term alerts ensures that the driver remains informed and can take control if necessary. This is particularly important in complex driving environments or unexpected situations. 3. User Expectations: Managing user expectations is crucial. Clear communication about the system’s behavior, especially in the absence of a set destination, should be included in the user manual and during system setup to help users better understand and trust the technology. 4. Feedback Mechanism: Providing a straightforward way for users to report unexpected behaviors can help Tesla refine the system and address any safety concerns promptly. 5. Reverting to Standard Autopilot: Without a set destination, it would be logical for FSD to revert to a mode similar to standard Autopilot. This would involve maintaining lane position, adjusting speed based on traffic, and following the flow of traffic without making autonomous navigation decisions. This approach ensures predictability and transparency, providing a safer and more controlled driving experience. While I understand the system’s logic when no navigation data is provided, improving real-time communication, managing user expectations, and considering a reversion to standard Autopilot mode can significantly enhance safety and the overall user experience.

@@jasonlynch9979 I'm sorry, but this sounds like something that mainly applies to you. I don't feel this and this would annoy me more. I understand the current model and have no issues with how it operates

@@davem45 thanks Dave but the broader concern is around regulation approval..self wander mode will not fly. I want FSD to be successful …the car is going to need a destination for FSD to be active or revert to basic autopilot functions without. And if we think wandering aimlessly is a feature then fine but notify the driver of intention and give the driver the opportunity to settings to turn driving aimlessly off.

@@jasonlynch9979 I'll respectfully disagree, FSD without direction is no less safer than with direction. I believe this is an edge case as 99% of people using FSD wouldn't use it without navigation set. There are times where I am on the interstate for more than 45miles and I may not agree with the navigation directions so I'll cancel the navigation but allow it to continue to drive. There isn't a situation where this poses a danger to you or anyone else. It's the car making decisions as it needs to as there isn't a set place

@@davem45 Great point. But if you cancel the navigation, the car will function like AutoPilot, which I am fine with. However, imagine that exact scenario and the car decides to take a random exit without any reason. That's the strange thing. Tesla states there are two modes: AutoPilot, which will work without a destination, and FSD, which will take you from the beginning to the end of a planned trip. There is a reference to FSD without a Nav destination. It says that the car will take you to a frequent location (Ie, I go to the coffee shop at 8am every morning, and it's 8am, the car may take me there. I have not tested that, but there is a reference to that in the owners manual) In my case, none of that happened. So, the behavior I experienced was unexpected. Which I believe could be made better.

The issue is the car was navigating itself to an unknown destination. Making turns etc on its own, whereby the driver has no idea where the car is trying to go to.

@@jasonlynch9979 what you call a problem is actually a normal operation designed to work that way. Imagine u r driving on a highway going 80mph and by mistake you cancel your navigation trip, do you want the car to come into a complete stop on the highway? I really dont see the problem here just as the rest of ppl on the comment section. If I dont want the car to drive without a route just turn FSD off… You as the driver understand that the car will continue driving without a destination (this is something u r making it a problem) therefore the only option are to simply turn it off, use signals, or input a destination.

@@MichaelCena08 Hi Michael, There are a couple of issues. 1. In your use case if I turn NAV off on the free then the functions of basic autopilot come into play., cruise, lane keep etc, all function. Imagine however in that the car decided to exit the freeway without notifying you. Thats what perked my interest in this.. when I turned off the nav the car continued to the stop sign. Normal AP would have just stoped. Instead the car decided to turn right and take me for an 8 mile drive without any notification to where it was taking me. Yes I could have stoped it at any time and I felt safe but the second issue from a safety perspective is there was no communication from the car to the driver of what the cars intentions were as it was deciding to drive and make navigation decisions on its own, and also I don’t think this should be expected behavior. It is not normal operations for a car do drive aimlessly. Just like in an aircraft you cant just push the Auto Pilot button and allow the plane to randomly navigate wherever it wants to go. You as the pilot need to give the aircraft instructions, heading, waypoints, etc. That is all I am saying here as well. The car should not be able to just pointlessly drive to an unknown destination forever. If you don’t want to have a route then that is fine.. then the car is using lane keep and cruise etc.. But its not navigating on its own to someplace its not telling you.. This is beta software and I think there is an opportunity to improve if this is a function that is intended. If it’s not known if it is intended behavior or not then I believe there could be a potential safety risk of not knowing how the system works. I think Tesla can do better.. and I actually see some potential positive use cases as I stated in the video.. but those are not current design considerations.

Wow using FSD without Navigation I never thought about that. I don't like it when the car changes lanes so much and sometimes in the wrong lane I'm going to try FSD without Navigation. Thanks learned something new and very useful

Hi ..thanks for your comment…can you explain the design process of the car randomly navigating to nowhere?

Hi Cody... Thanks for watching..I would agree with you.. I also know how to turn the system off.. The issue I have is on both occasions the expected behavior would not be that the car randomly drives around the city on its own aimlessly making turns etc without communicating to the driver that 1. its confused, or 2 where it is going. In both cases the car took very random paths changing lanes and making turns all on its own.. I absolutely know how to turn it off but the entire point of communicating this is I do not think it's safe for a car to be driving autonomously and aimlessly without any communication to the driver. In an aircraft for example the autopilot will follow the pre-programed route OR the heading... it will not randomly fly to random places all on its own.

Hi Earle.. thank you so much for watching and your comment.

Thank you so much for watching and the feedback

If you are controlling two cameras you wont be able to preview any video on the remote. Its just shows that you are recording and what mode you are in