Video

Без приемане на долара и еврото ок 2024😊

😅😅😅well information good show 😅😅

was this written by AI? you do waffle a bit and repeat yourself a lot 👍

If a ship travels at a constant 1g acceleration rate it would get to Alpha Centauri in 3.6 years (7.3 years would pass on Earth) and this includes turning the ship around halfway to decelerate. It would achieve about 95% light speed in 1 year. A 10 ton ship would require a mere 10 tons of continuous thrust. This is by far the fastest way we can get to other worlds and the ship would have gravity the whole way. All that is needed for this to become a reality is a fission rocket that can put out thrust for long periods and does not consume hydrogen. A true fission rocket should consume uranium or plutonium only. They are both jittery atoms that are on the verge of fissioning all by themselves. There should be a way to get them to fission in a linear fashion. What's needed is a controlled, time released nuclear explosion. In an atomic bomb fission occurs when neutrons hit uranium or plutonium nuclei. This is because they will not tolerate an increase in mass. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy the same should be true in you infuse them with energy. This might be as simple as having negatively charged uranium or plutonium atoms coming into contact with positively charged uranium or plutonium atoms. 1 kg of uranium contains the same potential energy as 120,000 tons of coal and plutonium has even more energy. Not much would be needed for the trip. With the constant acceleration method a ship can span the entire diameter of our galaxy in 24 ship/113,000 Earth years. Systems with stars similar to our sun can be reached in under 10 ship years.

If a ship travels at a constant 1g acceleration rate it would get to Alpha Centauri in 3.6 years (7.3 years would pass on Earth) and this includes turning the ship around halfway to decelerate. It would achieve about 95% light speed in 1 year. A 10 ton ship would require a mere 10 tons of continuous thrust. This is by far the fastest way we can get to other worlds and the ship would have gravity the whole way. All that is needed for this to become a reality is a fission rocket that can put out thrust for long periods and does not consume hydrogen. A true fission rocket should consume uranium or plutonium only. They are both jittery atoms that are on the verge of fissioning all by themselves. There should be a way to get them to fission in a linear fashion. What's needed is a controlled, time released nuclear explosion. In an atomic bomb fission occurs when neutrons hit uranium or plutonium nuclei. This is because they will not tolerate an increase in mass. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy the same should be true in you infuse them with energy. This might be as simple as having negatively charged uranium or plutonium atoms coming into contact with positively charged uranium or plutonium atoms. 1 kg of uranium contains the same potential energy as 120,000 tons of coal and plutonium has even more energy. Not much would be needed for the trip. With the constant acceleration method a ship can span the entire diameter of our galaxy in 24 ship/113,000 Earth years. Systems with stars similar to our sun can be reached in under 10 ship years.

Larwrwwrw

Awesome

Just put the nonsense word Quantum before everything so people who believe in magic will buy into it. Utter tripe.

Crazy that if this would be able to happen, to do tests they could make those little crafts reach the Sun in about 90 minutes.

Air Production - Fly Dragon - Close Air System Cars can work by atmosferic air This idea came from 11 years ago. They tried to have a car with air and petrol but it did not work. l asked why ? and l got the solution . We can do this only by air , not normal ways to make engines until now . Atmospheric air, if worked in a closed circuit can make a car moving . We have this idea in the Air Conditioning for cold , with compression and decompression , czcams.com/video/CNofxbMUsnY/video.html valves to close and open at the same time we can do it . But l do not have money for make any investiment. But the ideia is mine and is my name i want to be the person l developed for the first time . Air can be used from 7 to 50 bars easily but also can go 600 bars and more , like gas from petrol Technology , and oil industry for factories that are very advanced . Factories can work by air engines ,industrial fans generators to do electricity , bouts , and a lot of things, small airplanes or big ? That is very difficult to implant because it touches lots of industries but is a solution for our environment . All the three must work to save the Earth Dinis Soares

Here's a Better Solution to fight with Climate Change via Clean Solar Energy & Rain Water Harvesting System without Subsidy before 2030, Solution to Finance, Land Requirements, Transmission Loss, Pollution, EV Charging on the Go, Climate Change, unemployment, n many more benefits Google - lightenmyways #solar #renewable #climatechangesolutions #co2 #evcharging #globalwarming

All wrong, if you stoppped all the clocks instantly regardless of where they were they would all be in the same now regardless of what it says on the dial, the dial is meaningless. Now is all there is

climate changes get over it. thats why we have ice ages, thats why there are fossilized palm trees in the canadian arctic. and it has been happening long before there were people

Triumphant summary of disinformation, half-truths, and misleading truths.

The simplest solution to the EV problems is to just give it up.

we need to get rid of evs asap

It's a political investment push. Buy the stock, make the people buy it, when it blows up, sell. Rinse and repeat. This is how the government looks out for its people and the environment.

So EVs are bad because of lithium mining, so if you could stop it what would become of your cordless power tools, laptop, tablet, and cellphone? They all use lithium batteries and have been using them far longer then EVs. Then there is Medical equipment , cordless headphones and earphones, wireless speakers and wristwatches. There is a lot more than EVs on the dark side.

I am sure EVs can be used in future, but it will take completely different technology, and other 50 years of development...

Ok this video is an disapointment certainly not worthy of the channel name. The pure lack of information makes it more of a misinformation video as it leads you to a wrong assumptions if you do not know any better. Many other commemtars pointed out a few of them. Frankly you should pull this video; get back on researching as there is plenty of information about this topic and improve this video before you reupload it updated. 3 minutes about evs just isnt enough to cover the topic in depth to give a honest objective view on it. Especially the point about co2 emissions is infurating the comparison just isnt fair to begin with. If you compare them you need to look at life time emissions or at least mention the far greater co2 reduction while you drive a ev. A few graphics and statistics would be nice as well. Hope you improve on it hate to see your potential go to waste.😊

The conventional fuel industry uses more cobalt than the EV industry does. Cobalt is used in refineries in large quantities. It's also used in many medical alloys. The tone of this video makes me question who paid you to produce it.

While every EV maker obviously try to improve environmental factors of EV production, the environmental impact of EVs are ridiculously small compared to ICE cars, it is very unmasking and obvious that this environmental discussion against EVs is result of targeting campaigns to keep oil burning going as the big money is there. Nothing is more harmful for the environment as ICE cars and other usage of fossile fuels, it is a ridiculous discussion, and the nonsense story with the cobalt kids in africa is BS, and is brought up over and over again. Raw materials like lithium and cobalt (which is only used in about half of EVs, and by the way in many industries like oil industry and ICE car industry as well) are pretty low and environmental factors are clearly on the EV side. Consider the lifetime cycle of a car, if you do the math the result is terrible and shocking for ICE cars, and it shows how necessary it is to go away from ICE cars and go the EV road as fast as possible.

But the fossil fuel industry is led by bastions of virtue.

The new sodium batteries don't contain lithium or cobalt and there is plenty of sodium in the ocean. (NaCl)

Mandating EVs is silly. Someone who drives very little would literally be better off and have less income buying a gas car. People who need EVs can buy them. That is the free market.

I think the question of their ethicality is required for long term consideration. After all EVs required slave & child labor, especially early on to be created in the first place. In other words EVs literally used modern slavery as a stepping stone to create the entire EV revolution. What's worse is people knew about this BEFORE EVs started to grow, & still purchased the vehicles. As if that isn't bad enough EVs enthusiast actually try & justify it, by using comparisons.

What's it's "Flop" rate.........

EVs and Fani are toasts 🥪+🥪

There is nothing "unintended" about this. This is an agenda. Just like the "manufactured" pandemic and mass murder. "Population reduction".

It is true that the manufacturing of the average EV generates 8.1 tonnes of CO2, according to Argonne National Laboratory. But rather that stressing how huge that is, it would be good to say that producing the average gasoline vehicle produces 5.5 tonnes of CO2, according to the same source. And then, you could add that the difference, the "carbon debt" of the EV is amortized in 5-15'000 miles, depending on the models, or a year of driving or less for the average US motorist. That would be good, fact-based journalism! BTW, NO EV battery produces 17 tonnes of CO2, not even half... except ONE, that of the Hummer EV3X! A monster! No, an abomination! Then, you mention that half the lithium supply comes from the so-called "lithium triangle"... which was true... a couple of years ago! But huge lithium resources are being found EVERYWHERE in the world, in the US of A (CA, NV, ...), UK, France, Portugal, and of course Australia .... well, lithium is being proven to be found everywhere, and quite often in extremely easily exploitable forms, such as underground brines. So, a good journalist would present the situation of tomorrow, not that of yesterday! You could have also said that the water needed to produce the lithium for the average EV's battery is the same as the amount of water needed to produce one pair of jeans (!!!), or 2 lb of steak! THAT would have been more useful than the number of tonnes of water per tonne of lithium, a quantity to which no one can relate to! There are indeed artisanal cobalt mines in the RDC, in which work conditions, especially those of children, are shocking. But that would be interesting to add that not an once, not a gram of that cobalt is finding its way into an EV battery... which cannot be said of the catalyst used to refine the gasoline and diesel fuel going into ICE vehicle. That is no poor journalism, but PURE DISINFORMATION! Disposal methods for end-of-life batteries? No such things exist! EV batteries must, by law be recycled at 100%. It is true that a battery improperly removed from, say, an EV totaled in an accident, can be a fire risk. So, they are NOT stored as such, but rather ground and milled to what is called in the industry the "black mass", which IS safe to store, awaiting recycling of its constituting elements. You have succeeded in making a video presenting most, but not all, the obsolete things, falsehoods and other utter lies and myths being spread around on the topic of EV. Congratulations! I, as a specialist engineer stand at your disposal to help you do better on your next video!

Sorry but the consequences of forcing electrification are absolutely intended.

this is just shocking

Man made global warming is a planet wide grift so the super rich can get richer and more powerful by extracting your tax dollars and silence any scientists that refuse to toe the narrative! Poor dumb lemmings

Schools: sorry I don't think that is true

Focus on AOH 1996 ! It is ready and perfected after 22 years of research and testing. And , it kills cancer . Not just another low value treatment .

🔥🔥🔥

Bro why no one is supporting you😢😢.

queue-bits not kwoo-bits

Q-bits or KWOO-bits

America trying to take the cake for the first quantum computer... pathetic, surprise surprise.

Q. Bits.

hi

BTC and my passwords: 🤡

fake news.. this happen a long time ago. sorry for the engagement. un-remeding your channel, this is obviously AI trash.

Quantum moves program ☺️

Pls careful handle with care.this is dangerous thing.

Fascinating insights! It's exciting to see how Apple's Vision Pro is shaping the landscape for scientific research.

wow😮

Bullshit solar climate forcing always has been always will be

Your videos are amazing, it's a wonder how your channel is so small.