Video

In my eyes this theory has always been both Marx and Engels' biggest inherit flaw. It should be noted for any modern Marxist that both Marx and Engels had an understanding of human sociology that was sometimes presumptuous and often has not stood the test of time. While there is certainly a fair case to be made that modern family structures (the "nuclear" family) are in many ways influenced by capitalism, both Marx and Engels overstep their bounds in their belief to what aspects of which are in fact products of capitalism, specifically monogamy. Both made the (even at the time baseless) assumption that monogamy is a social construct tracing it's roots in the creation of capital, and that humans are more naturally inclined to unrestrained polyamory. This is a naturalist argument against monogamy, so in the sake of fairness let's give it a naturalist answer. The problem with this is that since then sociology has developed further as a field and it seems as though this does not reflect reality. Humans in a tribal society seem to be, with any exception exceedingly rare and more often than not cause for conflict, predisposed to three main forms of relationship; monogamy, serial-monogamy (a series of monogamous partners) and polygyny (the act of a male having multiple female mates). Monogamy as the status quo, serial-monogamy when a male partner dies and polygyny more often than not to account for the higher female:male sex ratio due to the higher male mortality rate. Thus making not only monogamy natural, but making this "promiscuous horde" concept his very own construct.

Thank you so much

i feel like this vid was made at a time before women had equal rights? the west isnt patriarchal anymore

Тут пишут, что мужчины чаще совершают преступления, потому что женщин все поддерживают, особенно эмоционально. Ну да, ну да Я вижу оскорбления женщин как мейнстримное медиа каждый день. Женщин считают за животных. В японском рисованном corn гуро это мейнстрим. Мы живем в мире, зная, что во многих странах у женщин нет обычных человеческих прав. И при этом мужские сограждане нашей страны говорят "вот бы и у нас так!". Виктимблейминг даже по отношению к восьмилетним. Насилию в отношении женщин радуются и чуть не национальный праздник по этому поводу устраивают. Сравни женщин, похищенных мужчинами в подвал с количеством мужчин, которые женщины похитили и заключили в подвале. Насилие над женщинами - мейнстрим, которым гордяться, это больше не темный секретный уголок интернета. Подписка на сливы это теперь долг любого школяра. Не существует женщины, которая не сталкивалась с домогательствамии с подросткового возраста. Я стараюсь изо всех сил избегать помоек, но все равно каждый день вижу тонну мизогинии. И думаю о женщин Афганестана, Дагестана, да и России, в которой домашнее насилие и отрезание гениталей девочкам легально. Я живу в этом мире. О какой эмоциональной поддержке вы говорите? Я ни разу не видела чтобы мужчин называли оскорблениями, которые существуют только для женщин. Да даже в каментах под этим видео снова оскорбляют и мифологизируют женщин, как будто они плачут от всего и только мужская печаль может иметь вескую причину. Кстати, неработающие домохозяйки - миф. Это реальность для маленького количества богатых семей. Женщины работают. Вот это сюрприз. 80% женщин сидящих за убийство это сидящие за самооборону (рф)

The one reason - gender socialization is toxic and dangerous. And no one never talks about it. Men don't born bad, women dont born kind. IT IS SOCIALIZATION ONLY. ONLY. But people continue silent about it. It's the most censorship topic in the world.

Families existed prior to capitalism so how is it a pillar in Capitalism. I just went to the bathroom. Turds benefit capitalism?

I will change this world forever for the future of us all. In the best way possible. This video is profound, great work my dear friend

why. did i not find this channel earlier?!??

what exam board is this, thanks

Marx is anti inheritance and family, go figure. What a garbage "economic philosophy."

The war on the family we are seeing today now makes sense. It’s a communist plot .

I think it's a combination of all theories

👍🏾

THANK YOU SOO MUCH... EXACTLY WHTA I WAS LOOKING FOR

Your videos are so good and simple. Thank you for such valueable knowledge.

These videos are so helpful thank you !

The best

. Although the Neo-Marxist's relentless onslaught on the twin Institutions of "Marriage" & "Family" has continued unabated since the 60's, now they're gearing up to bring it at the forefront of their Movement after the LGBTQIA+ push; I just watched this (it's available on CZcams): Description Family Abolition (with ME O'Brien, Jules Gleeson, and Dan Berger) Historical Materialism: Critical Marxist Theory 16Likes 404Views Sep 202023 A discussion of ME O'Brien's new book 'Family Abolition: Capitalism and the Communizing of Care' (20 September 2023) ---------- For some of us, the family is a source of love and support. But for many others, the family is a place of private horror, coercion, and personal domination. In capitalist society, the private family carries the impossible demands of interpersonal care and social reproductive labor. Can we imagine a different future? In Family Abolition, author M.E. O’Brien uncovers the history of struggles to create radical alternatives to the private family. O’Brien traces the changing family politics of racial capitalism in the industrial cities of Europe and in the slave plantations and settler frontier of North America, explaining the rise and fall of the housewife-based family form. From early Marxists to Black and queer insurrectionists to today’s mass protest movements, O’Brien finds revolutionaries seeking better ways of loving, caring, and living. Family Abolition takes us through the past and present of family politics into a speculative future of the commune, imagining how care could be organized in a free society. ME O'Brien is the editor of two magazines, Pinko and Parapraxis, and the co-author of the novel Everything for Everyone: An Oral History of the New York Commune, 2052-2072. Her new book is Family Abolition: Capitalism and the Communizing of Care. Dan Berger is Associate Professor of Comparative Ethnic Studies at the University of Washington at Bothell. He is the author most recently of Stayed on Freedom: The Long History of Black Power Through One Family’s Journey. Jules Gleeson is a writer, historian, and comedian. She is the co-editor of Transgender Marxism and has published essays in outlets including Viewpoint Magazine, Invert Journal, and VICE.

No wonder Marx was so against the family. He abandoned his son and the mother of his child. No family, no child support

this is so helpful, thank you!

World will be a better place if it's ruled by women ✨😊 we just straight away live our lives... Don't aim to hurt anyone

88 likes, 8 comments in one year? Seriously? It's such a top notch presentation!

It's so nice and crisp! No distractions or, garbage mixed with facts, no dilution. Yet, sadly enough, it's a thoughtful topic, needs a lot of attention, so your video didn't become popular. It's a fact that people avoid serious topics, because of their short attention span and lazy minds. 😊

What kind of nut would ever think that a self-described "promiscuous horde or tribe lacking boundaries of sexual relationships" would ever function as an advanced society ? 😂 Answer : Gross swingers in their 50s & 60s who already have every sexually transmitted disease known to mankind. Oh yeah, I seem to remember the popularity of hippies living in communes in ths late 1960s, all having sex with each other, really took off in popularity, and now than 90% of globalists live that way. (I was forbidden by Karl Marx to use the word American, also the word household, because that would be awful too). According to Marxists we should all just behave like animals. Actually, many animals are more decent and civilized than Marxists & Democrat Socialists of America, those freaks need to bathe, never be downwind from one of their marches.

Thank you so much for this well-explained video. A great help for students!

❤

Hello, Precooked Sociology. Just now I visited your channel. Your content is so excellent. But here is a problem: your video SEO score is too weak. That's why your channel is not growing. If you increase your video SEO score then your channel will get an active audience organically. If you want I can help you. Error we found in your CZcams channel: 1. Title 2. Tags 3. Description 4. End Screens Our Services: 1. CZcams Channel Optimization 2. CZcams Video SEO 3. CZcams Video Promotion 4. CZcams Channel Monetization Regards, Akash Sarkar CEO at Zillion Ten Agency Digital Marketing, Lead Generation And CZcams Expert.

nice lecture

you saved my life ily

Awesome video! Nice and clear, thank you!

Hello

Came accros your videos and was well explained. Wow you deserves more views and likes.

😊 P r o m o s m

thank you for you for the effort and work you have put in for this video, many people tend to destruct the works of Marx and Engels by what happened during the soviet union both of them could not imagine the cost to make such a state being created. even though I like Lenin his biggest misshape was not establishing a relationship to the Marxist ideals of a revolution to the people of the soviet union. the fact that you can look beyond this is astonishing to say the least keep it up

This information compilation seems significantly biased. In my opinion, a major factor was skirted but never addressed. Women are supported, economically, by men. Their fathers, boyfriends etc. typically support women's basic needs. This support has lessened in recent years but is still true at the basic level. Because their basic needs are met by others, women have less "need" to commit crimes, join gangs etc. Men, on the other hand, are expected to support themselves and any women in their lives. I agree strongly with a point made in the video that crime rates for women will continue to rise as their role in society changes to be more "equal" or masculine.

i am here just to know pronounce the " Marxist"

And then men say women are emotional🤡 The fact that anger,rage is emotion

Another evaluation for Durkheim is that his study is a case study that focuses on a single, small group of people which makes it lack generalizability- Durkheim's conclusions from this study is unfit for application to other groups.

the book title in 0:48 sayin 'how to become a sociology NINJA' made me audible giggle. These videos are very helpful and easy to follow. Thank you <3

Underrated videos tbh I love your channel I just found it today usually revision videos are kinda like a hard pill to swallow but I appreciate how you make very digestible content while still using key terminology and expressing ideas. If possible I think you should also try your hand with longer form more dense videos where you go into more detail but I understand that would be a huge undertaking, but thank you regardless.

Alpha men are the one who do more crime

He was a serious atheist.

Thank you ❤

Great video. thank you

Marxism IS a religion. Or at least- the Critical Theory worldview is.

Killer work! Find out how your competition ranks better - 'Promosm'!

great video

sir you are ausome

You’re a Marxist.

pls upload more vids