Video

I agree with you 100%, I'm afraid we'll never know...

The PCA makes allegations that BK was at that home. It uses information the State can NOT verify. And as a matter of fact. The PCA is exculpatory to BK. Therefore any warrant issued as a result of that B/S theory should be inadmissible. Thats Justice in America. The State can not lie or create a story to arrest and charge someone. Then use it to get warrants to build a case. And as far as I am concerned anyone looking for Innocence or Guilt should be as far from this case as one can be. I have no opinion one way or the other.

Not sure if you’re actually keeping up with all the legal paperwork that’s coming through, but they admitted it themselves they have nothing! They did it wrong! Illegal… It’s no good none of it’s good!

but kohbergers dna and only kohbergers, was found on the knife sheath

The only reason I understand anything about the DNA “ evidence “ in this case is because of your friend Get A Clue! Now we have you to continue teaching us 😊

21:45 wasn't there a similar high statistical match on a hair found in the Karen Read trial, but then later discovered the sample (originally identified as human) was later identified to belong to a dog.. a dog hair to be specific.

your analysis is always top notch. these other creators that talk crap about you it is because they come up with ridicules theories to try and have something to talk about but you actually have valid things: i hope your going to be doing trial coverage daily updates! i’m sure your busy but it would be great.

Im not convicting on dna alone. Better have something else.

These are my issues with the whole DNA, IGG issue. If it was only a small amount of touch DNA skin cells on the button snap of the knife sheath, they were probably lucky if they could even get an STR profile done from that. That leaves the question on if there was any DNA left on that button snap to send to Othram to even be able to do an IGG SNP profile. But even if there was, which I seriously doubt, then they were able to.pull together an SNP prifile in some magic Houdini fashion in less than 20 days, because the Fbi took over doing the family tree using Othram's magical SNP profile. And once again, magic was performed by getting together not only an SNP profile, but also a family tree with a name of a suspect from that family tree, all of thaf in less than 20 days. Then the next magic trick was to get a name on Dec 20th, wait 7 days to pull the trash at the family home. Fly that trash 2200 miles to the ISP lab, dig thru it to find a viable DNA sample and do an STR profile on it to compare to the one they had from the knife sheath and confirm it was a match to Bryan's father, all in 24 hrs. They pulled the trash on the 27th and had the magical mystery match flown back and identified by the 28th so that they could write up the PCA, present it to a judge and get an arrest warrant by the 29th and present it to PA and get an arrest warrant executed on the early morning of the 30th. This timrline is as ridiculous as the homicides being done by one person in less than 16 mns. My other issue is that the arrest warrant was executed by the PA LE. However, all of the evidence collected from the search warrant listed on the evidence list was retreived by the FBI. A part of the items seized under that search warrant were 3 buccal swabs and a cell phone, presumably Bryan's cell phone. And yet, MPD secured a search warrant on Jsn 5th after Bryan was expedited back to Moscow for his DNA buccal swab. Why was that necessary since the search warrant served with the arrest warrant listed 3 buccal swabs collected? Did the FBI not turn those over to MPD? If not, why and what did they do with them? Also Mowery stated in a court document and testimony that he had a downloaded hard drive from Bryan's cell phone. That means that he didnt have the actual phone itself. Would that hard drive show any GPS coordinates of his phone during the 2:44 am to 4:48 am time frame if the phone was in fact on, but not communicating with the network? And why didnt the FBI turn over the phone itself to MPD so they could do their own firesnsic download and look for any GPS coordinates? Where is Bryan's phone now? If the FBI still has it, why? I seems to me that perhaps the FBI had their own side investigation going on into Bryan for something unrelated to the Idado 4 case. We know that there was a federal grand jury because it was mentioned several times. Also, his parents were called to testify before a grand jury. Was it the federal grand jury they keep referring to? Obviously, Bryan was not indicted by the federal grand jury. There seems to be more here than meets the eye.

Thank goodness for the very few intelligent people that can provide proper education in regards to the issues in this case. AR HAZE (Hayes) constantly says how they say they didn’t use the DNA for the arrest but clearly it’s in the PCA LOL

The speed with which they collected the trash and used their match to get an arrest warrant put their actions outside the realm of possibility.

Thank you so much for going over this 🙏 you just cleared up a few things for me about the DNA. I hope Anne can get the match suppressed. Also, i really want to know why they never released a working profile for the perp or perps in those 6.5 weeks. No camera footage, nothing. It was all about the car that wasn't the right year model. Kent you are a Fantastic Teacher 💯 Have you thought anymore about memberships?

I'd love to see you cover the JonBenet Ramsey, or LISK. You're good at pointing out things we should look at as jurors and fellow American citizens. The healthcare and criminal industries are million-dollar industries these days. If they keep us in the hospital or jail,that's big money.

Prosecutors are also politicians. That is incentive enough to make Bryan Kohberger fit their case.

Good to see you highlighting this information again. I hope she's going after the warrants,as she's confident they did lie to the court and she can probably prove it. She's had all of these experts testify so far like Barlow, Vargas concerning the touch DNA, Sly ray about his phone. She's gotten Payne and Mowery on the stand testifying on record. It looks like she's well prepared for trial. At this point I don't believe that he did this. And I'm not sure that we will ever know at this point considering how could we trust anything that these Pricks do now, considering we know already know that they lie and are dirtbags.

Another great review of important elements within the case. Any perspective from yourself or other viewers regarding an issue I've highlighted below is appreciated. At 23:51, "...the suspect's STR DNA profile must be directly compared to the forensic profile previously uploaded to CODIS." guideline has concerned me for quite sometime. If the PA trash DNA was likely the biological father of the sheath DNA individual, wouldn't this qualify as an indirect match? If so, by DOJ standards, wouldn't continued evidence collection and DNA analysis be required until a direct match was achieved before arrest? Am I splitting hairs over direct vs indirect match validating an arrest by DOJ guidelines?

Excellent analysis and critique, as per usual.

Glad that you covered this! ❤ Ty ✌️

Agree 💯 percent ... Truth and Justice for All is a fine balance between the finding of fact and a fair litigation. There are a multitude of questions regarding the true nature of the evidence, the questionable actions of law enforcement and the secretive acts carried out by the Prosecution. These things, whether they are addressed in a Frank hearing or not, will always be a problem in a case that appears to be an unjustified prosecution or a loophole for the defense. In a perfect world, every part of an investigation and the subsequent prosecution have procedures that are meant to be followed. Sadly, in this case, those rules have been violated, in my opinion. The gates to Truth and Justice, swing both ways, for All ...

Agree, IGG process requirements should be handled as in Maryland law.

Me too. Want the truth, that is.

I will not be watching the livestream tomorrow either. First, because I will be working and would only catch a little bit at lunchtime. Second, even if I was off work tomorrow, there is no way I could sit through possibly 4 or 5 hours of agonizingly boring content. Why those who choose to attend this pre-trial hearing in person is beyond my imagination...as you will not get secret clues about the case just because you think Anne Taylor is giving you non-verbal communication, right Twizlestick? Or Rory, from Thou Shalt Not Kill Teen Beat Magazine, and his pre-game coverage starting at 7:30 a.m. PDT. Really? You need to have 90 minutes of pre-hearing coverage? Why? I kind of hope that the change of venue is granted so I don't have to hear about anymore wild conspiracy theories about why it was not granted by the usual CZcamsrs. I agree with you, Kent, that JJJ will want to try voir dire first as I know he has no intention of letting this trial out of Latah county unless something drastic happens.

Hi Kent!!! I have a question, if the IGG Results were obtained in less than 6 weeks(if I remember well) isn't't that a reason to suppress or at least question the results? From my point of view the results are not reliable. How could Othman analyze and obtain the results in much less time than what is supposed to? To me iAnn Taylor requests to suppress these results then it is Truth and Justice for all. Please clarify and thanks so much for your outstanding work as always.

Hey hope you have a Great Wednesday😊 I have never doubted the DNA belongs to BK my questions have been about how the knife sheath got there, does it really belong to BK, was this the sheath belonging to the actual murder weapon & why there is absolutely no other DNA on it although it was found laying in the bed with 2 of the stabbed to death murder victims & not any of their DNA. I also wonder about it being 1 knife, you would think it would have been so blood soaked even with gloves on, wouldn't it still get slippery? LE never investigated these murders thoroughly!

the STATE is the one who has put out all the info and miss info as well and the defense SHOULD be releasing whatever they can because the fact the public has him guilty already and only evidence they have is weak weak transfer dna which is very questionable as well. as far as the car goes didnt you say it was a chrysler 300?? AT fought to have things unsealed she wants public to see the case she said its NOT a nicely packed case the state is trying to make everyone think it is....i dont know if hes guilty or not until trial and everything comes out but, if the state is going on evidence we know of then they dont have a case and if hes found guilty its because of the false info and media coverage for 2yrs making him look guilty but i would not convict him off what we know now and sy ray will be huge in this trial...we will see

The FISHBOWL TOWN OR THE BUSLING CITY😂PICK ONE. MOVE THE TRIAL,,, THEY CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS

you should be at 100,000 subscribers! you do such great work and investigate the topics! appreciate all you do ❤

I really think he is staged and so are his supporters

he is so full of himself. makes me want to 🤮

Dearest Voy Deer 🤪

I'm 99% certain Judge Judge will deny the motion. Maybe BK should just plan to appeal the (potential) denial of change of venue motion after the trial ends - it could work out better for him in Appellate Court - when reviewing a judge's denial of a motion to change venue (after trial), that Court can independently examine the record to determine whether there was a "reasonable likelihood" that pretrial publicity adversely affected juror impartiality. The Court of Appeals in Idaho says the following: "The factors considered are the existence of affidavits indicating prejudice, or lack of prejudice, in the community where the defendant was tried; testimony at voir dire as to whether any jurors had formed an opinion of the defendant's guilt or innocence based on pretrial publicity; **whether the defendant challenged for cause any of the jurors finally selected, the nature and content of the pretrial publicity; and the length of time elapsed between the pretrial publicity and the trial. We also consider any assurances given by the jurors themselves concerning their impartiality. " (**The defense must raise challenges for cause or they will most likely lose any later appeal.)

Do you think the court hearing will go all day, or possibly a second day?

No pedestals 100%

Its an appeal issue. I think you could be right but the judge has to look at the appeal issues over his wishes.

I’m just glad u are back!

I think a major consideration is the community pressure on jury. In a small town, everyone will know who is on the jury. They, if they would find innocent, have to live with the guilters. Jurors will be held to account in the after math with their friends and neighbors. They need to deal with law enforcement in that community. That's a whole other sphere of prejudice. Even though factors in other counties maybe similar- peer pressure is less. I enjoyed your musical peaceful offerings.