Video

Can you power the fly wheel with an electric motor and compare the power you hav put in to the power you can get out?. Maybe with different time spans between in and out?

***Change the design slightly - put slots in the back magnet wheel so the magnets can move back and forth based on RPM maybe you would get some variability in torque base on how much centrifical force the wheel is applying the magnets since the RPM would would be larger when they are at the bottom of the slot and lower at the top of the slot.

Or just use magnetic bearings... Love your work!

LTD Stirling Engines next, please.

What happened to the one that only used the coils to aid the spin.

Please put this into your planes!!! Wow amazing !!!!

That motor would be slightly practical if you only turn it on above like 13mph, and pedal up to that speed first

Lol at the hair colour joke.

Great video, just found out pressurized air as for energy storage doesn't have that much of energy density

"extrusions witch has a track built into them allowing these nuts to slot in" mute:😃deaf:😃Blind:💀

Use helium in the air tank so the plane is lighter

Hey what is the maximum rpm of this heli drone

Duuuuddee, I can't NOT watch your videos. What'd you mean by "flying a plane powered by air"? Well hell yeah I have to see this.

What if you connect the capacitors in parallel and make a circuit to increase the voltage?

add more resistors

Efficiency is not just in the distance traveled; it's also in the speed. With the large difference in speeds it should be possible to travel further than the charging push with a really high efficiency vehicle. Peltier car: use Plutonium to heat it and you have a TNG like what is drivin Voyager or Perseverance...

Where can I affordably purchase glass -einforced plastic like this (for personal projects)?

Hello, I am trying to build a whipper trebuchet, and I was wondering if you could share the ratio between the counter weight arm and the throwing arm?

Very interesting indeed mate.👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

Ever thought about putting an air tag in it and going for height challenge?

Really stunning 😬

Is it possible to pressurize the wings there by adding more power

can you make the file free

I see 2 gears/sprockets. LIAR!!

When the prop is spinning during gliding could you use that to charge the capacitor?

17:03 "and more panel gaps than a tesla" 🤣

What if the exhaust was used as pusher to propel the plane farther?

Try heating/cooling the air before launch?

ladies and gentlemen, think about it, use granade instead of tennis balls, and you have created slient, small scale artilary.

I love you

What if you used human hair

I love you

This is learning how to jog instead of sprint

That second car design is so cute❤

Hello, I would like to learn about this stuff, would you please recommend some books or courses for a complete beginner. Thank you

Did he just make perpetual energy car!?!?!

Very cool, interesting, enjoyable and most importantly informativ vid! Thank you :)

battery /băt′ə-rē/ noun A device containing an electric cell or a series of electric cells storing chemical energy that can be converted into electrical power, usually in the form of direct current.

Love it! We all need one of theSE..

For some reason I can't find the chaep syringe where the standard is expensive with threaded cap I can't find 100ml or without thread syringe 😂

What I'm telling here is 1, the thrust doesn't have to face every direction in 360 cone. It can be turned into laterally symmetric high-aspect ratio wing with 4 push-pull props, with propwash not interfering eachother in a way so that all wing surfaces are submerged in a propwash when they are counter acting the forward and backward thrust. So that if the lift is created upward, no side way motion is made. To counteract the propwash interactions between the individual prop units, put 3 or 5 wing fences in between. To stabilize the craft, it should have V shaped adjustable parachute, made of 2 sticks with a flat plate. So that the plates are constantly stalling having the arm. The drag would be increased in the tilted AoA, so that it would have a stabilizing effect. If the angle between the V lines is adjustable, it would make them efficient horizontal stabilizers. This kind of crafts operate at such AoAs so that it would be not feasible to use a normal airfoil for the dragchute. By giving the V-chute the ability to vertically align within the CoG, gives them the ability to land on them. Because these V chutes need to be at the most outboard of the craft, it means they have the ability to control yaw by adjusting the drag on one side. They have 4 legs to stand on by itself. Also it's the ideal launch angle for them to stabilize in this A position. Because the shape of the letter A is the embodiment of a portable ladder. To take the effect, use layered airfoils with 2 flaps for pull props, 2 leading edge movable slats resembling that of 2 the previous trailing edge flaps but in a mirrored fashion. So that they can not only redirect the flow, but they can work as ailerons. By the nature, it's better for the outboard wing to be in a puller configuration because they should fulfill the role of ailerons, even though the high chord ratio leading edge flaps kind of work like ailerons if operated with servo. It's entirely possible, maybe even smoother. But the point being it should be symmetrical laterally, I mean horizontally but with just 4 mirror angles. Not a circular wing because they are hard to implement with flaps, they are not particularly efficient at redirecting the flow as the increased surface on the lower side of the flow tend to get too thin to stick to. Also the part I'm referring now is producing the lift sideways, it's wasting a lot of the lift potentials on the sideways especially on your previous submission. The only use for this type of configuration would be to put the thrust in a sideway direction to begin with so that you get a faster horizontal speed unless you can simply just redirect the vector of the thrust by having a propeller shaft gear specifically designed for it. I know it's easier to simply rotate the motor itself at this point. The few parts interesting about the proposal I recommended in the comments above is that so the propeller pitch of the push-config propellers should be adjusted to so called "Negative pitch" so that they essentially produce either forward or backward thrust. The puller ones don't need this because only one "forward direction" is needed for all of this Vtol system to work. If you could produce 30% force of the horizontally produced thrust to a vertical vector as the separated values from the sum up of the force. You need like 3 times more power to create the same vertical thrust. Which isn't very efficient. Maybe it should have like very high rpm props with completely flat propellers for the much needed ability to produce thrust in both directions depending on the circumstances. If the craft is handled in a near 0 speed regime, the flite should be controllable with the thrust differences between the left rotors and the right rotors. It's just possible because of the props literally having no off-center forces working on them, no matter the thrust, the forces needed for the actuators to work on the pitch angle would be almost negligible. Because the CP is perfectly aligned with such a simple prop design. The V sticks changes the CoG dynamically, that means the pitch is maintained by either the flaps or the dragchute angle. The redirection of the flow would be better if the flaps are segmented fowler-type flaps with wide vertical gaps between them. But they would be hard to make the flaps as reversed leading edge slats aerodynamically feasible to push against the air, in a horizontal flight. Also the aileron's effectiveness at extremely slow flight would be reliant on propwash, meaning the power difference in each props would have like a noticeable effect on the aileron effectiveness. Also, the individual prop's thrust should be adjusted by propeller pitch angle but not with motor torque output, because it's generally not responsive, I know it can be responsive, but it's just that even under the same power output, even with the faster rotor speed, prop pitch would get enough thrust difference, maybe designing the props in a such a way so that they could intentionally tip to the stalling angle to rapidly lose power on flight, but that would disturb the propwash, messing up the said aileron effectiveness stuff. With that much thrust to weight ratio, there is not much reason to just release it face-to-face with the vertical direction in the launch. It would fly like a space shuttle, but for some reason, it might be more aerodynamical in a horizontal flight. I hope this let you find new ideas. I also want to see it flying.

Can you engineer a new prop nose cone design, that includes ducts that will allow air to be scooped in and used for cooling of the radial engine, and would'nt it also generate thrust if the scoops are designed to be steep enough?

Liquid carbon dioxide or liquid air might work.

Huh... It's not only driving but... It's Tokyo drifting...

please checkout vertiq! They built the controller in jimmy's video and are currently building a similar propeller

Что такое супер капакутер?

9:45 что такое ебике мотор?

fun fuct most vieved is at 9:11

Electric pop-pop tri-cycle?besides it's not having popping sound, Hell yeah

That’s so cool. It’s like a slimline version of a induction motor.