Video

Really depends on your budget. Amd have some great options around their am4 platform which they seem to keep pushing new cpus out for. For personal gaming pc I'm using a amd ryzen 7 5700G with a Rtx 3060ti and it holds up well. But if you looking for a really good budget friendly option, the intel 12th gen 12400f at the moment is priced really well. Now that's a 6 core 12 thread processor that beats the ryzen 5 5600x in most non gaming scenarios. It uses only 65 watts comes with a cpu cooler, and the cooler is more than enough to cope with its temps and will work well with your RX 7600. Also alot of these H610 motherboards support 12th, 13th and 14th gen intel cpus, which if you wanted to in the future could upgrade to a 14th gen cpu. The 12400f beats both the 13100 and 14100 in most gaming scenarios due to its extra cores and threads. If you are not on a budget then I suggest looking at amds am5 platform specifically the 7800x3d cpu. Strangely enough I ordered a 12400f, a MSI PRO H610M-E DDR5 motherboard with 16gbs of ddr 5 ram yesterday, to do a all intel build, as I'm pairing it with an intel arc A750 gpu. Which I plan to do a video on later this month. That specific msi motherboard supports 12th, 13th and 14th gen intel cpus and can take up to 96gbs of ddr5, so it's got plenty head room for future upgrades. Obviously it's a entry level motherboard, so it only has 1 m.2 slot. And I wouldnt try stick a 14900k cpu in it and try over clock it 😂. But specifically for your gpu, I would say any i5 and i7 from 12gen onwards should handle it well. From amd side of things i would say 5600x and up, the 7500f is decent for its price vs performance and you will be on the am5 platform, which amd should support for a long time, dont waste your time with any of amds apus, i did that with the 5700g, purely due to cpu shortages during covid, and the smaller cache and pcie 3 support only, gpu wise will leave some gpu performance and storage performance out on the table. Let us know what you end up getting 👍

Its easier to make a console engine in c++ than c# tho

Hello :) , I will try after the current set of tutorials I'm working on. In the meantime though you should look at just using an http client. Here's some code to help you start, This is just for HTTP GET Requests, excuse the code, its a little rough I have included both sync and async versions...: public class HttpHelper { #region HTTP Get /// <summary> /// A simple HttpGet function ASYNC. /// <para> /// NOTE: Will only return a result if the Http Request executes successfully, otherwise an Exception is thrown. /// </para> /// </summary> /// <param name="url">The url to be used in the http request.</param> /// <returns>Http Response message.</returns> public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> HttpGetAsync(string url) { try { HttpResponseMessage result = new HttpResponseMessage(); using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient()) { result = await client.GetAsync(url); //Must be a http code of type success (CODE = 200) result.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); } return result; } catch (Exception error) { throw error; } } /// <summary> /// A simple HttpGet function. /// <para> /// NOTE: Will only return a result if the Http Request executes successfully, otherwise an Exception is thrown. /// </para> /// </summary> /// <param name="url">The url to be used in the http request.</param> /// <returns>Http Response message.</returns> public HttpResponseMessage HttpGet(string url) { try { HttpResponseMessage result = new HttpResponseMessage(); using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient()) { //SYNC - This should post the continuation to the sync context of the threadpool thread by using Task.Run(() & .Result. var data = Task.Run(() => client.GetAsync(url)).Result; //Must be a http code of type success (CODE = 200) data.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); //Only map if successful result = data; } return result; } catch (Exception error) { throw error; } } #endregion } My suggestion for the POST option is to parse the object you are posting as a json string object and then to set your header/content types accordingly. Have a look at this on stackoverflow: stackoverflow.com/questions/6117101/posting-jsonobject-with-httpclient-from-web-api

No unfortunately not, I plan on re-building it but with UWP support and I will use the Win2D api which supports gpu acceleration. For this I was using the GDI library which is all cpu based rendering, which obviously comes with limitations. When I do get onto it though, I will create a video series on it, so everyone can build their own or just use mine as I will make it public on a git repo somewhere once its done. I obviously want the Engine to be as flexible as possible, which shouldn't be a problem as I will firstly only be concentrating on 2D

@@gettoecoding1058 nice keep up the good work i love experimenting with new game engines

Yeah Unity is very cool, I've worked with it a bit, mainly on a 2D level. This is a game I never finished... czcams.com/video/HtxymwU3AOk/video.html I was doing everything 2D assets, audio, coding... Just got over it and lazy. The issue with this console game engine is the GDI LIBRARY, its limited to cpu rendering. I'm going to give this game engine stuff a go again at some point, but with the Win2D api which supports gpu acceleration.

The point of making an engine usually isn't to be the very best engine. The point of making an engine is to hone your skills and make a decent output. Also, I don't exactly know what you mean by "might as well do something original" Every engine is original in some way.

@@palegrass6168 The might of the Company and their shareholders will crush you sir, I would not test them if I were you.

@@mathew3267 I mean, it's not like they can stop you, since the code is original and all you'd need is a license.

@@palegrass6168 true