Video

The whole point about subjective or objective morale is so confusing for me from the philosophical point of view, but so much easier to understand from evolutionary and spreading genes. We dont rape children because they cannot make a baby and it most likely will lead to internal organ damage, so parents of that child would be interested in protecting it. We dont kill each other for no reason, because those groups who do are dying out, so no genes or memes that lead to such behavior are spreading good.

They allure me for heaven but i don't want heaven i want moksha.

1:23:39 Maybe there is a secret massage here that solves everything and we would never know.

9:56 oh c’mon guys, you know Christians aren’t allowed to have any fun or relate to anyone of a different religion

A beautiful world, where life feeds on life, part of a plan born from pure love.

This guy was all over the place. I think I need to find a different teacher. I've read John 1:14 and I don't see mother Mary in there

So it's obviously aliens who can quantum entanglement reincarnate bodies because they control all matter and energy you do not need a soul to be created all you need is the energy that makes up the universe or matter because we know it can be conscience because we are

Written in my heart😂😂😂😂😂 Oooh what a buffoon…

It scares me that this pompus Egnor whos knowlege of science comes from youtube is a neurologist?!?! He if anyone should understand that he himself could be wrong and the reasons for that empirically proven since long. What a scared idiot.

When my son was 23 months old (he’s 32 now) he had an unexplained stroke (he’s totally fine now). Dr Egnor became his Dr in the hospital. On my sons second day in the hospital my wife observed him acting strangely. She told the nurses and they brushed her off. She was sure something was wrong so called Dr Egnor, who rushed to Dennis’ room, diagnosed encephalitis, grabbed the bed and wheeled him to the operating room and saved his life. Thank God for Dr Egnor!

If Christ was raised from the dead and really is the incarnation of God (in some sense) then shouldn't we be attempting to evangelise all non-Christians? This is not a rhetorical question.

Because religion is abusive.

Imaginary 'relationship'.

Wow. It's as if believers can't imagine themselves being and wrong and God being a myth. God has been drilled into every thought they have.

Interesting Stream...Request you to please invite Radhika Kripa Dasi shes the Author of book titled " Vaishnava Teachings in Sikhism " shorter version of this Book is also available for free on Google search which is Scholarly Interfaith study book of Guru Granth Sahib ( Sikh Scriptures and Vedas ) ....there are some of her interviews also available on CZcams.. Vahegure Vaheguru ...

Without God we're just meat robots and why would anyone listen to a meat robot is basically his argument

Egnor is unjustifiably arrogant in claiming he knows where the natural ends and the supernatural begins. Theists have moving that goalpost for thousands of years.

Hate Krishna’s are the biggest dorks in the world. They have no life at all

The first part where this guy asks Matt the first way of Aquinas was gold. I mean, I've seen Matt discuss this, I know he knows what it is, however the other guy calling him ignorant on a subject he considers himself an expert in (arguments for and against god's existence) was unprecedented for me. I could clearly see this is a button that has never been pushed before.

Another douchebag debater whose soul purpose is to agitate and be dishonest and annoying, and people have the audacity to point out Matt's anger lol. They're just admitting they wouldn't fair in a debate at all because apparently they would just let their opponent interrupt and talk over them constantly because they certainly don't ever get angry, nope! Not even if someone was repeatedly punching them in the face. If you think this is how a conversation is supposed to go, you have no say in this and you shouldn't even leave your comment because it's unreasonable and people are laughing at it. If your intent however, is to provide the rest of us some comedy, then by all means, make yourself look like an ass 😂

if anyone wanted a bigger explanation of Realist Realist's question about NONbelief: The concept of beliefs as neurological states is supported by various findings in cognitive neuroscience that link belief formation and maintenance to specific brain activities and structures. However, the empirical investigation into the absence of belief, or "nonbelief," is a less explored territory. To address the existence and substantiation of nonbelief within the framework of neurological states, we can consider the following points: 1. **Neural Correlates of Belief**: Research has shown that belief and disbelief activate different neural pathways. For instance, functional neuroimaging experiments indicate that beliefs engage areas of the brain associated with motivation, emotional processing, and cognitive evaluation. Similarly, the neural activity associated with disbelief might not activate these areas as robustly, suggesting a distinct neurological response to nonacceptance of a proposition [citation:5]. 2. **The Role of Cognitive Mechanisms**: Studies on delusions and the cognitive processes involved in belief formation emphasize that the absence of belief could be understood through the mechanisms of cognitive dissonance and uncertainty. Individuals often experience cognitive states that signal confusion or doubt regarding a particular belief [citation:2]. This can result in a shift towards nonbelief in specific contexts, which may be measured through brain activity that reflects indecision or cognitive conflict [citation:1][citation:4]. 3. **Procedural Representations**: Nonbelief can also be tied to the absence of cognitive uptake or engagement with certain information. The absence of belief can manifest neurologically as a failure to process information in the same way that beliefs do. This could be studied through neuroimaging techniques when subjects are presented with information that they explicitly reject or acknowledge as not believable [citation:3]. The brain regions involved during active belief evaluation may show reduced activation when individuals express nonbelief. 4. **Cognitive and Emotional Responses**: Neurocognitive studies have documented that emotions play a significant role in shaping beliefs. The absence of belief, particularly in scenarios involving uncertainty or skepticism, could be represented as a lack of emotional engagement with the information being processed. This disengagement might be evidenced by reduced activity in regions responsible for emotional processing, such as the amygdala or the prefrontal cortex when responding to improbable or absurd claims [citation:6]. 5. **Empirical Measurement**: To substantiate nonbelief empirically, researchers could design experiments where subjects are presented with statements that vary in believability. Through neuroimaging, scientists could examine the differential activation patterns in neural circuits associated with belief, disbelief, and neither by comparing the responses when participants strongly affirm, deny, or express neutrality towards propositions. This would reveal potential distinct neurological signatures for nonbelief. In summary, while substantial evidence supports the existence of beliefs as neurological states, empirical evidence for a distinct neurological state of nonbelief could potentially be gathered through comparative studies focusing on neural activation patterns in response to belief, disbelief, and uncertainty, all of which implicate specific brain mechanisms and emotional cognition

I assert that a unicorn farrted the universe out of its ass and nobody can disprove this, but I CAN prove it, here's how: The universe exists The concept of the universe ass farting unicorn exists I assert that it's true I believe that it is true I believe that the universe came from the ass of this unicorn because I can't imagine how else it got here Therefore it is reasonable and logic to conclude that all this is true and this is the evidence. You can read it right here. It is written and you can read it.

Good convo.

Great closing Matt ! You summarized his disingenuousness perfectly !

Amazing video. Thank you ❤🙏🏻

Another debate...... another "no reasonable proof for a god" instance. The arrogance of not willing to say "I do not know at some point" proves itself yet again.

Karma is action, and action is God action, so Christians the same, always saying God is God . But Christian use to Wars the bible is about Wars, and East the is so much they find About God. Western is about WAR Money 🤑 So East is where you find God.

Matt is being asked TWICE if he believes raping a baby is objectively morally Wrong, ...and he tap danced around the question Without a straight: Yes, it's wrong answer! He literally said: No it's not wrong! (???) But at the same time he claims to care about the wellbeing of humans. (yeah right!) it's absolutely mind blowing to witness how Evil has corrupted the hearths and minds of many men. I can tell by his eyes and body language he knows he's on the wrong side. I pray you let go of your hardend hearth, so God will have mercy on you Matt. If not, ...there goes another one. (Smh)

What is a "perfect mind?" If you can't explain it, it certainly doesn't explain anything else!

Hey Zac, try responding to your interlocutor - maybe at least once per hour. I know this would involve listening, and perhaps even asking for clarification, but it's really worth it!

The idea of reincarnation scares me, and I don't know why 😅 Nothing in the Torah, Bible, or Quran denies reincarnation per se. It would make sense in the context of Abrahamic religions that some people die as babies or have really difficult lives compared to others, and I imagine it would be fairer to judge people after they've had enough time on earth to be tested. That being said, if you're gonna be tested in different circumstances during different lifetimes, not remembering your past life would be better, because you're not gonna be influenced by who you were in those circumstances. If you were born into a certain religion before, it's more likely that if you remember that, you'd still have the same religion (or ideas and values) as who you were before. The arguments for reincarnation seem to be logical, and that's giving me an existential crisis. Also, it's scary to not know who you're gonna be and where you're gonna be in a future life, but we didn't get to choose where we are in this life so we just trust God with our souls. We're very fragile and helpless, and that's okay.

Glad you entertain yourselves.

I like that name, Egnor

I wouldn't let he work on my brain.. his God came from nothing? 😂😂😂

the fact is that when we become follower of somebody we even don't want to listen others opinion .beacause we are now blind ,no crirical thinking, cognitive thinking who we follow becomes our god and we just waste our life following somebody at the end we get nothing . The problem is when you even near to death that ego is still their, ignorance, superstition,stupid follower of some business guru😂 only facts here i have no grudgea for anybody. if someone use his mind he will not accept anything in this world without facta and logical thinking , rationality. and will be free with that incompleteness,anger,hateed ,jealosyy, following. why do we hate other if someone opinion does not match to ours or ours guru .beacuse the guru we are following not every guru but those religion gurus ,smart business gurus making us fool the are irretion talking of some fantancy , of heaven they will give to us .is this make any sense. why are we so stupid accepting all this nonsence those gurus are saying who have not even read any scriptures with the right centre which is centre of rationality of truth.

A fantastic debate to watch for anyone who is interested in becoming a vegetarian and needing some spiritual validation in scriptures czcams.com/video/hKxvjoikeeU/video.html

Very interesting conversation! Thank you! A few points that came up for me listening to you both - I know from my research the bible is corrupted and is presented in a certain way to control the masses and actually cause division between the population for example, the word pederasty was in all bibles prior to 1946 which means adult male having sex with a child boy 'pedophile' then a group of so called 'scholars' changed it to 'homosexual' this is a huge difference, and I have seen proof online from other people that the original word in the original language was 'pederasty' but the newbies come along and say no it means homosexual; this is just not true. The fact that the church and it's leaders back in the day burnt thousands and thousands of scriptures that contradicted their version of what they wanted Christianity to be because they wanted the power over the people, these scriptures that were burnt were considered heretical as what we know today to be 'gnostic' I've done so much research into the gnostic gospels and they ring similar to the Veda's and Jesus's teachings were of similar strength and code to the Vedas, but this doesn't fit the Christian narrative so they shout it down as hearsay. From my research Jesus was not a meat eater and was trying to stop all the animal sacrifice that was going on in temples and around the place, please refer yourself to the documentary 'Christspiracy' you can watch it online for a small fee and it outlines everything biblically.

When Graham said, "is that an elephant I can hear?" My first instinct told me, yes there is an elephant in the room, but all of us can't see it, because we are blinded by our own preconceived perceptions of who God is and what is the right path 'religion' to follow lol.....

Buddhism, Hinduism and zen and Taoism: The ever expanding kaleidoscope of bullshit

Buddhists are the most fallacious and they know it. Their whole metaphysics is that they are playing a game and it’s only a game from what I can see.

The only thing holding thinking believers in their cave is plutonic idealism and not really understanding evolution. Zen Buddhism was the most sophisticated religion I’ve come across. There’s nothing to it and yet it’s always there. It made me see how stupid mysticism is myself not because “mysticism is bad”. Also psychedelics make you see how dumb words and language is and how deceiving the mind is.

Michael Might be the most dishonest debater I've ever heard. He constantly talks over Matt. What a self-righteous idiot

A chair is something that is specifically built to be sat upon.

14:55 “The soul is as if a filthy rag. A filthy rag. That’s in the Hebrew Bible” Is it though? Or is he thinking of Isa 64:6 - which doesn’t appear to be referring to the soul, and many translations render in terms of ‘becoming’ as one who is unclean (as opposed to an eternal state).

"The miracle of giving someone sight is not nearly as miraculous as writing letters" WHAT???

As an atheist, i find the hindu narrative much more compelling. The concept of christian sin and redemption feels like a lot of gaslighting. The concept of iterative refinement in hinduism demonstrably works, we see a similar process in biological evolution. Naturalism best fits the problem of occam's razer, hinduism best fits intuitions of justice.

İn İslaam (=Al-Qur’aan), there's no creation as ex nihilo, Allaah < Al-İlaah is The Non-Physical Infinite Creator, and the physical Life (= the Created Life) is Eternal but in stages. Once the judgment is done by the scale ⚖️, either one falls into the spectrum on the side of The Creator, hence back to the earth named with the feminine noun Al-Jannat or (its own and without its desinential inflection, the feminine Taa’ Marbuuṭat / Marbuuṭa expressed at the end of the noun -at may not be pronounced) Al-Janna (the Earth where Aadam was created). Or if one is to fall into the spectrum of Aš-Šayṭaan (= the Distant one. From his Creator of all) then into An-Naar ( = the Fire, "the physical light, from any earthy combustion, or nuclear fusion "like Aš-Šams = the Sun, the light of the stars" all the spectrum of light giving of this world or this universe or {Al-Ḥayaatu} Ad-Dunyaa = the Lower / the Nearer {Life}, as opposed to the Non-Physical Light An-Nuur" Qur’aan 24:35, Nuurun ᶜalaa Nuurin = Light over Light; An-Naar also known by name as Al-Jahannam) = final end / ultimate end of this earth. Temporary hell is from men's talks written down / hearsay = Aḥaadiiṯ (plural of Ḥadiiṯ), contrary within itself, and certainly contrary to Al-Qur’aan (= Kitaabu-LLaahi = Allaah’s Book, Kalimaatu-Llaahi = Words of Allaah and all of Allaah’s Kutub = previous Books since Ibraahiim into one Al-Kitaab as Al-Qur’aan, written down and copied down the line by humans), but in its original comes back (KalimatuHu = His Word, Qur’aan 4:171) with Al-Masiiḥ = The Wiped Clean ᶜiisaa (KalimatuHu = His Word < symbolism of Allaah’s creation in the Earth Al-Jannat Aadam by Ruuḥii = My Ruuḥ Qur’aan 15:29 and 38:72; Qur’aan 3:59) ibn Maryam = son of Maryam and Yaḥyaa (Qur’aan 19:12; through the masculine lineage of Yaᶜquub or Israa’iil; whereas Al-Masiiḥ is by the feminine lineage) of the dual sons (of the same mother) of Ibraahiim (İsmaaᶜiil and İsḥaaq and his son Yaᶜquub > Banuu-Israa’iil = Sons of Israa’iil within Banuu-Aadam = Sons of Aadam. = Duality)!

Christianity is diverse and 2000 years old but not more than the diversity of Dharmas and was 5000 years old history.

My 2 favourite people

Romans 9:15-23 [15]For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. [16]So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy. [17]For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. [18]Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. [19]Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will? [20]Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? [21]Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour? [22]What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction: [23]And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,