Video

Sir you really put so much love and effort into your videos I can‘t tell u how much I appreciate your work man.. thank you so much Matty!

Thanks Matty, was about to release a song but now I gotta do this. I was only ever thinking of mid/side EQ

All of the videos of this plugin is paid promotion and received it for free? I dont really see actual examples:/ okay guys thamk you

Ozone sounds like porridge

I have demo'd both Gullfoss and Bloom and I like how Bloom has some adjustments with focus on specific frequencies, compression settings and M/S. Gullfoss sounds great but you basically can only set tame/makeup amounts, bias/high general eq and high/low pass filter. Since they are essentially the same price, I think Bloom wins it slightly.

The NFuse is no longer available. Did Kiive Audio get in trouble with SSL or Neve..?

Genuinely confused on how you were able to use uad plug ins inside studiorack... ive been trying everything and nothing has worked thus far

I do this but with the 76 style compressor what I like to do especially on rap vocals is put it mid attack fast release. This allows the vocals pop out something similar to a kick side chained to a bass.

Matty can you run all acústica Audio plugins and show how many instance’s of you can run ?? I heard acústica is very heavy on CPU .

@mixedbymatty can you share your studio rack presets?

The pre-emphasis to de-emphasis EQ trick?

YES IT NEEDS A MIX KNOB AND OUTPUT MATCH

I already have the LA2A and 1176 plugins. I wanted to buy the LA610 for €163, but I ended up buying the 6176 for €70.

There’s gonna be a ton of people fussing at you about the order of the compressors in serial. For me, the 2A before the 76 has garnered better results on a majority of my songs.

I just did a few hours of mixing with LCD-Xs. I didn't solve my mix problems. Despite their high quality, these headphones are no replacement for a well treated room. So put your money there first. If making noise in a room is not an option, then do headphones. But, it won't work as well. Eventually you gotta hear your mixes through real speakers.

Surely the 76 should be first as it would work on the transients before the more broad compression of the la2a which would otherwise be reacting to said peaks?

Neat Concept

This is very cool and something that’s helpful to people trying to make their workflow faster. There seems to be some concern for longevity in the comments

I don’t know pretty much all CZcamsrs use AUTOGAIN while explaining compression. That way it’s less noticeable than without autogain on

Now do long release times

How abt tube mic

Would a Neve orbit 5057 be needed if I had this?

could you do a follow up video showing a good way to add another EQ on top of this EQ that you did with the fabfilter pro 3?

Thanks for this breakdown. I’m pretty mystified myself but after watching your 1 on 1 comparison I realised I don’t need it either 👍

Sounds really nice!!

This is great, specially for untreated rooms vocals. Why i dont like about soothe is the higly cpu usage. Man that thing can bring your computer down. This is free, has the R VOX inclouded...beautiful

When you parallel the fast attack, what does this do to the transients - does it let some of them through? I rarely like to hear compression grab a note, except for percussion.

ever notice how on headphones it's a lot easier to hear compression at lower volumes than at higher?

If you have a slow attack you will get punched. Best way to remember that.

I always just choose what feels and sounds best whether its slow or fast

Attack is rate of change not delay of action. More simple way to think of it 🤓

I do whatever attack time I want and nobody can stop me. When people try to control my attack times I laugh in their face and do whatever I feel like.

fast attack = more rounded sound, less punch, controlled fast spikes. so its main purpose to round sounds, make it silky and to fight the punch :) plus it's very useful for sound design (layering).

Hello! Excellent video and thanks for the Practical conclusions in comparison. I clearly understand - based on the graphs, that the Audeze LCD-X will be more "linear". Tell me please - I have read a lot of bad reviews about the standard cable - which comes with the Audeze LCD-X. And many people replace it with something more expensive. But I do not see the point in this. After all, all (smart) people and engineers know that cables instantly CHANGE the frequency response. But the Audeze LCD-X were developed specifically for their own branded standard cable. Tell me please, do you work with the standard cable, or have you replaced all the standard cables with the Audeze LCD-X? Thank you!

You forgot about carbon microphones, which are amazing at reproducing really vintage sound; they're perfect for producing period-sounding jazz, swing, early pop and rock, etc.

pls can you share your MH mid range settings?

Props to Will Shanks ! Thank you

Thanks!

Matty you the goat

The Smoother is also available now, which is said to be a less subtle version of Soothe 2, but at a fraction of the cost. I also think RESRES may be better for resonance removal at low cost.

I found the male voice was too thin after processing and upper mids were annoying.

Seriously underrated tip

Song Venom - Rhea Raj Just shazamed it lol

It's hard to admit, but I like your approach. Studio one is for music creating, not for fighting with DAW to make music.

WA production imprint. Thank me later :)

Never used UAD, until I got the Apollo and tried some of their plugins and then I understand what people was talking about. I use them a lot now: - Neve 1073 - Pultec EQP - Ampex tape - 1176 - API channel strip And many more

Is UAD better than McDsp!?