Video

You talk very stupid❤❤

For some people, he dies at the end. For others, he lives! Meaning he was the next step in evolution all along, just like the child at the beginning of the film who murdered. Explains why he was chosen to be a double agent, meaning the govt knew all along. Or.... he just killed himself. The ending is up to you!

So V30 means its guaranteed of minimum 30MB so its 30*8=240Mbps. That means its more than enaugh for 200Mbps video format. Right? im about to buy memory card for my Canon R6mkII and I wont use CLog3 but only IPB 4k 50fps. Manual says its 170Mbps format. Everyone yells that you need V60 and v90 cards for this csmera but in my case its just an overkill. So am I good to go with just V30 memory card?

This painting serves as a profound representation of the act of painting itself. The deliberate use of unskilled red brushstrokes against an off-white backdrop creates a striking visual contrast. The red strokes, while lacking in technical finesse, appear to convey a message that transcends artistic proficiency - suggesting that anyone has the capacity to express themselves through art. The choice of red as a dominant color carries multifaceted symbolism, embodying passion, the essence of life, and perhaps even the metaphorical significance of blood. These elements, in juxtaposition with a pure white square that weaves through and around the red strokes, create a powerful narrative. The white square, executed with precision, seems to represent a rigid boundary, attempting to confine and dictate order. Implicit in the composition is a call to "color outside the lines," a rebellion against the constraints imposed by societal norms and self-imposed limitations. Strikingly, without the bold presence of red, the white square would fade into the background, echoing the notion that the lines and labels we adhere to can often be arbitrary and inconspicuous. The analogy drawn between the white square and the porcelain of a toilet in comparison to the surrounding white tiles on the floor introduces a touch of humor and subversion. This subtle play on mundane elements invites viewers to reflect on the absurdity of societal norms and consider the possibility of breaking free from conventional constraints. In essence, the painting becomes a provocative call to action, urging individuals to "piss outside the lines" and challenge the status quo. Go ahead, pee on the floor.

This critique is honestly one of the best critiques I've ever seen.

i would love to watch a series of you critiquing commercial art

Absolutely genius!!

It reminds me of period blood. I don't think that's very fitting for a bathroom. I'm not a woman though, so I don't know what one would think about such a painting

shoutout to the algorithm for pushing this one

I feel like it’s not even a painting… they just threw something together in Photoshop and mass printed it probably 😭

A painting of a painting? I think you've come up with words for this than needed. You've probably put more thoughts into it than initially intended. I would have just looked at it and ... wait... Now i don't know what i would do. Now I'm thinking about it. And commenting. What the hell have you done to me? What has this painting done to us?...Art has a way of sparking contemplation and stirring thoughts. It's a testament to its power to evoke emotions and provoke reflection. So I wonder... Is this art?

thought this was a LANY album cover

It's period blood. You wouldn't understand.

I think that any piece of art that is able to captivate ones attention at such an hour, and to such a degree, is not painted without skill.

I don't know why but these kinds of videos give me an ASMR reaction, just people talking about something obscure they care about, I just faze out and listen to the voice without even comprehending the words being said, 10/10 would highly recommend

you spit truth

This artwork, characterized by what may be perceived as an overly simplistic composition, fails to evoke a sense of depth or meaning. The four red brush strokes appear haphazard and devoid of any discernible intention, resembling random swipes rather than purposeful strokes. The use of red, typically associated with passion and emotion, seems arbitrary and lacks the nuance that would elevate it beyond mere visual cliché. The decision to encase these lackluster strokes within a white square does little to salvage the composition. Instead of adding a layer of complexity, the square feels like a forced attempt to create structure in what is fundamentally a chaotic and uninspiring arrangement. The contrast between the bold red and the pristine white lacks subtlety, resulting in a visual impact that feels more elementary than sophisticated. The limited color palette, while intended to emphasize the significance of each stroke, only serves to highlight the monotony of the composition. The absence of variation in color or tone diminishes any potential for dynamic visual engagement. The red strokes, devoid of any discernible gradation, appear flat and uninteresting, failing to capture the viewer's attention or provoke any meaningful emotional response. The juxtaposition of the red strokes against the white backdrop lacks finesse, and the overall composition lacks a cohesive narrative or thematic resonance. Rather than prompting contemplation on the interplay of positive and negative space, the piece comes across as a half-hearted attempt at creating tension between the elements. The imbalance between the untamed strokes and the rigid square creates discord without offering any redeeming qualities in terms of visual intrigue or intellectual stimulation. From a compositional standpoint, the placement of the four strokes within the frame feels arbitrary, lacking the thoughtful arrangement necessary to create a harmonious visual experience. The asymmetry appears more accidental than intentional, giving the impression that the artist may have overlooked basic principles of balance and proportion. In essence, this painting falls short of delivering a compelling artistic statement. The attempt to convey complexity through simplicity results in a piece that feels more like an uninspired experiment than a thoughtful exploration of form and meaning. The lack of depth, intentionality, and visual interest leaves the viewer with a sense of disappointment, questioning the artistic merit of what appears to be a mere assemblage of four red brush strokes within a white square.

the meaning of our collective existence is encapsulated in those four red strokes. it's marvelous-

Why do I feel like this is going to go viral

thank u youtube recommended

The most concise and least self-interested and reactionary critique of postmodern visual art.

It's just abstract art. Yeah, it's shit, but it's not trying to say anything. It's quite literally just a painting to hang on top of a toilet, so being shit is thematically consistent.

you are right

This's some nice horror

Damn thats an awful painting

The works gauche menstruation subtext was clumsily overstated by the artist.

Balls

I'm guessing it's supposed to be a bloody toilet paper sheet?

This painting does suck!!

Unappreciative, the red is meant to evoke a sense of hunger thus motivating you to try the soap; whereas this painting solely exist to convince tenants to do something stupid without being blunt about it.

This video made my internet bill worth paying

its not even good in a minimalist sense

I agree with you. It seems like it is a painting about painting. With the white box being the canvas and the brushstrokes are intentionally emphasized. What with the varying opacity and the overlap and texture and such. It is a pretty color but not really memorable. Personally I like wildlife paintings, or paintings of people doing mundane things (ex: hanging laundry out to dry, cooking a meal, sitting on the porch). It just seems so peaceful and nice.

lmao how high were you when you made this

what a terrible fuckin toilet painting

me and all my homies hate that painting

it's everything

sucks I agree

hell yeah that painting sucks, this is the type of content i come to youtube for

I like weird movies like this and it was fun in a weird way to watch, but the way I take it is like how in the our world like: MEN who say their a WOMEN one day and expect everyone to acknowledge them as one but their NOT and will never be one. I feel like this movie is tryn to tell us this is Evolution, Natural and what actually happening in todays world is Natural and it’s NOT. It’s DELUSIONAL MENTALLY DISTURBED PEOPLE. I feel like that’s why this movie came out now as an attempt to maybe Guilt the “Average Normal” person whatever that even means that what those people are doing is Natural when it’s anything but a DELUSION. Now do I care what people do to themselves? NO NOT AT ALL. But I don’t want you to FORCE your DELUSIONS/ BELIEFS on me and my kids EVER or anyone who doesn’t agree with it. Stop tryn to GROOM our KIDS stop demanding fuckn holidays and hanging your flags everywhere your own section in stores I can give hundreds of examples, like just be creepy, and keep your weird shit to yourself.. That being said Hey cut your dick off, mold your vagina into a floppy dick. Maybe cutting your tits off and chilling at the beach all Thick Scars hanging out might scare some kids and should still be a crime , titties are titties.😬🤮 I would watch the movie cause I like seeing weird shit. I don’t agree with you but if you wanna do crazy shit to yourself I’ll enjoy the show..🤔😉👍🏼

Which floor

I’m not gonna finish watching this movie. Great movie for people who cut themselves.

i just saw the movie, it was nothing like i expected. The movie characters were very weird, i would say unnatural. It was like watching a bad result of trying to get a book into the big screen, when the book itself is around a very niche and abstract idea.

Was anyone else reminded of Eastern Promises when Saul meets with Vice

Interesting points

Thank you for the great analysis! I hadn’t considered that Brecken’s organs were implanted in Saul by Timlin. This is why I watch vids like this. I will always consider this when rewatching. Brilliant

Terrible speaker

I don’t see her trying to kill him. I just never get that vibe. (Except for maybe early on, when he jokes about her killing him) The father who takes the drill bits to the head says, “Did you ever stop to think you’re stopping something great from happening?” or something along those lines. I think he stopped removing his organs and was able to digest the plastic. I don’t see any potential gain for Stewart’s character to give Vigo those kids organs. Plus, they are child size and not of our normal biology. I think it would kill him. I also kinda think that Vigo n the child need to mirror each other, in the regard that they can naturally eat plastic. It further instills what evolution has in store for humans. I do like the theory though.

Lange Dotrice also tells Saul, “you’re one of us.” In the penultimate scene when Saul is meeting with the New Vice cop, he even seems to be upset by Lange’s assassination. My interpretation is that by the end, Saul is a sort of double agent - working undercover for New Vice AND newly belonging to Lange’s subversive group of plastic eaters. In the final shot when he’s eating the plastic bar, he’s completely at ease & able to eat it without any pain or discomfort (the only time this is the case in the entire movie). The eating chair even turns off bc it’s not needed. So I think he ultimately replaces Lange as the group’s leader.

Timlin couldn't have replaced Tensor's organ with the kid's organ. In the movie they have not yet developed cellular regeneration, you can't use a dead organ.