DNA Analysis of Neolithic Ukraine: Dnieper-Donets culture
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 08. 2024
- In this video, we will explore the Dnieper-Donets culture, an archaeological culture that existed in what is now Ukraine and parts of Russia during the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Ages, roughly between 5,000 and 4,200 BC.
Data Source: Mathieson, I., Alpaslan-Roodenberg, S., Posth, C. et al. The genomic history of southeastern Europe. Nature 555, 197-203 (2018). doi.org/10.103...
Reference: Kotova, N. Burial Clothing in Neolithic Cemeteries of the Ukrainian Steppe. Doc. praeh. 2010, 37, 167-178.
Facial Reconstruction Artist:
www.ancestralw...
Visit MyHeritage DNA: www.myheritage...
The original giga chad
Man he really does look like a giga chad😅
The Dniepr being peonounced as Dohniper hurts my Ukrainian ears 😂 but I thank you for making a video about our ancestors, there's not wnough of it on youtube yet.
Thanks, this is a fine video for a Finn like me! Hello ancient grandfather! I know we Finns also have got ancient grandparents on the Ural mountains and around. 👱♂️
finlandic
Nice video, please see if you can manage these next:
Tocharian sample
Andronovo
Gothic Sample
Scythian
Thanks!
Scythian is already done
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat
Is west Scythian
For ancient people like this individual instead of saying he is 59% Baltic - it should say modern Baltics are 59% genetic related to this individual. Obviously he is not 2.1% indigenous Amazonian but they have 2.1% common ancestry with this individual.
Modern Balts have 50% Steppe DNA associated with EHG and CHG, and 30% WHG, they also have secondary Uralic admixture represented by N haplogroups and associated with Uralic Siberians, probably inherited from the ancient Finns. Lithuanians are the living humans with the most WHG DNA, consequently the closest to ancient Europeans. Amazon DNA is just a misassignment, it is ANE DNA probably with identical alleles to Amazon Amerindian, however often DNA tests are also confused with Mesoamerican or Inuit. There are two types of Siberian DNA in Europeans, ANE which is present in all Indo-Europeans and Uralic which is present in Eastern Europe and Northern Siberia.
Ancient North Eurasian ancestry. My Heritage tends to misattribute it to South Amerindians, eg i got 100% european an all tests yet the my heritage said i was 1.1% karitiana (and italso completely messed up my european ethnicities, it was the most outlandish result of all).
@@amnbvcxz8650 It's because you're an ANEgrito from Southeast Asia.
@@chrono654 im fully european and all my relatives have been. All other genetic tests said i’m 100% european. I left the comment to highlight the innacuracy of some tests.
@@chrono654 imagine your face with darker skin, hair and eye colour and you look subs4h4r4n. Your features. That’s not a european nose.
The jaw looks enormous like whole mountain sharpened
But with beard it looks more natural
He looks like some Central Asians that i met.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat😂😂
@@superboy3633 I'm serious sir.
Central Asian are not at all Mongoloid you imagine
In Brazil we have a football coach called Fabio Carille, who is similar to that projection admixture, at 1:45
Eastern Hunter Gatherer + Western Hunter Gatherer = Jack Palance
Is good
obviously a faulty reconstruction of an obvious light featured person who lived during the end of an Ice Age.
Jack Palance has a typical cromagnonide face (WHG)!
Jack Palance looks like an Asiatic invader. This proves that no matter how much you mix with Europeans, you'll never look like one. You ANEgrito from Southeast Asia.
Finns are/were original Europeans.
Amerindian component is probably mixed with something like East Asian, because it's presence is odd there.
ANE
It says Amazonian, it's older ancestry than other Natives. Must be ANE.
Modern Finns are among the populations with the most autosomal WHG and EHG DNA, however they are already mixed with Asian Siberians of Haplogroup N, which is why the Finnish language belongs to the Uralic language family, a family of languages that spans For Northern Siberia, Amerindian DNA is not uncommon in fact it is quite normal and predictable this is because EHG are 75% ANE and modern Amerindians are 30% to 40% ANE Haplogroup R is closely related to Q , ANE DNA is not related to East Asia belongs to an ancestral Siberian population completely independent of East Asia
* And Balts. In the past Eastern Europe was like Balts (population that is now called Balts) in the Southern part and Finnish-Ugric peoples in the North. Baltic languages are the oldest living Indo-European languages. Population of Lithuania hasn't changed significantly for the last 10.000 years. Like if you want to see ancient Eastern European go to Estonia or Lithuania.
@@danbaltic9678 If they have changed during the Neolithic revolution, the Baltics are more EHG and WHG sterpen, WHG is the original component, modern Lithuanians carry 30% WHG, the Dnieper man shown in the video is only 20% WHG, so Lithuanians take credit
Please do Tocharian
Dnieper = d-KNEE-per.
Thanks Decimali, you did another ancient European and it was interesting but now comeback on East Eurasians pls i beg for Neolithic Baikal Hunter Gatherer (GLZ001, GLZ002 or samples from Shamanka/Fofonovo/Lokomotiv sites) and also *Ainu* please, thanks d’avance.
he should do zlaty kun woman dna test 45000 year old european
He looks like Buzz Lightyear
he looks kinda bearded messi
@@THEMANWHOFUCKEDGEOMETRY Messi is already bearded
Zlaty kun (45K year old european woman) please decimali❤
the reconstructions always make their jaws enormous
because that individual actually had a massive jaw and chin in his skull
Facial reconstruction is not always accurate. but as david anthony said the skull in dnieper-donets is much bigger and stronger than in sredny stog and yamnaya
@RichardBrent40, Humans in the remote past had more robust skulls than we’re used to seeing today.
can you make Sintashta culture samples
Sintashta is closest to modern swedish today,
European Hunter-Gatherer :54.0%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer :32.4%
Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer :13.6%
sintashta culture is believed to be ancestors of European people especially norwegian, swedish, icelandic etc... Also ancestors of turkic people.
Their Y-DNA is mainly R1a. Still they dont contain R1a1 nor R2 so they arent related to indians. Modern indian carries 10% Sintashta dna while even mongolian carries %15😂
@@postachamdi6286OK TURK, I'm an Arya Brahmin. I don't care about this at all. Happy to see they hail out of India.
@@postachamdi6286 Not turkic but native tajiks in central asia who got 40-50% steppe dna. The turkic tribes got it from assimilating into iranian tajik tribes, especially from tribes like saka, sogdian, khwarzmian and etc who were all eastern iranic/ tajik tribes.
Was his skin really that dark? Like he's Baltic and Finnish. Should look smth like modern Estonian.
The Northern European phenotype arose in Corded Ware Culture, this predates
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d wasn't even that common in the corded ware. The first truly scandinavian like community in pigmentation, as so far attested, are iron age estonians.
@@bezbezzebbyson788 The two great cultures that shaped Europe were Bell Beaker and Corded Ware, Bell Beaker had a high degree of Anatolian DNA which is more characteristic of Southern Europe and Corded Ware had a high degree of WSH or Yamnaya. Both Bell Beaker and Corded Ware were mixed with WHG
@@bezbezzebbyson788 Western Hunter Gatherers mixed with Eastern Hunter Gatherers, the mixture gave rise to Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers, Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers mixed with Bell Beaker and Corded Ware, much more with Corded Ware which is their main ancestry, giving rise to the Scandinavians modern
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d WGH (i2a) have been eradicated from Scandinavia. The carriers of the current i1a are more recent mutation wich took place among the EHG!
Very interesting results 👍👌 Closest to modern Estonian. Prove that modern Balts and Scandinavians were among the ancestors of first Ancient Europeans long before Indo Europeans came. Regards 🙌
no , Europe was never a unity
@@HAm-ru8qk I'm speaking from an aspect of oldeness not from an aspect of unity. I know that Europe was always devided.
@@HAm-ru8qk And genetically very diverse especially it's Southern parts
Scandinavians were heavily shaped by the highly succesfull just 4600 years old boom of I1 - why aren.t they as a booming male population linked with a language spread,I mean the R1 is given by the mainstream a personal and not just one
again I1 were´nt the only, actually I1 must have been limited to a isolated area- no other europ. that high numbers over 10 000 0000 have now such a gap in their phylogenetic tree no more than 5000 years have I1 men today with each other....... and 27500 with I2 men
The true Indo Europeans were from the far north. The indo Europeans of the mainstream thought were mixed. The ones who brought the culture and language were not Indian they just mixed with them. Europeans are a mixture of three hominids, and mostly 2 of those.
Decimali !! Bizim Türkiye de Selçuk lu Sultanlarına ait DNA testlerini ne zaman yayımlarsın ? Selçuk lu Sultanlarına ait DNA sonuçları varise yayımlarsan çok teşekkür ederim 🖐️ Selçuk lu Oğuz Türklerine ait Anadolu ya ilk gelenler hakkındada bir çalışma yaparsan çok güzel olur, teşekkür ederim.
Türkmen DNAları veya MA2195 selçukluları yansıtan en güzel örneklerdendir.
Açıklanmadı ki
Interesting his WHG DNA is 20%
EHG + WHG = Gigachad... Gotcha!
“Why yes, I am a Hunter gatherer. How could you tell?”
Use the Gedmatch Ancient Eurasia K6 calculation. There are no pure WHGs, Lithuanians have the most WHG on average, with a 30% autosomal load
Please make Itil Bulgarian DNA analysis.
The eastern hunter gatherer's picture is incorrect.
Day 13 of asking for Ainu results
👌
Maybe he couldnt find any Ainu result yet😢
These videos are great!
There's one thing I constantly find frustrating and strange....every time they show depictions of the R1b (even though they are clearly European and according to their own research and video, most represented by Irish/scottish/Germanic people's today) they show them looking like Arabs and /or with asian features...dark skin/eyes/hair. Always darker than today's R1b population and the 2500-3000 year old descriptions of them by ancient writers who without exception say" tall, robust men with red or blonde hair/ blue or grey eyes.
According to genetic models, the Yamnaya were predominantly olive or olive skinned, brown hair and brown eyes, however they also had paler skin and blonde hair. According to genetic models, the pale skin phenotype spread from the Corded Ware culture 4,500 years ago, before that they were more tan in general, although not all
Sorry but that's incorrect mate... Yes the southern Yamnya were darker, probably looked like Armenian peoples of today(subclade v88) but the Yamnya north of the black sea (i think was s269? the central Aryans were.,as i've already stated, tall ,strong bodied men with red or blonde hair and blue or grey eyes. " Striking in apearance", " The most handsome of peoples,tall with fierce eyes ", " among them you'll find robust men with ruddy skin ,beards mostly red hair some yellow and fierce blue eyes" and so many more contemporary descriptions from Persia, China, Greece and others going back to 2500 bc and beyond! This physical description tracking all the way to the western boarders of China (the Saccae, Massagetae. Tocharians, Yuezi and Wusun to name a few ,migrated from the N.W. Yamnya R1b tribes.
The corded ware popularion (or N,W, Aryans) were Nordic in appearance. Neither were "mostly" darker in their features....this is a falsity. Anyway even if it were as you say, or the northern tribes were a 60/40 or 50/50 split I am simply pointing out the fact they literally NEVER depict them this way. They won't even show two different portraits. Its like representing modern Scottish people ( who are a majority light featured but not all) with an Arab looking fellow. This would be dishonest, false and a misrepresentation of reality.@@user-yt3xd2jl6d
@@celtoscythae8911 The first living humans with the blonde hair mutation were the Ancient North Eurasians and the Eastern Hunter Gatherers. The EHG were pale but Yamnaya and Western Hunter Gatherers were worse, the WHG had only 2 of the 4 light skin mutations which puts them closer to modern Arabs or Indians in their phenotype. The Tarim mummies are not descendants of Yamnaya, they are 80% Ancient Northern Eurasians, they were closer to the Western Siberians and the Native Americans than to the Indo-Europeans of the steppes, it is not even a valid comparison, and they also had melanin even after check the body, they spoke an Indo-European language but it was only because of the influence of Andronovo that they were true Indo-Europeans of Central Asia
Listen to me mate! There has been (since the end of WW2) a singularly frenzied, ignoble, deceptive, subversive, infuriating all out push in progressive academia, globalists and politics. A push to absolutely by any means deny this history to white people. Why this is , may be debarable,But it is happening ! That is 100% fact son Please see it for what is! Painfully obviously so. How is virtually every ancient find of the steppe, europe, south siberia even north africa over turned by, not secondary but 3rd and 4th round studies? All of a sudden there is no such thing as white people? All our ancestors were dark skinnned ? Even though every early study confirms ancient descriptions...
Look around today's academic and political climate. Along with the attack on the white race, anti white racism and everything else and...OH!... look none of these ancient bodies are White after all... hmmm? From Oerzi the iceman to Cheddar man to the Tocharae to the Yamnya and lots more!. Doesn't pass the sniff test my freind! Be better. Be smarter. You're being lead by stick and carrot if you believe a few videos pushed by scheming, lying elite funded progressive cucks...@@user-yt3xd2jl6d
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d How was it that evolving from paleskinned mixing at the end of the ice age with genetics of UA5 (whose descendants today are practically albino) are the skin colour of tropic peoples? Makes no sense. Besides that the indigenous Anatolian and Georgians were mixes of that same ANE people. We also know that they depicted themselves similar to Parthians and Greeks, Anthropologists have found remains of red haired paleskin people without the DNA for it, because in the ICE AGE other DNA and Diet did the job of eliminating melanin from the skin and eyes. And the ANE mixed with Native Americans, Siberians and Tibetans making them taller, paler and more caucasian looking than there East and South Asian cousins. You are using 3 to 4 levels of faulty logic. BTW, the head researcher into CHeddar man admitted in follow up they did not find dark skinned dna, that the reconstruction was based on that of other "Iberian" recons. That it was an assumption. Even though Arab groups mixed with this DNA are some of the palest and caucasian looking in the middle east.
Paternal Lineage
Your haplogroup is:
I
Born between 35 and 28 thousand years ago, haplogroup I represents one of the first peoples of Europe, having several descendant lineages that spread throughout the European territory during the last Ice Age, having its maximum frequency in the Balkans. It is one of the most numerous haplogroups among European males, being the second largest paternal lineage found on the continent (second only to the R lineage). Its I1 branch is related to Nordic Europe, ancestor of Germanic tribes and Vikings, while I2 is strongly related to Neolithic cultures.

Y-chromosomal Adam
160 to 120 thousand years
A: Africa
140 to 90 thousand years
BT: Africa
85 to 60 thousand years
CT: Africa
80 to 60 thousand years
CF: Leaving Africa
75 to 60 thousand years
F: Leaving Africa
62 to 57 thousand years
IJ: Haplogroup parent of I and J
45 to 30 thousand years
I: Eastern Eurasia
35 to 28 thousand years

look like escaped prisoners there
2.1 brazil WHAT ?
Native Americans have an ancestral connection to groups in Central Asia.
That's probably where the first early migrations happened.
2:00 this reconstruction dude looks slightly asiatic for me
they were Asian
@@eloffmusk Not really.. Though his ANE ancestors came from Siberia but it was much earlier times
And the ANE were Europoid
Ancestral whispers make their reconstructions based on their biased views. Their reconstructions often have nothing to do with reality
@@aniketanpelletier82 Hmmmmmmmmm
3:05
"Finnish, Estonian, and Native American"
I don't think this man was strictly from the Baltic countries. But the Finns and Estonians specifically came from Central Asia.
And I think this man has the same origin.
If you look at the X Haplogroup that is found in some Amerindians, it’s most definitely European. Even though they refuse to call it that . They say it’s Amerindian.
Which is understandable, but at the same time they push that there were no Caucasiods in The New World at the time of the Age of Discovery.
Any real anthropologist called it before any tests were done.
Like the Florida Bog Mummies.
There are plenty more, but with Native American Sovereignty Laws, forbidding the desecration of the dead, without their permission they will not allow any further testing.
I'm racking my brain about how Southern Amerindian get into the mix of pre-Indoeuropean populations?
Because you’re looking at it backwards. This genetic sample predates those categories. He shared ancestors to those populations. They aren’t his ancestors.
@@brawndothethirstmutilator9848 thank you. I knew I was missing something.
Todays Baltic people are the population with the lowest input from the neolithic farmer from the Mediterranean and the Caucasus herders and this is probably a big reason they are very close to this ancient individual genetically. Also, Finns and Estonians may have that Asia ancestry but it is very low due the movement of Finnic speakers into a region dominated by European genetics.and along the way to this destination.
do sintashta culture
How could he be indigenous amazonian?
He is not but they have 2.1% common ancestors. Americas people came from asia.
It is ANE DNA, ANE is responsible for the Q haplogroups of Native Americans and R of Indo-Europeans/Indo-Iranians, EHG, Jomon and Amerindians derive from ANE, ANE is a type of Asian but has no relation to East Asians, it is closer to the West Siberians, Amerindians, and Northeast Europeans
The terminology is confusing. Had My heritage said it is haplogroup is Q, C that would be more clear. Otherwise just guesses, guesses...
I'm from the Amazon, his phenotype looks like lot Europeans mixed with Native Amazonians. He's mostly West Eurasian, but his eyes and cheekbones looks kinda East Eurasian.
The same reason why he's got Finnish DNA as well.
They both started out in Central Asia.
In Baltics we would call this man a gypsy. Im myself over 90% baltic at myheritage.
His big jaw reminds me of a Cro-Magnon
Buzz lightyear
They are cromagnons
Amazonian? How they connected to each other that time to have any offspring?
It's a common ancestor who lived in Eurasia. Its saying Ukrainian and Amazonian shares small ancestry long time ago. I'm from Amazon btw.
@@Arthur-ot7id amazing. Thank you for response!
@@Arthur-ot7id It is not the Ukrainians, it is the Finno-Ugric peoples who are closest to the Native Americans, the Sami are the ones with the most Siberian DNA within Europe
@@patrycjakonieczna Ancient North Eurasian, last common ancestor among Native Americans, destitute Siberians, and Europeans. ANE gave rise to EHG, and EHG gave rise to Yamnaya (Proto-Indo-European).
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d It says Indigenous Amazonian not Native Americans as a whole. Finno-Ugric is a language group.
Please make a Dna test of Kamboj caste from Punjab.
Punjabs are %30-40 West Asians, %20-30 Indian. The rest is half by half Caucaus and Anatolians. They are indian mix west asian. I bet they never identify theirself as an indian😂
@@postachamdi6286 you are dumb.
Punjabis have 10-15% west asian or many times no west asian at all.
They have central asian, European and south asian.
Plus, I'm only talking about kamboj caste in Punjab
@@hunar354Punjabis are similiar to each other, they are %80 Indo Aryan. Rest of the minority is european, caucaus, anatolian etc...
If you mean punjabis have central asian dna as turkic, they dont have any connections with turks or arabs. Basically indian mix aryan.
Here are a few punjabi results:
Punjabi (Lahore):
Ancient Ancestral South Indian :38.6%
Zagrosian Neolithic Farmer :35.0%
European Hunter-Gatherer :15.0%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer :5.8%
Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer :5.6%
Punjabi Arain (Pakistan):
Zagrosian Neolithic Farmer :41.2%
Ancient Ancestral South Indian :26.0%
European Hunter-Gatherer :17.4%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer :9.8%
Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer :5.6%
Punjabi Ramgarhia Sikh:
Zagrosian Neolithic Farmer :38.0%
Ancient Ancestral South Indian :28.0%
European Hunter-Gatherer :18.6%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer :9.4%
Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer :6.0%
Punjabi Jatt:
Zagrosian Neolithic Farmer :38.8%
Ancient Ancestral South Indian :25.4%
European Hunter-Gatherer :21.6%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer :9.2%
Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer :5.0%
@@postachamdi6286hey mfkr he's talking about bronze age central asia not recent faak they hot from turks and mungals, Punjabi do not carry any mongoloid dna in most places. so does Tamils unlike you go east where Tibetan and South East mixture is common.
@@Yasa5naIn South Asia only tibetans and some of afghans who mixed with uzbeks,turkmen, mongol carries mongoloid dna. Tamils are even darker than africans how tf can they carry mongoloid dna?
He moggs everyone, even Hernán Drago is sweating
As we can see, he includes native american and finnic-uralic genetics. So, WHG, EHG or both should have included northern east asian or north euroasian genetics who have P1 (altaian) ydna included as relatives of C3, N, O3 northern east asians.
I think both are included, because Q1b ydna is widespread in native americans as descendant of P1 (altaian) ydna. He includes both finnic-uralic (mostly N ydna) and native american (mostly Q1b ydna). His maternal side should be related to uralic-altaic language speakers.
I wonder, why don't they write then haplogroups, instead of showing regions and playing music that really has nothing to do with all those ancient migrations. That would make much more sense who originated where and what related nations are.
@@lba6859 Yes I think same as you. Region do not make sense, humans are not like flowers we can change location. 😀
Also, as far as I understand from language maps vs haplogroup maps comparisons, some haplogroups are mostly related to some languages. These are as much as I could match:
A2 - khoisan, southwest african,
A3, B2 - sudanese, nilo-saharan,
C1b, C2 - east austronesian, polynesian,
C3 - mongolic, tungusic,
C4 - aboriginal australian,
D1, D2, D3 - tibetan, burmanese, ainu,
E1a - niger-kongo, bantu,
E1b1 - kushitic, egyptian, hellenic,
E1b2 - berberic, northwest african,
F - proto indo-european, harappa indian,
G1, C1a - european early farmer,
G2 - georgian, south caucasian, arian,
H - south indian,
I1 - germanic, nordic, anglic,
I2 - slavic, balkanic, ukrainian,
J1 - arabic, hebrew, akkadian,
J2 - grecoroman, persian, bactrian,
K1, K2a, L, T - vedic, sanskrit, west indian,
K2b - west austronesian, austroasiatic,
M, S - papuan, sundaland,
N - uralic, finnic, samoyedic,
O - thai-kadai, southeast asian,
O1, O2 - austroasiatic, chinese, sinitic,
O3 - koreanic, japonic,
P - aeta, negritos (philippinese),
P1 - altaic, tuvan, nivkh, siberian,
Q1a - ket, yeniseian,
Q1b - native american,
R, R1 - uyghur turkic, mal'ta buret culture,
R1a - hunnic, turkic, ugric, oghur/oghuz,
R1b - saka/scythian, tyrrhenian, vasconic,
R2 - tamil, dravidian, bengali, sri lankan...
troll
@@Yasa5na A0 was located in west africa. Then, A0 mutated to A1, B0 and then A2, B1 during their migration to southwest africa and have spoken khoisan language.
A2, B1 mutated to A3, B2, CT during their migration to central africa and have spoken nilo-saharan language.
CT mutated to CF and DE and DE separated in east africa. E mutated to E1 in Kenya, D mutated to D1 during their migration to tibet region.
D1 migrated to souteast asia and mutated to D2 and have spoken burmanese and andamanese languages together with O2 sinitic language speakers.
D2 migrated to northern east asia and mutated to D3 speaking ainu language.
E1 has separated to E1a as speaking niger-congo, bantu languages. E1b1 separated to northeast africa as speaking kushitic, egyptian languages. E1b1 migrated to south balkans and assimilated to grecoroman language.
E1b1 mutated to E1b2 during their migration to northwest africa and have spoken berberic language.
CF separated in northwest india, C mutated to C1. F mutated to G, H, I, J, K. C1, G mutated to C1a, G1 during their migration to caucasia and europe as european early farmers.
C1b mutated to C2 during their migration to southeast asia and have spoken east austronesian, polynesian languages.
C2 mutated to C3 during their migration to northeast asia and changed to mongolic, tungusic languages after they mixed with P1 altaic language speakers.
C2 also mutated to C4 during their migration to australia and have spoken aboriginal languages.
H settled to south india and have spoken proto indian languages. I settled to central europe and have spoken proto european languages.
I separated to I1 and I2 in central europe. I1 migrated to north europe and have spoken germanic, nordic languages.
I2 migrated to balkans and ukraine and have spoken slavic languages. Then I2 have mixed with R1a in euroasia.
J separated to J1 and J2 in southwest arabia. J1 spread into all arabian peninsula and middle east and assimilated to semitic languages.
J2 spread to mesopotamia, anatolia and west asia and have spoken grecoroman and persian languages.
K mutated to K1 and then K2a, L and have spoken sanskrit languages. L mutated to T in southwest asia.
Some K1 mutated to K2b during their migration to southeast asia and have spoken west austronesian, austroasiatic languages.
K2b mutated to M, N, O, P in southeast asia. M migrated to papua and mutated to S. M, S have spoken papuan languages.
N migrated to northern east asia together with C2, O2, P and they have mutated to C3, N1, O3, P1 in northern east asia and have spoken uralic, altaic languages.
N1 mutated to N2, N3 during their migration to north asia and have spoken uralic, finnic, samoyedic languages.
O settled to thailand and have spoken thai-kadai languages. O mutated to O1, O2 in vietnam, south china and west austronesia and have spoken west austronesian languages. Some of O2 assimilated to sinitic (sinotibetan) languages in east asia.
P mutated to P1 in philippines and then migrated to north euroasia, siberia and have spoken altaic languages.
O2 migrated to northern east asia and mutated to O3. They have spoken proto uralic and altaic languages together with C3, N1, O3, P1.
P1 mutated to Q and R in siberia. Q mutated to Q1a in yenisei region and have spoken ket, yeniseian languages.
Then, Q1a mutated to Q1b during their migration to americas together with C3 and R. They have spoken in americas native american, nadene/atabasq languages.
Most R have remained in south siberia and have spoken uyghur turkic, ugric (oghur/oghuz) languages. R mutated to R1 and R1a during their migration to central asia and euroasia.
Some R1a migrated to euroasia and mixed with I2 slavic ostrogoths and assimilated to northern slavic language.
Some R1a migrated to north india and mixed with L, T sanskrit and H south indians and assimilated to indian languages. They were speaking a language like burushaski hunza.
Some R1a mutated to R1b during their migration to mesopotamia and mixed with persian, bactrian J2 and akkadian J1. They were speaking sumerian, elamite agglutinative languages.
Some R1b spread to anatolia, caucasia and euroasia and mixed with J2 grecoromans, persians, G2 south caucasian arians. They partly assimilated to indoeuropean languages. They are also speaking north caucasian avar andic, nakh, lezgic and balkar, bashkir turkic languages.
Some R1b migrated to central europe and north italy and have invented latin languages after they mixed with J2 grecoromans. They were speaking tyrrhenian, raetic, etruscan languages.
Some R1b migrated to west europe and have spoken vasconic languages. They assimilated to germanic, nordic languages partly after they mixed with I1 germanic visigoths. Basq still speak agglutinative vasconic language.
R2 have also spearated from R1 in central asia and migrated to south india. They were mostly speaking tamil, dravidian but converted partly to south indian language.
@@serkankinden5150 Thank you very much. Even though you made some generic classification of haplogroups, but it is clear and some systemisation, at least I see some logic in it. I mean at least it gives some connection and relation of languages/ethnicities with possible genetic relations. Now when I look at the maps of my heritage, I get confused really. Like in this case - possible ancestor of Ukrainians having connection with Amazonia, where first thing that comes to people's would be that what connections there could be! Or for example, inserting Finland and Ireland for most of North Europeans and Turkic nations. I can understand that they mean haplogroups N and I, however I would think that most people would be confused. Thanks a lot!
Musique look like kid cudy
1:16
He must have been from an earlier migration. Before the Indo-Europeans.
Next hoabinhian please
I never really trust ancestral whispers reconstructions, they aren't very accurate, but he certainly cranks them out fast.
How worthy are you test:
A class: Native American, Indigenous Northeast Asian, Ugric people.
B class: Oceanic (Except indonesia and filipino), Turkic people, Mongols, Japan&Korean
C class: Whole Europe except balkans and greece. China
D class: Anatolia and neighboring populations.
E class: Africans, Indonesians and filipinos,
F class: Indian and relatives such as afghan, pakistani, punjab, pashtun etc...
What the fuck are you talking about
Why is China with Europe?
Wtf is even that
According to human development, populations contributions to advancements in science, art, etc, and IQ this tier list doesn’t hold true in the least 😂
The 2ndin the photo is the reconstruction of a hunter not belonging to I-dna but to C-dna!!!
This guy is similar in appearance to contemporary Croatian boxer Filip Hrgović, only Hrgović is some 20 cm taller. LOL
Wow, the I group was more handsome. lol
Interesting no Eastern Europe
Both Baltic and Finnish is the most EHG rich and least Farmer ethnicity on MH database so it combination gives the closest to Dnieper Donetsk DNA make up.
@@barguttobed Baltic and Finnish is the most Eastern European you can get. Ancestors of these populations live here way before Slavs.
he looks like the old pictures of unadmixed AINU
Fathers of baltic populations and finland's automosamal granfathers.
İt's interesting that Fin male indivuals mostly haplogroup N
Ash stump. that the Urals were not originally European in appearance
The Baltics speak Indo-European and Uralic languages, Estonian is considered Uralic
Pratically paleo european males got čûckəd by finno ugric males its not that interesting lol 😭
@@k1r4z.rather paleo european females? Otherwise it’s sus..
@@barguttobed but their y dna change d
They be looking like Bulgarians or Tatars
Vedic Kshatriyas (R1a1a/R1a1) have conquered all Northern races.
Read more 👉Founder & kings of all European, Mediterranean, C.Asian, Steppe, SE Asian nations are Bharath's Vedic/Arya warrior caste R1a1aY/R1a1Y (Kshatriyas), this marker didn't exist in Steppe to Europe before 1k BCs. In 2k BCs Aryas' Bharath was upto Anatolia, Mittani-Hatti-Hari deities are purely RgVedic. Only Bharath, Mesopotamia, Ezypt nations existed then. In 1k BCs Mede, Persia, Greco-Roman, Saka, TochaArya nations are fragmentation & extension of Aryas. After 5th c. Aryas founded nations in Europe. Goth, Norse are CimmeArya+freshly arrived Aryas. In 1k BCs CimmeArya, Saka, Sauromata, Alani, Roxolani, TochaArya, Kushan, Wushun, Xiangno, Khotan Aryas have conquered Northern hemisphere+China while MHH descents have conquered Greece Italy. Only Aryas can bring IE language, chariot, Mitra, the thunder God, astronomy, astrology, funerary cremation in Greece, Italy. Aryas in west have turned blonde/white breeding with white women (Yamnyan Celt R1bY, Sintashtan Venedi R1aY) like brown Jews have turned blonde. Europe's literature in 10th c., Greek literature in 8th c BC., Iran's literature in 10th c BC., RgVeda is the oldest of all. Aryas from Eastern India have founded nations in China enroute Burma-Yunnan & SE Asia too, took chariot, Dishitan, the great flood mythology.
Aryavart's westward, northward conquest 👉2k BCs upto Anatolia, Mittani-Hatti-Hari, RgVedic Indra, Mitra, Nasatya, Varuna, Hari noted by Ezypt. 1k BCs >Greece, Rome, RV Elina, Dyus (Zeus), Mitra. 👉 900BC RV Parsu >Persia. 550BC upto> Greece, Balkan, Ezypt. 👉Since 750BC whites (Yamnyan Celt R1b, Sintashtan Veneti R1a), C.Asian, G.Steppe tribals are won by CimmeArya, Saka, Sauromata, Alani, Raslani, Kushan, Wushun, Xiangnu. 👉750BCs CimmeArya, Saka upto S.Russia, Ukraine, Balkan. 👉300-100BC Sauromata, Alani >Ukraine, Russia >100BC British-Irish isles, RV Danu. 👉 300BC-300CE Khotan, TochaArya from Gangetic plains won Tibet, Turk, Mongol tribals. 👉250BC Parthian won Persia, Mada, M.East, Anatolia. 👉Mittani sons Roman won Europe (whites) in 50BC. 👉150CE-500 Goth, Norse won Europe from Gangetic plains. 👉350CE Xiangnu, Khotan sons Hun won 1/2 Europe. 👉400CE Alanis >Spain raiding Greece, Italy. 👉150CE during Indo-Roman trade Aryavart's Aryas landed in Arabia, won M.East, Iran, Ezypt >Spain. 👉Khotan, TochaArya in Khazar, Avar, Turk, Mongol won whites, M.East, Iran in 6th-13th c. R1a1a/R1a1 is the conqueror, Indra worshipping Mittanis are the first to win great Mesopotamia.
Post 300bc emigrated Kshatriyas Khotan Tocharian Goth Norse from Gangetic plains are Kings of Turk, Mongol & Europe's tribals. They bear Kshatriyas' paternal DNA marker R1a1.
++++++++
Whites (Celt, Venedi) aren't IE/Arya, no evidence of native language, nation. Let alone riding chariot, never rode horse. Roman labelled them subhum@n. IBN Fadlan described yellow haired are f!lthiest. Till 10th c. custom of r@ping, hum@n s@crifice. Whites aren't martial race but they @nnihilate weakers, they've @nnihilated native Euros. Roman, Saka, Sauromata, Hun could do the same with whites but didn't. In last 1k years Kshatriyas in west assimilating with whites carried out gen0cides of American, African, Asian, Australian. Hiroshima nuking, WW1/2. British rulers who are R1a1a/R1a1Y l00ted $45 tril. alone from India & feeding whites leaving over 10 mil. starved to death. Vedic civilization is destroyed by her own children. Kshatriyas at home lost due to long imbedded nonviolence ethics from Buddhism, Jainism, Vaishnavism & decay in racial purity.
++++++++
Stark difference in civilization confirms west is multiracial. Celt, Vened are only whites who've changed others' physiognomy giving their women while their whiteness is reduced by others. Browns were Arya from India, Phonecian-Etruscan-Jews from Middle East. Negroids from Sahara. C.Asian, native Euros, Gypsies, Mongoloids too. Kshatriyas were massive in height & girth, dark haired/eyed, brown skinned (see earliest images of Greco-Roman, Alexander TG, 6th c. Byzantine emperor with Vandals, Persian, Saka, TochaArya, Kushan, Khotan, Xiangno).
++++++++
Kshatriyas are founder of Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism. Kshatriya Buddha, Mahavira, Ashoka TG, Kurus TG are the greats no other race could give birth. Abrahamic religions are existing because Kurus TG saved Judaism, he's the only non-Jews regarded "messiah". Literature of all civiliations can't reach 1/4 of Vedic. RgVeda is the oldest IE literature. 45% Earth's population speak Arya languages. Aryas who surpass even great Mesopotamian, Ezyptian can't originate from civilizationless Steppe or can have less than Sumerian, Ezyptian. Oldest chariot found in "Sinauli" India. Oldest city "Rakhigarhi". None ever rode Chariot in Steppe. Vedics=Aryas=IE.
+++++++
Will Durant, American historian.
"India was the motherland of our race, and Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages: she was the mother of our philosophy; mother, through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics; mother, through the Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity; mother, through the village community, of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all."
William James, American Author "From the Vedas, we learn a practical art of surgery, medicine, music, house building under which mechanized art is included. They are encyclopedia of every aspect of life, culture, religion, science, ethics, law,
cosmology and meteorology"
Cope mate... Least you except R1a now. Where's the H spread to Europe dude.. You can't just change the migration routes around to fit your own personal bias.
@@shaolindreams Common sense test for wh!tes 👇
Romans met all races, found the w0rst in the North, literally described $ubhum@n. 10th c. Arabs (IBN Fadlan) met all races, found the filth!est in Europe. Now you claim races lived in $@v@gery to that extent as late as 10th c. are progenitors of Europe's kings? Conquered Greece, Italy? Colonised all continents???
@@shaolindreams if North races are martial why there was no monarchy/nation before 6th c.?
@@saumensingh9482 I would like to answer you but i don't understand what you are even asking... Anyways back to the topic... watch?v=TdCaEXj2KeI
Yet, there is no Indian in Europeans, and a whole lot of Europeans in Indians.
We know they are foreign men that mated with indigenous women, the patriarchal system is European.
Turkic people rule
this whole concept of Indo European is nonsense, to speak of pre- if this was the other way around
EEF had a largely uniform language - no wonder since they uniformly bred and spread west and east
R1 with their tribal languages did only widen the gap and now do speak all sorts of lingua
ENF were over 50% HV'JT whose split may began 15000 bp who 5000 y ago covered all areas where R1 settled down and by available data still are majority everywhere between Iberia and Afghan mountain-range but not further
I2 and I1 were just as succesfully as were R1a and R1b - no need to give linguistic identity to the various R1 tribes - while depriving I2 and I1 of any concious selfidentificated spread
@@HAm-ru8qkare u andhbhakt?
no , what´s wrong to assume and this kind of view isn´t even Feminism
The linage R1 just as R2 belong to is a Intercontinental - without any doubt the most mobile & widest range since R & Q deserve to be grouped in 1... just as E1b1a and E1b1b are - despite older split off than GHIJK
such a wide spanned range was achived already by 10 000 bp * Sardinia was reached by R1b
eastern Europe´s watersheds were full of them .I think it would be only politically motivated to proclaim where exactly began success-story of M269 derived R1b with a TMRCA of 6400 bp in Yfull database.
I am the last one who would take Yfull´s tree for granted, atleast they don´t use constructs like Yamnaya ancestry, which only make look R1 like foreigners , while in fact R1 very well could have been first explorers on boats upstreaming from the Aral Sea or any existing Arctic Ice dammed fresh water overflowing south down to the Mediterranean untilll 10 000bp.
sure is this Fantasy ....but traveling in boats is real anyday , look Greenland.
India and Europe can also be linked with the U women ,who may have laid common phenotypes - foundation laid the ENF + their lexics languages....and R1 men did once only introduce U4 , are now themself much rather of ENF mitohondrial wherever this dispute goes on and somehow are upset when they´re linked with Q, ,,,or are they?