ifi GO Pod vs. FiiO UTWS5 Wireless IEM Adapter Comparison Review
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 07. 2024
- Get 10% off a wide array of items and brands from Audio46 by using code CHRIS10 at checkout. Code may not be applicable to all brands and items. If you're having trouble applying the code, shoot Audio46 an email at support@audio46.com and they'll be able to help you out.
Link to order the ifi GO Pod from Audio46: rb.gy/dv72h
Link to order the FiiO UTWS5 from Audio46: rb.gy/a29to
Taking a look at ifi's new wireless IEM adapter, the GO Pod. Comparing it to the UTWS5 from FiiO and asking: why is it that much more expensive? Stick around to hear why.
Connect with us:
==================================
LinkedIn: / majorhifi
Reddit: / majorhifi
Twitter: / majorhifi
Instagram: / majorhifi
Facebook: / majorhifi
================================== - Věda a technologie
I have both and this is my analysis...
I'm a mailman and I have been using Fiio UTWS5 for past year with my $6,000 UM Fabled Sound IEM...with Google 6pro, now Samsung S23 ultra (apple music, youtube broadcast, phonecalls). Both phones only support aptx 44/16 sound quality (not adaptive or HD).
This little gem is fantastic in terms of Sounds Quality. The Fiio app is great, I can map the button layout, EQ, etc...
Fiio negative includes: 5hr battery, but charges to 100% in about 50min. The mic is pretty terrible for phone calls since I find myself shouting for the other person to hear me.
When I heard the announcement that ifi Go Pod supports LDAC, better amp, mic. I preorder it and received it last week.
First, the good stuffs: Go Pod battery lasts 7 hours. Much better mic. LDAC 990k is fantastic.
I am returning it because...
There is no app to control this device. Ifi Go Pod claim to have higher power output than Fiio, wrong. With go pod, I have to turn up volume to 90% to have the same effect as the fiio where I listen at about 70%.
LDAC 990k is nice but in order to get it, you have to go into developer settings everytime to change it to LDAC990k everytime you connect the device.
Charging is wonky: once placing it the charging case, it does not always charging.
After a week of usage, I see the charging metal contact ifi is starting to rust. Yes, I am serious.
Also when the unit is inside the charger and not charging, there is no way to turn off the unit other than go into settings and disconnect.
Ifi Go Pod shell is made of cheap plastic and after a week, there is a huge crack. I think it's from me trying to press it down to make sure it's charging.
The physical button on the Fiio is so much nicer than the idiotic touch sensitive button on the go pod.
I can't wait for Fiio to release their next gen hook. I want LDAC so badly for my pricey IEM and returning this ifi device. Total waste of time imo.
thanks. this was very helpful and I am skipping the ifi go pod for sure to wait for other products which are bound to compete with it in the next several months at hopefully a cheaper price. But even if not, the issues with the ifi go pod are not acceptable for the price. too fragile and unreliable for the price.
Now its ldac supported
@@AbalMarius which one is ldac supported now? UTWS5?
@@Viewer13128 no ldac for fiio with current 1.5 firmware.
There is a Bluetooth codec changer app for android that takes away all your downsides.
Thank You Chris for your thoughtful and informative IEM Adapter review. Just what I was after 😊
Would it be possible to use the Go Pod with not hard to drive over Ears when using a MMCX/2 pin to 3.5mm adapter?
Thanks, great review!
only addition i would suggest would be talking about comfort, weight, long periods of wear vs short.
Just received my IFI Go Pods yesterday with a set of Meze Advars. I have not yet used them, trying to get a feel for the IEMs first. I am going to try them as you suggest with all my higher end IEMs just to see how they sound. If they do have a little treble bump maybe a warmer set will work best - options - fun! Thanks for the comparison
can you share your findings after 10 days with them now?
can u tell me a bit about the mic quality between the 2?
When You Buy go pod do they come with BOTH MMCX AND .78adaptors? Or do You have to choose?
You dont need to buy 2 fiio for the connections,there are pretty fine cheap adapters for mmcx or 2pin!
Exactly. What an argument 😂
100% agree. btw which adapters are nice?
Oeaudio are awesome
When Z reviewed with pride FIIO stuff he linked buying options for the adaptors. 400 USD is insane. OKok the have LDAC and FIIO APTX but the difference in audio is NO MORE than 10 % better at most if not less . It SHOULD lower price with time. And besides it is so chunkier ifi....
@@leonardopapantoniou4227 he give other reasonably options but in the meantime he still selling those fiios too!!!
3:54 No you don't need 2 units, you just need an angled mmcx to 2 pin and vice versa, costs about 30 bucks, like the OE ones
I use one with the mmcx version of UTWS5 and works perfectly fit wise
10:00 Different fit might also be the culprit, if the iem nozzle is pointed at a different angle inside the ear, it will reflect differently in your ear canal, boosting certain frequencies.
I've definitely had that happen with different cables, that had different/ longer connectors.
Im sorry asking out of the topic, but can you recommend me IEM-bluetooth module for me like AZ09 Pro, CCA BTX, or something else? Especially from the durability and water/sweatproof aspect
Ill be grateful if you can help me 🙏😅
Hope the ifi has better qc than my fiio which had to ho back due to a battery that refused to charge and the replacement still won't give anywhere near the 30hrs between charges.
Do these adpters supports the Fidelity+ MMCX solution?
they make mmcx to 2pin adapters
Nice review on these 2 bt, hook adapters....That is alot of cheddar for an adapter....I was lucky!! Now!! It's not the earhook design, but it's a wireless, bt adapter, that has a wireless connection....I bought the ,revonext b02 adapter, / sbc/ aac codecs, which it works fantastic...only paid 10 bucks for it, Also have tbe fiio btr dac / amp, which works nice ...Anywho!! Nice review on both of these ,earhook design bt adapterz....
Good day. A review of the Penon 10th anniversary would be greatly appreciated! Regards. WvS
The UTWS5 v.2 does support a samplerate of 96kHZ and a bit depth of max. 36 bit by using LDAC oder LHDC V3. Needs the newest Fiio-firmeware v1.74 and a LDAC/LHDC supported phone or player.
I'd rather go wired with say 7hz 71 dongle which cost 3-4x less the price of go pod. From your review 7hz 71 significantly sounds better than either of the BT adapter reviewed here.
Hallo Sir, But is "FIIO UTWS5 V2.0" strong enough to drive/(use) the earphone planer???
Utws5 actually has adapters so you would just need the adapter for which ever connection that you have opposite of the w5
3:46 - you can just buy a tiny mmcx to 2pin or the opposite
Hi, LDAC is lossy. Thanks for the video.
ifi go pod is like trn bt modules chi-fi and fiiO is like kz az09
Fiio Utws 5 has now ldac.
I hate when reviewers hear stuff I can't hear. I have the fiio utws5 and a mojo 2 and some other great dac amps dongle. And with aptx adaptive enabled on the fiio and listening to lossless apple music I'll say the the mojo 2 sounds slightly better (with a careful ear). Most people will not tell a difference though (because they are not experienced with premium sounding headphones and constantly doing AB comparisons).
So if you say the ifi sounds significantly better than the fiio then that means it sounds significantly better than the mojo 2 (which I will bet is untrue).
I do not hear the digital compressed sound you are talking about. It sounds natural and identical to a wired setup.
Maybe your source is already lossy (like Spotify or aac apple music). Lossy to bt conversation (another lossy codec) is a significant difference (and noticeable degrade) from lossless to bt conversation (no human can tell the difference).
Im running the newest fiio update (has full eq) and possibly improves the sq.
I have other ifi dacs and none of them sound better (slightly different though) than the fiio (unless you prefer the warmer color they add to the sound).
Sure for Lossless?
Somebody in my community said thats so Bullxx...
Dunno whats right tho...
Next step is adding ANC.. FIIO ARE YOU LISTENING????
Are we suggesting people buy a whole 2nd unit instead of a two pin adapter? 🤔😳🤦🏽♂️
Spend $400 to make your $15 IEM sound even worst? Why didn't I think of that?
Thanks for the review and video, it definitely helped me.
Just one thing: your voice is a little bit hard to listen, the info was interesting but probably the things like “Amm” “yeah” the pause talk, I believe if you make little changes your channel can be actually pretty good.
Or buy an mmcx -> 2 pin adaptor for $10
Fiio UTWS5 have ldac now
Really?
@@leonardopapantoniou4227 yepp just search or check out head-fi or just utws5 firmware update section
Codecs are irrelevant
If you are listening to hi res or lossless music that is streamed to lossy (aptx, aac, or even sbc) then no human can tell the difference if they did a blind test.
Better Codecs seem to give people a placebo effect.
I would advice to not talk about Codecs in detail (and relate them to any difference in sound quality). Nor think about Codecs when you are doing critical listening. I can name many tws sets with inferior Codecs that sound better than sets with superior Codecs.
Difference in sound quality has nothing to with Codecs but other factors.
What about long term comfort? I heard the ifi wasn't comfortable in long term cases.
What about max volume? Which one gets louder?
Ronan? There are a billion iems that sound better and are well known. Why not use something more well known?
Lastly by default LDAC is worst than aptx because the bit rate is about 330kbps. You have to enable developer options and choose optimized for audio (990kbps). Aptx has significantly less lag as well.
I can hear the difference when using aptx then switch to aptx adaptive. Aptx adaptive is bettter
@@miwanrochman9243 We all can hear a difference (even me) when initially switching Codecs the 1st few times. But when streaming from lossless file to a lossy bt codec (not lossy to lossy) and doing a random blind test (double blind test) where your partner flips a coin and switches the codec according to the flip (heads is codec 1 and tails is codec 2) then we all fail statistically. Unless for some odd reason one codec plays significantly louder than another. Then it's then obvious.
Apt is supposedly better than 256kbps acc.
From hundreds of tests, no human has successfully ABX (double blind test) a 256kbps aac file converted from a lossless file from the original lossless file.
Now if you stream acc (apple music) or mp3 (Spotify) over to Bluetooth (acc BT or aptx BT) then some of us (not a lot) can successfully ABX the files. That's because the degradation going from lossy to lossy is significantly greater than going from lossless to lossy.
@@h1a8 For me whichever codec can deliver under 100ms latency is a winner and that happened to be AptX adaptive.
man you are trying too hard to shill for the go pod
Why isn't anyone comparing the gopod to Shures wireless adapters?
Don't get those. I have them and the fiio is miles better. The biggest difference is the volume (much higher on the fiio). The shure is too quiet and is a deal breaker if you are using not so efficient iems.