Today, I came across Keynsham Police Station and decided to put my Drone up, but two police officers came up to me to find out if I was doing anything wrong!
Imagine having to explain to your doctor how to do a operation? Or a mechanic how to fix your car? One of the only professions where you can know absolutely nothing about your job and still have one...is policing
@@petes1926To be fair, drones are kind of out there in the deep end of the murky waters of law. But the disturbing thing is that they don't know the basics either, like trespassing, freedom of expression, "anti-social behavior", assault, criminal damage, section 43 of the terrorism act and a bunch of other laws they misunderstand and misuse.
They so wanted to get you on something and instruct you on things they don't have a clue about.... They just can't stop themselves. Their mental battery ran out ages ago.
To all police officers watching ,both officers should be charged with section 26 of the criminal justice act. And lose their jobs. This would stop these tyrants.
They should, but will not. They are always protected from their incompetence by their dubious leaders. If and when they are held properly accountable, the rest of their gang will think twice. Meanwhile, crimes go unsolved all over the country.
@MikeEves So you have been gathering information and been afforded information that could be used in Threats and criminal activitiy towards Police officers I have reported this post and will be passing it on to the relevant authorities ....
"Confiscate your drone". That would be attempted theft wouldn't it constable? That's crime isn't it constable, you know the things YOU'RE supposed to deal with but can't be arsed....
Police can't confiscate property. That is theft. What they can do is collect evidence. So they would need to charge someone first, then the can hold property.
I've got a theory. If police concentrated more on whether an actual crime is being committed rather than the 'personal' cars, police getting followed lines, and trying to just get personal details there might be a very slim chance of some actual crime busting police work taking place? Great video pal 👏 👍
Sadly, there has never been any real incentive for the Police to actually prevent, detect or reduce crime as it does them out of the justification for their existence and assigned budgets. They make a show of it every now and again for the gullible of course, but in the meantime concentrate on highlighting any tiny "success", downplaying failures and protecting themselves and their perceived place in society.
“Ex cop and now police staff.” Wonder if that’s the same Sergeant Andy Bradshaw that pushed and injured Mr Andrew Hughes in 2015 causing life changing head injuries.
Bristol Live article after Andrew Hughes took the case for compensation to High Court “The Independent Police Complaints Commission are said in the writ to have investigated the allegations and to have found there was enough evidence to refer Sgt Bradshaw for possible prosecution for assault causing grievous bodily harm, and that he could be dismissed for gross misconduct. But the Crown Prosecution Service decided it was not in the public interest to prosecute Sgt Bradshaw, as he would face an unacceptable risk of suicide. And a misconduct panel ruled he had not breached police standards says the writ.”
Two immediate flashbacks to Focus Pocus. 1. Have you got a flying over the car park licence and 2. Doesn't that place look just like Lincoln with the two junior bobbies- thus proving age and experience add nothing to knowledge in these chaps case!
@@rokketron just checking you know GOAT means greatest of all time. Hes super calm, super knowledgeable, quick witted and a great photographer. All subjective of course but my favourite auditor.
They all lie as part of their job to entrap suspects to get convictions. They are out to "get" people. Anyone who thinks they're our protectors are severely mistaken. Awful people they are.
The little cop who didn't do too much talking was absolutely gutted by Auditing Britain in one of his audits about a year ago. I think he may have learned his lesson.
More suspicious some dude wandering around a police building with an open laptop and a tight T shirt. 1st copper brilliant and interested and learned something. Little weasle copper was just relentless to try and do you for something and just stomped off when he couldn't getcha. A great audit 👍🏻
A desk jockey who pretended to be a policeman .He should be very aware that the public are entitled to his identity if he approaches and engages in an official manner . requesting details when a crime has not been committed good job they confined him to desk duties isn't it as he looked real sketchy. thin blue line tag and his face pulling sidekick were a pair of wet weekends weren't they Good Viddy Big up Pure Audits.
The trouble with the 2021 act is that the police can't read it properly, yet alone understand it. Your patience, once again, shines through especially when reading through the act with them. I'd have been rude! Amazing that they tried to tell you you were breaking the law, yet wanted a copy "for later". They still don't get the "creating an offence" bit and I'm sure many more will suffer when they get it wrong.
The police were actually correct, well mostly !. Most people only read schedule 8 of the Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Act 2021 but neglect to read schedule 9. In this case schedule 9, part 2 and schedule 9, part 8 (1)
So . . . . flying a drone over police car parks is . . . ? . . absolutely allowed. But, 'they' just don't like it. . . . "But, you've done nothing wrong - have you?" said PC Calloway . . . . . . 17:27: " I want that back, though".😆😆😂 Excellent education . . and recycling !!. . . . and 19:57: "would you like to take a picture of that?" - ". . .yeh, I will, there's no harm in it is there?" replies Calloway - was just the icing on the cake !! Once again, a smooth and faultless performance, which will take you into this year's final. Great team effort with the viewers. PA - your videos get better and better - a delight to behold.
Do British coppers ever watch CZcams?. They'll learn more about the law than what they are taught in the academy. It may save their job in the future. Watching from Mexico.
They don't need to know about the law or what it stands for. Anything illegal (and there is lots of it) by them, is swept under the carpet and excused, take Bradshaw for one.
"Please dont film private plate as police are attacked, i can think of one incident many many years ago"........... Many many yaers ago ? Its not really a problem then is it
I would have asked the grumpy officer if he'd like to apologise for his threat to confiscate the drone - so that we can shake hands, put it behind us, and part on good terms. They usually won't. The problem I have with it is that if you were not so clued up, you may have been coerced by his statements made under 'colour of authority' I now carry a statement of fees to hand out. Taking my drone will cost them 250 + 80 per day (or any part thereof) - and they accept by taking the drone without lawful authority. It's on a 30 day account, with 8% statutory interest (over the BoE base rate) for any fees still outstanding after that time. Obviously, should they turn out to HAVE lawful authority, they have nothing at all to worry about - the fees only apply where they DON'T have such authority. Then, just be very willing to comply with the demand on that commercial basis. It's amazing how quickly the police start to reconsider when you set up a fee schedule ; ) 330 quid just for taking your drone to check the ID. And it's commercial, so no need to prove any wrongdoing... they have to provide a defence against the commercial contract. There's no reason you cannot charge the full value of the drone, if they hold it - as you'd have to replace it in order to continue your lawful work. Suddenly they get really antsy - and the more happy you are for them to avail themselves of your 'services' - the more antsy they get ; ) Some coppers may be dumb as a bag of rocks, but they can still smell a trap being set XD
Have to ve fair that dark haired copper was relatively polite all the way through although he did say a couple of silly things he respectfully took the legislation from you to read rather than just shutting you down like other would. He didnt let his ego get the best of him.
It's wild that in every one of these encounters they walk away looking like idiots but they insist on keeping on confronting the auditors. Are they really incapable of understanding that they are the story and If they would just leave them alone this would stop?
To any Police watching.....how much law are you taught regarding drones...... Time and time again the member of the public has to educate you regarding the law/ rules
The cop that made the threat to confiscate was a right tool and shouldn't have a badge. The taller officer that was willing to have a civil conversation was pretty decent.
LOL. The little thug tyrant/light hair, didn't like being told he was mistaken right from the beginning. He was just itching to take your drone just to punish you for daring to question him. This is why the police are hated.
No wonder your battery went flat mate, he was trying to cover what he thought was ANY means possible concerning your drone. I notice he cropped info where it ended with if they suspect a crime has been commited, to read you a lot of tosh Confiscate your drone - they couldn't confiscate kids sweets !! 🤣🤣
I’m happy to criticise poor policing when I see it, so I think it’s only fair to equally acknowledge good policing. The young officer on the right was doing everything correctly - had a good demeanour, was respectful and was happy to explore the rules with you. The other officer showed a little more of that attitude we have become accustomed to, which was a shame. I’ve been watching auditing videos for years, and on reflection to what we would have seen a few years ago, this was a fairly good interaction. 👍
Reminded me , 76, of Radio Luxembourg donkeys years ago only the old ones will know. In the 1950's and 1960's Keynsham became a household name due to the radio ads of Horace Batchelor, the self-styled 'football pools king'.
Great video and drone views. 👍⭐⭐⭐ In 2011 announced multiple new police centres to be constructed with Keynsham constructed 2014 with 48 custody suites. The Miller Construction was contractor for the four station project at £129 million. A blog from August 2014 includes numerous photos of the building interior and custody suites. Prior to the former station demolition 2019-2020, Council claimed they were unaware property guardians (legal squatters) were staying in the former police station. 🤔Unaware of squatters but always investigate drones in public.
Not surprising.that police staff guy heard you coming with those radar ears. And still those cops trying to ID you , you did a great job standing your ground, cops must learn they can't get away with bullying people who are not breaking any laws
Looked it up, there is an active sergeant Andy Bradshaw on Linkdin, I reckon dumbo was the idiot sergeant on the radio. Side note. There is also a sergeant Andy Bradshaw that assaulted a drunk man in the cells in 2015 at Keynsham station. IOPC found evidence of an assault but CPS refused to prosecute… if it’s the same Andy Bradshaw Pure audits found a real wrongun.
No offences need to have been committed for the cops to get the Operators details ... BUT ... they DO need to cite the correct statute / act and sections ( see below ) in order to be able to invoke the powers conferred by those cited statutes and sections. - - - *Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Act 2021 - Schedule 9* Section *ONE* : " Provision by remote pilots of *EVIDENCE OF COMPETENCY* " - ( The only competency requirement for Sub 250g Cat A1 drones is that you (quote) " read the User Manual " ) - - - Section *TWO* : " Provision by remote pilots of *INFORMATION ABOUT UAS OPERATORS* " ( Identity of the registered Operator ) (2) The constable may require P to provide such information as the constable considers reasonable as to the identity of - (a) the person or persons who are or were the UAS operator for the flight, or (b) the person or persons who made the unmanned aircraft available for use by P - - - Section *THREE* : " Provision by UAS operators of *EVIDENCE OF REGISTRATION* " - ( Is it required to be registered for an Operator ID and, if so, does it have one correctly displayed as required ? ) (2) The constable may require P to provide such evidence as the constable considers reasonable of P's compliance, as respects the unmanned aircraft and the flight, with a relevant registration requirement. - - - Section *EIGHT* : " Power to inspect unmanned aircraft in connection with other powers " (1) A constable may require a person in possession of an unmanned aircraft to allow the constable to inspect it if the constable considers that the inspection would assist the constable in deciding whether a power conferred by any of paragraphs 1 to 7 is exercisable.
While you cannot expect all police to know all legislation, their first duty is to investigate if a law has been broken. PC 816 you contact the police authority that understands drone laws that is why we have police drone officers, not some "colleague" trying to flick through the paperwork. Remember the legal term "ignorantia juris non excusat" that goes not just to members of the public it also includes members of the police. It could save you from being in court and being sued. The other officer was doing his due diligence politely while PC 816 took umbrage when he was put straight at the start. That is not good policing.
How to make the police look stupid?
Let them talk.
And talk, and talk and talk they did.
Good one. 👍
That dummy is flying gang signs on duty as well
@@svenpoletka5236First thing I noticed, and I immediately knew he was a jackboot. Makes me want to puke 🤮
Never an apology for the unlawful threats. Disgraceful behaviour.
Member of the public having to educate the Police AGAIN!!!.
Imagine having to explain to your doctor how to do a operation? Or a mechanic how to fix your car? One of the only professions where you can know absolutely nothing about your job and still have one...is policing
I know it’s crazy
@@petes1926To be fair, drones are kind of out there in the deep end of the murky waters of law. But the disturbing thing is that they don't know the basics either, like trespassing, freedom of expression, "anti-social behavior", assault, criminal damage, section 43 of the terrorism act and a bunch of other laws they misunderstand and misuse.
No apology from the Drone who threatened you with confiscation, when you proved him wrong.
Apology...they never apologise, it's way below their decency threshold!
Embarassing cringeworthy waffle. WHY do they have to behave like that, it is utterly stupid.
".... morally...." ...from a copper... 😂
They so wanted to get you on something and instruct you on things they don't have a clue about.... They just can't stop themselves. Their mental battery ran out ages ago.
They were like drones malfunctioning.
First chap is a pilot you can tell that by his ears 😂😂😂
The police are absolute idiots and thick as two short planks and half as useful and they are corrupt to
To all police officers watching ,both officers should be charged with section 26 of the criminal justice act. And lose their jobs. This would stop these tyrants.
They should, but will not. They are always protected from their incompetence by their dubious leaders. If and when they are held properly accountable, the rest of their gang will think twice. Meanwhile, crimes go unsolved all over the country.
And to any police officers watching: I have a database of police officer's cars and their reg numbers. Over to you...
@@MikeEves
And ive started collecting there private number plates also. And i know were many live
@MikeEves So you have been gathering information and been afforded information that could be used in Threats and criminal activitiy towards Police officers I have reported this post and will be passing it on to the relevant authorities ....
What a pathetic weasel you are. Little classroom tell tale. People like you are the reason the Stasi existed.
"As an ex police officer"
So a civilian then.
Ha ha exactly !! 😂 Although to be fair to the guy, for an ex-copper he was actually quite decent and reasonable. Shocker I know 😂.
Why do these clowns always come out trying about their personal cars ,totally not bothered about other crimes
Officer safety comes before ALL else - even when it's paranoid rubbish. Another USA import.
This is the trouble they know he's not committed an offense but they try and get him on something and then wonder why people don't like them
12:43
The police are ashamed of their work.
If I know someone works in the police I know they will be a snake
They never tell there neighbours they are plods just say they work near them 😂😂😂
They're all snakes 24/7 the never switch off
"Confiscate your drone". That would be attempted theft wouldn't it constable? That's crime isn't it constable, you know the things YOU'RE supposed to deal with but can't be arsed....
When you kidnap and assault people on a daily basis, theft is no big deal.
Police can't confiscate property. That is theft. What they can do is collect evidence. So they would need to charge someone first, then the can hold property.
I've got a theory. If police concentrated more on whether an actual crime is being committed rather than the 'personal' cars, police getting followed lines, and trying to just get personal details there might be a very slim chance of some actual crime busting police work taking place? Great video pal 👏 👍
🤣🤣🤣
Why would they do that 😮😮😮😮😮
Now that's just crazy-talk.
Sadly, there has never been any real incentive for the Police to actually prevent, detect or reduce crime as it does them out of the justification for their existence and assigned budgets. They make a show of it every now and again for the gullible of course, but in the meantime concentrate on highlighting any tiny "success", downplaying failures and protecting themselves and their perceived place in society.
@@dr_dr 💯👍
“Ex cop and now police staff.” Wonder if that’s the same Sergeant Andy Bradshaw that pushed and injured Mr Andrew Hughes in 2015 causing life changing head injuries.
Bristol Live article after Andrew Hughes took the case for compensation to High Court “The Independent Police Complaints Commission are said in the writ to have investigated the allegations and to have found there was enough evidence to refer Sgt Bradshaw for possible prosecution for assault causing grievous bodily harm, and that he could be dismissed for gross misconduct.
But the Crown Prosecution Service decided it was not in the public interest to prosecute Sgt Bradshaw, as he would face an unacceptable risk of suicide. And a misconduct panel ruled he had not breached police standards says the writ.”
Of course they did..disgusting
He wasn't suicidal in injuring the pensioner then ?
Two tier policing we hear about. Too busy to attend a burglary but can waste time with someone doing nothing illegal
Officer safety comes first, then VIPs, big business and then the public if they’ve got time.
its great when a member of public educates the po lice on law
Po lice 😅 HFTCD ACAB.
😂😂😂
The little squirt was determined to get you on something.
Good interpretation of little squirt
@@MickyMathews-hz2kl He had turnups on hi s undercrackers. 🤣🤣😂
cop with the beard how to look a pratt with one statement
"Legally there is no issue" So--what is the problem officer??
The only problem is the two numpties....
Their police issue pants , our to tight lol
So the police have to get the law off the member of the public now a days !!!
Tonight’s education class sorted 😂
That man, police staff, is in panik mode.
Two immediate flashbacks to Focus Pocus. 1. Have you got a flying over the car park licence and 2. Doesn't that place look just like Lincoln with the two junior bobbies- thus proving age and experience add nothing to knowledge in these chaps case!
I thought exactly the same 😅😅😅
It does look very similar, but I think at the start he said it was Keynshome, which is Avon and Somerset area.
FP is the GOAT
@@Busterpoo1964 Why?
@@rokketron just checking you know GOAT means greatest of all time. Hes super calm, super knowledgeable, quick witted and a great photographer.
All subjective of course but my favourite auditor.
The moment a police officer lies he has become a criminal and should be treated accordingly
They all lie as part of their job to entrap suspects to get convictions. They are out to "get" people. Anyone who thinks they're our protectors are severely mistaken. Awful people they are.
Unfortunately, (I know this isn't on the US) the US Supreme Court has upheld the "right" for police to lie.
They all lie, without hesitation, as there are no consequences for their deceit.
Yet they wonder why we have zero respect for them 😮
A copper talking about morals, oh the irony.
Right. They get their morals from a morally bankrupt government. They feed off our misery.
The little cop who didn't do too much talking was absolutely gutted by Auditing Britain in one of his audits about a year ago. I think he may have learned his lesson.
The little cop looked totally pee'd off, the taller one likes to waffle on!!
Assertive, polite, and you know the laws about sub 250g drones.
You educated the plods!
Well done PA good audit.
Thank You 👍 PA
816 really embarrassed himself on his lack of knowledge and thought photographer would just agree
Time after time it's proven that a little knowledge is very dangerous in the wrong hands
More suspicious some dude wandering around a police building with an open laptop and a tight T shirt.
1st copper brilliant and interested and learned something. Little weasle copper was just relentless to try and do you for something and just stomped off when he couldn't getcha. A great audit 👍🏻
Thank You 👍 PA
It’s a pity police didn’t have the same consideration for the public!
A desk jockey who pretended to be a policeman .He should be very aware that the public are entitled to his identity if he approaches and engages in an official manner . requesting details when a crime has not been committed good job they confined him to desk duties isn't it as he looked real sketchy. thin blue line tag and his face pulling sidekick were a pair of wet weekends weren't they
Good Viddy Big up Pure Audits.
"No, you're mistaken". "Oh, am I, OK". You couldn't any of this up could you?
The trouble with the 2021 act is that the police can't read it properly, yet alone understand it. Your patience, once again, shines through especially when reading through the act with them. I'd have been rude! Amazing that they tried to tell you you were breaking the law, yet wanted a copy "for later". They still don't get the "creating an offence" bit and I'm sure many more will suffer when they get it wrong.
The police were actually correct, well mostly !. Most people only read schedule 8 of the Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Act 2021 but neglect to read schedule 9. In this case schedule 9, part 2 and schedule 9, part 8 (1)
So . . . . flying a drone over police car parks is . . . ? . . absolutely allowed. But, 'they' just don't like it. . . . "But, you've done nothing wrong - have you?" said PC Calloway . . . . . . 17:27: " I want that back, though".😆😆😂 Excellent education . . and recycling !!. . . . and 19:57: "would you like to take a picture of that?" - ". . .yeh, I will, there's no harm in it is there?" replies Calloway - was just the icing on the cake !! Once again, a smooth and faultless performance, which will take you into this year's final. Great team effort with the viewers. PA - your videos get better and better - a delight to behold.
Thank You - and thanks for supporting me. PA
“You’re free to leave “😂😂😂😂
“If your filming you need to provide me with a drone operator number”
“No I don’t”. Silence…………..😂
That cop definitely sounded like he knew what he was talking about. 😂😂😂
Good work Pure. Keep educating these tyrants.
The young lad was doing so good then his muppet mate ruined it by his need to be the man.
Do British coppers ever watch CZcams?. They'll learn more about the law than what they are taught in the academy. It may save their job in the future. Watching from Mexico.
I think they do but their egos overrule any common sense that they might have.
Thanks for your support and comments 👍 PA
They don't need to know about the law or what it stands for.
Anything illegal (and there is lots of it) by them, is swept under the carpet and excused, take Bradshaw for one.
When they wander away to talk on their radio, I personally would just walk away.
The cop STILL had the Gaul to tell the drone pilot who actually gave him info anyway about what cops can do and can't 🙈
Their only goal here was to find any possible way they could hurt you. Even if they could take even one pound out of your wallet, they would.
"Hurt", "Harm" is exactly what they do to people. Remember believing they were there to protect us? What a big fat lie that was.
They are just spiteful. They hate us
"Please dont film private plate as police are attacked, i can think of one incident many many years ago"...........
Many many yaers ago ? Its not really a problem then is it
I would have asked the grumpy officer if he'd like to apologise for his threat to confiscate the drone - so that we can shake hands, put it behind us, and part on good terms.
They usually won't. The problem I have with it is that if you were not so clued up, you may have been coerced by his statements made under 'colour of authority'
I now carry a statement of fees to hand out. Taking my drone will cost them 250 + 80 per day (or any part thereof) - and they accept by taking the drone without lawful authority. It's on a 30 day account, with 8% statutory interest (over the BoE base rate) for any fees still outstanding after that time.
Obviously, should they turn out to HAVE lawful authority, they have nothing at all to worry about - the fees only apply where they DON'T have such authority.
Then, just be very willing to comply with the demand on that commercial basis. It's amazing how quickly the police start to reconsider when you set up a fee schedule ; )
330 quid just for taking your drone to check the ID. And it's commercial, so no need to prove any wrongdoing... they have to provide a defence against the commercial contract.
There's no reason you cannot charge the full value of the drone, if they hold it - as you'd have to replace it in order to continue your lawful work.
Suddenly they get really antsy - and the more happy you are for them to avail themselves of your 'services' - the more antsy they get ; )
Some coppers may be dumb as a bag of rocks, but they can still smell a trap being set XD
The younger Bobby was OK the other was rude an arrogant an was clearly butt hurt when you schooled him in drone regs tyrant that one
@alanboyd9013 na it hasn't I'm actually dyslexic 🤪
Well done for standing up for your rights .
Get yourself a cornflakes box and halfway through the conversation, walk away and talk into it.
Always irritated when they do that. Bloody annoying
Have to ve fair that dark haired copper was relatively polite all the way through although he did say a couple of silly things he respectfully took the legislation from you to read rather than just shutting you down like other would. He didnt let his ego get the best of him.
This Bobby is a fast talker. Should be in car sales
It's wild that in every one of these encounters they walk away looking like idiots but they insist on keeping on confronting the auditors. Are they really incapable of understanding that they are the story and If they would just leave them alone this would stop?
To any Police watching.....how much law are you taught regarding drones......
Time and time again the member of the public has to educate you regarding the law/ rules
To be fair the younger one was more willing to learn. The older one made all the threats.
The wee ginger cop was so much better than us public, I don’t think he liked being told that he was wrong 😂. He is a fanny
The smaller cop is SO rude too. Turning his back and walking away whilst you are talking to him.
" No I don't ! " - that stopped him in his tracks.
How can coppers uphold and enforce the law when they obviously don't know what the laws are themselves
I think they were more reasonable than most officers and they accepted the information you provided. So they were better than some officers.
I think Auditing Britain has been here before
Hahahaha they were inside doing drone research but failed to do it properly.
They are useless at everything.
asking questions about the law --- YOURE PAID TO KNOW THE LAW
It’s funny when cops get nervous they love to talk to their shoulders.
Very well done, you're getting better PA, a couple of months back
you might have gave them everything.
You should report the police to the police for disturbing a drone pilot while flying
PC Knob Head takes the walk of shame!
The cop that made the threat to confiscate was a right tool and shouldn't have a badge. The taller officer that was willing to have a civil conversation was pretty decent.
Typical, police reading a section of an act they think gives them authority, but when you prove them wrong will still try blustering you.
QUALITY JOB MATE WELL DONE FOR STANDING YOU’RE GROUND
DJE WOULD HAVE HANDED THE DRONE OVER AND COMPLIED 😂
the little copper is as bright as he is tall, and hes not very tall ! the other one can name one incident many, many years ago ! brilliant
IQ of his shoe size, thick beyond words
Excellent PA.
Cop splaining as usual shut up it's lawful
LOL. The little thug tyrant/light hair, didn't like being told he was mistaken right from the beginning. He was just itching to take your drone just to punish you for daring to question him. This is why the police are hated.
Well played...maybe ask him to explain why he is wearing the same thin blue line gang badge that Carrick and Couzens wore with pride !!
At least they were willing to be educated on the matter!
'Ignorance of the Law is no Excuse'....unless you're a Constable it seems....
No wonder your battery went flat mate, he was trying to cover what he thought was ANY means possible concerning your drone.
I notice he cropped info where it ended with if they suspect a crime has been commited, to read you a lot of tosh
Confiscate your drone - they couldn't confiscate kids sweets !! 🤣🤣
Plod seems to think them filming us is equivalent to us filming them. No, it isn’t. Not at all.
The tall officer was fine, but the ginger one didn't want to let it go did he!
You should walk off when they ignorantly go off on their radios.
Another awesome audit 👍
They just dont know when to stop digging.
When all the tools in the box are rusty - what can we do eh!!!
Should the short older policeman have a large pair of scissors clearly up on his uniform ?
Mr P.A is too good for em
Love the background music 👍👊 Sir
I’m happy to criticise poor policing when I see it, so I think it’s only fair to equally acknowledge good policing. The young officer on the right was doing everything correctly - had a good demeanour, was respectful and was happy to explore the rules with you. The other officer showed a little more of that attitude we have become accustomed to, which was a shame.
I’ve been watching auditing videos for years, and on reflection to what we would have seen a few years ago, this was a fairly good interaction. 👍
Reminded me , 76, of Radio Luxembourg donkeys years ago only the old ones will know.
In the 1950's and 1960's Keynsham became a household name due to the radio ads of Horace Batchelor, the self-styled 'football pools king'.
I've seen that horrible little copper in another video; he was wrong in that video as well. 😂
If I remember correctly, he looked red as a beetroot, and they were concerned for his health. Horrible thing indeed..
Great video and drone views. 👍⭐⭐⭐
In 2011 announced multiple new police centres to be constructed with Keynsham constructed 2014 with 48 custody suites. The Miller Construction was contractor for the four station project at £129 million. A blog from August 2014 includes numerous photos of the building interior and custody suites.
Prior to the former station demolition 2019-2020, Council claimed they were unaware property guardians (legal squatters) were staying in the former police station. 🤔Unaware of squatters but always investigate drones in public.
Thanks again - NarnianRailway 👍 PA
PC 816 was a bit of a brash tyrant!....What a suspicious character he was?.....LOL
We the public have a issue after you said that , it's legal..😊
Not surprising.that police staff guy heard you coming with those radar ears.
And still those cops trying to ID you , you did a great job standing your ground, cops must learn they can't get away with bullying people who are not breaking any laws
Looked it up, there is an active sergeant Andy Bradshaw on Linkdin, I reckon dumbo was the idiot sergeant on the radio.
Side note. There is also a sergeant Andy Bradshaw that assaulted a drunk man in the cells in 2015 at Keynsham station. IOPC found evidence of an assault but CPS refused to prosecute… if it’s the same Andy Bradshaw Pure audits found a real wrongun.
Personal registrations?
There's no such thing, car registrations are government owned public information
No offences need to have been committed for the cops to get the Operators details ... BUT ... they DO need to cite the correct statute / act and sections ( see below ) in order to be able to invoke the powers conferred by those cited statutes and sections.
- - -
*Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Act 2021 - Schedule 9*
Section *ONE* : " Provision by remote pilots of *EVIDENCE OF COMPETENCY* " - ( The only competency requirement for Sub 250g Cat A1 drones is that you (quote) " read the User Manual " )
- - -
Section *TWO* : " Provision by remote pilots of *INFORMATION ABOUT UAS OPERATORS* " ( Identity of the registered Operator )
(2) The constable may require P to provide such information as the constable considers reasonable as to the identity of -
(a) the person or persons who are or were the UAS operator for the flight, or
(b) the person or persons who made the unmanned aircraft available for use by P
- - -
Section *THREE* : " Provision by UAS operators of *EVIDENCE OF REGISTRATION* " - ( Is it required to be registered for an Operator ID and, if so, does it have one correctly displayed as required ? )
(2) The constable may require P to provide such evidence as the constable considers reasonable of P's compliance, as respects the unmanned aircraft and the flight, with a relevant registration requirement.
- - -
Section *EIGHT* : " Power to inspect unmanned aircraft in connection with other powers "
(1) A constable may require a person in possession of an unmanned aircraft to allow the constable to inspect it if the constable considers that the inspection would assist the constable in deciding whether a power conferred by any of paragraphs 1 to 7 is exercisable.
''may' is test. PA outfoxed them - with authority.
Good education.
Nicely done. Two more that tried to enforce laws they didn't understand and again got it entirely wrong that you needed to give the operator ID.
While you cannot expect all police to know all legislation, their first duty is to investigate if a law has been broken. PC 816 you contact the police authority that understands drone laws that is why we have police drone officers, not some "colleague" trying to flick through the paperwork. Remember the legal term "ignorantia juris non excusat" that goes not just to members of the public it also includes members of the police. It could save you from being in court and being sued. The other officer was doing his due diligence politely while PC 816 took umbrage when he was put straight at the start. That is not good policing.