Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
See why the 4% RULE is more of a GUIDELINE than a rule...
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 08. 2024
- JL Collins wrote one of the most influential money books on the market, The Simple Path to Wealth, easily our favorite investing book for beginners (and experts!). Watch JL explain what the 4% Rule is and why it's more of a guideline when considering FIRE and Early Retirement.
00:00 Intro
00:06 Where did the 4% Rule originate?
01:32 Why does JL call it the 4% Guideline?
02:08 What is the 4% Rule?
02:30 Sequence of Returns Risk
02:47 Never set it and forget it
03:14 Trinity Study Observations
Want to learn more about the FIRE movement and how you can achieve financial independence? Watch the documentary Playing with FIRE today!
🎥 Amazon: amzn.to/2vLnbrt
🎥 iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/movie/pla...
🎥 Google Play: play.google.com/store/movies/...
🎥 CZcams: • Playing With Fire
🎥 Vimeo: vimeo.com/ondemand/playingwit...
📀 DVD: amzn.to/3sCG342
Check out the book Playing with FIRE, based on the documentary:
📖 amzn.to/2RB3XvK
Or listen on Audible:
🎧 www.audible.com/pd/B07MVN6VHC...
Get started on your FIRE journey:
👩💻 www.playingwithfire.co/beginn...
Start tracking your money today with our favorite money tracking tool, Personal Capital:
👩💻 personalcapital.go2cloud.org/SHQO
Find more of JL's work here:
👩💻 jlcollinsnh.com/
Read JL's book "The Simple Path to Wealth":
📖 amzn.to/3o9aeib🎧amzn....
FOLLOW US:
Instagram: / playwithfireco
Twitter: / playwithfireco
Website: www.playingwithfire.co/
Thanks for watching!
*Links above include affiliate commission or referrals. Sometimes I receive compensation from partnering websites, products and services at no cost to you. Thank you for your support! The video is accurate as of the posting date but may not be accurate in the future.
JL "The FI Godfather" Collins breaking down the "guideline" behind the 4% rule. As always, do what's comfortable for you and always check in on your financial situation to ensure you're adapting appropriately.
YES! The OG (original Godfather) of personal finance! Love that this is sticking hahahaha
I owe this man a beer for changing my life when it comes to investing.
You and me both, dude.
Ditto
In that case, you owe him much more than a beer, mate! 🍺🤣
Bill Bengen is the first to design this study and name it. And it was actually 4.15% and NEVER failed! Hence the 4% SAFE withdrawal rate. I know, I know, past performance doesn't guarantee future results. But we've had some pretty drastic markets (think great depression or the stagflation of the 70s) and 4% survived.
The study was based entirely on US Markets. Another study was done using markets outside of the US and it found that a safe withdrawal rate was 1-3%. So if anyone outside of the US is watching this you may want to be more conservative unless you're invested 100% in US markets.
I'm liking the 4% guide incorporated with the dynamic spending strategy.
I have a question about inflation: as far as I can see, the FI community assumes a nominal 4% withdrawal rate. But 'adjusting for inflation' seems to mean that over the years, one withdraws more and more than 4% of the nominal FI number in order to keep up with increasing costs. How can this be calculated correctly in the long run?
Also, if you determine a FI number and have a, say, 15-y timeline to reach it, in 15 yrs inflation will already have kicked in. Shouldn't that FI number change too, to reflect that?
The 4% rule goes like this... If you can get an average of 7% returns on your investments, and assume 3% inflation (widely excepted avg), you have 4% of the annual gains left to live off of in perpetuity. The Trinity Study made this loose formula a "safe" assumption to use as a guideline for financial planning. Obviously, all these numbers can fluctuate from year to year, but these are farily safe assumptions to plan against a 30 yr horizon (though it might take you only 15 years to reach your "FI number"). So, in your example, the 15 years of inflation are already built into the equation.
I agree that it is not very clear. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that in practice it works as follows: If you need e.g. 40K/year and have already (x25) 1 million saved, the first year of retirement you withdraw 40K, the second 41.2K (assuming a 3% inflation), and so on. I agree on your second point, which is rarely mentioned. The FI number you set out at the beginning is a bit of a rough goal, which you will have to adjust after 15 years. Another item I don't understand is how to account for taxes in your FI number, which can vary a lot across countries...
@@PlayingwithFIREco thanks for the reply! You lost me at the first sentence "u assume 7% gains and 3% inflation and 4% is left to live off of". What about the 3%?
@@vtheb1299 7-3=4
@@vtheb1299 the 3% is the widely accepted rate if inflation.
Good one. Vanguard published a really good paper on this topic in June 2021. Highly recommended it, as there’s so much confusion on this topic.
Title and authors of said paper, please? 🙏
@@EvolvedBonobo title is : “Fuel for FIRE: updating the 4% rule for early retirees”, Vanguard, June 2021.
I have a question about the withdrawal. Let's say you have 1 mil and you withdraw 3% at the start of retirement. 15 Years later its at 4 mil but you are only withdrawing 40k per year. Can you basically reset your withdrawal system and then start withdrawing 120k per year or would you then go broke?
Look at the portfolio value at the beginning of the year and withdraw 4 percent of the value and keep it in bank. You can safely so this for next 30 years and then you will go broke.
3:15
🐐
Absolutely. 🔥
He has Jackie Chan's mouth.
2nd 🔥
🔥🔥🤙