Men ata yurta kalan türklerdenim. Özbek türkuyum. Kandaşlarima selam olsun Özbekistan'dan 🇺🇿 Men ota yurtda qolgan turklardanman. Ōzbek turkiman. Qondoşlarimga salom bōlsin Ōzbekistondan 🇹🇷
Greetings to all my Turkic brothers from Bashkir. We are all Turks: from the Crimea to Altai, from Sakha to Cyprus - the Turkic lands. We are all one big family, we all speak the Turkic language. I hope, I believe, I pray that the Turkic World will flourish and gain strength. The Turks of the whole world will unite in a powerful union. Glory to Allah that we are uniting and making friends, despite all the problems and provocations. As they say: water wears away a stone. Sooner or later we will be united. I believe in it. Long live our Nation! We are descendants of great people. We decorate this World. We are this World. 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲 + other brothers 🐺☪️
First of all, you need to get a very good education and read a lot. Then we need to get stronger economically. You also need to be mentally strong. If we do not educate ourselves, there may be well-educated and financially powerful organizations that want to use such a great power. Believe me, these are not well-intentioned. Study hard like the Israelites and read a lot of books.
@@werapeeverythingthatmove6266 That's not true. Turks did not marry other races.Their appearance has changed due to geography. I hope you understand it.
@@werapeeverythingthatmove6266 ahahaha,idiot. we did not interfere with the Arabs. Arab lands were in the hands of the Ottomans. but the Turks lived in Anatolia and the Arabs in the Middle East. In the dna tests conducted, no arabic dna was found in the Turks. Turks mixed with the Byzantine Roman peoples in Anatolia. but despite this, we have a central Asian DNA ranging from 5% to 45%. don't talk in the ass without knowing anything.
@@rylodimadperoksizko5129 evet çok iyiler çinliler hiç katliam yapmiyor Kardeş ne diyorsun çinliler onlara soykırım yapıyor, hapse atim işkence etip öldürüyorlar, türkistan türkler mücadele ediyor sen onların yerinde olsaydin dayanamazdın
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28]
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
Tatarlar Cuman ve Kıpçaklarin birleşmiş ve Tatar dendi ve ayrıca çoğu Tatarın dili Kıpcakca Turgesh de adından belli Türk sen ve diğer Türk karşıtı kişilikler Geberin kabul etmeyip bizi dünyaya yeterince küçük gösteren ındo-european ve afro asiatic denen soytarı ırklar yüzünden Türklük artık efsane gibi birşey yeni çıkma falan çıktığı gibi yok olma bu ne?!!!! Tarih çocuk masalı değil istediğiniz gibi şekilenmez
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
Stop admiring genghis khan bi*ch because he is not a TÜRK and he is not our ancestor because he is a mongoli. PS: TURKIC and mongolic are diffrent lenguages races and cultures. And share not the same ancestors.
: Hungaryball : Thank you! Btw just a correction, you guys are our cousins not brothers. But still, you guys are a part of Uralic-Altaic family. So thanks :D Love Hungary from Turkey
theodoros kolokotronis the most powerful states of the world are the Turk states.göktürk empire,ottoman empire,seljuks empire,europa hun empire,hun empire,white hun empire,avar empire,aqqoyuns,mamelukes,east hun empire,west hun empire,asia hun empire,uyghur empire,mogol turk empire,golden horde empire,safevid empire the most powerful empires always founded Turks.We Turks like to read history but our main duty is to write history.
Theodoros Kolokotronis We recommend reading the kürşad, which attacked the chinese palace of 5000 people with 40 people and saved their relative.kürşad's china rescued from his palace brother established east gokturk state.your sources for kürşad's name is Chieh-she-shuai
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
A Tunisian and a Turk were chatting. Tunisian belittled Atatürk and asked what did Atatürk achieve? and the Turk replied ; "I learned French because I wanted it, you learned it out of necessity.Now do you understand what he's accomplished? "
Love them or hate them, you would be a fool for denying that they didn’t change history forever. Starting in Siberia and making it to as far as Anatolia is pretty impressive imo.
Only a fool would think Turk started from Siberia, the Turks were the slaaves of Mongols, who were the original inhabitant of the steppes, it is through the Mongols that Turkish influence spread to Central Asia and the Steppes first through trade. The Turds try to claim the history of all inhabitants of the Steppes as theirs, and in return the Koreans try to claim they are the original Turks, I do not know who should win the first price for historical liars, the Turks who claim the whole history of the steppes when it is not true or the Koreans who claim the history of everyone, including the Turks.
@@red4812 Turks are mongols are not totally different groups. Xiongu was fathers of both and even after seperation they didn't seperated totally. In big Turkic empires there were lots of Mongol tribes and similarly under Genghis Han there were a lot of Turkic tribes. i.e Golden horde considered more Turkic than Mongol. Also there are a lot of common names in both languages, Cengiz(Genghis), Kubilay(Kublai), Kutluk(Qutlugh), Ögeday(Ogeday), Paydar(Baidar) etc.
Hun (xiongnu) people were turks. Turks have founded Xiongnu (hun) empire, but mongols have joined the empire later times. On the other hand, golden horda empire was a union of turks and mongols. This empire was founded by mongols, then turks had got the power of menagement from mongols. Turks and mongols are totally differant races but they have made some unions and confederations because of their common enemies such as china and russia.
Ahmet Demir Austria-Hungary controlled almost all of Central Europe and balkans (which they took from the ottomans). The US is huge and basically it’s own continent, they had a lot of land outside of North America as well such as panama, Caribbean and the Phillipines not to mention it was one of the largest GDP’s and military in the world, Italy under Rome conquered almost all of Europe, Middle East and North Africa. France had almost all of west and North Africa as well as Indochina and much of North America, they also kicked the ottoman’s asses in WW1 and captured much of the Middle East. Napoleon also conquered almost all of Europe as well. Poland-Lithuania conquered the entirely of Eastern Europe from Scandinavia to the Black Sea. Greece ate the entire eastern half of the known world under Alexander the great in under a decade also they too captured much of turkey in the 20th century. Also the ottomans lost twice in Viena after getting their asses beaten by an outnumbered foe. The polish winged Hussars ate the entire ottoman army’s ass for lunch. Comment when you’ve actually won a world war and maybe even recognise the genocide of 3 million Armenians which were force marched into the desert to their death or pushed into the Black Sea to drown by the young Turk retards. It’s been a hundred years maybe you can finally apologise for it.
@@KazakhBoy The Turkic people living in Altai mountains migrated to modern day America 30.000 years ago in the ice-age time using the bearing strait. This is well documented. If you look at the culture of native indians and the culture of Shamanic Turks you will see 99% simiralities
Yeah but the during the late 16th century the slaavic tzaars of muscow put a full stop on the Eurasian turko - mongolic khaganates through which the turk dominance of Eurasian ended
Seriously? Rising sun flag? No shame for your war of aggression? This is like Germans using the Swastika(which they don't as they feel shame for their actions and are good people).
@@alparslanosmangokturkoglu2366 olm niye fuck iran diyorsun. adamların iranla alıp veremedikşeri yokki. İranda hayet normal vatandas statusundeler. ayrıca oradaki azeri-türkmenler sever ve desteklerler devletlerini. muhalifleri de vardır da farsilerde de var o.
The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
@@user-sw6ip2hk5w (Asya Hun imparatorluğu, Göktürk İmparatorluğu Türklerin bir arada olduğu imparatorlukları) Türklerin ilk dini Tengri ve bu dini 2000 yıl öncede kullanıyordu Türkler
i am a Greek and i believe in Turkish-Greek friendship , all the wars we had on the past doesnt matter shit to me, every leader in this period of time wanted a bigger empire , more food, more gold , more area, this is natural. Let's respect each other's origins, culture, borders. Greece and Turkey have a long history and we have a lot in common and a lot of differences. Let's all live in Peace. Peace & Love.
Thecool Inio yes also Turks came to Europe with Huns, later followed by Pechenegs, Cumans First Bulgarians they build empires in the region some of them allied with Roman empire some of the fought later they became a part of the Greek Byzantium empire and fought against Muslim Turks in 1071 lost their identity.
"Your land is either colonized and replaced by Turk, Or ruled by the Turks as your kings of elites" Elijah Oliver Dickenson (a British officer from India British Raj and a historian of Turkic culture) Pretty accurate. Turks are either your kings or your replacers of population.
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over. Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511806681.009
@@pompacitokmakci On a VERY unrelated note. You'll appreciate this Yoruk quote. "We migrated to Anatolia because God told us so, and we migrated to Anatolia because God made his garden here" Yoruk Proverb
You Tube why do Turks at central asia call them as kazakh , kyrgyz or uzbek ? At least you can call yourself Kazakh Turks , Uzbek Turks or Kyrgyz Turks
They are already called like that. Both terms are used ( kazakh - kazakh turk; uzbek- uzbek turk etc.) But it's shorter and hence easier to say kazakh, krygyz ,azeri etc. No need to add "turk" to the end cuz everybody will understand that when u say kazakh, you mean the turks living in central asia in their own state called Kazakhistan etc. :)
Dogan Cetinkal when we talk about our ethnic we call Turk but when they talk about their ethnic they call theirself kazakh , uzbek etc and it seems we are different people
Yep, we all are originally same (Turk), but of course time, region and interaction with neighbours have affected and changed cultures by time. Hence Uzbek, Kazakh, Azerbayjani, Turks (Turks in Turkey) etc. all are different people for sure but they are all Turkic people and nations and have many in common.
Baran Yalçın the Aegean Islands are pure Greek. No debate there. But seriously you need to get rid of Erdocunt, he is destroying you with propaganda and disrespecting the turkic culture. Greetings
Arda Baştürk I'm so glad you understand. I'm a Greek but we don't warn you guys because we want to destroy you. We are not saying that erdogan is destroying you as an enemy. We are saying that as neighbors who want peace. You need to get rid of him before he starts sending your families in prison. My fellow greetings
In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.
@@malikabd2902 first of all Seljuk was *RULED* by Turks from present day Turkmenistan, second more mongols are crying about xiongnu and Hunnic empire being Mongol then any other ethnic group
@@leratking8842 it was a turco Persian empire, the Seljuks had their capital in Isfahan Iran and we're as influenced by Persian culture as they were by turkic
@@malikabd2902 İran çoğunlukla Türk'tür. Selçuklu Türklerinin devamı Anadolu Selçuklu'dur. Anadolu Selçuklu da yıkılınca Türk komutanlar beyliklere ayrıldı. Osmanlı ise hepsini yeniden birleştirdi. Osmanlı Selçuklu Türklerinin devamıdır
Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’): This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
*In Iran entered a period of relative obscurity and seclusion under two dynasties of Turkish origin: the Safavids and the Qajars.[1] *The Safavids were of Turkish descent..[2] *As with their Safavid predecessors, the new dynasty was of Turkish origin ; and administrative institutions similar to those the Safavids had attempted to build up were revived.[3] *There was a real need for the Safavids to disassociate themselves from their arch-foes by playing down their own Turkish origins.[4]
*The Divan of Shah İsmail, the founder of the Safavid Dynasty was written in Turkish,, because he was of Turcoman origin.[5] *The Safavids (1501-1722), two major dynasties of Turkish origin.[6] *The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the SAFAVID dynasty in 1500. Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the SHITTE form of Islam and established a state.[7] *The Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires. Though political and ideological rivals, all three empires were of Turkic origin and belonged to the same Persianate cultural universe.[8] *Form of Shi'ism under pressure from the Safavids, originally a Turkic Sufi order who were themselves former Sunnis.[9] *The three Islamic empires of the early modern period - the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman - shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage.[10] *Safavid power with its distinctive Persian-Shi‘i culture, however, remained a middle ground between its two mighty Turkish neighbors. The Safavid state, which lasted at least until 1722, was essentially a "Turkish" dynasty, with Azeri Turkish (Azerbaijan being the family's home base) as the language of the rulers and the court as well as the Qizilbash military establishment.[11] *Under the Safavids, the Azeri Turks came into conflict with the expanding Ottoman Turks[12] *A massive migration of Oghuz Turks in the l lth and l2th centuries not only Turkified Azerbaijan but also Anatolia. The Azeri Turks are Shi'ites and were founders of the Safavid dynasty.[13] *The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the *Safavid Dynasty in 1500. Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the Shi'ite form of Islam.[14]
*The Caucasus was a battleground between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Turkic Shia Safavid Dynasty of Persia.[15]
*Shah Isma'il I (1500-24), the founder of the Safavid dynasty of Azeri origin, made the Shi'a branch of Islam.[16] *This family, reported by some sources to be of Azerbaijani origin[17]
*Three major Islamic empires emerged, all with Turkic roots to varying degrees: those of the Ottomans (1300-1922), Safavids (1501-1722), and Moghuls (1526-1858).[18] *The Ottoman eastward expansion was stalled by the rise of another Turkish dynasty, the Safavids, in Persia.[19] *The Safavid Turks, who had their genesis in a Shia dervish order in Azerbaijan.[20] *Selim I captured the Capital Tebriz also and thus put a check on the growth of the military power of the Safavid Turks.[21] * “gunpowder empires”: the Empire of the Ottoman Turks (centered in Turkey), that of the Safavid Turks (centered in Iran or Persia)[22] *Discuss the religious and political issues that separated the Ottoman Turks and the Safavid Turks.[23] *See Ottoman Empire; Safavid Turks Turks, 10 revolt against, 225 Safavid, 30 Twelver branch.[24] * In the early 16th century, the Azeri dynasty of the Safavids ( r. 1501-1736 ) took power in Tabriz and developed a culture that influenced much of the region.[25] *Of three great empires: the Mughals in South Asia, the ?afavids in Persia, and the Ottomans in the west. The three empires shared basic features such as Turkic dynastic origins.[26] *What most Iranians are not told (neither by the Shia clergy nor ultra-Iranian nationalits) is how the Turkic Safavids slaughtered thousands upon thousands of Persians (Sunnis), starting with the elite, the thinkers and scholars.[27] *The rule of the Turkic Safavids completed the process of linguistic Turkicisation of modern Azerbaijanis which was initiated by the Seljuks in the eleventh century.[28] *Buyids (Iranian) (945-1055) . Ghaznavids (Turkic) (994-1030) . Seljuks (Turkic) (1045-1217) . Mongol/Ilkhanid Dynasties (Turkicized Mongols) (1221-1338) . Timurids and Turkmen (Turkic) (1383-1501) . Safavids (Turkic) (1501-1722)[29] * Although arising from a local, originally Sunni Sufi order in Azerbaijan, the Turkish Safavids speedily became the vigorous upholders of Shi'ism.[30] *The Safavid and Qajar dynasties,rulers in Iran from 1501 to 1722 and from 1795 to 1925 respectively,were Turkic in origin[31] *Understands political achievements of the Safavid and Mughal Empires ,how Persia was unified by the Turkic Safavids.[32] *Therefore, the student is able to: 5-12 Explain the unification of Persia under the Turkic Safavids.[33] *To bolster its legitimacy, the Turkish Safavid dynasty created the fiction of an ancestral link.[34] *The Turkic origin of the Safavid dynasty,which is rarely acknowledged in u conventional Turkish nationalist historiography.[35] *Shah Ismail, a Turk of the Shi'i sect of Islam, arose as leader of both Turkic and Iranian adherents of this sect, who placed more emphasis upon religion than upon ethnic origin.[36] * The Safavids were originally Turkic, ghazis like the Osmanlis and succeeded, like them, in distancing possible rivals.[37] * The Safavids were descended from a family of Turkmen Sufi sheikhs from Ardabil, in Azerbaijan.[38] * In the early 1500s, a thirteen-year-old Turkmen named Ismail, who lived in western Iran, conquered the whole country[39] * Yet even Iran's foreign conquerors - such as the Turkic Safavid, Afshar, and Qajar dynasties.[40] Sources: *1-Women, Religion and Culture in Iran *2-World History DeMYSTiFieD Stephanie Muntone McGraw Hill Professional-Page 238 *3-Modern Persian Prose Literature-Page 9 *4-Comparative History of Civilizations in Asia: 10,000 B.C. to 1850 Edward L. Farmer Westview Press-Page 430 *5-Cultural Horizons: A festschrift in honor of Talat S. Halman,Volume 1 Jayne L. Warne Syracuse University Press, 2001 *6-Women's History in Global Perspective,Volume 3-Page 82 *7-New Catholic Encyclopedia: A-Azt-Page 140 *8-The Eckstein Shahnama: An Ottoman Book of KingsWill Kwiatkowski Sam Fogg,2005-Page 9 *9-Religions of Iran: From Prehistory to the Present-Page 192 *10-Safavid, Mughal,and Ottoman Empires(Cambridge University Press) *11-Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective(Cambridge University Press)-Page 86-87. *12-Global Security Watch-The Caucasus States-Page 3 *13-Iran II: Iranian history - Iran V: Peoples of Iran,Volume 3 Ehsan Yarshater The Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation,2006-Page 325 *14-New Catholic Encyclopedia-Volumr 1.-18.-Page 16 *15-Caucasus:Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide-Page 3 *16-Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia 2003-Page 104 *17-Azerbaijan, Mosques, Turrets, Palaces Ilona Turánszky Corvina Kiadó,1979-Page 21 *18-The Turks in World History(Oxford University Press)-Page 94 *19-Conflict, Conquest, and Conversion: Two Thousand Years of Christian Missions in the Middle East(Columbia University Press) *20-The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism: The Nation-state at Bay?(Univ of Wisconsin Press) *21-Proceedings of the All Pakistan Political Science Conference,Volume *22-Expansion and Global Interaction, 1200-1700 David R. Ringrose Longman,2001-Page 135 *23-Student Study Guide and Map Exercise Workbook to accompany Traditions and Encounters,Volume 2 BENTLEY McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated *24-The Politics of the Middle East Monte Palmer F.E. Peacock Publishers,2002-Page 425 *25-Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set(Oxford University Press)-Page 236 *26-The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics Emad Eldin Shahin, ?Peri J. Bearman, ?Sohail H. Hashmi - 2014 *27-Son of Sunnah-Persian Sunni scholars VS the King of the Safavids *28-Routledge Handbook of the Caucasus *29-Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-Muslims in Modern Iran-Page 275 *30-Encyclopaedia of Islam Ian Richard Netton-Page 570 *31-Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Africa and the Middle East-Page 707 *32-Content knowledge: a compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education John S. Kendall, Robert J. Marzano Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory,1996-Page 243 *33-National standards for history National Center for History in the Schools (U.S.), Charlotte Antoinette Crabtree, Gary B. Nash-Page 180 *34-Government and Politics of the Contemporary Middle East: Continuity and change-Page *35-New Perspectives on Turkey,36-37.-Page 230 *36-The Middle East and South Asia,Stryker-Post Publications,1968-Page 10 *37- The History of the World JJohn Morris Roberts, Odd Arne Westad (Oxford University Press)-Page 403 *38-The Safavids and their Successors - The David Collection *39- Iran the People - Page 10 *40- Iran and the world: continuity in a revolutionary decade(Indiana University Press)-Page 11
Azerbaijan❤Iran. turk azerbaijani qajars , safavids,and afshars ruled iran 500 years. persians love turk azerbaijan! azerbaijanis were greatest turkic warriors and lions 🇦🇿❤🇮🇷
Arghun Pride almost half this video is fake most of them are not even Turkic origin like Göktürk the rulers of Göktürk were Iranic Saka-Wusun Origin Form the Ashina according to Chinese sources and almost all modern historians Researchers such as H. W. Haussig,[1] S. G. Klyashtorny,[2][3] A. N. Bernstamm,[4] C. V. Findley,[5] D.G. Savinov,[6] S. P. Guschin,[7] Rona-Tas[8] and R. N. Frye[9] have pointed out that the origin of the Ashina is from the Iranian Saka-Wusun Origin form the Ashina tribe
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
The first Turkic-speaking community appeared between 7,000 BC. and 5,000 BC. in South Central Asia (in today's Turkmenistan, near the Iranian border), namely Anav culture. Part of this community remained in this area until around 1,000 BC. while another part of the community around 4,000 BC. was distributed in the northern part of Central Asia and another part was distributed in regions such as Mesopotamia and Anatolia. The name of one of these communities in Anatolia and Mesopotamia was even called Turukku.
"Timur had not captured anyone from the people of Anatolia after the Battle of Ankara. Because the state he was fighting was also a Turk state. He remained loyal to the tradition, which had the understanding that a Turk would not be a prisoner. " -Ducas, Byzantine History, p.174
On the other hand, as has been recently pointed out, though the beginning of Bahri rule is usually dated to 1250, none of the first five sultans were, in fact, members of the Bahriyya. 32 The Arabic sources for the period refer to the dynasty as the dawlat al-atrak, dawlat al-turk, or al- dawla al-turkiyya (i.e. dynasty of the Turks), in recognition of the racial or ethnic group which predominated in the mamluk caste during this period, and to distinguish it from the Burji sultanate in which mamluks Northrup, L. (1998). The Bahrī Mamlūk sultanate, 1250-1390. In C. Petry (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt (The Cambridge History of Egypt, pp. 242-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521471374.011 The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/ 1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517) amalia levanoni The Turkish era of the Mamlūk sultanate The Mamlūks’ rise to power: a decade of trial and error The Arabic term mamlūk literally means ‘owned’ or ‘slave’, and was used for the white Turkish slaves of pagan origins, purchased from Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes by Muslim rulers to serve as soldiers in their armies. Levanoni, A. (2010). The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: The Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517). In M. Fierro (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam (The New Cambridge History of Islam, pp. 237-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521839570.010 The term 'Mamluk Sultanate' is a modern historiographical term.[9] Arabic sources for the period of the Bahri, Mamluks refer to the dynasty as the State of the Turks (Arabic: دولة الاتراك, Dawlat al-Atrāk; دولة الترك, Dawlat al-Turk) or State of Turkey (الدولة التركية, al-Dawla al-Turkiyya).[16][17][9] In the obituary notices about Niẓām al-Mulk the fact that he drew his power and authority from the thousands of Turkish Mamlūks he possessed (kathrat mamālikihi; wa-malaka min ghilman al-Atrāk ulūfan) is clearly stated. See al-Athir, Ibn, al-Ta’rikh al-Bāhir fi al-Dawla(Cairo, 1963), p. 10;Google Scholar and Abū Shāma, who cites Nizām al-Mulk’s contemporary or near-contemporary, the historian Muhammad b. ‘Abd al-Malik al-Hamdānī, who died early in the sixth/twelfth century (Kitāb al-Rawdatayn,Cairo, 1288H, i, p. 26).Google ScholarFor more detail see “Aspects of the MamlⅫk phenomenon”, pp. 213-14. TheSiyāsat-nāma certainly reflects Nizām al-Mulk's personal attitude to the Turkish Mamlūks and the spirit of the time, even if it was edited after his death. When the ‘Abbāsid Caliphs were under Buwayhid suzerainty their Mamlūk policy was not free from the pressure of that Daylamite dynasty. The success of the Daylamite soldiers in so many eastern armies is really astounding, but in the slightly longer run they stood no chance against the Turkish Mamlūks, and they disappeared. Even a Buwayhid ruler preferred Turks over them (see e.g.Bosworth, , “Ghaznevid military organisation”, p. 42;Google ScholarAyalon, , “On the eunuchs…”, p. 109Google Scholar). 41 I have already pointed out, in “Egypt as a dominant factor …”, pp. 30-1Google Scholar, some of the reasons which prevented the Mamlüks from taking real root under the Fātimids. There I mentioned especially the fact that, on moving from the Maghrib to Egypt, much of their ruling and military systems had already been crystallized, and they could not replace, or at least replace properly, the already existing and most powerful military bodies. Another factor which I referred to there was the great distance separating Egypt from the Turkish Mamlüks” homeland, which was, in addition to that, cut off from Egypt by mainly Sunnite states hostile to the Fātimids. (The antagonism of the Seljuks to the acquisition of Turkish Mamlüks by the Sunnite al-Muqtafī must have been at least as strong in the case of the Fātimids. This, coupled with the much greater distance of Egypt from the sources of supply, illustrates well the obstacles which the Fātimids faced in forming a proper Mamlük army.) Yet another major factor was the very inadequate military schools of the Fātimids, when they had them (I discuss this aspect in my book on the eunuchs). The impossibility of the Mamlük system (with the Turkish Mamlüks at its heart) developing under the Fātimids as it should, was clearly demonstrated in the second half of the fourth/tenth century, as soon as its great protagonist al-'Aziz billāh died (386/996), that is to say, quite soon after their occupation of Egypt. That was one of the reasons why their hold on Syria was even then not strong enough. With the later appearance of the Seljuks and the Crusaders that hold, without a further military force, could not but become more precarious. Note also the military feats of the Turkish Mamlük contingent which Saladin sent in 568/1172-3 to the Maghrib (“Aspects of the Mamlük phenomenon”, part B, pp.12-13Google Scholar). 2. Kitāb Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk min Kitāb al-ʻAnāṣir li-majālis al-Malik al-Nāṣir : manuscript, [1567] ; Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; Thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; كتاب ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر : مخطوطة، [1567] ; ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر ; ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر CREATOR/CONTRIBUTOR: Maqrīzī, Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī, 1364-1442, creator مقريزي، أحمد بن علي،, 1364 al-Malik al-Muẓaffar Sayf al-Dīn al-Muʿizzī , third Mamlūk sultan of the Dawlat al-Turk or Baḥrī dynasty. A nephew of the K̲h̲wārazm-S̲h̲āh D̲j̲alāl al-Dīn, Ḳuṭuz (whose original Muslim name was Maḥmūd b. Mamdūd) was taken prisoner by the Mongols and sold to a Damascus merchant who, in turn, sold him to the Mamlūk amīr Aybak in Cairo. Aybak, as the husband of S̲h̲ad̲j̲ar al-Durr, became in 648/1250 al-Malik al-Muʿizz, from which title Ḳuṭuz derived his nisba , al-Muʿizzī. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Political Theory Leigh K. Jenco, Murad Idris, Megan C. Thomas · 2019 · Political Science The lens of mamlūk military slavery has dominated studies of medieval Egypt. ... dynasty (established by Salāh al-Dīn in the twelfth century) to the Turkish Mamluk sultanate in the mid-thirteenth century. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Medieval Warfare and Military Technology Clifford J. Rogers, William Caferro, Shelley Reid · 2010 · History In general, the Mamluk Sultanate was referred to at the time as the “Turkish state” or “dynasty” ( dawlat al-turk/atrak). In this period the emergence of the Ottoman Turkish dynasty challenged what remained of the Byzantine Empire, eventually absorbing the other Turkish domains in Anatolia, while the Turkic Mamluk Empire “The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: Emergence of the Ottomans.” Ottoman Dress and Design in the West: A Visual History of Cultural Exchange, by Charlotte A. Jirousek and Sara Catterall, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 2019, pp. 41-78. Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks " Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39 Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012 The Mamluks (whose name denotes their slave status) were a quintessential Turkic military dynasty. Spannaus, Nathan. “HISTORY AND CONTINUITY: AL-AZHAR AND EGYPT.” Modern Islamic Authority and Social Change, Volume 1: Evolving Debates in Muslim Majority Countries, edited by MASOODA BANO, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2018, pp. 79-101. What they did not know was that with Baybars, a new Turkish dynasty would unify the Islamic Middle East with an uncompromising commitment to jihad not seen since the days of Saladin “BETWEEN THE MAMLUKS AND THE MONGOLS: 1250-1260.” Accursed Tower: The Crusaders' Last Battle for the Holy Land, by ROGER CROWLEY, Yale University Press, NEW HAVEN; LONDON, 2019, pp. 40-50. He ended up assassinating the leading Mameluks, the Turkish dynasty that had held power since the 13th century. “Of Egypt and Levantine Plagues.” Free Trade’s First Missionary: Sir John Bowring in Europe and Asia, by Philip Bowring, Hong Kong University Press, 2014, pp. 73-82.
azerbaycanlılar sırf karabağ Azerbaycan devletinde gözükmüyor diye video'ya disslike atmayın.bu video sadece hangi toprak kimin elindeyse onu anlatıyor.mal mal iş yapmayın
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over. Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turks are Mongolian , Azerbaijanis are not Mongolian = Contemporary Turkic peoples as "possessing East Asian physiognomy", according to Joo-Yup Lee and Shuntu Kuang, historians from University of Toronto. Turks were described as "short, with small eyes, nostrils, and mouths" (Sharaf al-Zaman al-Marwazi), as being "full-faced with small eyes" (Al-Tabari), as possessing "a large head (sar-i buzurg), a broad face (rūy-i pahn), narrow eyes (chashmhā-i tang), and a flat nose (bīnī-i pakhch), and unpleasing lips and teeth (lab va dandān na nīkū)" (Keikavus). Concerning Yangikent's Oghuz Turks in particular, al-Masudi remarked that they are "distinguished from other Turks by their valour, their slanted eyes, and the smallness of their stature". Stone heads of Seljuq elites kept at the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art displayed East Asian features.[47]
Huns,Xiognu and Hepthalite is Turkic. Hunnic Empire was the empire of the Huns. The Huns were a confederation of Eurasian tribes, especially Turkic ones, from the Steppes of Central Asia. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Hunnic_Empire ---------------------------------------------------- Recent genetics research in 2003[4] confirmed the studies[5] indicating that the Turkic peoples,[6] originated from the same area and therefore are possibly related. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Xiongnu ----------------------------------------------------- Hepthalite Imagewww.oxfordreference.com › ... Hephthalites - Oxford Reference Inner Asian 'Hunnic' group (or rather dynasty), perhaps of Turkic origin, whose name appears first in 456; by 467 they had displaced the ... Iranian Huns. The term “Huns” was also used for several tribes who posed a continuous threat to northeastern Iran and northwestern India from the 4th century C.E. Earlier research attempted to establish a connection between the different tribes mentioned in the sources, and to consider them all as Hephthalites (cf. Ghirshman, pp. 69-134). Altheim (III, 1961, p. 7) viewed the Hephthalites as the original tribe of the Huns, from which the European Huns had split off. In addition, he also assumed a Turkish origin for all these tribes (Altheim, I, 1959, pp. 45 ff.). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Babur is Turkic origin. Imagebooks.google.com.tr › books The Oxford Illustrated History of the World Felipe Fernández-Armesto · 2019 · History In July , Ismail was enthroned as Shah and he proclaimed Shiism as ... Turkic-Mongol in origin, the Empire was established in by a Chagatai Turk, Zahiruddin Muhammad Babur books.google.com.tr/books?id=eUSCDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA316&lpg=PA316&dq=babur+shah+turkic+oxford&source=bl&ots=1CRP9wyLg4&sig=ACfU3U3z2yUJfMwp3U8m5uedHqLxLVQYIg&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiii4yH3aTnAhUz4KYKHfv3BdMQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ Imagewww.cambridge.org › books Safavid, Mughal, and Ottoman Empires (Chapter 1 ... - Cambridge University Press In 1501 Shah Ismail I (1501-1524), the founder of the dynasty, defeated the Turkish Aq Quyunlu forces ... Muhammad Zahir al-Din Babur, a Chagatai Turk from Fergana in Central Asia ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scythian is a confederetion and its founding group was Turkic SAKA. Imagebooks.google.com.tr › books Routledge Revivals: Trade, Travel and Exploration in the Middle ... John Block Friedman, Kristen Mossler Figg · 2017 · History Arab geographers described “Inner Scythia” (the land of the Turkic peoples) using ... Harvard Ukrainian Studies 12/13 (1988-1989): 400-413. ---------------------------------------------------------- These earlier scholars based their accounts not on classical texts but on references to Scythians (sometimes explicitly identified as “Turks”) in medieval Latin and Byzantine universal chronicles and apocalyptic literature. In these sources ... Page153 None of the humanist authors who read Greek-Filelfo, Sagundino, Gaza, Merula -based his history of the Scythian Turks on information from the Histories.139 books.google.com.tr/books?id=XDmZXIDiZG8C&pg=PA149&lpg=PA149&dq=scythian+turks&source=bl&ots=d7qnjR6GgR&sig=ACfU3U1UMWCuSHWCtuxdtMnOdCYJp134VA&hl=tr&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=scythian%20turks&f=false
Hi! I was wondering how do you create this kind of videos? Do you use a specific program to freerly draw areas around the map and specify when to appear?
The backbone and most umportant part of the Mongol army were Turks, Cengiz and han are Turkish words and names. The mongols simply didnt have enough manpower to create the biggest empire in the history it was the Turks
Birader tarih ve gerceklerde "yersiz" diye bir gtanim yok sadece gercekler, Mogol ordusunun neredeyse tamami Turklerden olusmaktaydi Mogollar'in yeterli insan gucu yoktu.
@@vitalalive69 cengizin ordusunda türk de vardı ama ordusu tamamen türk değildi. Moğollar da türkler gibi göçebe olduğundan savaş tarzları birbirine benzer.
@@iskambillordu Cengiz han in ordusunun 70%-80% türk olduklari tahmin ediliyor. Zaten mogollar kücük bir toplumdu eger cengiz hanin nasil hükümdar oldugunu arastirirsan zaten türk devletlerini birlestirdigini anlarsin.
Modu Chanyu was the second ruler (“chanyu” in Ancient Chinese sources - 單于) of Xiongnu, a nomadic Empire situated in East-Central Asia. He reigned between 209-174 BC. As far as we interpret from the Chinese sources, at least we know that his title is Turkic: 冒頓單于 Modu Chanyu or 撐犁孤塗單于 (chengli gutu chanyu)- transliterated as “Tengri Qutluğ Yabgu?”.(The translation of the chanyu is somewhat disputed, some Turkologists claim “Chanyu” is “Tarkan” another Turkic title, it could be “yabgu”, or maybe “tanhu”- there is no general consensus). The first two words are certainly Turkic, “Tengri” is Turkic for god, and Qutluğ is “blessed” implying the bearer of the title as “blessed by the God”. (In today’s modern Turkish language, “Tengri Qutluğ” would be “Tanrı kutlu”) We can say that the Modu Chanyu certainly had Turkic titles, so most probably, yes, he was Turkic. Back then, the region was inhabited by speakers of the Proto-Turkic language.
@TURAN UNİON TURKS Aslinda ayni seyi anlatmaya calisiyoruz sanirim. Evet dediginiz dogru. Lakin mesela İrak Turkleri demekten çok İrak Turkmenleri diyoruz, Suriye Turkleri demek yerine Suriye Turkmenleri, Bayirbucak Turkmenleri vs diyoruz. Halbuki birebir ayniyiz onlarla. Kastettigim fark bu. Turkiyede biz Turkmeniz demekten cok millet adini kullanmayi yani Turkuz demeyi tercih ediyoruz.
we are not Arabs...we are not Europeans...we are not Mongols ... we're not Africans... WE ARE TURKISH.... ONLY TURKISH...we've always been here..........and we'il always be here...
@Edward Snowden Kurds already freedom 😂 Killing a mother with her baby does not mean that they are prisoners, but that they are free and t*rrorists. (except good people and not supporters of terrorist organization like pkk / isis / ypg). #ErenBülbül #BedirhanKarakaya
@@ancientturkey2308 Ughurs are already free, going to a mining site and Murdering almost a hundred Han Chinese Innocent workers in Cold blood, does not mean they are prisoners but T*rrorists. China should Open a Kurdistan embassy and help people like Ocalan form Kurdish organizations in China just as turkey has done for Ughurs.
Merhaba 😊, I am from Tunisia and descendant of Crimean-Tatar mamluk of Ottoman Army in Tunus. 25% of Tunisia are descendants of Turks, there are millions descendants of Turks in North-Africa except Morocco. I am also scared they would lose their Ottoman heritage 😔. I am self proud of my Tatar/Turk/Ottoman heritage I would say I am Tatar/Turk before Tunisian, my dream is to InsAllah move to Istanbul Turkey and therefore study at Ankara tech university. Greetings my Turkic brothers from Tunisia 😁.
The Italian traveler Pietro della Valle, who visited the Safavid Empire during the reign of Shah Abbas I, wrote that the only information in the state was the military elite, who monopolized all the posts of provincial governors and most important positions since the Safavid rule in the early 16th century. He also described that the Persians lived under the intolerable enslavement of the Turkomans.
Batu Khan Mongolozied Merkit Turk[75] Subutai was Tuvan Turkic origin[76][77] Timur was Barlas Turkic[1][3][4][6][7][9] Most of the Mongolian army is Turkic and almost all of its most important generals are Turkic.The Mongols lived under the Turks for 400 years,Turks made Mongols slav** like İranic peoples also The Qara Khitai are often referred to as " the infidel Turks ” ( kāfir al - Turk , al - Atrāk al - kuffār ) , or simply as Turks[78][79][80] Mongol history big a joke LOL Bumin destroyed the Mongolian Rouran with tiny Turkish tribec and his son Muqhan slaughtered and enslaved the last remaining Rouran Mongols until their lineage was over. Mongol History is a joke against Turkic history.
azerbaijanis were greatest turkic warriors and lions 🇦🇿❤🇮🇷 turk azerbaijani qajars , safavids,and afshars ruled iran 500 years. persians love turk azerbaijani!
Love them or hate them. Turkic peoples are awesome!! My daddy told me cool stories about them as warriors so cool y'all should check the history of them. I'm a 12 year old black american girl and I use to have a Turkic friend she was Uzbek and I love the way she paints pictures of things and show me cool things from Uzbekistan. So sad she had to move to Great Britain she was so fun to has as a friend. Turkics are awesome to me.
their most elite units(yanissaries, quapukulus and ghulams), mostly consisted of captured europeans and steppe children, that they raized up to do soldiering(without having family bonds, loyalty issues etc).
SuperMrFriendly this is the most cruelty of Ottomans but also Janniseries had become most precious army of Ottomans. Its little bit dilemma. They were important than Turkish origin army which name is akinji (cavaliers from turkish village). Janniseries were used hand cannon. They were one of the most fired arm military groups of the world. (second, spanish conquistadors).
SuperMrFriendly yanissaries ghulams and quapukulus were not our most elite units. They where more elite than normal soldiers since they have no bond, but no where near the most elite. The most elite consisted of small groups of soldiers and not big groups like yanissaries. Btw these groups are ottoman groups and this kid is referring to turkic background.
Add Ghurids I cannot conclude this head on the Ghorians without mentioning a remarkable passage found in Janabi, who calls the Ghorides Turks, whilst they are generally reckoned to \'91belong to the Afghans; if it" is not, perhaps, to be understood, that only the reigning family Was of a Turkish origin. This passage runs thus :\'97\'93 The \u64257 rst who became known of the Ghorian kings, are the descendants of Hossain; who are a race of Turlcs, that came from Khata to the mountains of Ghor. In the sequel, their affairs prospered; and they possessed themselves of countries, as it is mentioned in the History of As-of Shah, and in the Tarilch Ulmzwader of Ahmed ben Mohammed Altabrizi.\'94 The author of the Khulassat Ulansab, who is very careful in distinguishing the real Afghans from those that are either supposed or erroneously pretend to be Afghans, seems, too, to consider the Ghorian dynasty as a Turkish race: in support of which assertion, I shall insert here a passage relative to this subject :-\'97\'93 History of the Afghans/ Tarikh-i-khan jahani wa makhzan-i-Afghani Translated from the Persian of Neamet Ullah Part of Cambridge Library Collection - Perspectives from the Royal Asiatic Society AUTHOR: Haravi Nimat AllahTRANSLATOR: Bernhard DornDATE PUBLISHED: June 2013AVAILABILITY: Available FORMAT: PaperbackISBN: 9781108056250 www.wdl.org/en/item/3034/view/1/304/ Chronicler: thesaurus.babylon-software.com/Nimat%20Allah%20al-Harawi Original Work: archive.org/details/TarikhEKhanJahaniOMakhzanEAfghaniJildEAwwal-KhwajaNematullahBinKhwajaHabeebullahAl-HarawiFarsi
@@purple.requiem turkish and turk are not the same things. turkish are Anatolia turks and Cyprus turks. Orher turks are Azerbaijani turks, Turkmen turks, Uzbek turks, Uyghur turks, Altai turks, Kerkuk turkmens, Gagauz turks, kazakhs, Yakut turks and etc
In contrast to those Iranian officials who claim that the Turks in Iran were actually originally Persians, the late IRGC Commander Qassem Suleimani claimed that the descendants of Turkic dynasties that live in Iran are not Iranian. Suleimani claimed: "Turks are aliens and non-Iranians. For hundreds of years (during Turkic rule in Iran), Iran had no history. Non- Iranians like the Seljuks invaded and ruled Iran."74 Shaffer, B. (2023) Iran is more than persia: Ethnic politics in Iran. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Iran had a history, yes, Turkic dynasties used to rule Iran, but saying that Iran had no history due to them is as absurd as saying that Brits and Russians had no history because many of their kings and czars were of German origin. Even Greek kings of new liberated Greece (after Ottomans) were of German descent. And Qassem Suleimani was never an Iranian historian, he was a commander and general. His thought on this topic are irrelevent
@@LoveAndPeace2004 yes but we Turks hate when some random persian claims the rulers were etnitchy persian but they are not... But i agree persian culture asimilited them
Men ata yurta kalan türklerdenim. Özbek türkuyum. Kandaşlarima selam olsun Özbekistan'dan 🇺🇿
Men ota yurtda qolgan turklardanman. Ōzbek turkiman. Qondoşlarimga salom bōlsin Ōzbekistondan 🇹🇷
Aleyküm Selam Kardeşim
Selam türkistana
As yine hizliyorum işte izliyorum.
Ula sovyetlerden hala dejenere olmamis bir nesil varmis en azindan
Türkiye'den aleykum selam kardasim
I'm Nogai Tatar Turk ❤
Mende nogai
hallo tatar turuk
Nerede yaşıyorsun. Kangı ülkedensin
@@canopusyt9961 Kangı ülkedensin gardaş
@Gagavuz Haritacı ben de Tatarım ve Anadolu Türküyüm sen Komrat'tan mısın? :)
Greetings to all my Turkic brothers from Bashkir. We are all Turks: from the Crimea to Altai, from Sakha to Cyprus - the Turkic lands. We are all one big family, we all speak the Turkic language. I hope, I believe, I pray that the Turkic World will flourish and gain strength. The Turks of the whole world will unite in a powerful union. Glory to Allah that we are uniting and making friends, despite all the problems and provocations. As they say: water wears away a stone. Sooner or later we will be united. I believe in it.
Long live our Nation!
We are descendants of great people.
We decorate this World.
We are this World.
🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲 + other brothers
🐺☪️
Sooner or later my brother. Love from Turkey🐺☪️
🕎
We will rise again
poland to china
@Bumın Khan in shaa Allah
Hello my Turkic brothers from 🇰🇬,
It's time to built mighty Turkic Kganate back.🇰🇬🇹🇷🇰🇿🇺🇿🇦🇿🇹🇲🙏
All the worst
and who is gonna lead all those nations ? turkey ? ERDOGHAN ?
@@aryakia850 not erdogan.
First of all, you need to get a very good education and read a lot. Then we need to get stronger economically. You also need to be mentally strong. If we do not educate ourselves, there may be well-educated and financially powerful organizations that want to use such a great power. Believe me, these are not well-intentioned. Study hard like the Israelites and read a lot of books.
@@unseliorki1395 yes u r right but i think most important thing is monarchy and military power just like ours history
Selam aleykum kardeslerim I am from Chuvashia but I want to hear my Turkic brothers around the world, let me hear the voice of all of you!
Hello qardasim from Azer turk
Selam gardaş from turkey
Aleykum salom
Aleyküm selam güzel Kardeşim. Çuvaşistan’da çok çok selamlar sevgiler. Gönlümüzdesiniz her zaman. Allah’a emanet olun. ❤️❤️
Enver Turkanova dont say sekamınaleyküm we are not arab
i am greek and i respect the turkish culture
jak jouk rare
jak jouk thank you :D I'm a turk and I also respect the greek culture :3
and we know that how great is greek culture and history but we are in ignorance era so we will have a lot of retards attacking other coutries
jak jouk I am Turkish and I respect all cultures and religions. And Fuck USA
Sergio Ramoz Greek*
Turkey: I m alone 08:15
Other turkic countries : No we exist 08:27
Wtf where is azerbaijan?!?!?!
wtf are u talking about They are Turkish and they are friend with Turkey
@@akinaspeedstarso modern turkey people are mixed with aryan and arab,some people did't look turkic people too.they look more aryan russia
@@werapeeverythingthatmove6266 That's not true. Turks did not marry other races.Their appearance has changed due to geography. I hope you understand it.
@@werapeeverythingthatmove6266
ahahaha,idiot.
we did not interfere with the Arabs. Arab lands were in the hands of the Ottomans. but the Turks lived in Anatolia and the Arabs in the Middle East. In the dna tests conducted, no arabic dna was found in the Turks. Turks mixed with the Byzantine Roman peoples in Anatolia. but despite this, we have a central Asian DNA ranging from 5% to 45%. don't talk in the ass without knowing anything.
Kurdish and Persian nationalists writing too many of the same interpretations doesn't change anything.
Haha thank you brother they just jealous 🤝
Don't mind them they don't have as glorious as history as Turks that is why they are whining in comments.
They barking like a dog lul they just steal our history
@@atc123456789 Türkümğ kıskanıyor puahhaha
@@islamckurt hoşşsssss SG mq kürdü
O'zbekistondan salomlar, aziz qardoshlar!
Anvarjon Yunusov Aleykum Selam Kardeşim
Selam gardaş
Aleykum selam Ozbek kandasim kardesim
T’urkiyeden sucuklar aziz qardaşım
ve aleykümselam türkiyeden
Hemmisine yahşi we güzel ömür tileymen.
From East Turkistan.
Özgürlük ve Adalet istiyoruz,Doğu Türkistan için!
Uygurların torunları özgür olacak!
Free East Turkestan 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
kardeşim nasılsın oralar iyi mi çok kötü şeyler duyuyoruz çinle ilgili. türkiyeye gelin kapımız açık her zaman.
@@rylodimadperoksizko5129 evet çok iyiler çinliler hiç katliam yapmiyor
Kardeş ne diyorsun çinliler onlara soykırım yapıyor, hapse atim işkence etip öldürüyorlar, türkistan türkler mücadele ediyor sen onların yerinde olsaydin dayanamazdın
Keşke yardım etsek ama çin bizden kat kat güçlü
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28]
Yaaa sana noldu hesabına😭😭😭
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
LOL şimdi sen Bumin Han ve onun devleti Gokturklerdemi moğol diyorsun? Enee!!!! Geriye ne kaldı amk daha nekadar zayıf ve küçük göreceksiniz
Tatarlar Cuman ve Kıpçaklarin birleşmiş ve Tatar dendi ve ayrıca çoğu Tatarın dili Kıpcakca Turgesh de adından belli Türk sen ve diğer Türk karşıtı kişilikler Geberin kabul etmeyip bizi dünyaya yeterince küçük gösteren ındo-european ve afro asiatic denen soytarı ırklar yüzünden Türklük artık efsane gibi birşey yeni çıkma falan çıktığı gibi yok olma bu ne?!!!! Tarih çocuk masalı değil istediğiniz gibi şekilenmez
🦭
Greetings from Turkey to the whole Turkish world 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬
hate Turkey
@@SP.-Iran What's the matter, man?
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
Kırım Tatar Kıpçak turklerinden tüm Turan a selam olsun
ve aleyküm selam
Turk was Korea’s neighbour
good old times
We just like to travel. Nothing more.
Turk people just like have no home
@@constantiniasmith4231 But fuck all your ethnicity:) rip your home
@@constantiniasmith4231 like make new home
🐺🇭🇺🇰🇿🇹🇲🇹🇷🇰🇬🇦🇿🇺🇿🐺
TURKICH PEOPLE
Love to all Turkic Brothers from Kyrgyzstan!!
Stop admiring genghis khan bi*ch because he is not a TÜRK and he is not our ancestor because he is a mongoli. PS: TURKIC and mongolic are diffrent lenguages races and cultures. And share not the same ancestors.
Long live Turks! From our brothers, Hungary!
: Hungaryball : love my Hungarian brothers, love from Azerbaijan
: Hungaryball : Thank you! Btw just a correction, you guys are our cousins not brothers. But still, you guys are a part of Uralic-Altaic family. So thanks :D Love Hungary from Turkey
theodoros kolokotronis Turks have more than a hundred states What do the Greeks have?
theodoros kolokotronis the most powerful states of the world are the Turk states.göktürk empire,ottoman empire,seljuks empire,europa hun empire,hun empire,white hun empire,avar empire,aqqoyuns,mamelukes,east hun empire,west hun empire,asia hun empire,uyghur empire,mogol turk empire,golden horde empire,safevid empire the most powerful empires always founded Turks.We Turks like to read history but our main duty is to write history.
Theodoros Kolokotronis We recommend reading the kürşad, which attacked the chinese palace of 5000 people with 40 people and saved their relative.kürşad's china rescued from his palace brother established east gokturk state.your sources for kürşad's name is Chieh-she-shuai
Salam aleykym from Kyrgyzstan 🇰🇬 Tanri biz menen !
Aleykum selam gardas
Aleyküm selam
My Mongolian history is Great
Beybars Barsbek Aleykum Selam , Tengri ( Allah ) biz Menen 👏🏼🇹🇷🐺🇰🇬
Beybars Barsbek ✊🏻🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬✊🏻
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
Age of Dicovery😂
@@Its-darkdead6 bruuh Persian kids 🤣🤣
islam was thrown out of Northern India by the Maratha and the Sikhs. too bad for you
@@kanhaibhatt913 Pakistan and Bangladesh Keşmir muslim
@@YusufOzdemir-df3bb the weak convert, the strong resist to the end
A Tunisian and a Turk were chatting. Tunisian belittled Atatürk and asked what did Atatürk achieve?
and the Turk replied ;
"I learned French because I wanted it, you learned it out of necessity.Now do you understand what he's accomplished? "
Mustafa Kamâl in devri bitiyor.
@@otonomfilmstudio948
Secimlerde tekmeyi yiyince gorecegiz kimin devri bitiyor :)
@@hannibalbarca2928 Yav he he . Bak Mustafa Kamâl resimleri Apo ile beraber (CHP HDP) olması gerektiği yerde hemde Mustafa'nın kendi partisi .
@@otonomfilmstudio948
Ben chpli değilim.ama o hdpyi meclise alanlarda sizdiniz ne çabuk unuttunuz.
@@otonomfilmstudio948 ayrıca ypg liderini kırmızı hali ile karsilamistiniz ne çabuk unuttunuz :D
Love them or hate them, you would be a fool for denying that they didn’t change history forever. Starting in Siberia and making it to as far as Anatolia is pretty impressive imo.
From Siberia to the heart of Vienna.
Only a fool would think Turk started from Siberia, the Turks were the slaaves of Mongols, who were the original inhabitant of the steppes, it is through the Mongols that Turkish influence spread to Central Asia and the Steppes first through trade. The Turds try to claim the history of all inhabitants of the Steppes as theirs, and in return the Koreans try to claim they are the original Turks, I do not know who should win the first price for historical liars, the Turks who claim the whole history of the steppes when it is not true or the Koreans who claim the history of everyone, including the Turks.
@@red4812 Turks are mongols are not totally different groups. Xiongu was fathers of both and even after seperation they didn't seperated totally. In big Turkic empires there were lots of Mongol tribes and similarly under Genghis Han there were a lot of Turkic tribes. i.e Golden horde considered more Turkic than Mongol. Also there are a lot of common names in both languages, Cengiz(Genghis), Kubilay(Kublai), Kutluk(Qutlugh), Ögeday(Ogeday), Paydar(Baidar) etc.
Hun (xiongnu) people were turks. Turks have founded Xiongnu (hun) empire, but mongols have joined the empire later times. On the other hand, golden horda empire was a union of turks and mongols. This empire was founded by mongols, then turks had got the power of menagement from mongols. Turks and mongols are totally differant races but they have made some unions and confederations because of their common enemies such as china and russia.
Ahmet Demir Austria-Hungary controlled almost all of Central Europe and balkans (which they took from the ottomans). The US is huge and basically it’s own continent, they had a lot of land outside of North America as well such as panama, Caribbean and the Phillipines not to mention it was one of the largest GDP’s and military in the world, Italy under Rome conquered almost all of Europe, Middle East and North Africa. France had almost all of west and North Africa as well as Indochina and much of North America, they also kicked the ottoman’s asses in WW1 and captured much of the Middle East. Napoleon also conquered almost all of Europe as well. Poland-Lithuania conquered the entirely of Eastern Europe from Scandinavia to the Black Sea. Greece ate the entire eastern half of the known world under Alexander the great in under a decade also they too captured much of turkey in the 20th century. Also the ottomans lost twice in Viena after getting their asses beaten by an outnumbered foe. The polish winged Hussars ate the entire ottoman army’s ass for lunch. Comment when you’ve actually won a world war and maybe even recognise the genocide of 3 million Armenians which were force marched into the desert to their death or pushed into the Black Sea to drown by the young Turk retards. It’s been a hundred years maybe you can finally apologise for it.
Magyar & Török! 🇭🇺❤🇹🇷 Greetings From Hungary to our Brothers!
Szia testvér! Éljen Attila fiai!🇭🇺❤🇹🇷
God bless Hungary♥️🇭🇺♥️
You guys are turkic too.
Hungarian Turks salute brother
Hungarians are Hun Turks Turkic Brother
Turks ruled EVERYWHERE bro
Except America and Australia
@@KazakhBoy The Turkic people living in Altai mountains migrated to modern day America 30.000 years ago in the ice-age time using the bearing strait. This is well documented. If you look at the culture of native indians and the culture of Shamanic Turks you will see 99% simiralities
İm sad. Cause we didnt rule britain.d
@@KazakhBoyAustralia is ruled by Asians or specifically aborigines
Yeah but the during the late 16th century the slaavic tzaars of muscow put a full stop on the Eurasian turko - mongolic khaganates through which the turk dominance of Eurasian ended
Turks are best warriors in history but you missed tons of empires anyway
First of them is mamluks
Yes we are number 1 bulding Empires and also destroying them
Fun fact is, considerably more Turkic polities were destroyed by other Turkic polities rather than foreigners.
@Ludvig Hauger Turk and Circassian periods not Arabic
@@Nomadicenjoyerplus kardes siz bir grup falan misiniz yaw bende girmek isterim
Turan🐺 🇰🇿❤️🇹🇷
Turan yalnız bu ikisinden ibaret deil
Rusça konuşmayı bırakın
Siz Rus olmayın Turan
Biz kazakca konusmus, rusca degil, kazak turkcesi mangi 🇰🇿🇹🇷✊
@@cuntdoku siz de arapça konuşmayı
Love you Turk from Japan
Love you Japan From Türk
Seriously? Rising sun flag? No shame for your war of aggression? This is like Germans using the Swastika(which they don't as they feel shame for their actions and are good people).
We too
Love Japonic peoples from Turkic peoples :)
BANZAİ from Turkey ;)
Iran azarbaycan turklerdenem, turk qardashlarima salamlar, tarimiz bizi bir gun bir yere yigajax , BOYUK TURKUSTAN quraciyux.
Aynen gardaş fuck iran
@@alparslanosmangokturkoglu2366 olm niye fuck iran diyorsun. adamların iranla alıp veremedikşeri yokki. İranda hayet normal vatandas statusundeler. ayrıca oradaki azeri-türkmenler sever ve desteklerler devletlerini. muhalifleri de vardır da farsilerde de var o.
Evet DP FGC hakli
@@RetroArayuz aynen öyle tek sorun farsilerin Türklüğü 1000 yıldır düşman olarak görmeleri Türk birliğine karşı iran farsi yönetimi
Birgün!
The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.
İman gücü var Allah Allah diye koşarız. Bir de Osmanlı Tokatı :)
Sein herberge goruyorum at
Aq*
That and many other factors made them fierce warriors. Not just the fact that they can pew pew while they're on the dıgıdık
Salam, Kirgizstandan!
Selam Türkiyeden🌷
Türkiyeden aleyküm selam
Islam zindabad
Selam kardasim.
Dastan Turatbekov selam karındaş
buiak turklarga salam kazak turkilrrden kultegin tonikok tugulgan kazak turan yurtidan!
Angel Angel aleykum selam kandaşim. Yurtin bizim yurtimiz bizim yurtimiz sizin yurtiniz.
Külteginin ağabeyi Bilge khanı biliyormusunuz
Ve aleykum selam kardeşim.
We especially hope that everyone whose native language belongs to the Turkic languages group will become a true Muslim
@@sobank4743No thank you live your religion yourself don't try to spread it.
Dünyadaki bütün Türklere selam olsun.
Tanrı Türk'ü Korusun.
🇹🇷 🇦🇿 🇹🇲 🇰🇬 🇰🇿 🇺🇿
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
@@user-sw6ip2hk5w (Asya Hun imparatorluğu, Göktürk İmparatorluğu Türklerin bir arada olduğu imparatorlukları) Türklerin ilk dini Tengri ve bu dini 2000 yıl öncede kullanıyordu Türkler
What do ancient Turkic writers and philosophers say about their history?
Long live Turkey🇹🇷
çok yaşa Türkiye🇹🇷
from Japan🇯🇵
Japonyadan🇯🇵
ゆうた1727 thank you bro respect good peoples Japan 🙂
@@kartalkara7345
You are welcome.
どういたしまして。
Long live Nippon🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵
@@anonymous2580
Long live Türkiye.🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Respect to Japanese People
i am a Greek and i believe in Turkish-Greek friendship , all the wars we had on the past doesnt matter shit to me, every leader in this period of time wanted a bigger empire , more food, more gold , more area, this is natural.
Let's respect each other's origins, culture, borders. Greece and Turkey have a long history and we have a lot in common and a lot of differences. Let's all live in Peace.
Peace & Love.
Thecool Inio yes also Turks came to Europe with Huns, later followed by Pechenegs, Cumans First Bulgarians they build empires in the region some of them allied with Roman empire some of the fought later they became a part of the Greek Byzantium empire and fought against Muslim Turks in 1071 lost their identity.
Yeah, who the hell needs war?
Thecool Inio are you greek? Are you sure?😶😶😶😶
Thecool Inio You are cool!
I completely agree with you my Hellenic brother. I hope Hellens and Turks will be good friends again.
"Your land is either colonized and replaced by Turk, Or ruled by the Turks as your kings of elites"
Elijah Oliver Dickenson (a British officer from India British Raj and a historian of Turkic culture)
Pretty accurate.
Turks are either your kings or your replacers of population.
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over.
Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511806681.009
@@pompacitokmakci On a VERY unrelated note.
You'll appreciate this Yoruk quote.
"We migrated to Anatolia because God told us so, and we migrated to Anatolia because God made his garden here"
Yoruk Proverb
@@noahtylerpritchett2682 I'm a pure Yoruk yoruks migrated Anatolia because Central steppes are poor and Turks were overpopulated in Central Asia
@@pars-efe3543 purity doesn't exist. Every race is a formation of mix racing which created new races.
Love to all my turkic friends from Pakistan, some of the fiercest warriors of Islam and of course The Conqueror were of turkic descent, much respect
Jive Pakistan
Yenisey Kirghiz. I am kyrgyz, and I am proud to be Kyrgyz. Long live to Turks people!
You Tube why do Turks at central asia call them as kazakh , kyrgyz or uzbek ? At least you can call yourself Kazakh Turks , Uzbek Turks or Kyrgyz Turks
Leave Alone that's good question
They are already called like that. Both terms are used ( kazakh - kazakh turk; uzbek- uzbek turk etc.) But it's shorter and hence easier to say kazakh, krygyz ,azeri etc. No need to add "turk" to the end cuz everybody will understand that when u say kazakh, you mean the turks living in central asia in their own state called Kazakhistan etc. :)
Dogan Cetinkal when we talk about our ethnic we call Turk but when they talk about their ethnic they call theirself kazakh , uzbek etc and it seems we are different people
Yep, we all are originally same (Turk), but of course time, region and interaction with neighbours have affected and changed cultures by time. Hence Uzbek, Kazakh, Azerbayjani, Turks (Turks in Turkey) etc. all are different people for sure but they are all Turkic people and nations and have many in common.
im from greece,i like to read history such turk,chinise,greek,agypt,romans.All we have to respect each other
that comment made my day. Thank u man
respect
George Ts you are right but what about cyprus?
Baran Yalçın the Aegean Islands are pure Greek. No debate there. But seriously you need to get rid of Erdocunt, he is destroying you with propaganda and disrespecting the turkic culture. Greetings
Arda Baştürk I'm so glad you understand. I'm a Greek but we don't warn you guys because we want to destroy you. We are not saying that erdogan is destroying you as an enemy. We are saying that as neighbors who want peace. You need to get rid of him before he starts sending your families in prison. My fellow greetings
In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.
这些土地都是荒芜且寒冷的土地
只能用来放牧
在古代没人想占领
Otistik misin
So many peraian, kurdish trolls crying in comments.
Well tbf the Seljuk empire was Persian
@@malikabd2902 😅
@@malikabd2902 first of all Seljuk was *RULED* by Turks from present day Turkmenistan, second more mongols are crying about xiongnu and Hunnic empire being Mongol then any other ethnic group
@@leratking8842 it was a turco Persian empire, the Seljuks had their capital in Isfahan Iran and we're as influenced by Persian culture as they were by turkic
@@malikabd2902 İran çoğunlukla Türk'tür. Selçuklu Türklerinin devamı Anadolu Selçuklu'dur. Anadolu Selçuklu da yıkılınca Türk komutanlar beyliklere ayrıldı. Osmanlı ise hepsini yeniden birleştirdi. Osmanlı Selçuklu Türklerinin devamıdır
I'm Turk from Iran
Ben Iran Türk'üyüm selam olsun bütun Türk'lere
Teimour Moghanloo aleyküm selam
Why are you in Iran?
Österreich I thought OP was Turkish
Österreich I'm from Iran and Khorasan.But we are not turkish...
a littel peoples from Khorasan are turkaman.Maby 2mil of 13 mil
فرازمان جهانبخش چون تو ایران ترک زیاد داریم
Men Orto Aziya Turkiman!
Timur Joro menem Orta Asiya Türkmen ema atalarym anadolu ya köch diler, sana salam bolsyn Allah biz bilen amin.
Timur Joro
Ben Orta Asya Türk'üyüm
Cenk Özkan iiiyyyy o resim ne öyle
Kültegin Batyr
Ne resmi
Cenk Özkan profil resmin ........
Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’):
This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
Bütün türk tarih videolarının yorumlarında varsın knk hdkslsşzzlx
Otistik misin
*In Iran entered a period of relative obscurity and seclusion under
two dynasties of Turkish origin: the Safavids and the Qajars.[1]
*The Safavids were of Turkish descent..[2]
*As with their Safavid predecessors, the new dynasty was of Turkish origin ;
and administrative institutions similar to those the Safavids had attempted to build up were revived.[3]
*There was a real need for the Safavids to disassociate themselves from their
arch-foes by playing down their own Turkish origins.[4]
*The Divan of Shah İsmail, the founder of the Safavid Dynasty was written in Turkish,,
because he was of Turcoman origin.[5]
*The Safavids (1501-1722), two major dynasties of Turkish origin.[6]
*The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the SAFAVID dynasty in 1500.
Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the SHITTE form of Islam and established a state.[7]
*The Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires. Though political and ideological rivals,
all three empires were of Turkic origin and belonged to the same Persianate cultural universe.[8]
*Form of Shi'ism under pressure from the Safavids, originally a Turkic Sufi order who were themselves former Sunnis.[9]
*The three Islamic empires of the early modern period - the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman -
shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage.[10]
*Safavid power with its distinctive Persian-Shi‘i culture, however, remained a middle ground between
its two mighty Turkish neighbors. The Safavid state, which lasted at least until 1722,
was essentially a "Turkish" dynasty, with Azeri Turkish (Azerbaijan being the family's home base)
as the language of the rulers and the court as well as the Qizilbash military establishment.[11]
*Under the Safavids, the Azeri Turks came into conflict with the expanding Ottoman Turks[12]
*A massive migration of Oghuz Turks in the l lth and l2th centuries not only Turkified Azerbaijan
but also Anatolia. The Azeri Turks are Shi'ites and were founders of the Safavid dynasty.[13]
*The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the *Safavid Dynasty in 1500.
Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the Shi'ite form of Islam.[14]
*The Caucasus was a battleground between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Turkic Shia Safavid Dynasty of Persia.[15]
*Shah Isma'il I (1500-24), the founder of the Safavid dynasty of Azeri origin, made the Shi'a branch of Islam.[16]
*This family, reported by some sources to be of Azerbaijani origin[17]
*Three major Islamic empires emerged, all with Turkic roots to varying degrees: those of the
Ottomans (1300-1922), Safavids (1501-1722), and Moghuls (1526-1858).[18]
*The Ottoman eastward expansion was stalled by the rise of another Turkish dynasty, the Safavids, in Persia.[19]
*The Safavid Turks, who had their genesis in a Shia dervish order in Azerbaijan.[20]
*Selim I captured the Capital Tebriz also and thus put a check on the growth of the military power of the Safavid Turks.[21]
* “gunpowder empires”: the Empire of the Ottoman Turks (centered in Turkey),
that of the Safavid Turks (centered in Iran or Persia)[22]
*Discuss the religious and political issues that separated the Ottoman Turks and the Safavid Turks.[23]
*See Ottoman Empire; Safavid Turks Turks, 10 revolt against, 225 Safavid, 30 Twelver branch.[24]
* In the early 16th century, the Azeri dynasty of the Safavids ( r. 1501-1736 )
took power in Tabriz and developed a culture that influenced much of the region.[25]
*Of three great empires: the Mughals in South Asia, the ?afavids in Persia, and the Ottomans in the west.
The three empires shared basic features such as Turkic dynastic origins.[26]
*What most Iranians are not told (neither by the Shia clergy nor ultra-Iranian nationalits)
is how the Turkic Safavids slaughtered thousands upon thousands of Persians (Sunnis),
starting with the elite, the thinkers and scholars.[27]
*The rule of the Turkic Safavids completed the process of linguistic Turkicisation
of modern Azerbaijanis which was initiated by the Seljuks in the eleventh century.[28]
*Buyids (Iranian) (945-1055) . Ghaznavids (Turkic) (994-1030) . Seljuks (Turkic) (1045-1217) .
Mongol/Ilkhanid Dynasties (Turkicized Mongols) (1221-1338) .
Timurids and Turkmen (Turkic) (1383-1501) . Safavids (Turkic) (1501-1722)[29]
* Although arising from a local, originally Sunni Sufi order in Azerbaijan,
the Turkish Safavids speedily became the vigorous upholders of Shi'ism.[30]
*The Safavid and Qajar dynasties,rulers in Iran from 1501 to 1722 and from
1795 to 1925 respectively,were Turkic in origin[31]
*Understands political achievements of the Safavid and Mughal Empires
,how Persia was unified by the Turkic Safavids.[32]
*Therefore, the student is able to: 5-12 Explain the unification of Persia under the Turkic Safavids.[33]
*To bolster its legitimacy, the Turkish Safavid dynasty created the fiction of an ancestral link.[34]
*The Turkic origin of the Safavid dynasty,which is rarely acknowledged in u conventional Turkish nationalist historiography.[35]
*Shah Ismail, a Turk of the Shi'i sect of Islam, arose as leader of both Turkic and Iranian
adherents of this sect, who placed more emphasis upon religion than upon ethnic origin.[36]
* The Safavids were originally Turkic, ghazis like the Osmanlis and succeeded, like them, in distancing possible rivals.[37]
* The Safavids were descended from a family of Turkmen Sufi sheikhs from Ardabil, in Azerbaijan.[38]
* In the early 1500s, a thirteen-year-old Turkmen named Ismail, who lived in western Iran, conquered the whole country[39]
* Yet even Iran's foreign conquerors - such as the Turkic Safavid, Afshar, and Qajar dynasties.[40]
Sources:
*1-Women, Religion and Culture in Iran
*2-World History DeMYSTiFieD Stephanie Muntone McGraw Hill Professional-Page 238
*3-Modern Persian Prose Literature-Page 9
*4-Comparative History of Civilizations in Asia: 10,000 B.C. to 1850 Edward L. Farmer Westview Press-Page 430
*5-Cultural Horizons: A festschrift in honor of Talat S. Halman,Volume 1 Jayne L. Warne Syracuse University Press, 2001
*6-Women's History in Global Perspective,Volume 3-Page 82
*7-New Catholic Encyclopedia: A-Azt-Page 140
*8-The Eckstein Shahnama: An Ottoman Book of KingsWill Kwiatkowski Sam Fogg,2005-Page 9
*9-Religions of Iran: From Prehistory to the Present-Page 192
*10-Safavid, Mughal,and Ottoman Empires(Cambridge University Press)
*11-Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective(Cambridge University Press)-Page 86-87.
*12-Global Security Watch-The Caucasus States-Page 3
*13-Iran II: Iranian history - Iran V: Peoples of Iran,Volume 3 Ehsan Yarshater
The Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation,2006-Page 325
*14-New Catholic Encyclopedia-Volumr 1.-18.-Page 16
*15-Caucasus:Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide-Page 3
*16-Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia 2003-Page 104
*17-Azerbaijan, Mosques, Turrets, Palaces Ilona Turánszky Corvina Kiadó,1979-Page 21
*18-The Turks in World History(Oxford University Press)-Page 94
*19-Conflict, Conquest, and Conversion: Two Thousand Years of Christian Missions
in the Middle East(Columbia University Press)
*20-The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism: The Nation-state at Bay?(Univ of Wisconsin Press)
*21-Proceedings of the All Pakistan Political Science Conference,Volume
*22-Expansion and Global Interaction, 1200-1700 David R. Ringrose Longman,2001-Page 135
*23-Student Study Guide and Map Exercise Workbook to accompany Traditions and Encounters,Volume 2
BENTLEY McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated
*24-The Politics of the Middle East Monte Palmer F.E. Peacock Publishers,2002-Page 425
*25-Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set(Oxford University Press)-Page 236
*26-The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics Emad Eldin Shahin, ?Peri J. Bearman, ?Sohail H. Hashmi - 2014
*27-Son of Sunnah-Persian Sunni scholars VS the King of the Safavids
*28-Routledge Handbook of the Caucasus
*29-Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-Muslims in Modern Iran-Page 275
*30-Encyclopaedia of Islam Ian Richard Netton-Page 570
*31-Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Africa and the Middle East-Page 707
*32-Content knowledge: a compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education
John S. Kendall, Robert J. Marzano Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory,1996-Page 243
*33-National standards for history National Center for History in the Schools (U.S.),
Charlotte Antoinette Crabtree, Gary B. Nash-Page 180
*34-Government and Politics of the Contemporary Middle East: Continuity and change-Page
*35-New Perspectives on Turkey,36-37.-Page 230
*36-The Middle East and South Asia,Stryker-Post Publications,1968-Page 10
*37- The History of the World JJohn Morris Roberts, Odd Arne Westad
(Oxford University Press)-Page 403
*38-The Safavids and their Successors - The David Collection
*39- Iran the People - Page 10
*40- Iran and the world: continuity in a revolutionary decade(Indiana University Press)-Page 11
I LOVE YOU TURKS! I'M FROM KAZAKHSTAN!
you are turk too...
Kardaş sen de Türksün
Spinosaurus Maroccanus most are Turks and some are Slavic and Mongol people
phuck y'all What the fuck are you saying ? They're not slavic people, they are altaic people (turkic, mongolic and tungusic)
Zeng Khan 回族 so you tell me there are no mongols and slavs in Kazakhstan?!? Tell me I am wrong?
Fun fact we turks create empires and most of the time another turk destroys it.
aglamak istiyom hahahahhah
Only Turk can destroy Turk
yeah say thanks to fucking Timur
Bu çok doğru değil. Hep devlet yıkma diye anlatılır bizde ama aslolan sadece hükümdarın değişmesidir. Devletler genelde aynı kalır.
Niko Nasirov turk got destroyed by more than turk
Turks are the greatest conquerors of all time respect from iran
علیرضا نصیرپور
Thanks brother :)
Thanks. Respect Iran🇹🇷❤🇮🇷
love İran also Persian Empire very strong
you are probably from "south azerbaijan" not iran :) we count that part to be "south azerbaijan" so clearly say that you are from there! love ya!
@@abbeyrhapsody3205 Yes, South Azerbaijan. Land of the Turks. Long live Greater Azerbaijan
raged kurds and persian Nationalists in the comments
however, they come to these countries to work for 3 cents of money. Let them have a little fun.
Don't forget jealous Arabs.
@@Ambrosia- turkish people are arabs
salam uigurlardan!
Aleyküm selam 👋☺️
Aleyküm selam gardaş
Türkiyeden Sergiler ❤ ve Selamlar.👋
Selam
this video is joke turk have not history
Gretting Mighty Turks ! Grettings and respect from Finlanddd !
West mongolia is best mongalia !
Grafhindolf my ural brothers 10 years ago brothers
Finland is best land
We love you Finland
Grafhindolf Thanks,finland
Azerbaijan❤Iran. turk azerbaijani qajars , safavids,and afshars ruled iran 500 years. persians love turk azerbaijan! azerbaijanis were greatest turkic warriors and lions 🇦🇿❤🇮🇷
About Türk history not Shia history Please be Türk not sectarian of Iran
We are TURKS
We don't sectarian
@Bilge Kağan I think he's Persian not Turkish Azeri
@@foreverturkh azerbaijanis are greatest turkic warriors!
@@iran6888
Typic Shia fachist propaganda
Ha haa 😊
TURKS IS TURK
Not Turkic, Shia boy
ممنون برادر آذربایجان همیشه برای ایران جنگیده و خواهد جنگید چون ایران وطن ما هست 🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷
Best history in history=Turk history but you missed many states anyway...
tarihimiz çok köklü ve ihtişamlı olduğundan fars , moğol yunan gibi tarihte üzdüğümüz bazı azınlıklar tarihimizi bölmeye , sahiplenmeye çalışıyor.
Thank you for this great video! Greetings from Kazakhstan to my Turk brothers & sisters all over the world!
Selam olsun Anadolu Türklerinden Kazak eline!
@Alpha Film
Anladım. Hatta doğulular buna benzer konuşuyorlar. Dağdan infim şehre tipler
@Alpha Film İstanbul'a sonradan gelmeler
Arghun Pride almost half this video is fake most of them are not even Turkic origin like Göktürk the rulers of Göktürk were Iranic Saka-Wusun Origin Form the Ashina according to Chinese sources and almost all modern historians Researchers such as H. W. Haussig,[1] S. G. Klyashtorny,[2][3] A. N. Bernstamm,[4] C. V. Findley,[5] D.G. Savinov,[6] S. P. Guschin,[7] Rona-Tas[8] and R. N. Frye[9] have pointed out that the origin of the Ashina is from the Iranian Saka-Wusun Origin form the Ashina tribe
@@yaqubleis6311
:) I am laughing to you :) Ashina means "she wolf" and ashina Iranic ? :)))) hahahah
Man Uzbek turkuyim her keza selamlar
Men*
Salam OZBEK kandasim
@@turkestanskymapper9580 E ben
Aleyküm selam
Aleykum selam kandaş
I m proud to be Turk 🇹🇷
Greetings to all Turk brothers and sisters from Turkey 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇬🇰🇿🇺🇿🇹🇲
TURAN ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️💪💪💪💪💪
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
Turkish from Anatolian peninsula are more Persian than Turk sorry to disappoint
Macaristan Nerde?
The first Turkic-speaking community appeared between 7,000 BC. and 5,000 BC. in South Central Asia (in today's Turkmenistan, near the Iranian border), namely Anav culture. Part of this community remained in this area until around 1,000 BC. while another part of the community around 4,000 BC. was distributed in the northern part of Central Asia and another part was distributed in regions such as Mesopotamia and Anatolia. The name of one of these communities in Anatolia and Mesopotamia was even called Turukku.
my turkic brothers assalamualeykum. respect from the old khwarezm and Uzbekistan! central Asia!
Salam Özbekdan! Yaşa Türkiy millat va Türk askar! 🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇺🇿🇹🇷
Aleykum selam kandas
Aleyküm selam kardeşim
CD AB speak turkish pls
My Mongolian history is great
Enkhjargal Hatantuul we are cousin Mongolian And Turks
𐰀𐰤𐰀𐰘𐰃𐰓:𐰢𐰜𐰼𐰇𐱅:𐰆𐰞𐱃𐰆𐰢:𐰀𐰤
Ne mutlu Türküm diyene 🇹🇷🇰🇿🇰🇬🇦🇿🇺🇿🇹🇲
"Timur had not captured anyone from the people of Anatolia after the Battle of Ankara. Because the state he was fighting was also a Turk state. He remained loyal to the tradition, which had the understanding that a Turk would not be a prisoner. "
-Ducas, Byzantine History, p.174
Esir almamasının sebebi neredeyse tüm beylikler Timurun yanında yer aldı. Neden esir alsın. Karatatarlar ve Karamanlılar başta..
Im Azerbaijaninan Turk, GOD bless all Turks people
Логико go fuck yourself
you are from us Turks bro
@A oh i see
I'm a Kazakh/Turk and I find this video very helpful
🇰🇿🇦🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲🇹🇷💪🏻💪🏻
Sexy Tomato Hello From Anatolia
Hello i am frim france is turks empire big and awsome !
JustAgame la olm kimi kandıryon turksun biliyoz videolarin turkce xd
türkçe yazsana :D
Sexy Tomato Hello from taşkent
On the other hand, as has been recently pointed out, though the beginning of Bahri rule is usually dated to 1250, none of the first five sultans were, in fact, members of the Bahriyya. 32 The Arabic sources for the period refer to the dynasty as the dawlat al-atrak, dawlat al-turk, or al- dawla al-turkiyya (i.e. dynasty of the Turks), in recognition of the racial or ethnic group which predominated in the mamluk caste during this period, and to distinguish it from the Burji sultanate in which mamluks
Northrup, L. (1998). The Bahrī Mamlūk sultanate, 1250-1390. In C. Petry (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt (The Cambridge History of Egypt, pp. 242-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521471374.011
The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/ 1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517) amalia levanoni The Turkish era of the Mamlūk sultanate The Mamlūks’ rise to power: a decade of trial and error The Arabic term mamlūk literally means ‘owned’ or ‘slave’, and was used for the white Turkish slaves of pagan origins, purchased from Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes by Muslim rulers to serve as soldiers in their armies.
Levanoni, A. (2010). The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: The Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517). In M. Fierro (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam (The New Cambridge History of Islam, pp. 237-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521839570.010
The term 'Mamluk Sultanate' is a modern historiographical term.[9] Arabic sources for the period of the Bahri, Mamluks refer to the dynasty as the State of the Turks (Arabic: دولة الاتراك, Dawlat al-Atrāk; دولة الترك, Dawlat al-Turk) or State of Turkey (الدولة التركية, al-Dawla al-Turkiyya).[16][17][9]
In the obituary notices about Niẓām al-Mulk the fact that he drew his power and authority from the thousands of Turkish Mamlūks he possessed (kathrat mamālikihi; wa-malaka min ghilman al-Atrāk ulūfan) is clearly stated. See al-Athir, Ibn, al-Ta’rikh al-Bāhir fi al-Dawla(Cairo, 1963), p. 10;Google Scholar and Abū Shāma, who cites Nizām al-Mulk’s contemporary or near-contemporary, the historian Muhammad b. ‘Abd al-Malik al-Hamdānī, who died early in the sixth/twelfth century (Kitāb al-Rawdatayn,Cairo, 1288H, i, p. 26).Google ScholarFor more detail see “Aspects of the MamlⅫk phenomenon”, pp. 213-14. TheSiyāsat-nāma certainly reflects Nizām al-Mulk's personal attitude to the Turkish Mamlūks and the spirit of the time, even if it was edited after his death.
When the ‘Abbāsid Caliphs were under Buwayhid suzerainty their Mamlūk policy was not free from the pressure of that Daylamite dynasty. The success of the Daylamite soldiers in so many eastern armies is really astounding, but in the slightly longer run they stood no chance against the Turkish Mamlūks, and they disappeared. Even a Buwayhid ruler preferred Turks over them (see e.g.Bosworth, , “Ghaznevid military organisation”, p. 42;Google ScholarAyalon, , “On the eunuchs…”, p. 109Google Scholar).
41
I have already pointed out, in “Egypt as a dominant factor …”, pp. 30-1Google Scholar, some of the reasons which prevented the Mamlüks from taking real root under the Fātimids. There I mentioned especially the fact that, on moving from the Maghrib to Egypt, much of their ruling and military systems had already been crystallized, and they could not replace, or at least replace properly, the already existing and most powerful military bodies. Another factor which I referred to there was the great distance separating Egypt from the Turkish Mamlüks” homeland, which was, in addition to that, cut off from Egypt by mainly Sunnite states hostile to the Fātimids. (The antagonism of the Seljuks to the acquisition of Turkish Mamlüks by the Sunnite al-Muqtafī must have been at least as strong in the case of the Fātimids. This, coupled with the much greater distance of Egypt from the sources of supply, illustrates well the obstacles which the Fātimids faced in forming a proper Mamlük army.) Yet another major factor was the very inadequate military schools of the Fātimids, when they had them (I discuss this aspect in my book on the eunuchs). The impossibility of the Mamlük system (with the Turkish Mamlüks at its heart) developing under the Fātimids as it should, was clearly demonstrated in the second half of the fourth/tenth century, as soon as its great protagonist al-'Aziz billāh died (386/996), that is to say, quite soon after their occupation of Egypt. That was one of the reasons why their hold on Syria was even then not strong enough. With the later appearance of the Seljuks and the Crusaders that hold, without a further military force, could not but become more precarious. Note also the military feats of the Turkish Mamlük contingent which Saladin sent in 568/1172-3 to the Maghrib (“Aspects of the Mamlük phenomenon”, part B, pp.12-13Google Scholar).
2. Kitāb Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk min Kitāb al-ʻAnāṣir li-majālis al-Malik al-Nāṣir : manuscript, [1567] ; Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; Thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; كتاب ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر : مخطوطة، [1567] ; ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر ; ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر
CREATOR/CONTRIBUTOR:
Maqrīzī, Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī, 1364-1442, creator
مقريزي، أحمد بن علي،, 1364
al-Malik al-Muẓaffar Sayf al-Dīn al-Muʿizzī , third Mamlūk sultan of the Dawlat al-Turk or Baḥrī dynasty. A nephew of the K̲h̲wārazm-S̲h̲āh D̲j̲alāl al-Dīn, Ḳuṭuz (whose original Muslim name was Maḥmūd b. Mamdūd) was taken prisoner by the Mongols and sold to a Damascus merchant who, in turn, sold him to the Mamlūk amīr Aybak in Cairo. Aybak, as the husband of S̲h̲ad̲j̲ar al-Durr, became in 648/1250 al-Malik al-Muʿizz, from which title Ḳuṭuz derived his nisba , al-Muʿizzī.
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Political Theory
Leigh K. Jenco, Murad Idris, Megan C. Thomas · 2019 · Political Science
The lens of mamlūk military slavery has dominated studies of medieval Egypt. ... dynasty (established by Salāh al-Dīn in the twelfth century) to the Turkish Mamluk sultanate in the mid-thirteenth century.
The Oxford Encyclopedia of Medieval Warfare and Military Technology
Clifford J. Rogers, William Caferro, Shelley Reid · 2010 · History
In general, the Mamluk Sultanate was referred to at the time as the “Turkish state” or “dynasty” ( dawlat al-turk/atrak).
In this period the emergence of the Ottoman Turkish dynasty challenged what remained of the Byzantine Empire, eventually absorbing the other Turkish domains in Anatolia, while the Turkic Mamluk Empire
“The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: Emergence of the Ottomans.” Ottoman Dress and Design in the West: A Visual History of Cultural Exchange, by Charlotte A. Jirousek and Sara Catterall, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 2019, pp. 41-78.
Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks "
Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39
Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012
The Mamluks (whose name denotes their slave status) were a quintessential Turkic military dynasty.
Spannaus, Nathan. “HISTORY AND CONTINUITY: AL-AZHAR AND EGYPT.” Modern Islamic Authority and Social Change, Volume 1: Evolving Debates in Muslim Majority Countries, edited by MASOODA BANO, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2018, pp. 79-101.
What they did not know was that with Baybars, a new Turkish dynasty would unify the Islamic Middle East with an uncompromising commitment to jihad not seen since the days of Saladin
“BETWEEN THE MAMLUKS AND THE MONGOLS: 1250-1260.” Accursed Tower: The Crusaders' Last Battle for the Holy Land, by ROGER CROWLEY, Yale University Press, NEW HAVEN; LONDON, 2019, pp. 40-50.
He ended up assassinating the leading Mameluks, the Turkish dynasty that had held power since the 13th century.
“Of Egypt and Levantine Plagues.” Free Trade’s First Missionary: Sir John Bowring in Europe and Asia, by Philip Bowring, Hong Kong University Press, 2014, pp. 73-82.
bunca kaynağı nasıl buluyorsunuz?
Selamun aleyküm kardeş birşey diyecemde tipin çok efsooo yözkat lımısın
@@suleimanthemagnificent1494 nasıl acaba 🐸
@@papazataklaattiranimam Allah Allah ya🤔
azerbaycanlılar sırf karabağ Azerbaycan devletinde gözükmüyor diye video'ya disslike atmayın.bu video sadece hangi toprak kimin elindeyse onu anlatıyor.mal mal iş yapmayın
Aynen güzel video
@@kaldirdimgobegihophopa9811
Kardeş su link de arnavutlar Ataturke arnavut diyolar. Oraya da bi raid yapsaniza
czcams.com/video/nE85HSzSKLc/video.html
I am Yenisei Kyrgyz !
So are you Khakass?
@@blgram No i am Kyrgyz !
Okay you are Yrnisei Kyrgyz Turk
I know Cengiz Aytmatov 🌷 Cengiz ağabeyden bilirim Kırgız kültürünü . selam Türkiye Türklerinden
Ramazan Bilgin Khakasses were also part of the Yenisei Kyrgyz
ben iran türküyüm . herkese selamlar . yaşasın qardaşlarım 😍
mohsen gh selam 👋
Hayır her türk kanı taşıyan kişi türk
Emre Yilmaz iran turkleri var sadece bagımsız ilıklarını ilan etmediler tıpkı uygur ve rusyadaki turkler gibi
@Emre Yilmaz siktir
Emre Yilmaz Haklısın kardeşim yüzde yüz
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over.
Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeah n us germanic/celtic people r ur rulers. Don't forget it
Hail the great Turkic nation🐺🐺🇹🇷🇹🇲🇦🇿🇺🇿🇭🇺🇰🇿🇰🇬
Turks are Mongolian , Azerbaijanis are not Mongolian = Contemporary Turkic peoples as "possessing East Asian physiognomy", according to Joo-Yup Lee and Shuntu Kuang, historians from University of Toronto. Turks were described as "short, with small eyes, nostrils, and mouths" (Sharaf al-Zaman al-Marwazi), as being "full-faced with small eyes" (Al-Tabari), as possessing "a large head (sar-i buzurg), a broad face (rūy-i pahn), narrow eyes (chashmhā-i tang), and a flat nose (bīnī-i pakhch), and unpleasing lips and teeth (lab va dandān na nīkū)" (Keikavus). Concerning Yangikent's Oghuz Turks in particular, al-Masudi remarked that they are "distinguished from other Turks by their valour, their slanted eyes, and the smallness of their stature". Stone heads of Seljuq elites kept at the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art displayed East Asian features.[47]
@@S.P_Iran Cry
🇺🇿❤️🇭🇺🇰🇬🇹🇲🇺🇳🇹🇷🇦🇿
güney azərbaycannan , ne mutlu türküm diyənə 🌹🌹🌹
Kuzeyi de var ezizim nsnsj
Güney azerbaycan birgün fars hükmünden sıyrılacak ve ÖZGÜR VE HÜR OLACAK.
Farslar müslüman düşmanıdır
Birleseceyik inshAllah az qalib qardasim
@William Jeff sen şimdi tutupta 40.000 kişiyi öldürmüş bir katili mi savunuyorsun? Kendi insanlığını gözden geçir...!
Baardyk turk elderine salam KIRGHIZ adamdan !!!!!!
Самат Толомушов KIRGHIZ A SELAM
Selam
Ve aleyküm selâm ve rahmetullah. . .
Banda kırgızbay
Huns,Xiognu and Hepthalite is Turkic.
Hunnic Empire was the empire of the Huns. The Huns were a confederation of Eurasian tribes, especially Turkic ones, from the Steppes of Central Asia.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Hunnic_Empire
----------------------------------------------------
Recent genetics research in 2003[4] confirmed the studies[5] indicating that the Turkic peoples,[6] originated from the same area and therefore are possibly related.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Xiongnu
-----------------------------------------------------
Hepthalite
Imagewww.oxfordreference.com
› ...
Hephthalites - Oxford Reference
Inner Asian 'Hunnic' group (or rather dynasty), perhaps of Turkic origin, whose name appears first in 456; by 467 they had displaced the ...
Iranian Huns. The term “Huns” was also used for several tribes who posed a continuous threat to northeastern Iran and northwestern India from the 4th century C.E. Earlier research attempted to establish a connection between the different tribes mentioned in the sources, and to consider them all as Hephthalites (cf. Ghirshman, pp. 69-134). Altheim (III, 1961, p. 7) viewed the Hephthalites as the original tribe of the Huns, from which the European Huns had split off. In addition, he also assumed a Turkish origin for all these tribes (Altheim, I, 1959, pp. 45 ff.).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Babur is Turkic origin.
Imagebooks.google.com.tr
› books
The Oxford Illustrated History of the World
Felipe Fernández-Armesto · 2019 · History
In July , Ismail was enthroned as Shah and he proclaimed Shiism as ... Turkic-Mongol in origin, the Empire was established in by a Chagatai Turk, Zahiruddin Muhammad Babur
books.google.com.tr/books?id=eUSCDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA316&lpg=PA316&dq=babur+shah+turkic+oxford&source=bl&ots=1CRP9wyLg4&sig=ACfU3U3z2yUJfMwp3U8m5uedHqLxLVQYIg&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiii4yH3aTnAhUz4KYKHfv3BdMQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ
Imagewww.cambridge.org
› books
Safavid, Mughal, and Ottoman Empires (Chapter 1 ... - Cambridge University Press
In 1501 Shah Ismail I (1501-1524), the founder of the dynasty, defeated the Turkish Aq Quyunlu forces ... Muhammad Zahir al-Din Babur, a Chagatai Turk from Fergana in Central Asia ...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scythian is a confederetion and its founding group was Turkic SAKA.
Imagebooks.google.com.tr
› books
Routledge Revivals: Trade, Travel and Exploration in the Middle ...
John Block Friedman, Kristen Mossler Figg · 2017 · History
Arab geographers described “Inner Scythia” (the land of the Turkic peoples) using ... Harvard Ukrainian Studies 12/13 (1988-1989): 400-413.
----------------------------------------------------------
These earlier scholars based their accounts not on classical texts but on
references to Scythians (sometimes explicitly identified as “Turks”) in medieval
Latin and Byzantine universal chronicles and apocalyptic literature. In these
sources ...
Page153
None of the humanist authors who read Greek-Filelfo, Sagundino, Gaza, Merula
-based his history of the Scythian Turks on information from the Histories.139
books.google.com.tr/books?id=XDmZXIDiZG8C&pg=PA149&lpg=PA149&dq=scythian+turks&source=bl&ots=d7qnjR6GgR&sig=ACfU3U1UMWCuSHWCtuxdtMnOdCYJp134VA&hl=tr&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=scythian%20turks&f=false
Var videoda hepsi
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 yorumlarda inkar edenler var onlar için yazdım
Hi!
I was wondering how do you create this kind of videos? Do you use a specific program to freerly draw areas around the map and specify when to appear?
What a history! They owned everything !
The backbone and most umportant part of the Mongol army were Turks, Cengiz and han are Turkish words and names. The mongols simply didnt have enough manpower to create the biggest empire in the history it was the Turks
Birader tarih ve gerceklerde "yersiz" diye bir gtanim yok sadece gercekler, Mogol ordusunun neredeyse tamami Turklerden olusmaktaydi Mogollar'in yeterli insan gucu yoktu.
@@vitalalive69 Pseudo-history
@@vitalalive69 cengizin ordusunda türk de vardı ama ordusu tamamen türk değildi. Moğollar da türkler gibi göçebe olduğundan savaş tarzları birbirine benzer.
@@iskambillordu Cengiz han in ordusunun 70%-80% türk olduklari tahmin ediliyor. Zaten mogollar kücük bir toplumdu eger cengiz hanin nasil hükümdar oldugunu arastirirsan zaten türk devletlerini birlestirdigini anlarsin.
Greetings to Turkish people from a Hungarian men! I love Turkey,Turkish people and Turkish language! ❤
❤❤
Csaba Horváth thank you :)
i love Hungary too
Thank you! I'm flying back home to Budapest in about an hour! I'm already at the boarding gate for my flight! ✈ :)
Csaba Horváth greetings to you and hungarian my brothers ! :D
☆ TURAN ☆
Turks and Slavs are the most magnificient people in Euroasian steppes.
Are you Slav ?
@@Nomadicenjoyer31 Yes.
@@kps3604 Turks and Slavs fought many times but Bulgar Turks used to love Slavs lol
exactly
@@Nomadicenjoyer31 In fact, here are just few turkic tribes, but they are so dominant so many non-turkic tribes become Turks.
Modu Chanyu was the second ruler (“chanyu” in Ancient Chinese sources - 單于) of Xiongnu, a nomadic Empire situated in East-Central Asia. He reigned between 209-174 BC. As far as we interpret from the Chinese sources, at least we know that his title is Turkic: 冒頓單于 Modu Chanyu or 撐犁孤塗單于 (chengli gutu chanyu)- transliterated as “Tengri Qutluğ Yabgu?”.(The translation of the chanyu is somewhat disputed, some Turkologists claim “Chanyu” is “Tarkan” another Turkic title, it could be “yabgu”, or maybe “tanhu”- there is no general consensus). The first two words are certainly Turkic, “Tengri” is Turkic for god, and Qutluğ is “blessed” implying the bearer of the title as “blessed by the God”. (In today’s modern Turkish language, “Tengri Qutluğ” would be “Tanrı kutlu”)
We can say that the Modu Chanyu certainly had Turkic titles, so most probably, yes, he was Turkic. Back then, the region was inhabited by speakers of the Proto-Turkic language.
單于(old Chinese tar-gwa) is Tarkan for sure.
İrak Türkmenlerinden, Selam olsun Türk Qardaşlarıma ✋️ Turan Kurulsun 👏
Aleykum salam qardaşım. 🙏
Kayra we talk in Turkman Language thats so near to Turkesh accent ☪️
@Kayra Turkiye disindaki Oguz Turklerine Turkmen diyoruz
@Kayra turkic.
@TURAN UNİON TURKS Aslinda ayni seyi anlatmaya calisiyoruz sanirim.
Evet dediginiz dogru. Lakin mesela İrak Turkleri demekten çok İrak Turkmenleri diyoruz, Suriye Turkleri demek yerine Suriye Turkmenleri, Bayirbucak Turkmenleri vs diyoruz. Halbuki birebir ayniyiz onlarla.
Kastettigim fark bu.
Turkiyede biz Turkmeniz demekten cok millet adini kullanmayi yani Turkuz demeyi tercih ediyoruz.
we are not Arabs...we are not Europeans...we are not Mongols ... we're not Africans... WE ARE TURKISH.... ONLY TURKISH...we've always been here..........and we'il always be here...
sckn07 sorry bro, you were not here, this was Anatolia with Anatolian people
@@PersianAudit remember 1071 malazgirt
adam haklı lan ne diyon sen hani we ve always been here asdsad inkar etme işgal ettiniz o toprakları
You mean Turkic? I am not Turkish..
We are Anatolian mixed Turks. This lands belong to us
All Turks will be unite in Great Turk State 🐺🇹🇷🐺🇹🇲🐺🇰🇬🐺🇦🇿🐺🇺🇿🐺🇰🇿🐺🇭🇺🐺TRNCyprus
🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
This is flag of all Turks not only Turkey Turks
🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
This is flag of all Turks not only Anatolian Turks*
Yanlış, bu Türkiyenin bayrağı.
Tüm Türklerin bayrağını görmek istiyorsan Türk Birliğinin bayrağını aratman yeterlidir.
@@mhmmdnagyev4879 Mavi Bayrak
@Lars Arap???
@Lars kürt sjhshdhsjhd
there is still a lot of turkic origin autonomies in russia and ex-soviet countries also china.
freedom to Uyghurs!
Türk yurdu esen olsun.
Freedom to Kurds
More like the Turks have a lot of East Asian ancestry....
@Edward Snowden Kurds already freedom 😂 Killing a mother with her baby does not mean that they are prisoners, but that they are free and t*rrorists. (except good people and not supporters of terrorist organization like pkk / isis / ypg). #ErenBülbül #BedirhanKarakaya
@Juche Not east asian but central asian
@@ancientturkey2308 Ughurs are already free, going to a mining site and Murdering almost a hundred Han Chinese Innocent workers in Cold blood, does not mean they are prisoners but T*rrorists. China should Open a Kurdistan embassy and help people like Ocalan form Kurdish organizations in China just as turkey has done for Ughurs.
MEN HORASAN TÜRKÜYEM
@Sinan KOÇ Komik mi?
Ertuğrul Gazinin yurdu 🌷
@Kanadalı Türk sen olsa olsa zenci olursun💩💩💩
Bizim ata toprahları
Eray Hantepe ırkçı
he missed many Turkish states such as Turk Shahi,Zunbils,Tokhara Yabghus,Ghurids,Kushans,Ayyubids etc.
@@Crxyzen1 Tochara Yabghus
Süper hazırlanmış. Emeğine ellerine sağlık. gurur duydum
Merhaba 😊, I am from Tunisia and descendant of Crimean-Tatar mamluk of Ottoman Army in Tunus. 25% of Tunisia are descendants of Turks, there are millions descendants of Turks in North-Africa except Morocco. I am also scared they would lose their Ottoman heritage 😔. I am self proud of my Tatar/Turk/Ottoman heritage I would say I am Tatar/Turk before Tunisian, my dream is to InsAllah move to Istanbul Turkey and therefore study at Ankara tech university. Greetings my Turkic brothers from Tunisia 😁.
You're kidding or what ?! million lol
frist time heard that, is all North African Arab?
@@mydad4332 north Africans are mostly Berbers , not Arabs
@@gezguchinomadi4880 no they are Mediterranean, Zinedine Zidane is a north African
Marlon Jormungand Isn’t a huge difference for me.
UYGHURLARDAN SELAMLAR
Türkiyeden Aleyküm Selâm.
Çine atom hedef alındı tek eksik ur 235
Allah sizleri korusun
I m iran torkemen slam olson 🇨🇳🇨🇳🖕🖕🇹🇷🇹🇷🤘🤘
The Italian traveler Pietro della Valle, who visited the Safavid Empire during the reign of Shah Abbas I, wrote that the only information in the state was the military elite, who monopolized all the posts of provincial governors and most important positions since the Safavid rule in the early 16th century. He also described that the Persians lived under the intolerable enslavement of the Turkomans.
Poorsians and K*rdish people crying in the comments
Turpoorish
@@Pasargadae_Persia_Iran poorsian
@@arctic1091 Poorkish
@@Pasargadae_Persia_Iran poorsian
@@arctic1091 Turkpoorish
Batu Khan Mongolozied Merkit Turk[75] Subutai was Tuvan Turkic origin[76][77] Timur was Barlas Turkic[1][3][4][6][7][9] Most of the Mongolian army is Turkic and almost all of its most important generals are Turkic.The Mongols lived under the Turks for 400 years,Turks made Mongols slav** like İranic peoples also The Qara Khitai are often referred to as " the infidel Turks ” ( kāfir al - Turk , al - Atrāk al - kuffār ) , or simply as Turks[78][79][80] Mongol history big a joke LOL Bumin destroyed the Mongolian Rouran with tiny Turkish tribec and his son Muqhan slaughtered and enslaved the last remaining Rouran Mongols until their lineage was over. Mongol History is a joke against Turkic history.
im turk from east turkistan ben dogu turkistan liyim uyghur turkuyum ben uyghurum
TheLegend1337 Doğu Türkistan Çin’de dimi
@@kingdrager9045 evet
💗
@@kingdrager9045 işgal altindA
❤️
Turkiye Turkistan Turkmenistan Kazakstan Kirgizistan Azerbaycan
Ozbekistan
THE TURKS!
Grijze Wolf k
( )
(00000)
Grijze Wolf dont forget tatarstan in russia
Grijze Wolf ALL THE ASIAN NEANDERTAL BASTARDS TOGETHER!yeah!
Xarriable what a waste of sperm
Turks are the born Warriors
azerbaijanis were greatest turkic warriors and lions 🇦🇿❤🇮🇷
turk azerbaijani qajars , safavids,and afshars ruled iran 500 years. persians love turk azerbaijani!
evet 🇺🇿❤️🇭🇺🇺🇳🇹🇲🇹🇷🇰🇬🇦🇿
Nice job bro. Thanks 👍 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇭🇺🇰🇬🇵🇰
Love them or hate them. Turkic peoples are awesome!! My daddy told me cool stories about them as warriors so cool y'all should check the history of them. I'm a 12 year old black american girl and I use to have a Turkic friend she was Uzbek and I love the way she paints pictures of things and show me cool things from Uzbekistan. So sad she had to move to Great Britain she was so fun to has as a friend. Turkics are awesome to me.
Helal sana kardeşim. Merak etme Dünya'nın her yerinde en az bir Türk bulabilirsin :D. Yorumunu çok beğendim sevgilerle :)
their most elite units(yanissaries, quapukulus and ghulams), mostly consisted of captured europeans and steppe children, that they raized up to do soldiering(without having family bonds, loyalty issues etc).
SuperMrFriendly this is the most cruelty of Ottomans but also Janniseries had become most precious army of Ottomans. Its little bit dilemma. They were important than Turkish origin army which name is akinji (cavaliers from turkish village). Janniseries were used hand cannon. They were one of the most fired arm military groups of the world. (second, spanish conquistadors).
SuperMrFriendly yanissaries ghulams and quapukulus were not our most elite units. They where more elite than normal soldiers since they have no bond, but no where near the most elite. The most elite consisted of small groups of soldiers and not big groups like yanissaries. Btw these groups are ottoman groups and this kid is referring to turkic background.
Greetings to Black community ❤️
Afghanistan turkman salomlar
for all turks brothers
turkman bacha Aleykum selam kardaş
Chok yasha goney turkestan.
turkman bacha love and peace for you and afganistan people.
Salam from indonesia
Selamlar sizede kardas
turkman bacha ve aleyküm selam
Add Ghurids
I cannot conclude this head on the Ghorians without mentioning a remarkable passage found in Janabi, who calls the Ghorides Turks, whilst they are generally reckoned to \'91belong to the Afghans; if it" is not, perhaps, to be understood, that only the reigning family Was of a Turkish origin. This passage runs thus :\'97\'93 The \u64257 rst who became known of the Ghorian kings, are the descendants of Hossain; who are a race of Turlcs, that came from Khata to the mountains of Ghor. In the sequel, their affairs prospered; and they possessed themselves of countries, as it is mentioned in the History of As-of Shah, and in the Tarilch Ulmzwader of Ahmed ben Mohammed Altabrizi.\'94 The author of the Khulassat Ulansab, who is very careful in distinguishing the real Afghans from those that are either supposed or erroneously pretend to be Afghans, seems, too, to consider the Ghorian dynasty as a Turkish race: in support of which assertion, I shall insert here a passage relative to this subject :-\'97\'93
History of the Afghans/ Tarikh-i-khan jahani wa makhzan-i-Afghani
Translated from the Persian of Neamet Ullah
Part of Cambridge Library Collection - Perspectives from the Royal Asiatic Society
AUTHOR: Haravi Nimat AllahTRANSLATOR: Bernhard DornDATE PUBLISHED: June 2013AVAILABILITY: Available FORMAT: PaperbackISBN: 9781108056250
www.wdl.org/en/item/3034/view/1/304/
Chronicler: thesaurus.babylon-software.com/Nimat%20Allah%20al-Harawi
Original Work:
archive.org/details/TarikhEKhanJahaniOMakhzanEAfghaniJildEAwwal-KhwajaNematullahBinKhwajaHabeebullahAl-HarawiFarsi
Can someone tell me what is music of that great video ?
I'm a kazakh. Assalauma Aleikum my turkic brothers
probbly all turkic language uses gardaş,kardeş,qardash etc.
Aleykum salam ben Türkiye türkuyum
Aleyküm selam
Salam Kandas
Алейкум салам из турсия
Long live Turks. Turk jasasyn 🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇷🇦🇿🇺🇿 Greetings from Kazakstan
And 🇹🇲
♥
Turkic people are not Turks
@@purple.requiem turkish and turk are not the same things.
turkish are Anatolia turks and Cyprus turks.
Orher turks are Azerbaijani turks, Turkmen turks, Uzbek turks, Uyghur turks, Altai turks, Kerkuk turkmens, Gagauz turks, kazakhs, Yakut turks and etc
@@purple.requiem there is no such thing like Turkic stupid! This is bullshit of Stalin. We all Turks.
You showed us every details in map. Great job.
He missed tons of states bad video
In contrast to those Iranian officials who claim that the Turks in Iran were actually originally Persians, the late IRGC Commander Qassem Suleimani claimed that the descendants of Turkic dynasties that live in Iran are not Iranian. Suleimani claimed: "Turks are aliens and non-Iranians. For hundreds of years (during Turkic rule in Iran), Iran had no history. Non- Iranians like the Seljuks invaded and ruled Iran."74
Shaffer, B. (2023) Iran is more than persia: Ethnic politics in Iran. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Iranians do have great history, what are u talking aboyt
@@godshandftwfr 🤣😂😂😂
Iran had a history, yes, Turkic dynasties used to rule Iran, but saying that Iran had no history due to them is as absurd as saying that Brits and Russians had no history because many of their kings and czars were of German origin. Even Greek kings of new liberated Greece (after Ottomans) were of German descent. And Qassem Suleimani was never an Iranian historian, he was a commander and general. His thought on this topic are irrelevent
@@LoveAndPeace2004 yes but we Turks hate when some random persian claims the rulers were etnitchy persian but they are not... But i agree persian culture asimilited them