Hillary Clinton And Condi Rice Rewrite History On Jon Stewart's Show
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 11. 2022
- Kamikoto is now running a Black Friday Sale, their biggest sale of the year! Go to kamikoto.com/MAJORITY to get an additional $50 off on any purchase with code MAJORITY” Thanks to Kamikoto for sponsoring today's video.
Hillary Clinton and Condi Rice join Jon Stewart to revise that Libyan intervention was good, actually (as, of course, all other US intervention.) They discuss how wartime situations, specifically the US's role and rules of engagement, and how those apply now to the war in Ukraine.
Watch the Majority Report live Monday-Friday at 12 p.m. EST on CZcams OR listen via daily podcast at www.Majority.FM
www.house.gov/representatives...
www.senate.gov/senators/senat...
#JonStewart #HillaryClinton #CondiRice #SamSeder #EmmaVigeland #MajorityReport #politics #news #progressive #leftist #democrats #liberal
SUPPORT the show by becoming a member: www.jointhemajorityreport.com/
Download TMR's FREE app: www.majorityapp.com
TMR MERCH: www.shop.majorityreportradio.com
CHECK OUT MORE from the MR crew:
Matt Binder DOOMED / mattbinder
Brandon Sutton DISCOURSE / expandthediscourse
Emma Vigeland ESVN / esvnshow
Matt Lech LEFT RECKONING / leftreckoning
OTHER LINKS:
Twitch: / themajorityreport
Facebook: / majorityreport
Twitter: / majorityfm
Instagram: / majorityreport.fm
Check out more from the MR crew:
Matt Binder DOOMED / mattbinder
Brandon Sutton THE DISCOURSE / expandthediscourse
Emma Vigeland ESVN / esvnshow
Matt Lech LEFT RECKONING / leftreckoning
I know people love John Stewart, but this is Joe Rogan quality of fact checking. War criminals should not be given a chance to lie about their war crimes
They should be too far behind bars to be heard
You are absolutely right. Jon Stewart has a juvenile view of politics especially foreign policy of the USA.
I would never forget that Ghaddafi was killed in the sewers pleading for his life and when the news of his death flashed on Hillary's phone, she was giving an interview on CBS, and she happily said on live tv "we came, we saw, he died".
She literally celebrated his death even though it was illegal and a war crime (regardless of what his history was).
@@OwlsEyelash True. He is a very concerned citizen with a platform and a voice, but is sorely out of his depth with these two.
He kinda sorta got ahead of himself.
He is trying though and the tightrope he walks is to hold scum like this to questions without becoming so toxic that he will get no interviews.
He needs a super Jamie to handle real time fact checking.
It is weird how little he pushed back, especially considering his coverage of the Iraq war (and Condi herself) at the time was so critical.
very weird indeed
"suspect"
those were his salad days. he’s old now and has a fortune to leave behind
He spoke truth to power - just not directly. I remember mostly fawning interviews of politicians in person.
It’s not weird at all. He’s always been controlled opposition, like most of the people you idolize on the boob tube. Midwit.
@@john-paulhunt6943 I don’t quite follow. Can you rephrase that for me?
War criminals should be directly challenged and not be permitted to lie
Absolutely - also, preferably tried for war crimes - regardless of whether the US is "willing" to participate in the ICC (I mean, they are... Just not as defendants. How just.🙄)
i miss Michael the most for these foreign policy related clips. not that sam and emma didnt do a good job, but this is one of the topics where Michael really shined.
Omg...Michael 😢
You took the words right out of my mouth. I learned so much about foreign policy from Michael. Man I miss that guy.. I really miss his ability to slip an Obama impression in just about anywhere.
I would never forget that Ghaddafi was killed in the sewers pleading for his life and when the news of his death flashed on Hillary's phone, she was giving an interview on CBS, and she happily said on live tv "we came, we saw, he died".
She literally celebrated his death even though it was illegal and a war crime (regardless of what his history was).
Ya, Michael just had a depth of knowledge where even if you disagreed with his foreign policy opinion, you could tell he knew the general topic well.
Sam and the gang just don’t have that type of expertise outside the US.
The only times war criminals should be allowed to speak is in front of a war crime tribunal
I agree with Sam regarding Rice being a deal-breaker. Media is complicit when they profit from, as Hilary says here, “bad actors.” Rice marching right along and carrying water for an unconscionable military invasion makes her a “bad actor.”
Condoleezza Rice talking about "worrying about the rise of terrorism" when you consider how much terrorism resulted from the actions of the US government during her tenure is actually a bit sickening. Pretty much everything Daesh was able to achieve can be laid at the feet of the Iraq war.
“England hasn’t invaded France”- no but they’ve been occupying part of Ireland for a very long time.
England DID invade France: Edward III of England (fathered by William Wallace, according the Gospel according to Mel Gibson) started the HUNDRED YEARS' WAR in 1337 in order to claim the French throne after the death of Charles IV of France, his mother being the later French king's sister. English law allowed female succession, but French law did not.
@@schoolfreak32 I believe the context of that remark was much more recent than that.
Just like the US and Cuba. Maybe we haven't attacked directly but we're occupying a piece and perpetrating the worst human rights abuses on the island while hypocritically denouncing Cuba and embargoing them, because of the fact that they kicked us out 65 years ago
1:20 “The Arab league, who for the first time said, ‘we want to be a part of protecting the people of Libya’”
Actually, only 11 of the 22 Arab League nations were present to vote on the Libya intervention, 6 of which were GCC members - aka America’s gulf monarchy allies. So it’s not like there was universal consensus independent of US interests.
This is not to mention that the African Union condemned the intervention.
true. clinton is such an amazing liar. she would have been a great american president.
Sounds like you would have given a more substantial interview than Stewart did.
The only time these two should ever be allowed to talk on television ever again is if it's on a prank show and it ends with them getting a pie to the face followed by being brought up on war crimes.
Save the pie; proceed directly to war crimes charges.
@@selfish-perverse-n-turbulent After throwing ALL the books you can at them, then throw a pie?
@@selfish-perverse-n-turbulent
If Cheney and W Bush aren’t brought up on war crimes, then who in the past 30 years would, at least at those levels of power?
Who’s going to charge them?
I’m not saying they don’t deserve it, just that it’s not realistic, with how the U.S. has let these types get away with it, since at least the Vietnam War.
I would never forget that Ghaddafi was killed in the sewers pleading for his life and when the news of his death flashed on Hillary's phone, she was giving an interview on CBS, and she happily said on live tv "we came, we saw, he died".
She literally celebrated his death even though it was illegal and a war crime (regardless of what his history was).
@@CorbCorbin In the 60' s these people would have been dealt with much more directly and permanently.
for every amazing piece of work jon does, then he does this. I don't understand what he was thinking.
He got starstruck or something. Sam needs to have Stewart on for a debate/discussion.
I saw the thumbnail for their "debate" about a week ago, and I almost puked. They were laughing and joking, best of buds. It's all a big fucking club, and you ain't in it! That may sound overly simplistic, but it's true.
I would never forget that Ghaddafi was killed in the sewers pleading for his life and when the news of his death flashed on Hillary's phone, she was giving an interview on CBS, and she happily said on live tv "we came, we saw, he died".
She literally celebrated his death even though it was illegal and a war crime (regardless of what his history was).
I saw the thumbnail and decide to not watch the videos even though Jon is normally great. But just interviewing one of the would be quite tricky, but even both at the same time?
Hillary hardly gives herself to an interview, without hard concessions in advance, I would believe.
He always laughs and had a good time interviewing right wingers. Go back and watch with clear eyes.
@Bryna L. remember when he humiliated Tucker Carlson? He doesn't even ruffle a feather here. He's a simp and so are you.
Carlin said it first
No, you're right, Sam. War criminals shouldn't have a megaphone. When Merv Griffin weirdly found himself interviewing Albert Speer, fresh from prison and busily reinventing himself, he was so dumbfounded that he didn't even know where to start. Jon Stewart has fewer excuses.
To be fair, Speer was even more on the nose about it. When asked if it was because of his apostasy and good personality that he wasn't sentenced to life he responded "well, if it was, I must be thankful". Because they are shielded by the institution that is the United States, the fact that Hillary Clinton et al. are war criminals is actually obscured, and so they are obligated to behave as if they weren't war criminals. This allows them to trick stupid people. Speer did not have this luxury, being associated with what is popularly known as the most evil and criminal regime to have ever existed
I would never forget that Ghaddafi was killed in the sewers pleading for his life and when the news of his death flashed on Hillary's phone, she was giving an interview on CBS, and she happily said on live tv "we came, we saw, he died".
She literally celebrated his death even though it was illegal and a war crime (regardless of what his history was).
But Condi is a war criminal who doesn't question election results..so she's respectable, right MSDNC?
I think that was Phil Donahue, not Merv Griffin.
I would definitely like to hear why he thinks this was a good idea. Like Trump, you're just giving these people a platform to spew more bullshit. They're frauds and warmongers, and nothing they can say would "contextualize" those facts. They think the American people are monkeys and farm animals.
Why on earth would he have Condi Rice on?!
In hope that a spontaneous cage fight would erupt..
Possibly to have her side by side with Clinton to show us that not matter what party they represent, they are both lying, corrupt, warmongering criminals. Jon gave them a platform to rationalize the destruction and havoc they brought upon thousands.
These two were sworn archivas and now they speak with ONE voice on HUGE issues.
It speaks volumes about this country really being a dressed up one party society.
All roads lead to the monied class.
traditionally the two parties were never arch enemies ... thats a very recent development
Biggest softball interview that Jon has given. Seems like he's somewhat scared of these two...
If Jon would have brought a 1/10 of the ferocity that he brought to that attorney general who espoused all that anti-trans bs, perhaps I would have been able to actually watch the video until completion.
To be fair they are mass murderers, being afraid is very reasonable.
Well he doesn't have a large corporation (Comedy Central, and whoever owns them) standing behind him anymore. Maybe that makes him a bit more cautious.
This is the same guy who helped get benefits for burn pit harmed veterans? I really hate to see him go the CNN (Fox, if just Condi) way. Just embarrassing.
He softballed quite a few Bush admin flunkies on The Daily Show.
Someone needs to say to Jon "Imagine doing what you did with Clinton, but instead its with Bush" and see how he reacts. He's got so much fire when it comes to who started the war on terror, but nothing when it comes to who continued and escalated it.
libs gonna lib
condi rice was with bush
Go ahead and figure out who condi is, dip.
I knew something felt off for the interview. There was only a small moment I felt where he pushed in any way
I saw that interview and didn't like it either. Thank you for this.
I know what people expect but I also know what it takes to have two guest of that level at the same time and what both of theirs teams put in place so this could happen .
GO SAM GO This is the SAM I WANT TO SEE MORE OF. GO OFF
Jon was soft on them. That's why they let him on TV.
Hillary and Condi Rice "let" Jon on TV? 🤨
@@FakingANerve No, the wider political-media establishment. You get blacklisted if you step on the toes of important people by holding them to account.
@@elephantman2112 Ah, fast and loose with the pronouns. So... who are these people, exactly, who "let" Jon Stewart on TV? Did they do it in person? Were there demands made?
@@FakingANerve My big, hairy ballsack.
@@elephantman2112 That tracks.
Thank you, Sam, Emma, and MR Crew
Preposterous that he didn’t push back on anything
@@orionsshoe2424 Yes, because that is what works so well on other news programs. Uncritical interviews make their 'informed' viewers really consider all sides... Are you really this naive?
@@orionsshoe2424 that works out SO well for Joe Rogan’s fans!
@@orionsshoe2424 pushback doesn’t mean sensor them, it means provide alternative views and information
Jon, like most folks doesn't know exactly how the Soviet Union actually collapsed.
Gorbachev was bribed and sold out. He never even wondered why the slimmest American businessmen like trump were doing in Russia in the 1990s while Russia experienced pillaging.
How? I didn't realize there was a disagreement on this.
@@yosikama2611 Economically corruption was rampant so there's that, in a nutshell as it was declining. Also they had loosened up quite a bit already.
After mass protests they had decided to loosen up the border as well. That didn't go as intended.
The Berlin Wall coming down was accidental as was the rest of it. Shabowski screwed up an announcement that people could obtain a certain visa and pass freely into West Berlin. He actually never got to that part and basically said people could pass freely beyond the wall, effective immediately. The guards heard it as well as everyone else. Swarms of people came out, the guards let them go and that was the end of the wall and the Soviet Union as it was.
I watched that. Seriously, it's like chewing tar. Those two made me want to join the Peace Corp.
Sam is spitting nothing but fire here. Straight facts. So happy to see it...
What is facts? I dont have the stomach to go over the UN1973 resolution & its relation to the R2P act or russia abstaining not acquiescing & its eventual ending of medavevs political career. Im pretty sure im blocked from this channel but if not seder is lying
It was a featherweight interview which is a shame because they are an important part of History!
I would never forget that Ghaddafi was killed in the sewers pleading for his life and when the news of his death flashed on Hillary's phone, she was giving an interview on CBS, and she happily said on live tv "we came, we saw, he died".
She literally celebrated his death even though it was illegal and a war crime (regardless of what his history was).
I'm sorry but I'm not going to sympathize with Gaddafi. He raped his all female bodyguards and starved and oppressed his people. I'm not saying war crimes are okay, but Gaddafi deserved much much worse.
what the USA did to Libya was a stain on our history, and the reason why I not not respect Hillary or Obama.
Bet you voted for her though because the other guy was mean.
@@jonhelguson I did vote for her. Not particularly proud of it but I'd do it again in the same matchup.
And what do you think the rebels who killed him are saints? They are, in my book, worse scum than Gaddafi ever was.
I’m so happy you’re covering this. I was so disappointed with Jon when I saw this interview. Hilary and Condi really pissed me off and Jon didn’t push back at their sugar coating and rewriting of history.
Jon is also a union buster so I hear.
Except Sam is WRONG. The UN mandate was ALL MEANS NECESSARY which includes eliminating Qadhafi.
The Security Council today effectively authorized the use of force in Libya to protect civilians from attack, specifically in the eastern city of Benghazi, which Colonel Muammar Al-Qadhafi has reportedly said he will storm tonight to end a revolt against his regime.
Acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which provides for the use of force if needed, the Council adopted a resolution by 10 votes to zero, with five abstentions, authorizing Member States “to take all necessary measures… to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamhariya, including Benghazi, while excluding an occupation force.”
The abstentions included China and Russia, which have the power of veto, as well as Brazil, Germany and India. [Sam claimed Russia and China were in agreement when they were not]
Expressing grave concern at the deteriorating situation, the escalation of violence, and the heavy civilian casualties, the Council established a no-fly zone, banning all flights - except those for humanitarian purposes - in Libyan airspace in order to help protect civilians. It specifically calls on Arab League states to cooperate with other Member States in taking the necessary measures.
The Arab League last weekend requested the Council to impose a no-fly zone after Mr. Qadhafi was reported to have used warplanes, warships, tanks and artillery to seize back cities taken over in what started out a month ago as mass protests by peaceful civilians seeking an end to his 41-year rule.
Overall, it was a pretty good discussion. I mean, despite feelings for either of these women, and despite some politician speak, it was civil, insightful, and knowledgeable. A discussion among smart, educated, and experienced ppl.
I like MR, but they seemed to miss some of the points. It's like Sam just só badly wants someone to tell them off for their decisions that he didn't really follow what they were actually talking about. Also, It was made clear that they weren't going to get into whether their past decisions were right. Lastly, I think it's a little arrogant for anyone to talk about/criticize foreign policy as if it's all so simple and obvious.
@@JohnCarterRocks We were in Afghanistan to protect civilians too I hear
It's definitely all about protecting the civilians right, we really care about that?
It's called an excuse
@@felicityc ... The US went into Afghanistan to kill Bin Laden and destroy AQ's network. The civilians became a priority for the UN once AQ was wiped out.
It feel so awesome when hero from your youth turns into a microphone stand for powerful. There was a reason he stopped being a host at his last gig(was replaced by another microphone stand). So now him coming back to the screen, there was a price to be paid. And this interview was one of the payments.
That claim is just absurd.
Their point about the lack of staffing & decreasing role of civilians in the State Department is a huge issue and has been largely overlooked in the coverage of this interview. The increasing presence of career military and intelligence service veterans has skewed our foreign policy further and further from diplomacy.
Good video. Spot on
I threw up in my mouth a little bit when Condi mentioned WMDs.
Good thing I saw this before tomorrow. This interview would have had me spraying Turkey chunks.
I didn’t even bother watching the clip, so thanks for breaking it down!
Jon understands theses issues well enough, yet he doesn't give adequate pushback to powerful people spewing lies. Likewise, Jon has shown that he can give adequate pushback to bigoted nonsense and lies when it comes to low level politicians, but when it comes to people with huge influence and reach like Dave Chappelle, he just provides excuses and cover. Seems like Jon has an issues challenging power in some case, idk.
If Dave Chapelle is Jewish, Ye have an idea.
Jon admits he is biased when defending fellow comedians/friends. He tries to be objective, but knows he sees them in a different light because of his personal ties. He did push back in that interview, but it wasn't as much as Sam wanted.
He doesn't give adequate push back to powerful people with ego. He knows that the conversation will be ended, they'll walk away and he'll have killed the opportunity.
I agree that, in a perfect world, Jon shoulda pushed back a lot more in this one, but that would have had him pushing back on literally every sentence. I feel he was riding the line and he knew it. He still got them to talk. I would have loved to see an on-screen annotation with some corrections, at least... but I applaud Jon's in-the-moment sense of when pushing would cause the subject to be less talkative.
@ his take on Dave Chapelle, Jon's a comedian and the conversation was moving towards censoring comedy. Jon's just never going to jump on that with both feet, so he gave a lukewarm take.
@@jeremyshahan2218Could you maybe give us a timestamp or something? Maybe I missed it. But, I did not see any push back from JS whatsoever.
I think it's because he doesn't want to lose his mainstream access. He knows for sure that people won't go to his show if hes too aggro
Hillary and condi wouldn't have did this if they didn't know John was gonna play nice. It's awful
Jon Stewart back in the day called Harry Truman a war criminal then pathetically walked it back
Disgusting
Our military is great at destroying not rebuilding. Beau of the 5th has a good short video on this.
This whole segment had me crawling out of my skin. These two wrecking balls crushing Jon's polite rhetorical yield signal. Hillary implicitly backing the outright lies of Condi Rice. Chilling.
He allowed it to happen, he did nothing to push back.
How about criticizing John Stewart for doing it?
I watched this, thought the same things. Why would Jon okay this to go out?
Never forget that Jon Stewart had a falling out with Wyatt Cenac in the writer's room, because the latter wanted to explore more about systemic racism. Stewart's always been a moderate, people just didn't notice. He's also one of those "capitalism can be fair if we just regulate it enough" democrats. Despite the word "CAPITAL" being right there on display as the primary objective of such a system.
Jon really sucks at holding Dems to account.
These kids come into the game 20 years too late and think they now a man's whole game.
Yall are fvcking clueless. Jon's been killing it for 2 decades.
What he understand more than any of you is that TOP LEVEL DEMS DO NOT TAKE INTERVIEWS where there is ANY kind of pushback. He's mastered getting them on camera while not overstepping his bounds. If you think ANY of you can get ANY of these people ON CAMERA and HOLD THEM ACCOUNT, it only proves you are BRAND SPANKING NEW to this game of politics and would get less than a reply from them.
@@deetrixreed8961 So, don't have them on? it's better than getting them on and then sycophantically letting them parrot their whitewashing narratives.
He certainly really sucks at holding these two Dems to account.
I haven't seen any of his other interviews, but this is a gigantic disappointment.
@@bsqwahlE Stewart is great at holding far right Republicans and CEOs accountable for their bullshit but never has the nerve to hold the moderates in both the Republican and Democratic party accountable for their bullshit. It's disappointing but not entirely surprising since Stewart is pretty much a moderate Dem himself.
Since when was Condi Rice a "Dem?" She was and still is a Bush Republican.
You're right about Rice but wasn't Clinton just as hawkish? Neither one should have a public voice.
I couldn't make it through the whole thing. The lies are too unbearable. The hubris is too vomit-inducing
As an antiwar Libertarian, I'm going to say Thanks for standing firm on these issues.
We probably don't agree on a ton, but on Iraq and Libya we agree.
Jon Stewart should have questioned more toughly
Give up the libertarian position it's literally untenable and a fallacy
The click picture on this is 💯 😂😂😂
Really good you’re covering this story!!
Worst Jon Stewart interview ever. I thought he was better
sigh, feels like 2008 all over again!
It's ironic that Jon Stewart's new show is about Interviews because when he hosted _The Daily Show,_ he was bad at it. But he was stellar with *"Headlines",* catching public officials contradicting *_themselves._* A terrific example of that was the juxtaposition of Candidate President George W. Bush debating President George W. Bush.
The footage and the issues sought out by Jon Stewart and his team on _The Daily Show_ has not yet been duplicated anywhere but we need it.
He was BAD at interviews?
You are insane and have no clue what you're talking about.
I watched every episode. He was perfect. He respects right wing guests and did not use their dirty tactics against them. He never once backed down. Sometimes we don't know how to push back against spin when the other side refuses to accept reality. I'd love to see anyone else's pathetic attempts to stand up to the people Jon has over his entire career.
You must be coming from the prescriptive of a younger, newer viewer because you clearly do not know his repertoire.
His interviews on his new show are on average very good. He actually does push back on his guests. He made his last 3 republican candidate/officials look like complete idiots because of the level of scrutiny he gave them. Could he have done more in this one? Sure. Did he not push back at all? It'd be disingenuous to say so.
If the Stewart, Clinton, Rice interview were played for someone NOT watching here and NOT familiar with the truth, it would be a successful revision of history.
Not really. Did you watch it in full, or just here? The parts shown here aren't what the full discussion was really about. I would say the opposite. If you only watch here, it gives a pretty misleading idea of the discussion.
I wonder why China felt the need to build up their blue water navy?
Prior to the regime change Libya had the highest standard of living in North Africa.
I’m almost certain that Jon had to agree to not ask about Saudi Arabia in order to get the interview
Then you don’t do it
@@scoobertmcruppert2915 I agree
I watched this and was disgusted that he platformed these war criminals
8:25 "Oh shut the f--k up, Condi" was what I was hoping Stewart was going to cut her off with... Instead of "mmm-hmmm"ing along.
Taxes don’t fund federal spending.
Wasn't he on the ground advocating for veteran rights like a few months ago? And now he's having a friendly chat with some of the ghouls that made the Iraq war happen, letting them re-write history
im sure the iraq war started in 2003..on George Dubyas watch post 9/11. Like 6 years before Obama & Clinton
@@philwill0123she was one of the primary whips for "bipartisan" support for the illegal invasion. And her hubby tried to make a play to invade in 98 but had to back down when it was clear too much of the base would rebel. Sorry you're either too young or didn't pay enough attention to the news to remember these things.
@@philwill0123 ah yes and they were surely completely powerless just magically popping onto the political scene out of nowhere and totally did not drag on and escalate the war even further. /s
Almost barfed seeing those 2 (Hilary and Condi) together
Seeing Stewart in the kiddie gloves is somehow more disturbing than it is with other people. He had a chance to expose bourgeoise imperialist neoliberal revisionism and he really showed a lack of character treating Dems with a complete lack of scrutiny.
Well, if Mr. Seder is so sure of his counter arguments then I suggest to invite Mrs. Clinton on his show to have a one on one, or any other high government official.
When politicians say they want to spread "democracy," they actually mean capitalism. It's always about money.
I actually watched this and it was so funny watching them cont to put in hours for Uncle Sam lmao
Hell it's all they've ever done. In too deep to get out now lol.
"I mean you can't kill hundreds of thousands of people and then say we did it for the good of the people"
I wonder if there is a single person in South Korea that would agree with that logic.
These ladies are not evil, their mind is just warped by power, i think you can't imagine the corruptive power of power.
great analysis.very glad to see this ghastly account by Hillary and rice taken to task
Sad to see Jon pandering to those two war criminals.
Because Imperial Interventionalism is SO DEEPLY interwined with capitalistic greed humanity would be best if we minimalized global intervention like we've been seeing this past age to an absolute minimum.
Something that really gets me when I hear a comment like, "European countries through NATO and the Arab League.... said we want to be part of trying to protect the people of Libya."
The sense of self-absorption and entitlement could choke a donkey! There's this assumption that other countries must band together and invade another country to protect that country's people, is mindboggling. It's like breaking into a bank to steal the money to protect the money of depositors.
I think sometimes it is valid to invade a country to protect some of its inhabitants from genocide. Sometimes it's an obvious farse. Sometimes the mess you create is worse than the threat you invaded to stop.
I mean in the last few decades he has done more than most liberals or politicians ever has, and he's a comedian. He may take an L here but I will take that ratio anyday
Your friendly reminder that Condi Rice is part owner of Dropbox. Read the line again, then never put stuff you care about in dropbox.
lol wtf i didn't know that
These two were Secretary of Defense, right? Because their options are either regime change or nothing, which doesn't sound very diplomatic.
Stewart blew it with "what difference does it make" and "they had wmds". He gave both revisionists a platform to continue with throwing shade at the perceived threats to empire building. Stewart softballed the duo. Ignore.
i have a feeling hrc and rice purposefully negotiated this tag team against jon stewart as a condition of the meeting. he's outnumbered by design.
@@sandrafrancisco Basically, it was a waste of air time. I wonder how much each of them all got paid?
@@shmoopiebear a lot
The way John kept interrupting Hillary and Condi when they wanted to talk about their war crimes was so odd, almost uncomfortable to watch. IMO they shared more than John wanted them too because they knew beforehand he wouldn't push back and used those circumstances for some historical revisionism. Clever girls
"we thought Sadam had weapons of mass destruction." does she seriously think people still believe that shit?
These two should be jailed on sight. They only care about profit for themselves through military industrial complex
After coming to power in Libya, the RCC government of Gaddafi initiated a process of directing funds toward providing education, health care and housing for all. Public education in the country became free and primary education compulsory for both sexes. Medical care became available to the public at no cost, but providing housing for all was a task the RCC government was unable to complete.[2] Under Gaddafi, per capita income in the country rose to more than US$11,000, the 5th highest in Africa.
During the 1980s and 1990s, Gaddafi, in alliance with the Eastern Bloc and Fidel Castro's Cuba, openly supported rebel movements like Nelson Mandela's African National Congress, Yasser Arafat's Palestine Liberation Organization, the Provisional Irish Republican Army and the Polisario Front (Western Sahara).
What a monster he was, he basically helped fight for freedom and autonomy from Western imperialism across the globe!!!
No wonder they wanted him dead for so long!!!
Hilary Clinton's situation room skit makes me think she is too scared to make proper choices
I totally agree keep Condi Rce buried forever. Actually she should be in prison for the lies she told about a Iraq.
Given Gaddafi's close relations to Russia and China, and his interest in developing mechanisms for great pan-African unity, the alleged threat of genocide was always intended to be the pretext for invasion, regime change and breaking Libya.
The first time I'm ever disappointed in Jon Stewart.
Rice, Cheney, Bolton, Bush, and how may more should be in jail at best. I have another suggestion. I'll keep that to myself. What a hypocrite, at best.
I think if Stewart where to grill these two than he’d have trouble getting other guests that might be why he doesn’t go all our against em maybe
If you have to pull your punches in such an important interview then you may as well not have it at all
"Jon, the Variables "
You could argue that Grenada is a neighbour.
In Stewart’s defense, He obviously doesn’t want to die.
He always liked Condi Rice. He had her on the Daily Show many years ago. Who wants to hear what they think? Does John Stewart care about the veterans who died in the Iraq War for no good reason?
In 1812 the US invaded British North America, now called Canada
England didn't invade France ... but we had the so called Hundred Years' war which lasted from 1337 to 1453 and was only one among many more wars after that.
What a great take down of these two, no actually three lifelong charlatans.
These people treat life as if it were a computer game. The way they talk they might as easily be narrating call of duty
Just to clarify, Intervention doesn’t actually have a low success rate, the majority of UN peacekeeping operations, with some very notable exceptions, have been pretty successful. But I would agree that US-Led intervention has a sketchy record
Rice is a liar too.
Of course. In a way she's the bigger liar since lying has been her ENTIRE career. At least Hilary has done a tiny modicum of good.
I've listened to John's show and found it informative and interesting. I skipped this one, neither of these 2 needed to be heard from again. They can join trump on an island. Is exile still a thing?
How are you supposed to stop a genocide without regime change? Ask the dictator nicely?
perhaps by not committing genocides ourselves
I don’t recall democratic nations pursuing regime change. I do recall that they imposed a no-fly zone over Libya, which the anti-Quadaffi forces utilized to emerge victorious in the civil war.
RWANDA was on Her Watch!
You mean Rwanda was on Bill Clinton's watch. But that would only bolster her point. She wants to stop other countries from becoming Rwanda, which gives her a reason to intervene.
i don't get what stewart was thinking here with this show