GB News: Why "Britain's Fox News" is Dying
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 06. 2024
- Get Nebula using my link for 40% off an annual subscription: go.nebula.tv/tldrbusiness
GB News, known for its right-wing stance, faces financial challenges despite ambitions for dominance by 2028. In this video, we'll explore its origins, current struggles, and uncertain future.
🎞 TikTok: / tldrnews
💡 Got a Topic Suggestion? - forms.gle/mahEFmsW1yGTNEYXA
Support TLDR on Patreon: / tldrnews
Donate by PayPal: tldrnews.co.uk/funding
Our mission is to explain news and politics in an impartial, efficient, and accessible way, balancing import and interest while fostering independent thought.
TLDR is a completely independent & privately owned media company that's not afraid to tackle the issues we think are most important. The channel is run by a small group of young people, with us hoping to pass on our enthusiasm for politics to other young people. We are primarily fan sourced with most of our funding coming from donations and ad revenue. No shady corporations, no one telling us what to say. We can't wait to grow further and help more people get informed. Help support us by subscribing, engaging and sharing. Thanks!
0:00 Intro
0:45 How it started
3:00 How it's going
8:03 Will it go bust
8:41 Sponsor
That level of propaganda is more suited for the States.
MSNBC, and alike
@@Jonas_M_Mlearn to read better
The headline says *Fox* News.
Nice try, MAGAt.
@@Jonas_M_M nope. Not exactly the same. MSNBC is news that is biased to the left. It’s not raw propaganda.
@@Jonas_M_M More like Fox News and Sky News, considering the political affiliation. But MSNBC and CNN too, I guess
BBC is the propaganda king.
Discovery invested in gb news? Thats wild
Fox makes a lot of money in the UK, the new discovery boss is all about fake reality and whatever brings in cash.
Whats wild is that their GBN shares lost over 50% of their value in a little over a year
not even David Zaslavs worst financial decision tbh... and he's not even a swivel eyed hard right lunatic, just an incredibly shrewd businessman who's both overseen some incredible acquisitions and mergers (Warner/AT&T/HBO/Discovery), but also made some horrible decisions along the way. I guess you don't get to be CEO of the Worlds largest and most powerful media conglomerate without making some questionable choices along the way.
Well Zaslav IS evil
What the hell?
The people behind it are paying for their opinions to be spread, not to make money from it. They see it as a necessary cost to achieve their aims. And a cost billionaires are fully willing to finance.
Who? Most mainstream media does not present itself as conservative. Quite the opposite, in fact.
It's the faux-alt background noise of the corporatocratic Anglo-American Empire. Just as Reform UK are a faux-alt political alternative (although in reality they just represent more of the same neoliberal failure with the controls cranked up to 11) to lead us into thinking we're still living in some sort of democracy. Just as Henry Ford offered cars in any colo(u)r "as long as it's black", our political choices seldom offer an egalitarian alternative anymore, and only present us with a choice that caters first and foremost for the privileged few.
Oh because the BBC is so different 😂
Thankfully@@Conn458
Labour is going to win by a massive landslide (of course not Corbyn's Labour but it's Labour Anyway). It's an absolute failure. They thought that Brexit would work, but that wasn't the case. I mean, they didn't find an appropriate environment. It doesn't seem like they will find one in the mid time...
i don´t think it´s dying, because i don´t think the owners care about profit.
Indoctrination is the name of the game.
What indoctrination are they are engaged in?
Bit like the bbc then
It's like Murdoch with the Sun newspaper.Happy to make a loss providing he was able to peddle his right wing agenda.
.
@@hilaryjohnson2386 similar to the Guardian. Never needs to sell a newspaper when they’ve got a huge trust fund
Money launderers don't care about profits.
They seem to have deep pockets. I think it'll keep going.
It's a small price to pay to keep all the turkeys voting for Christmas for those deep pockets.
A perfectly sound investment even.
I think Paul Marshall will continue fund it up until the election in order to try and keep Labour out. Beyond that, he's ambition is to go global hence why he is trying to purchase The Telegraph because with online media it's easier to go global then a TV channel. The Guardian online is a good example of this. If the Telegraph deal falls through, which is the way it is going, I think he GB News may carry on a little longer.
They have holes in thier pockets.
Someone needs to find out who is really behind the money via Dubai- I doubt it's just rich sheikhs wanting to invest
I think once Starmer becomes PM you’ll see a resurgence. GB news will look a lot more like Sky Australia. Does pretty mediocre when the people they like are in charge but get a lot more unnecessary traction when those they don’t like are.
More to say don’t discount them too soon.
Well, they don't really need GB News for that. The mainsteam media in the UK is owned by Tory donors, so any Labour government will receive its bashing from even the BBC.
Yeah, carping from the sidelines is easier when your guys aren't in power. Precisely why ofcom needs to be given it's claws back to actually regulate their blatant bias and MPs need to be banned from this kind of second job
Yeah this is how it is in the US to, opposition media has a big resurgence in ratings when their political party doesn't control either house of congress or the Presidency.
Doubt it, most brits ain't lead paint lickers unlike the states.
Sky Australia? Surely you mean 'Fox2 Aus'. Anyone stupid enough to watch it is already a lost cause.
The fact it's struggling gives me more hope in humanity
Yea, it shouldn't succeed, just like other fascist media like der stromfront and more shouldn't have in the past.
Real
Yet the subscriber account is growing, worry harder.
Why? They don't talk about even half the problems you've been indoctrinated to believe don't exist
Don’t you like people who don’t agree with you? Says a lot about
"GB News keeps having terrible PR" or, as they may see it "GB News keeps getting an incredible amount of free publicity thanks to controversies that keep it in the mainstream media, meaning the station doesn't have to pay for advertising."
"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." A. Lincoln
@@j.dunlop8295 bob marley
In PR, it is better to be hated than to be forgotten.
Can you name one of their new items you do not agree with?
Exactly - the types of people they want to attract are 65 year old right wing helmets with 3 GCSEs who think ofcom are woke lefty agents paid off by Corbyn. GBN being told off by ofcom every other week is just a free ad
It was founded by a company called 'All Perspectives Limited'? That's Fox New 'Fair and Balanced' levels of irony
Is it? When there's such a media/government blackout on right wing opinions that they're literally trying to de-person Russell Brand? When the UK government is sending letters to youtube asking them to demonetize the content of British citizens who have never been convicted of any crime just because they have right wing opinions??
How can ya'll act like there isn't a one sided system when that happened?
It's a clanger right up there with "Entertain and Inform".
They seem to be depending a lot on being, like Johnson and Farage before them, over-represented on the BBC, particularly QT. Have you seen the statistics for the no of right wing journalists on QT vis-a-vis left-leaning ones? Startling imbalance.
if its ok for the bbc why is it wrong for gb news
@@josephberrie9550 news channels arent allowed to employ politicians......
It’s not a business, it’s propoganda
And probably funded by the Kremlin. The Kremlin doesn't have an ideology, just the aspiration to divide democratic societies.
Literally all news is propaganda
The BBC is bigger propaganda on the Global scale ... while they pay Lineker Millions.
It is basically the Reform UK propaganda channel, given how many presenters and guests are active Reform members. I have the misfortune of having a father who watches it constantly, and I swear six hours went by before a single person who was not in that radical right party appeared...
Actually it is dangerous nonsense, but Brits tend not to lap arrant rubbish up as easily as easily as Americans do with their version of GBN-Fox News.
legatum are based in dubai. who own the holding company all perspective ltd. The irony of a anti-foreign news agency who is based in a tax haven to avoid paying UK tax.
You confuse being anti-foreign with being anti-swarms of millions of undocumented illegal immigrants.
Citation requested that GB News are hostile to foreign countries.
@@darthkek1953 foreigners you did. Anti immigration slant. But they themselves are not patriotic enough to pay uk tax. They are based in a tax haven
@@Professional_CZcams_Commenter being against _mass_ low-skilled illegal immigration from religious warzones is not the same as your claim of being "anti-foreign."
@@darthkek1953 sure it is didnt thins channel also push for brexit?
I am pretty sure Dan Wooten is not experienced in having a female presenter in his bed!
He prefers them with crisp white Y-fronts.
oohhh thats gender bashing from the woke.. i thought you were supposed to be the caring people
Nothing against gay people. Possibly a little sarcastic. But really just a joke : )@@josephberrie9550
@@josephberrie9550 no its not. hes a cvnt who happens to be gay.
he must be well over 40, and said that line and said about being a cukc or whatever.......whatever happened to adulthood.
1:46 the irony of GB news having Muslim investors 😂
Not so ironic, actually. A lot of places with heavy immigrant demography (London being the exception) are surprisingly right-wing. It's the whole working class Tory thing. Rochdale voted heavily for Brexit and now they've just elected another self-serving, publicity-seeking headbanger.
@@alfresco8442 i meant in the other direction.
The Arabs funding GB news couldn't care less what happens to Muslims in other countries.
But the GBN pundits who keep complaining about Muslims should probably check the hand that feeds them
Legatum is based in Dubai but the management and stakeholders are nearly all American, take a look at their people page and play spot the brown face.
It's only based in Dubai for tax reasons. They're not emerati investors
@@alfresco8442 I wonder if the GBN pundits will check the hand that pays them the next time the scapegoat muslims
Probably because no matter how much the last few years have shown, Britain isn’t entirely thick to believe the utter rubbish these pathetic excuses spout for relevance
I don't think its dying. Yes, it may be losing money. But the channel is still growing. They are just playing the long game.
"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." A. Lincoln
This is an acceptable cost for the right wing financiers that fund it, because they know the value of having a propaganda mouthpiece they control.
I'm expecting that sooner or later like Fox, they'll take it too far with the lies and conspiracy theories and end up slandering/libelling someone who has pockets deep enough to be able to fights back. They won't be able to help themselves it's the basis of their business model.
Define propaganda. Don't you consider the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and so forth to be "propaganda"?
Exactly, all GB news does is provide the real world view that the traditional (left af) media outlets ignore @@noahbrock349
Just like bbc, itv, guardian is for the left wing
@@noahbrock349 the BBC is possibly the most impartial broadcaster in the entire world, nowhere else is the legal requirement to be impartial and separate from government enforced so much, while also being completely free of dependence on advertisers with a specific view they want to fund. They give balanced coverage without favouring one view on it, and with interviews with people from all sides of politics in equal amounts, the exact opposite of GB news.
you have to ask, was it ever intended to make money itself? Or was it always just a loss-leader intended to insert more extreme right wing views into the British political culture for the long term benefit of the super rich? Because if it was never meant to make money, then it not making money isn't a problem for it or its backers
Of course it is. Distract and devide working people so they don't demand a fair wage, and also demand fair bills.
Many see the left wing policies being pushed so hard by mainstream media for the benefit of the super rich. Such as Black Rock and their stranglehold on so many media organisations who are losing money hand over fist due to having to push left wing ideologies rather than focus on making good product. It's interesting that left and right both see the other as being puppets of the super rich. Like they both have a common enemy but still bicker between themselves.
@@BoyeeSmudger In England the working class do want fair wages, working conditions etc but the standards are kept so low due to the never ending supply of cheap workers being imported into the country. Most employers attitudes are if you don't like it, there's the door and there's 100 immigrant workers who will do the job for low pay and keep their mouths shut.
@@darkwoods1954thought Brexit was supposed to fix that problem? You’ve been fed a big one, chief.
@@jackpowrie3 I didn't mention Brexit but ok.
They launched it in 2020s .. should’ve started 30 years earlier. They completely missed the timing on capturing the boomer market
Lot of truth in that... And TLDR did a fantastic job on the GB news subject... Well Done TLDR.. Pitched perfectly...
Totally incorrect. Boomers didn't think then as they do now. It would never have worked 30 years ago due to thier target demographic (50 years and upwards) were far fewer in number and far better educated. Massive numbers of uneducated old people are needed to make GB Spews successful, so the fact that it's on its last legs gives me hope for the future.
@@garyt.8745 GB news will be around for a while, but they are NOT what they keep trying to convince people they are... again, they are a privatized version of the BBC.. run by MP's ... In other words GB news is the enemy trying to energy harvest the boomer generation, but even on that score i think they are failing miserably...
Their simply ISN'T a market for it in the UK - since (ignoring the brexit aberration) we are generally not a bunch of racist fascists.
more like capturing a market that doesn't even exist in the UK. Most people are socially conservative. and they should have a voice.
From the graph in the end you can see they are more trusted than the daily mail and sun, so not doing that badly as both of those still exist after many years.
New media usually gets a free pass for a long time. Some people are hopeful, others curious. And everyone knows they are just new. Old media has to be perfect or isn't trusted.
Daily Fail, Express, the Sun and Mirror are quite well known for being completely dishonest and badly researched news. Comparing a TV channel with them is quite shocking.
My trust in GB News plummeted(further) when they have employed a minister for 18 century.
My toe is more trusted than the daily mail and the sun worst newsites to ever exist
It does baffle how the Daily Fail and the Scum are still in business.
Since the Mail and Sun are politically from the same stable, but marginally less strident, that they are less "trusted" than GB News is no more than a reflection of the extremist faction that harkens to all three.
I'm surprised it's lasting as long as it has tbh
why what other news channel gives a conservative voice?
@@internethardcase - the daily mail
- the sun
- sky news australia
- the telegraph
get a grip..
@@AlexReads1613not on UK telly though.
@@Alto53 yh but no one watches the telly anyways 😂 you’re hard pressed to find anything except bbc or itv that people give a shit abt
@@AlexReads1613 I think its unfair to say no one watches the TV, though that is the direction of travel. Irrespective, GB News has a significant online presence which is only rivalled by TalkTV when it comes to a mainstream UK visual broadcast outlet (on the right).
"All Perspectives" How Orwellian.
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
GB News is Factual
how so? now the speech the UK government bans is orwellian.
What's Orwellian is having your government writing letters to youtube asking them to demonetize content made by British Citizens because what their content is saying leans right wing.
THAT is "Orwellian." Allowing your political minorities to speak freely is the opposite of Orwellian.
The fantastic GBNews living in your head rent free 😂😂
oh wow you can repeat old memes
Go Anti "Woke", Go Broke???
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Go fash, lose cash
Well you keep paying your TV license tax to keep your BBC and Channel4 going shall we. I would rather have free choice in watch I watch
@@marshyman66 Channel4 doesn't receive any licence fee or any other form of public funding, it's a commercial enterprise funded by advertising revenue.
@@marshyman66 Advertisers are happy to fund Channel 4 but do not want to be associated with GB news. Says a lot about GB News toxicity and right-wing bias.
TV is dying is it surprising a new TV news channel is dying
Exactly this. I'm 23 & haven't watched a TV channel in the best part of 2 years now. Everything is via browsing or streamed. Even if my political bias sided with GBNews, I wouldn't have any aspiration to watch it regardless.
TV doesn’t make sense anymore.
@@TheBooban I agree, I am in my late 30s I remember when people spoke what you watched on TV last night. Now it's what did/do you watch on Netflix, CZcams or Disney?
My parents are in their's late 70s they watch stuff on Roku and go to the pub to watch the footie. I do watch GB News because it I like to hear the other point of view. I am an centre in politics and I don't vote. GB News are scared to say anything due to Ofcom.
A lot of broadcasters are in the same boat with ratings. Brodcast TV is becoming a dead medium like radio. I am not convinced by their arguments but they do touch on things on like globalism.
@@andrewjames9996 Is GB news not streamed too? But actually I’ve stopped watching the news too. As a centrist, i think it’s pointless. All just want to manipulate you. But ending globalism would solve most problems.
@@TheBooban I think they want to give people a choice either watch or stream the channel. I have a feeling they paid for much channel slot than Talk TV and also Talk TV problem was they had too many ITV daytime presenters. Kyle, Trisha and Feltz it's like the mid 2000s all over again. Even Reese-Mogg is a Saint compared to Piers Morgan.
The bigger issue that is not mentioned in this video is Offcom don't consider GB News to be a new channel so don't regulate it as such.
If it looks like a news channel, quacks like a news channel and calls itself a news channel..
Of course they regulate it , everything on UK TV or radio , apart from pirate radio , is regulated by ofcom. . That is why one of their at the time more popular presenters . Mark Steyn , left because he was going against the politicians narrative lies during the corona virus scam
Are you kidding Ofcom are always investigating GB News. Mind you its not viewers complaining its lefties that never watch the channel but would like to get GB News taken off air. Funny lefties believe in free speech but only if you agree with them.
It is no more a news channel than Fox.
yeah we should let the government decide what is true or not. i have an idea. what about a ministry of truth?
There's an issue with it describing itself as a 'news' channel. Sitting MP's are not allowed to have shows on a 'news' channel, as it violates impartiality laws. They have argued that they are an 'opinion' channel, yet here we see that they present themselves as a 'news' channel. Surely Rees-Mogg and Anderson should be pulled up for presenting and the channel itself should be fined or sanctioned for this?
I don't understand, I thought fixing all of the UKs problems was getting out of being a friend with Europe.
I wouldn’t celebrate just yet. Here in the US we find that the opposing viewpoint outlets tend to become more popular when new administrations come in (MSNBC grew during Trump etc). If Labour wins, GB might see a similar upswing. Tori’s have been in charge so long, it likely their isn’t as much demand for more media supporting them
Oh no!
Anyway...
You fail to mention how much Sky/Comcast loses each year and it's much more than GB news? And not forgetting the huge cost of running the BBC at license fee payers expense.
If TLDR is so neutral, how come all the comments are from just one side?
lots of tory rimming comments, just like yours. learn to read?
Because we’re just too cool
Idk if you know this, but TLDR doesn't decide who comes in and comments
Lying, losing money , lawsuits , extreme , i thought he was talkabout the BBC for a moment.😂
You have spent much too long on the far lunatic-Right. 🙄
@@Tyronepeader Nice one 😁 but - what was I wrong about ?
@@markmanc-zw3td I don't reside in the UK but at this distance even I can see clearly that there's quite a caravan of the far right that much prefer to strut their stuff on GB News, Talk TV or Sky News Australia where never a challenging word will be heard. They allocate the BBC only occasional appearances and stick to down home terrority. You seemed to imply they were interchangeable.
These children don't have to watch GB News, and they don't have to pay for it...but still they flood their jam rags.
Does media on the left do much better financially? Media in general is loosing money fast.
most media is right wing, some is centrist. hardly any is left wing.
@@kanedNunable Manifest and demonstrable horseshit.
It generally has higher viewing figures than Sky or the BBC. I can't see it struggling long-term even if I find it terminally boring myself.
"Go Woke Go Broke" cue £42 million loss
I must admit I do watch their news rather than BBC, as they seem willing to discuss and express views that other main stream providers seem petrified of even mentioning. Yes they’re crass at times but I want to hear all views not just those seen as currently acceptable at liberal dinner parties. If the liberals were truly liberal there wouldn’t be such as vast appetite for GB news or Russel Brand.
Check out the Jimmy Dore Show. Ex classical liberal who once supported Bernie Sanders.
I'm honestly shocked they even managed 6.7 million pounds in 2023
right wing? because it's balanced?
the UK is too cynical to buy into something so blatantly opinionated. Even if we aren't immune from echo chambers and confirmation bias, we still enjoy being able to fit current events into our pre-existing world view ourselves, rather than have someone else digest and interpret that for us. It's uncouth, and it feels dirty to so receive the news along with such a conspicuous slant.
I think Andrew Neil is a good example of that - someone that definitely holds a personal bias, and may have even agreed with many of the views expressed on the channel, but recognised it was too americanised to want to stay a part of.
I thought sky news was the Fox News of Britain
Was until a few years ago. I guess sponsors didn't want to advertise with people not pushing the woke message
sky news australia is fox news for australians
It can't due to Ofcom.
murdoch sold it years ago....
@@kanedNunable To the liberal Comcast.
Just like Brexit, it's going down like a lead balloon 😂😂
Would it be worth looking into the sources of their funding?
It wouldn't call GB News right wing but it isn't very good but neither is the BBC!
Good.
US fox News is dying too. That's why when Disney bought Fox they intentionally bought everything BUT the news business unit.
It's... dying? For 22 years straight it is the #1 cable news show in the US. It has nine of the ten most watched news shows (all demos) and 10 of the 10 most watched shows in "the demo" (25-54).
@@darthkek1953 had not has its ratings have been sinking and let's not forge the nearly 1 billion dollars it owes for losing defamation lawsuit & the 2nd lawsuit is still ongoing. It's no wonder Murdock tried so hard to sell it off lol
These media outlets are run at a loss. It is a tool not a bussiness for profit.
GB News no audience and little viability. It won't be missed much. 😊
Presenters such as Farage, Rees Mogg, 30p Lee, Fox, Wootoon what a recipe for success.
James O'Brien could be worse..?
@@SB111058
O’Brien has more listeners than KGB news has viewers 😂
A bit like Saturday night after someone has puked up their Donner Kebab.
GB News is the most watched news outlet in the UK, so guess what? You're right!
It is not a NEWS outlet. It's propaganda for the sheeple.@@williambolton4698
Good
It’s basically bankrolled by people who don’t want to make a profit
Freedom of Speech is not just more important than money, it is critical to wealth.
The holding company is aptly named: All Perspectives Limited.
O:07 the background picture prominently shows the Royal Liver Building, one of the most prominent buildings in Liverpool: The city where the Tories didnt even manage to get 2% of the votes in 2023 elections, and Reform UK didnt even manage to get past 1%. Like many choices made by GBN this seems odd to say the least.
Because most of the brainless husks would vote for Gary Glitter if he stuck a red rosette on. That's nothing to be proud of Son.
I'm not red or blue - I'm not daft enough to vote.
Culture war claptrap and QaNonsense works in America. But most people in the UK just aren't that interested in wind up TV.
The left started these "culture wars". Wokism is a civilisational threat and must be resisted.
you sure? look at our newspapers.
@@kanedNunable Yeah. The Sun and Mail are certainly full of it. But younger people get their news online these days. I think the Sun is actually losing money. The Tories are not popular regardless. So it seems that most people aren't buying the pro Tory messaging.
Wind up TV just about sums it up.
@@kanedNunable Look at GB News viewing figures. They'd be bankrupt if a hedge funder did not keep them afloat. I wonder why he does that? It's not like all that righty propaganda is helping the Tories.
GB News actually has some very good presenters like Andrew Doyle and Patrick Christys. But it unfotunately also has some utter wingnuts like Bev Turner and Neil Oliver.
I am entertained and informed by Christy. He's a pretty good presenter and at time can even be journo like. I think he's wasted where he is and deserves a break on a more adult forum.
Neil Oliver has deteriorated into a complete conspiracy headbanging t--t! Mad as a hatter.
8:31
FT just casually flexing how they are the most trusted source in that poll
I bet Marshall is going to attempt to buy the Telegraph
Ehh, Digital platforms, broadcast TV is now an all-digital platform. Analogue TV transmitters were turned off years ago!!!!! I think you meant Internet Protocol platforms!!!
It's kinda mad that they got sunak on there
mainstream tv should be discussing the issues which affect us-often it doesn't and if GB News disappears it will continue to fail us with a continuing declining audience.
What issues ffs it's hysteria tv for gammons
Oh please let it go bust. I’ve made an effort to watch it and it is awful. 4 speakers on repeat - so poor
I have always maintained that GB is not so much a news service but more of a propaganda channel, so for me it's a non starter. If I want that sort of thing would buy a newspaper, but I have not even done that since 1964!
It seems like they are growing just not as fast as expected
Their losses are also growing, faster than expected.
@@Algolxxxxxx The TV industry hasn't been profitable since 2020 they are losing billions of dollars due to streaming and free CZcams options. News is dead and obsolete even the BBC is losing money. CNN NBC CBS ABC FOX are all losing money in the U.S. The whole old media industry is bleeding dry.
WHATS WRONG WITH THE TRUTH
Gbn is not truth.
Thankfully, GB "News" has limited appeal for it's output and will be gone before long
295 staff in 2023?? How many hours of material do they produce each month?
The thing is it doesn't exist to make money it exists to influence our politics and hence the various overseas players with stakes in that will continue to prop it up.
propaganda TV
Regardless of its political stance, it was just terrible.
Not having a lot of views or not making money is not related to whether GBN will continue or not. This is completely different from TalkTV for which these are important factors. GBN is a completely different animal, a side project on which whose owner/owners enjoy splashing money without seeing a commercial return. The joy is in the spending of the money itself, and maybe secondarily giving certain types of views a platform. It's like someone having money to spend on cameras without ever expecting to or wanting to make money out of photography. They will keep buying cameras so long as buying cameras is a joyous experience.
If they stop sacking their top presenters perhaps we will switch back to GB News
And well OFCOM, really? We do have to worry about this impartial organisation when it allows the self nominated channel of truth (not G B News) to bend the truth.
Ironically it's the most non-British news channel we have in the UK.
RIP GB news they got what deserved it’s a crap channel just a Murdock propaganda channel bye bye
The rich owners of GBnews and talktv aren’t worried about profits. It’s all about propaganda and blaming poor so they can carry the narrative that greed is good.
Why would relying on Tory MPs for "talent" be a problem if their party implodes? If a lot of them loose their seats at the next election they will be looking for new jobs and might be happy to put more time into TV presenting.
wait,,, but the UK still got Skynews right???😂 isnt Piers Morgan Britains greatest export to the right wing world??.😂😂
You think Morgan is right-wing? 😂
@@ian0143 I love how people called Piers right wing, there nothing right wing about him. He doesn't like arguing and he loses every debate.
sky news was sold by murdoch years ago, hence why its less shit now.
@@andrewjames9996 "He doesn't like arguing and he loses every debate." sounds like a right winger to me from that ;)
@@kanedNunable He lost debates with stalwart conseratives like Ted Nugent, Ben (Never Trumper) Shapiro and Jesse Ventura.
So the fact that they have seen such growth in revenue and online engagement means that it seems too early to say that they are dying. Yes, they are unprofitable, but it seems like any other growth-focused company, that their goal isn't near-term right now. And even if they don't hit their 2028 goal, if they keep growing like they have been, they'll still be close. And while they may be controversial, as seen in America, this could be a strength as much as a weakness. While I can't see them overtaking the more mainstream media, I could see them establishing themselves within their niche and doing well there. Of course, it's also possible their growth will peter out and they'll keep burning through their investors' money until they go bankrupt. And I admit I know nothing about the UK political landscape. But to say they are dying seems presumptuous.
I think “dying” is more wishful thinking on the part of the creators of the video than reality
@@andrewjames3908 That or clickbait. Saying "GB News isn't meeting the growth goals they set for themselves" is not as good of a title. And I get that TLDR needs to play the CZcams game, but I take issue when the title says "X is true" when X is not true based on the evidence they present.
Analysis by The Guardian ? I wouldn't trust The Guardian to deliver a weather forecast !
@TLDR You guys are the problem. Calling GBNews a 'News Channel' and Dan Watton a 'Journalist'. This is the real problem
Interesting phenomenon, the right are always wrong, but it is never their fault.
And the left are never wrong because they'll call you (checks Trudeau's literal convoy speech) "Antisemitic, Islamophobic, anti-Black Racist, Homophobic Transphobes.".
You can tell most of the people commenting on here have never actually watched a GB News segment before, they are still subject to Ofcom regulations, meaning they are required to have a mixed cast of political representation, just because Nigal Farage has a show on there doesn't change that fact.
if ofcom did their job, they would have done something about JRM having a show whilstbworking as an MP.
Making money isn’t the primary goal of GB news, keeping people angry and ignorant is the real goal
Yay! If the tories lose there is no point in it
So, if the current New Labour Party in power, gets replaced by the other New Labour Party in power, something will have changed?!
If MP's aren't at work in Parliament,why aren't they at their office looking at their voters problems.?
Holds true only for non Tories. Tories don't want to hear from the unwashed voter.
8:25: “unless GB News dials back the hysteria that sometimes overtakes its broadcasts…”
So, it’s simple. GB News just has to stop being GB News.
I think I’ll keep my money.
Good news! 👍
GBNews is too rich to fail.
Because in Britain we value reliable news
No you don't lol just look at the BBC's coverage of the Palestinian genocide. Or the hunt of Jeremy Corbyn
We really don’t. You’re fed the stories they want you to hear, no matter what side they’re coming from
What happened to Corbyn and the coverage of the Palestinian genocide aren't signs of reliable news
There is a difference between reliability and bias. Only the BBC has a duty to be unbiased.
Since when? We havn't had impartial just-the-facts news since the late 90s. Now all the news is delivered dripping with the presenter's implied opinions and biases.
Genuine curiosity, how is "show me any self-respecting man who'd sleep with that woman" misogynistic? Sure, it's offensive and insulting, but is it considered mysogynistic due to the person saying it being male?
Have you seen Ava Evans?
Who cares about GB News? The Daily Telegraph is the one up for sale
Like the Tories in 2019 the public voted for them in hope of being truly represented and action taken. And we see how quickly the machine grinds that hope down by making everything impossible. The people vote/watch/choose - then Ofcom get involved, the banks, big business, WEF, UN, ECHR, none of which are elected. But they seem to be able to control everything with zero accountability….
This is good news. I hope Talk TV follows
Good news that diversity of opinion will be reduced?
Nice one. Sounds slightly single minded and totalitarian.
Yes we must all think the same on all issues.
And LBC
I think TalkTV is already going online only soon.
Why is it good news? There should be a political balance in the media. GB News and Talk TV are the only centre right channels we have in this country. If you don't like it, don't watch it!
GB news says what the majority of the brits think. Its doing fine.
You chose the wrong side of the narrative, At this moment I am not concerned about the financials, GB News is growing and getting stronger,
...despite all evidence. Which, befittingly, makes you their perfect viewer.
.... so, like when did discovery turn from nature docs to peddling controversy? Think it was the reality TV?
GB News paid the tories £660k and Labour £1,100 - I wonder if that shows a clear bias? Nah!! 😂😂
That's cause Labour are wankers
At least they're not doing it with taxpayer money.
@@xyz-uw3ps Of course they are.
BBC is practically a Ha -m as broadcasting network at this point, what are you talking about "bias"??
If the channel's investors are mainly interested in a financial return, then the channel may be doomed, but I don't think this is true.
I think the main investors see it as another way to influence the public into voting against their own best interests and for the investor's interests.
So as long as they think it can achieve that goal, they will continue to fund it, no matter how much money it loses (same with TalkTV).
I do like going on GB on youtube and slagging off Mogg, Fararse and Piers and rich people are losing money on it and it also always makes me laugh too. I have very mixed feelings about this issue.
We just have fewer deluded boomers to consume that kind of content
"Deluded boomers". Arrogance right there.
@@noahbrock349 truth hurts eh cupcake?
deluded boomers and thick gen-x. happy now?
@@noahbrock349 oh books have been written about this. boomers are the most psychopathic generation ever, victims of the parenting style they were given probably mixed with consuming too much lead.
It's a shame if it does go under as it reports on a lot of stories the media establishment tend to ignore and suppress. But I imagine advertisers are reluctant to deal with the channel as it doesn't tow the line as much.
What are these stories.. give us just one?
Love it great channel better than the BBC by a mile