High Expense Ratio Is Not Bad For Mutual Funds

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
  • Here's why high expense ratio is not a bad thing for a mutual fund.
    For more such videos, subscribe to our channel
    / @businessinsiderindia9294
    Visit us at: www.businessin...
    BI on Facebook: / businessinsiderindia
    BI on Twitter: / biindia
    BI on Instagram: ...

Komentáře • 25

  • @brijeshkukreja7411
    @brijeshkukreja7411 Před rokem +20

    Higher expense ratio = Higher fees and no guarantee of performance. If you get me more returns is never a condition one should look it. Probably best to invest in index mutual funds keeping safety in mind. I have seen a lot of people getting burnt with active mutual fund unless the company is willing to give back the expenses if they don't perforn

  • @sampatharuna6884
    @sampatharuna6884 Před rokem +2

    Bro! expense ratio need not be the management fee unless it is stated as management expense ratio. But even then MER can be apart fm expense ratio

  • @Ro_hitttt
    @Ro_hitttt Před rokem +5

    Majority of funds also fail to beat benchmark index in long term

    • @anubhavtomar3499
      @anubhavtomar3499 Před rokem +5

      Can you please tell me how is this relevant to India, many mutual funds are able to beat nifty 50 in both 5-10 years span. I alwasy hear this statement but I am not able to understand it completely

    • @umeshchandraverma6518
      @umeshchandraverma6518 Před rokem +2

      ​@@anubhavtomar3499 this is what I also want to know

    • @TheSlimmshadyy
      @TheSlimmshadyy Před rokem +1

      ​@@anubhavtomar3499They don't.

    • @religionofpeace782
      @religionofpeace782 Před 9 měsíci +1

      ​@@anubhavtomar3499 Nifty 50 is the large cap index. Most largecap/bluechip funds were not able to beat the nifty 50 returns for a long time. But its different for midcap index and small cap index. Majority midcap funds and small cap funds have beaten the midcap and small cap indexes.

    • @samsha2100
      @samsha2100 Před 9 měsíci +2

      This statement of "Fail to Beat Index Funds" is valid for USA/UK stock markets where all the Active Mutual Funds fail to beat Index fund.
      Where as India is emerging market.
      Due to this Most of all Active Mutual funds are beating the Index funds in both Short term and Long Term.

  • @Vishal_Bass.
    @Vishal_Bass. Před 2 lety +2

    Well said, Exactly my opinion too!

  • @umeshchandraverma6518
    @umeshchandraverma6518 Před rokem +4

    Thanks sir this is what I search
    That expense ratio is included or not in cagr return

  • @thamizharasan3925
    @thamizharasan3925 Před 2 lety +5

    Sir always being in English I am from tamilnadu

  • @lakshminarasimhannarasimha1338

    Valuable insight

  • @vivekgowdack2708
    @vivekgowdack2708 Před rokem

    Thq❤

  • @ShivamShukla-te5ws
    @ShivamShukla-te5ws Před rokem +4

    how much expense ratio is ok

    • @Savage11798
      @Savage11798 Před rokem

      0.05 0.03 0.09

    • @dlxpro9342
      @dlxpro9342 Před rokem +2

      any thing less than 1%

    • @ALTInvestchannel
      @ALTInvestchannel Před 10 měsíci

      @@dlxpro9342 You should look at what the funds giving returns and if beating the benchmark. You investment should never be based on expense ratio of funds only.

    • @religionofpeace782
      @religionofpeace782 Před 9 měsíci +4

      ​@@Savage11798No fund has such low expense ratio 😂 not even the index funds.

    • @johnbrian8296
      @johnbrian8296 Před 8 měsíci

      ​@@religionofpeace782 1.75 okay?

  • @D-SK7942
    @D-SK7942 Před 23 dny

    Higher NAV is good for starting MF

  • @S.A.1
    @S.A.1 Před rokem

    Are there passively managed index ETFs in India?

  • @RaviRavi-ez4kz
    @RaviRavi-ez4kz Před rokem +1

    Sorry,one willnt end up with 87.5l for mf which had exp ratio of 1.5 “PER YEAR” and not only once 🤦🏻

  • @rohitmaheshwari3102
    @rohitmaheshwari3102 Před rokem +2

    @LabourLawadvisor becomes dalal of Mutual fund who are not able to perform