Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump's ballot eligibility in 2024 race | full audio
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 02. 2024
- The Supreme Court on Thursday heard arguments in Trump v. Anderson, a case that questions whether former President Donald Trump is ineligible for the presidency because of his conduct related to the assault at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The case, which stems from a lawsuit filed by six Colorado voters, cites Section 3 of the 14th Amendment as the reasoning for keeping Trump off the ballot.
#news #supremecourt #trump
CBS News Streaming Network is the premier 24/7 anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations, available free to everyone with access to the Internet. The CBS News Streaming Network is your destination for breaking news, live events and original reporting locally, nationally and around the globe. Launched in November 2014 as CBSN, the CBS News Streaming Network is available live in 91 countries and on 30 digital platforms and apps, as well as on CBSNews.com and Paramount+.
Subscribe to the CBS News CZcams channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News: cbsnews.com/live/
Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on Twitter: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/?ftag=PPM-0...
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
How could a President NOT be held to a higher standard? What happened to the buck stops here? The President of THE United States should be accountable for their actions, not exempt!
thomas needs to recuse himself from these cases since ginni was involved in the insurrection. he should resign b/c he's corrupt
Truth is, there is no difference between office and officer. The reason why is clear and simple. If it's an office and you're a member of said office, then you're an officer.
Alito does not want to accept it as Trump as an insurrectionist. Alito is not accepting it as an insurrectionist. Definitely, he's a Republican.
Justice Thomas should not have heard the case and all the justices know that. So it already shows they themselves think they are above the law.
Donald Trump even romanticized even more in statement "what if Mafia ran this country yeah maybe things would be a little different around here yeah "this is during his rallies his pep rallies which seemed to be the Crux of his whole purpose in office the last time he was bouncing around like a loose canon in there .... I think we can see the line of aspiration leading to his spoken statement during an interview desire to be a king ...
These judges are asking the lawyers questions about somethings they are appointed to decide. At times, they are cutting off the attorney's attempts to respond saying they are not staying on subject, then immediately after go off topic with a question that has NO RELATIONS to the subject at hand !!!!!!!!!!!
Officer of the state's back in1776 were call state officials. And they were senators and president's. The Supreme Court knows this.and stop adding to the constitution , if we go to a autocratic system these court's are all gone.😢😮😢😮😮
Justices are making their own way to get away from following the law. How can they allow some states handle abortion issues and say that CO shouldn’t be able to determine that Trump stays off the ballot. Hello- the appellate court of CO followed their rules. So therefore, they should be allowed to keep Trump off their ballots.
Judges do your duty for the country, dont help a criminal keep on playing with the laws and don't let a political party lie and scheme ways to help a criminal.
Because common sense should let you know it include anyone that try to over throw out Democracy.
Previously taken an oath (sworn into office) therefore officer. ‘Or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof’. Simple.
Arguments 😂 the judges are slapping those lawyers around with their own words.
Excluding the President as an Officer of the U.S. is absolutely asinine.
Presidential Immunity ( Trump Argument he can do whatever he wants and not be prosecuted ) rejected in DC Appeals Court vs The Constitution Article 14 Section 3 arguments ( This does not apply to Trump ) same argument as presidential immunity
We watched the whole thing live on tv. We were all there, smh. Wow cbs!
So i guess biden can do all the same things now?
TOTAL WORD SALAD FROM "THE BEST BRAINS IN AMERICA"
SupremeSupreme Court should be asking questions dealing with the Constitution and not fallacies dealing with what if
It's a disgrace to the Lord Supreme Court throwing out Colorado Supreme Court decision just because the Mega Republicans that was appointed by Donald Trump and I have mixed feelings with Johnson maybe she needs some more studying to do about our constitution