Bravo Strict clear line of logic demonstrating not only the principle ideas but how they develop into a working systemic theory. The inclusion of the books was appreciated as was providing Google search history. Your the winner.
So in industrial societies, the only social cohesion is that different jobs/specialisations depend on each other in the market economy. And that holds societies together, despite everyone's different lifestyles and outlooks (compared to an agrarian society where everyone's a farmer). But what happens if an industry dies, or is automated, or is outsourced to a cheaper country? All those professions are abandoned by the rest of society (i.e. social cohesion fails). It implies that market economies are inherently unstable for society because the different professions are constantly changing. So countries use something else to hold themselves together (nationalism, religion, a common enemy). Or they limit technological and market penetration.
Why would a peasant willingly send a lot of or most of the food they grow the city? They wouldn't. The flow of food from the fields to the cities is always coercive. It is in fact, the primary function of the state.
Good effort dude, but kind of hard on the ear , memory is encoded acoustically and semantically, I suggest something hormonic rather than clashing cymbals and add stories and humor that people want to remember
Great thank you, so much clearer than reading the text
Bravo
Strict clear line of logic demonstrating not only the principle ideas but how they develop into a working systemic theory. The inclusion of the books was appreciated as was providing Google search history. Your the winner.
Explained really well thank ypu
I don't get a single thing...
But better than my lessons at school, this I can rewatch
Well done Sir. You gave it a ( KISS)! Keep it simple stupid. I understand better then I did reading 100 pages of text!!
thank you!
So in industrial societies, the only social cohesion is that different jobs/specialisations depend on each other in the market economy. And that holds societies together, despite everyone's different lifestyles and outlooks (compared to an agrarian society where everyone's a farmer).
But what happens if an industry dies, or is automated, or is outsourced to a cheaper country? All those professions are abandoned by the rest of society (i.e. social cohesion fails).
It implies that market economies are inherently unstable for society because the different professions are constantly changing.
So countries use something else to hold themselves together (nationalism, religion, a common enemy). Or they limit technological and market penetration.
Thank you ❤️
Why would a peasant willingly send a lot of or most of the food they grow the city? They wouldn't. The flow of food from the fields to the cities is always coercive. It is in fact, the primary function of the state.
very useful video thank yoooooou!!!!!!
This came in my exam thanks alot
Great video
really helpful. Thank you
Thank you
Can someone help me ," What is the alternative of Gemeinschaft in Emile Durkheims Theory?
Thanks brother
I noticed some parellels between this and Ted Kaczynski's beliefs if taken pessimistically
Technology is slavery/domestication. We are livestock as long as we are civilized.
Hi! I'm using your video to help write my essay, how can I site your information??
Nice
thanks a lot
Slow down
Good effort dude, but kind of hard on the ear , memory is encoded acoustically and semantically, I suggest something hormonic rather than clashing cymbals and add stories and humor that people want to remember
examine the views that without durkheim, max and Spencer there is no sociology