Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
WILDLIFE PHOTOGRAPHY Q & A: How Good Is The CANON R6 II AF And Is 24MP Enough For Cropping?
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 12. 2022
- JOIN ME ON A WORKSHOP: www.hallofthewildstudios.com/
INSTAGRAM: (@hall.of.the.wild) / hall.of.the.wild
PRESETS: www.hallofthewildstudios.com/...
Where I get my music: share.epidemicsound.com/aavo6d
Main Camera:
(Adorama): howl.me/cjmJzBpNswu
(Amazon): amzn.to/3ftxI1f
Favorite All Around Camera: howl.me/cjmJDkOfPCX
(Amazon): amzn.to/3LWzRPl
Favorite APS-C Camera:
(Adorama): howl.me/cjmJGIJLEro
(Amazon): amzn.to/3DTPaFT
Favorite Drone: howl.me/cjmMQBZLWPd
Lenses
My Favorite Lenses
Favorite lightweight 800mm
(Adorama): howl.me/cjmOlEO0jLZ
(Amazon): amzn.to/3CpaLoW
Favorite Telephoto Lens: (also, my favorite lens overall)
(Adorama): howl.me/cjmJL3GRTvX
(Amazon): amzn.to/3dWLI38
Favorite budget wildlife lens
(Adorama): howl.me/ckWRLXRxXA8
(Amazon): amzn.to/3CrDAkD
Bags
Favorite Wildlife Bag: shimoda-designs.j8ujgp.net/21... (Hall10 for discount)
Favorite Overall Camera Bag: shimoda-designs.j8ujgp.net/oe... (HALL10 for discount):
Favorite camera strap: amzn.to/3M1P5mg
Favorite camera clip (for backpack): howl.me/cjmJRizzkhE
My Ghillie Blanket: amzn.to/3Crbaao
Camo Hood: amzn.to/3gK3W9s
3-In-1 Travel Tripod: heipivision.com/products/heip...
Mics
Main Mic: amzn.to/3tRhx1A
Backup mic
(Adorama): howl.me/ckWR0rVDA5z
(Amazon): amzn.to/3UYMugh
Website: www.hallofthewildstudios.com (for workshops, presets, and more)
I've said this many times that I downloaded raw files from the original R6 and R5 on one of James Reader's videos, all shot at the same spot with the same lenses (Canon's best). When I output the R6 files to 45 MP in Adobe Camera Raw then overlayed on the R5 files, most of the time I could not tell which was which (viewed at 100% on a 5K monitor). This included portraits, studio shots and landscape. If I used the Adobe Enhance feature on the R6 files and then output to 45 MP using Adobe Camera Raw, when viewed at 100% my graphic designer buddy unknowingly picked the R6 files as sharper and more detailed than the R5 files (view 100% on a 5K monitor).
I did the same with R6 vs A7IV files output to 33 MP. When both used their respective 35mm 1.8 lenses, the Canon looked way sharper... because the the RF35 1.8 is sharper than the GMaster 35 1.8. Same with the 85 2.0 and 85 1.8. When they both used the best of the best primes and hit focus, they looked essentially identical (and again if I used Enhance on the R6 files they looked better both in 100% view and in print).
So, my conclusion was that there was no case where the R5 files could be printed or cropped where the R6 files could not be.
I've also had 8MP files from the 1DIIN printed on sides of city buses that looked AMAZING.
MP is more marketing hype than anything at this point. It increases FOMO (fear of missing out) and makes people spend more money. I think that as long as the sensor stays the same size, it's pretty much limited now. If we look at phone cameras, many advertise 50MP but they look no better (sometimes worse) than iPhone 12MP images. So in the phone market, they are now trying to build larger sensors. This is why images from a medium format 50MP image will always look better than a 50MP "full frame 35mm" sensor .
Once I learned all this, I decided to get the R6 instead of the R5 and put the extra $2000 I'd save in Canada toward a lens (70-200). The R6 II was announced so I got that instead and I'm so happy with it!
makes sense - I had the R5 for a year.... owned all of the previous EF 5d series.... ended up dumping the R5 and settled on a cheap "R" for only $1400 new... it's been great and seems to work better with Adobe products in terms of noise reduction. I don't see some "monumental" difference between the two for landscape duty. I think I'll go for the R6 II for cleaner images, and of course - the speed and agility the R lacks... Really what I'm after: The cleanest images for night/astro duty - with the ability to do birds if i end up living somewhere that has birds 🤣
Thank you for the review. I am a R5 owner and was curious about the R6II. But better was seeing all your images. This was the best batch of bird photography I've seen from you ( or anyone) in a long time! There's more to those photos than the awesome camera. You have a good sense of when to get the image and definitely know your subject. I hope your shoulder injury decides to recover quickly so you can keep taking photos.
I agree completely. I have an R5, an R6 MK ii, the 100 to 500 and the 800 F11. The focusing on the R6 is amazing. I can't wait for the R5 ii. I love the R6 and have been using it a lot with the 800 in a cotton carrier and my R5 and 100 to 500 on a strap.. it's a nice combo and easy enough to truck around.
I hope your shoulder stuff gets figured out and you’re feeling better soon!! Love all the pictures you’re getting with the R6ii.
Thanks Jenifer, I hope so too!
Thank you very much. very nice pictures! I hope your shoulder gets better soon. I also have a problem with an old shoulder injury and know that.
Yikes, sorry to hear about your shoulder flaring up, Brent. All the best on effective treatment and speedy recovery! You sure do make the R62 look appealing, but for now I'm still sticking with my R5 and R7, and awaiting the R52 announcement!
Very interesting review ! thank you for sharing ! i hope your shoulder will be better soon ! all the best from France.
Brilliant review Brent. I’ve got the R6, and love it. Doubt if I’ll upgrade, but I am seriously thinking considering purchasing the RF 100-500 for my wildlife work.
Great to hear that my issues with the R5 keeping focus is not just me. I didn't go for the R6 because I wanted more than 20MP, but they MkII might have been a bit more tempting had it been available. I think a better sweet spot might be around 30MP, but I'll just continue to suffer with 45.
Excellent review. Granted you concentrated upon big birds with slow wingbeats. Until! Until the kingfisher. Thanks for the BEKI Brent. I needed to see that as a real test of the bird-eye auto-focus we hear so much about. I'm still using my two 7D Mk 2's but I can see the shutter activation apocalypse looming on the horizon.
Plus I slipped yesterday on some slick seaweed on rocks, fell hard, and knocked the dial off my camera. It could have been worse. I can still figure out where I am using my "Q" screen. Still just another warning shot across the bows which is telling me to really bear down on my research, and to that end I've narrower my attention to the R6 Mk II.
I was frankly surprised that you had better performance than with your R5! Wow! That would save me a lot of money. The R5 lost the birds sometimes with a busy background, and the R6 Mk 2 didn't? Be still my beating heart!
I've got three lenses I use on my Canons: the Canon 100-400 mk II gem; my little old 24-105 on my 60D, and the Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary with Canon mount, so I can still use all my lenses. For a time I was considering Sony but that didn't really make any sense lens-wise.
But I am rambling. Were you using APS-C mode or full frame? And were you using mechanical shutter or electronic. I don't recall you stating those.
Great review. I upgraded from R6 to the ii, should be here today!
Really enjoyable content as always! Sorry to hear about your shoulder. I don´t have any military injuries but for several years I had trouble with Lateral Epicondylitis. Couldn´t grip or lift a camera. Took a few years of trying everything from acupuncture to physiotherapy but I finally got rid of it after getting treatment with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy. Hurt like hell but if worked!
Hope for a speedy recovery. Nice to see the improvements that Canon have made in just a couple of years. I have an R6 so I personally cannot justify the jump to the Mark II, but it will be interesting to see what updates are done on the R5 Mark II when Canon gets around to that camera.
Same here! I can see myself selling my R6 for an R5 II if it's all that and keeping the R5 as a backup.
Hi Brent that was very informative video on the R6MII. I have the R6MII. Would you consider doing and in-depth tutorial on how you set your camera for wildlife shooting.
Oh, Sorry to hear about your shoulder. I hope you can get back in the field soon.
Great Review and I am thrilled to see you good photos. I learned a new word “croppability”, which I understand.😅
Hang in their Brent. Hope your surgeries go well. Hate those old military injuries. Mines my lower back on right side. Yuck! Hope you and your family have a nice Christmas. Very much enjoy your videos. Take care now.👍👍
Brent, take care of that shoulder!
I must say your review of the R6II was excellent, as are your photos excellent. But I was really impressed with your thoughts in comparing that body with the R5 and your discussions of needs and wants. No one has done this nearly as well as you have.
I am still using a Canon 6D, old 20mp body. But I am still blown away at just how sharp the images are using good technique and good lenses. I don’t print often, and no bigger than 16x20. Viewing a foot away ( yea, I know they say don’t do that), they are amazingly sharp. I am retired, on a fixed income, so an all new mirrorless system is just not affordable. I may WANT a new mirrorless setup, but I don’t NEED it.
My 6D is no bird camera, yet there are times I took photos of a rare bird, too far away with the 6D and ancient 300 f4 IS lens and yet the eye of the bird is in excellent focus after severe cropping, yet others with their crop DSLR and 70-300 zoom cannot get that sharp eye focus. But, I would not hesitate buying a 6D II as old 6D body may expire before I do.
Anyway, wishing you shoulder to heal quickly, and look forward to seeing more of your videos from beautiful New Mexico.
Hey thank you so much for the kind words Kerry, I really appreciate that!
Thanks for the review! I think 2048 pixels on the long side is what Facebook compresses to or at least that's what I've heard. With the R7 I can crop as much as I need to and I almost always have more than 3840 pixels left on the long side which is 4k. I really like that crop ability.
Sorry to hear about your medical situation. If it's an old service injury, I hope the VA does you right. Vets I've known in the past give very mixed reviews. I expect nothing less than great results from the R6 Mark II, as I write this at the beginning of the video play. Merry Christmas and feel better soon.
If the R6 II nailed AF on that kingfisher, I'm very impressed. Yesterday I shot a Great Horned Owl that was partially obscured by vines covering the tree. My R5 and 100-500 struggled to find and keep focus. I had to switch to manual for acceptable images.
Since the trees affected by rolling shutter on the night heron shots were completely above the bird, you could have corrected then via a warp adjustment without affecting the heron at all. Other than for demonstrating how minimal the distortion is, did you consider such an edit?
Thank you for your service
It was my pleasure, thanks for watching!
Very good video. I am still debating to buy the R5 or the R6 II. I hope you shoulder get better!
Thanks for the video. I am going on a hawk walk/hunt later today and will be my 1st real shoot with the R6 MKII. Good luck with your shoulders. I tore mine up pretty good in the Army and have had both Labrums repaired. Good times!! lol
Oh nice, congrats on the new camera! Sorry you have to deal with the VA medical system too, it's definitely a pain. Unfortunately, this recent shoulder problem is just the tip of the broken iceberg for me, lol. The navy was not good to my body, and I've been dealing with the VA for surgeries, PT, & general fixin's since 2006.
Hi Brent, fantastic shots as every. Question: Is there a BIG difference between the R61 and R62, re the way they both work? I have a Mk1. Have the set up the Mk2 exactly the same as you Have your R1? If you have made any changes re autofocus or other setting, please let us know. Hope your shoulder problems are cleared up soon. Best wishes Phil AKA keepclickingphotography Hope you and camera lady have a great Christmas.
Hi Brent, nice video as always! I have two questions not covered in your videos yet.
1) In some specs I have seen that R6ii is 100g lighter than R6i. Could you please check and say if it is true? And if so, how do you find the balance of the lighter body with various lenses?
2) How do you find the buffer? Is it close to original R5/R6 or it has same poor buffer as R7 has?
Thanks and wish you solve your problems with the shoulder!
Hi thanks for the review made me re-think about R6M2, good bet for sure. Just one thing what would your setting be for Autofocus (case 1-4) to make focus sticky especially for inflight shots and where the bird is within bush with un-wanted distraction all around (like twigs and leaves)
Second any experiment using R6M2 with 100-500 + 1.4 tele convertor ? if so what has been your experience on auto focus + bokeh effect now that Fstop is high
Every time i think you will come out with a video that won't do anything for me, i eat my words. another top notch video. my favorite subject is birds in flight. Learning which photos merit cropping and which ones don't was a great learning experience. I would love to see a video on using or not, the cropping feature on a canon r5 . If you have already done one in the past, i am sorry i missed it, please just tell me when you did it and the name of the video please. thanks again brent for another fantastic educational video.
Hey thanks Erick, I'm lad you got something out of it! I don't know if I've done a full video on the R5 crop mode, but I use it a lot, and have used for parts of videos. If I know I'm going to need a heavy crop, then I'll definitely go ahead and put it in crop mode, especially with the R5 being 45mp.
@@BrentHall i was told by a friend that he felt in the crop mode "1.6 " he felt it was easier for camera to focus in on a subject at long distances. . any thoughts? thanks for taking the time for help.. btw, as i have stated many times, your guidance has helped me many times. I mention your name at home and in public, like your part of the family. "brent says....." This past weekend I got a great blue heron poised on ice. His beard was puffed up to the point of making him look like santa claus. It was 2 degrees (F.) Nature, you got to love it.
Thanks for the fantastic review. May I know which lens you’ve used for the wildlife photography?
Great video👍 like the R6 mii but can’t wait for the R5 update. As a bird nerd your footage af the raptor struck me. I took the same pic, within limits, near amsterdam the netherlands. Mine is called the female hen harrier, so not a guy😏
Love to see that we get the same species on different continents…
Yeah, I'm definitely looking forward to a future R5 mk II, whenever that will be, lol. The R6 II and R5 are doing pretty well for me now though.
Indeed the R6ii seems impressive
I'm definitely very happy with it!
Lots of great pics, I really don’t think I need the mark II but your getting me to doubt that. 👀
Received mine yesterday. Wow such a great camera, especially after owning a 5D Mk2 for the last 10 years. The sheer features, and useability are superb.
I've been working on a front yard shoot with a roadrunner that really likes my place. He seems to love busy backgrounds -- the darn bird! -- and there's nothing I can do about it except open up to f/5.6 or f/4. Not my preferred apertures, but that's how Roadie rolls.
Used to do this with the 10d back in the day. No one ever complained that we didn't have enough detail back then.
It's about customer expectations. You're right... they didn't complain back then. But today they do, because they expect more. It's not a matter of whether I'm happy with it.
The idea that 24MP isn't enough, or even that 20MP isn't enough, is insane. I think the fact that higher resolution sensors exist make people feel like they NEED more, but they don't. I can't recall anyone saying that the Canon 1Dx iii or Nikon D5 didn't have enough resolution for wildlife, sports, etc. They were(and, for many, still are) professional workhorses.
Once you’ve tried the 45mp sensor from the canon R5 you will think differently. Well at least for nature photography.
@@lewcehjitl3282 I have, and it's great. Clearly, you can crop a lot more and still have solid detail. My point wasn't that there's no reason to have more mega pixels, but that people claiming 20mp isn't enough strikes me as odd, given the massive body or professional work done with 20mp(or less).
@BrentODell a bit late to the party on this one , any hoo.
I agree but there are some factors to consider here , back in the day the photos were compared to comparative work , everyone was working with less mega pixels and I would also say the photos were viewed differently. An award winning photo was viewed in a magazine and to zoom in you moved the magazine closer to your eye. Photos today in wildlife seem to be judged differently and by judged I mean in general , it's all tack sharp Eagles Sat on posts filling the frame , unless you have some insane lens then it's crop city and MP's count I guess.
@@Johnny641 Yeah, I think the whole perception has shifted, although I think we mostly THINK it has, as photographers, because that's what WE look at/look for. I think the average person is still looking at pictures without zooming in and analyzing them. But, yeah, pics of eagles still get the clicks :)
Thanks Brent. This video is what I needed. Moving from Fuji to Canon for BIF as the autofocus isn't reliable in my experience. I'm looking at the R6 mkll tomorrow and the Tamron 150-600 G2. I saw you liked the G2 in another video so I'll give it a try. Hope your shoulder get better. I know what you're going through. Been there. RVNmedic.
Hey thanks Bruce, I appreciate it! I did used to like the Tamron G2 lenses a lot, but if you're getting a newer Canon mirrorless, I'd be a little cautious because the AF on the 3rd party lenses doesn't play so nice with the newer bodies and every time there's a newer firmware update it gets a bit worse. This is because Canon will not allow 3rd party companies to do AF lenses for the RF mount and the other companies can't reverse engineer the newer Canon AF. It's a bummer for sure, but maybe someday it'll change.
@@BrentHall Thanks. If it doesn't work I can always return it and buy an EF or RF lens.
Focus problems occur mainly when your settings aren't set up for the situation you're photographing.
Number one problem with any type of photography is understanding your gear and settings necessary for your equipment to work properly.
Canon Cameras are the best ergonomically camera in the world and their focus system is top of the line. But first you must realize your faults and correct them. Also realize that not every image will be absolute perfect after all nothing in this world is perfect. As we all make mistakes but by understanding our gear we can eliminate many problems.
Thanks Brent; great as always. So, the question: I have the R5 + 100-500 and am principally a wildlife photographer. I can’t afford to have both: would you sell the R5 to get an R6 II or not? Also wondering if the R5 will improve over time.
Brent , sorry about your shoulder and hope you get the help needed . What filter was used in the opening video with the sun? Take care and thank you.
Awesome footage! Do you have a video that goes through your AF settings on the r6mkii? Thanks!
Not yet, though I'm thinking about it. A lot of people have been asking me for it, but I've still been getting to know it and dialing in my preferred setups. So far it's pretty similar to how I have my R5 and R6 setup, so you can check that video out if you haven't already.
what telephoto lens do you use w your R5 and R6 and can you use Tamron or Sigma lens w those cameras? thanks. enjoyed your video. thanks!
So Brent, you've accumulated some great work. I have a similar issue with my radial tendon after just getting the Z9. I did it with the D850 and 200-500 lens while rotating, ugly! We're in ski season so I can't see an orthopod until March, ugh. Left arm all the way...best of luck but you're younger.
Hey thanks Dave! Sorry to hear about your shoulder problems too. Unfortunately for me, that's just the tip of the broken-bodied iceberg. 2 destroyed shoulders, both with degenerative disk disease, fractured back that never healed right, destroyed left knee, and a left arm that was snapped in half and barley works. Sometimes I just have to it easy for a bit, when things start acting up real bad lol.
@@BrentHall Have you thought of making a mobile trailer hide that you could pull with an ATV or something on a Kayak? Just make it all pretty automated. You've got a lot of years in your future, make it work for you.
Almost every photographer is read or watch says the same thing: the R6 mk II is fabulous, BUT.. I’m prefer the R5 for cropping for wildlife. Thanks great video.😊
Brett, great review of R6 II and enjoyed your beautiful pics!
Many thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it!
I’ve been waiting for this review of the R6 Mkii. The decision I have to make is do I really need 20 more mp.
Well, I'll definitely have some more videos about the R6II soon. I still need to do some astro with it. I took it to White Sands recently for some landscape stuff and was very happy with that. I'll also do a more in-depth review about the camera body, ergonomics, buttons, features, etc., soon.
So, I was on on of those "Big New York online stores" about to add the R6 II with lens to the cart, when something told me to take a look at the R5 one more time. It was then that I noticed they had apparently just added one used R5 with a 24-105 L RF lens to their stock and it was just a little over $400 more than what I would have paid for the R6 II/w Lens. Oh my, now what!?
This camera is rated to be 9-9+ condition with moderately low shutter count (under 25k) - and I just needed to pop for a bit over $400 over the price of the R6 Mark II.
I figured that with the number of people all over the world looking at that web site at any given minute, this deal wasn't going to last long, so if I was going to make that leap, I'd better do it now.
I did.
I'm be heading to Bosque Del Apache first chance I get to try it out with my Sigma 160-600.
PS: Hope your shoulder heals soon. I' know how that is - I had a bum shoulder for a while and it wasn't fun.
What would your recommendation be for a camera body and lenses for shooting landscape and Astral photography.
Thanks for your service, and I hope your shoulder heals fast.
That's tough, and really depends on your budget. It's hard to give gear recommendations like that. The R6 II would be a great all-in-one body for both landscape and astro, though it's a little on the low mp side for landscape (personally I think it's fine).
One thing I have noted (I have the R6 Mark II but noticed this on other mirrorless cams) is that the electronic shutter increases ISO noise by about 1-2 stops so I don't use it. It might be different with stacked sensors though. Btw, would love to see how you set up your AF (unless you've already done so).
What lens did you use for those shots brother 😊?
Would love to see a bird photography video with the r6mk2 and the 800 f11. I'm considering getting the 800 f11 spring 2023. Thanks Brent
czcams.com/video/XRHVdvWlPRM/video.html
@@BrentHall thanks so much my friend
I know Canon DPP4 is awful slow but it can show the AF area and for video it would have been a win.
Thank you very much, that was a very good and interesting review for people like me. Who don´t have the money to buy a camera with 40,50 or 60 megapixel. I bought this camera for 2 months ago and I´am more than happy with it i combination with the RF 100-500. This means a lot of cropping after shooting birds which I think gives me good enough results. It is interesting to hear your thoughts about using CRaw in combination with cropping til 40-30 prosent?
As long as I have good lighting, close subject, no heat haze, and the AF was locked on, I haven't had any issues cropping in 30-40%
What size do you use
if you can get close to the animal and it's larger, then 24 mp is fine. If not, it is not enough, especially for smaller songbirds and kingfisher species.
Also, when printing, A3 is really the limit for a 24mp camera, unless you either print at lower DPI or upsize using software such as gigapixel.
PS I own a 24mp camera and mostly shoot birds.
I have a friend who just bought the R6 Mk 2 and is still getting used to the camera. You mentioned a 500mm lens. Was it your 100-500mm or the 500mm f4 you were using for some of your videos? I'm probably way behind the current events in your life but I hope you're able to find the medical help you need for that shoulder real soon and make a full recovery.
When I filmed this I only had the 100-500, so if I mentioned a 500mm then it was probably that.
The VA mostly fixed my shoulder, now they're working on my knee 🙃
If you’re starting with a good file using AI up scaling software works really well. I’ve taken files from my R6 ii and upscaled them to 45mp and they look superb. Obviously if you’re doing this with a file that’s not critically sharp or is very noisy then all you’re doing is the proverbial “lipstick on a pi g”. I’ve done a lot of testing with this and the result is I’d rather have the R 6 ii and its features, and be able to upscale files as needed or when appropriate. You could crop and then scale the file back to around 24mp… again only if it doesn’t compromise the file to the eye.
Ive really questioned if I made the right decision grabbing this instead of the r5. I don't really crop much so the extra resolution wasn't a big thing but being a "beginners" camera usually gives me pause. So far Im content....
I’ve had Canon 1Ds, 5Ds, and shot film with Leica M bodies for thirty years before digital existed. The R6 mk II IS NOT a beginners camera. High megapixel cameras require a steady hand. The sensor is the same size but the light absorbing pixels are smaller. Thus camera movement is amplified and light spills over to nearby pixels. Stabilization helps,but in low light there will be some loss of sharpness unless you are very still.
Wow what beautiful photos I'm thinking about getting a Canon camera thinking about getting the EOS R6 Mark ll for vacation photos my wife and I enjoy wildlife and sunset and I also enjoy going to sporting events so I was wondering if that would be a good all around camera for those things would appreciate your opinion or if you recommend a different camera
I love my R6 II, and personally, I think it's probably the best all around camera Canon has right now.
@@BrentHall Thank you for replying to my question 😃
I know you have a RF 800 mm F/11 lens. Did you try it on the R6 mkII? I understand the focus area is much larger in the frame. If so how did the camera’s focusing with that lens?
I like your CZcamss.
Canon specs states 600mm and 800mm focus area goes from 40/60% on mk i to 80/80% on mk ii which is why I'm going to upgrade. The 20 to 24 Mpx, etc. does not justify an upgrade.
I do have the R7 which beat the rest when there a desent amount of light.
Yep. that was the first video I did with th R6 II:
czcams.com/video/XRHVdvWlPRM/video.html&ab_channel=BrentHall
You may have mentioned it already, but can you tell me which focus area you use with the R6 Mark II to for birding? Do you have whole area tracking servo AF option enabled? Thanks
I think I have it enabled, but I'm also not really too sure how much that particular setting matters in real world performance. Then again, I don't really use R6II for anything other than filming my videos since I still mostly use my R5 for wildlife.
@@BrentHall it’s just my OCD trying to understand every option whether I use it or not. I keeps my mind distracted from a lot of chaos in my life right now. I haven’t heard anyone explain that function very well. I appreciate the time and effort you put into your videos. Amazing skills
Hi Brett, at around the 10.20 mark, referring to the square crop, you say that the image has 2600 megapixels. This isn’t correct, it has around 2600 pixels, not megapixels. A 2627 x 2627 px image has around 6.89MP. At 300ppi this gives you an image of around 22cm square. So to print this out at a couple of feet would mean increasing the image size almost threefold. Whilst the resulting print might be acceptable, it’ll be a lot softer than if the original image were shot at a much higher resolution.
All the pictures are unedit ??
For me thé good question is : a New R6II body or a second hand R5 for only 500 USD more ????
Oh that's a tough choice! Depends on your needs and shooting style I guess, but you certainly couldn't go wrong with either.
Still deciding between the R7 and R6 II, paired with the RF100-500. Which of the two would you recommend if mainly used for bird photography and no budget concern? Thank you and have a speedy recovery!
Personally, I really don't like the R7 that much. Mostly because I'm comparing it to my R5, R6, and R6II, but for me and my own photo/video needs, I'd take any of those three over the R7. I'm still working on a full long term review of the R7 and will talk about all that stuff in a lot more detail. But that's just my opinion based on my personal usage and needs.
@@BrentHall Thank you much for your thoughts on the R7! So, I guess even the longer reach of its APS-C sensor would not be enough to compensate for its shortcomings compared to the R6 ii.
@@maxidrivemaxidrive4330 I'm sure it is for a lot of people, just not for me personally. I really enjoy the extra reach, and I'm not saying the R7 is a horrible camera, in fact it is quite decent, especially if you're upgrading from something lower or older, but for me personally even though the reach is quite nice, I still prefer my R5 and R6 mk ii for their IQ, noise performance, ergonomics, button layouts, video features, better rolling shutter, higher buffer, etc.
@@BrentHall Looking forward to your full review of the R7!
Great advice.
I think i'll opt for the R6 mark ii.
For me (i have no camera!) it will be great for learning - macro, family, wildlife...
But i'm remoted to get a second hand R7 as well, for bird photography. Will i need it?
Thank you for your opiniins.
J
Need is a relative term. No, you probably won't "need" it, but you might just really want it. The R6II is a perfectly capable wildlife camera, and better than the R7 in every way , except for that pesky effective reach, which most people fall prey.
@@BrentHall You are right.
I'll use my R6 and see how it goes. Excited to learn. Thanks.
Do you have the latest firmware on the R5?
Yes.
People can obsess over pixel count, it isn't worth it. I have been a pro photographer all my life, notably motorsport, I recently used some images in competition taken on a 1D, 4mp, you look at them on screen and wonder why you ever upgraded. [I got two firsts incidentally.] Especially when the R5 will not play ball with my Sigma lenses, I still use them with the 5D4 though.
Yeah, people's obsession with mp is crazy, but it's not all their fault. the industry and companies are really leading everyone on about it...cause, sales. lol.
I am sure the AF is good, but I am not sure why anyone would choose a 24MP camera for wildlife in today's market.
2,600 megapixels! Wow thats a lotta pixels.
Heck yes it is! lol