Is This Really Noah's Ark? | Biblical Mystery at Mount Ararat, Turkey | Megalithomania
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 07. 2024
- Explore this site, Gobekli Tepe, Mount Nemrut and more of ancient Turkey in September 2024: www.megalithomania.co.uk/east.... Near Mount Ararat on the Turkish border are the remains of what some believe to be the ruined shell of Noah's Ark from Biblical tradition. Geologists say the Durupinar site is a geological basalt formation, whilst researchers like Ron Wyatt believe it could be the remains of Noah's Ark. Petrified wood, metal objects and other evidence has been discovered, and the size of it matches the descriptions in the Bible. In this video we explore the site and the on-site museum to find out more. Includes exclusive aerial footage and some segments taken from an interview with @stargate_voyager. The full version of the interview can be viewed here: • Strange Mysteries of T... .
Join us on Patreon: / megalithomania
Megalithomania T-Shirts & Merch: teespring.com/stores/megalitho...
Explore the world with Megalithomania Tours:
www.megalithomania.co.uk/tours...
Subscribe here: / megalithomaniauk
www.megalithomania.co.uk
Copyright Megalithomania MMXXIV. All Rights Reserved.
The fact that the size matches the Biblical size for the ark is quite something. That alone would make me want to go.
Petrified wood is typically millions of years old....
And the animals in Noah's Ark are constellations in the sky.
Thats what they tell you yet there's plenty of examples of things petrifying rather quickly under the right conditions and mineral content, which a flood could easily cause.
@@RxYouth There is copious empirical evidence that there was never a global flood.
@@plainsman I would say there's copious amounts that there was, now to what degree I'm not entirely sure, I wouldn't say it necessarily means absolutely everything was under water but the younger dryas alone proves that the sea levels rapidly rose world wide and this would have had a dramatic effect on a large majority of people especially on all coastal habitations which is where humans tend to congregate and live in most abundance.
Its also foolish to think that the thousands of stories of a massive flood from various different cultures worldwide, and many of which tend to tell a very similar story, has absolutely no validity to it.
@@RxYouth Oh good grief, not that old trope. Was the YD hard on megafauna and some ancient societies like the North American Clovis? Yeah, sure, but YD proponents greatly exaggerate when they try and equate it with Noah or devastating floods. And while we're at it, the impact hypothesis has been dropped by the wayside.
Obviously just a unique geological feature, but pretty clear why the Turkish government would want to promote it as "Noah's Ark."
Yeah right. Yet the Story is all over the world. Manu in the Fish Chronicles from Vedic India, Atrahasis, Xiasudra, Utnapishtim, Noah, Nuada from the Irish Book of Invasions, The Chinese Dynasty Of Xia founder Yu saved the world by repairing for the flood. The Aztec Nahua people Speak of Coxcox who survived the flood, The Mayans speak of Bacabs, the the Hopi Waynaboozhoo, the Toltec Coxcox, the Incan Una Pachakuti where Con Tiki Veracocha wipes out the Tiahuanaco Giants, just like the Anak, the Nephilim, and the Iggiggi. The Vedic Fish Chrincles even has his 3 sons of Manu Yapeti (Japhet), Sharma (Shem) and Charma (Hamm). The Patriarch founder of Greece was Iapetus. Yapeti Dias Pater, Japhet. Iapetus's father was Uranus. His mother was Gaia. There is also the Greek Deucalion and Pyrrha.
@@dannunakifuque7795 Uh huh... cool. So what does any of that have to do with whether or not this specific rock feature is actually an old boat?
@@dannunakifuque7795 So what? Why do other flood myths vary so greatly from the Genesis account? Flood myths are fairly common worldwide, and if they came from a common source, we should expect similarities in most of them. Instead, the myths show great diversity. For example, people survive on high land or trees in the myths about as often as on boats or rafts, and no other flood myth includes a covenant not to destroy all life again. Also, there's the fact that there is copious empirical evidence that there was never a global flood to begin with.
@@plainsman Confusion of tongues, and transculturalization. In other words whisper down the lane.
@@BnaBreaker Do a math equation on what all of the coincidental factors are, and tell me what the odds come out to.
Some Institutions will stop @ nothing to control their peasants
Yeap
i dunno about all that.... its more that they just genuinely dont believe in anything... anytime we dont have something rock solid to prove what we want to prove we accuse mysterious forces of working against us..... i think it is noahs ark but it also looks like an impact event.... if your proclivity is toward god then you need to grasp that he has set reality in such a way that he can separate those who want there to be a god from those who do not.... he would not permit solid "proof" cause it would defeat the entire purpose of a test now wouldnt it? you have to feel comfort in your decision and let them have theirs - (thats why we are here to reinforce our own decision by making that giant dirt vagina what we want it to be)
Thanks for doing this. For years, all I’ve ever seen is a distant photo of this, and never closer.
"Many historians and Bible scholars agree that "Ararat" is the Hebrew name of Urartu, the geographical predecessor of Armenia; they argue that the word referred to the wider region at the time and not specifically to Mount Ararat. The phrase is translated as "mountains of Armenia" (montes Armeniae) in the Vulgate."
Which is partly how Ron Wyatt located it because many people had searched on Mount Ararat specifically but going off the translations Wyatt realized it meant the mountains of Ararat. People should really check out the documentary about it and some of Wyatt's other discoveries, there's some compelling evidence.
@@RxYouth If you prefer to believe things without evidence, then Ron Wyatt is the greatest “finder” of Bible relics in all history. He also ranks as one of the most serially debunked Bible relic finders. Not one of his "discoveries" was ever offered for peer review in any reputable independent science journal. The geologist professor Ian Plimer, who visited the site that Wyatt claimed to contain the Ark, said it was impossible to repeat ANY of the various radar, seismic, magnetic and electromagnetic tests claimed by Wyatt.
Ron found many things 😂😂. Until his budget ran out
As usual 😂
@@KA-pq3yz Wyatt’s list of claims is so long and so extraordinary that he could go down in history as the most successful archaeologist of all time - in spite of only being qualified as a nurse. In fact, Not ONE of his alleged discoveries has ever been independently verified. Even the Wyatt Museum admits “For now, we cannot provide conclusive evidence of his claims.”
What better place to park than right beside the visitor center.😊
I love these videos
Not Noah's Ark.
Noah landed on the highest mountains that had just appeared. [not the low land in Turkey]
Noah did not use metal rivets.
His ship did not break apart and sink, and fossilize.
His ship landed where we still find the greatest biodiversity even today.
The Himalayas is the highest land [ararat]
Thanks Hugh, love all your uploads💜🕊
Fascinating place, thanks for sharing Hugh!
I find it incredible that anyone seriously thinks that a wooden boat built thousands of years ago could possibly be intact out in the open on a mountain top. It is most likely that this is just a geological formation that resembles an approximate boat shape and a money spinner for tourism.
let em have it... its one of those stupid things ppl fight over.... some believe some dont.... at the end of the day what any of us think about what happens after we die makes no impact on what anyone does in day to day life anyway.... you do you and they do them
Hi Hugh, I enjoyed this video very much. Could you please cover your visit to the Garden of Eden area at some point? Thanks
It is not the Ark. It is on the top of Ararat.
Thank you for giving this a fair and balanced approach. Your Geologist associate knows which side his bread is buttered on, if he dared give you a positive responce, they would be cancelled and looking for work.
Ziusudra is the Sumerian noah, the oldest story of the flood that we know of. The way they built their rafts back then with with homemade cordage and special mud they would coat the outside with. They made them in the shape of a bowl. So the way the original "Noah's" Ark was said to be built was in a bull shape out of giant cordage and a mud coating. Someone tried to build one one time and it was impossible because the weight of it could not support itself. So although I love the video and I respect people's beliefs, these are the facts of the matter
no archaeological digging? seems that there must be something buried!?
Any professional geologist would recognize that natural rock formation as a doubly plunging syncline and nothing more.
Thank you Hugh
I would appreciate going there.
Why don’t ppl look into where the flood story came from? Before it was written into the bi Le it was written in Sumerian text and probably other older texts. But all of them clearly state the ark was round, not boat shaped.
I think we found Noahs ark quite a few times now. Keeps disappearing and reappearing elsewhere.
If the Durupinar site were the real *_Noah's Ark,_* it would be higher, since once the Ark had landed on the mountains of Ararat, it was necessary *_75 days for the tops of the mountains were seen._* Only two places fit this description, *_Mount Ararat_* in Turkey with an altitude of *_5,137 meters_* high, and a not revelead yet place in *_Iran._*
Good PR
Where is Thor's hammer located? That's about as valid as the mythology of Noah's ark, garden of Eden, etc. Interesting geology, that's all it is.
Another noahs ark is frozen in a mountain with different levels and actual wooden beams.
Another one? This guy had a whole fleet!
I think we built one for every pole shift and then we build memorials to it after we survive the flood. So yeah we keep building them in a giant loop.
The first Ark took over 100 years to build according to scripture.
Pity he lost the one with the dinosaurs and unicorns
Hard to believe that people think this is a giant boat when its so obviously geological. Similar ridges are parallel to it and further up slope.
...
exactly. thanks for posting so I didn't have to hahah
wasn't the ark made of reeds?
That formation is a vesica pisca shape. Genesis describes a rectangle. So It's BS.
THANK YOU
Peace & Enlyghtenment Alwayz
A Micah Hill Dezert-Owl
Search Name
If you look at the old photo next to the new one you can see that someone has added dirt/earth to the middle of the structure and dug away ground to the side of it
ya, now that its a tourist attraction theyll attempt to maintain it like this.....real or not thats what it is now...
Riddle: is Noah's Ark naturally distributed?
Is there any evidence that this geologic formation was once a boat?
Any professional geologist would recognize that natural rock formation as a doubly plunging syncline and nothing more.
The so called basalt ridges are actually mud- when the waters subsided the vessel caught on the central rock- and the sendimentery mud formed the ridges- - rhe same floods water filled those tepes
Basalts is Basalts Sol
It seems more likely that early people of the region came across the boat shaped formation and made up a story to explain it. That's why the dimensions match.
Nah, you're not thinking, the flood is engraved on the human psyche for a reason
@@doug8515 The memory of past events is not "coded" on DNA. The only reason the idea of a flood and a boat is known is because of stories told by humans. There have been major regional floods around the world at differing times in the past, some long before people were around to experience them. This rock formation is a great example of stories being invented to explain a natural event that happens to look like a boat.
It's absolutely something.
Not just geological formation.
Ron Wyatt did a lot of research on it.
You used to be able to see it on Google Earth but now it's all blurred out.(Why if it's just rocks)
@plainsman
Ron Wyatt? AHHahaha! Wyatt’s list of claims is so long and so extraordinary that he could go down in history as the most successful archaeologist of all time - in spite of only being qualified as a nurse. Not ONE of his alleged discoveries has ever been independently verified. Even the Wyatt Museum admits “For now, we cannot provide conclusive evidence of his claims.”
@@plainsman Ron Wyatt put in the work and collected the evidence.
He's not the only one to research that location.
The evidence proves that it's not just a bunch of rocks.
@@edlomonaco Where is this "evidence"? Has it been peer reviewed and published in a reputable independent science journal like Nature, Current Anthropology, or Archaeological Science? The facts are it HAS NOT. A science literate person would appreciate that a major warning sign of pseudo-archaeology includes discoveries pitched directly to the media. The pseudo-archaeologist knows his or her claim will not stand up to scrutiny by actual archaeologists nor will their dubious "data" ever be able to pass the rigorous requirements of peer review, so it gets pitched directly to the media.
@@edlomonaco When this "evidence" passes peer review and shows up in a reputable independent science journal like Nature, Current Anthropology, or Archaeological Science, let us know.
Hey Babe, quick, a new Magalithamaniacs video just dropped! Great video 👍😊
Worth watching Irvine Finkle podcast about Noah's Ark...he reckons it was circular?.
Nephilim Ark, How Did the Giants Survive the Flood?
czcams.com/video/vantoKzfzKE/video.html
they flew on the backs of dragons and ferries.
It is beautiful and interesting and I bet it had some significance to people in the region of the past... but it's clearly geological. That's not a bad thing: it' doesn't dismiss the flood or the fact that the ark may one day be discovered. It's just that this isn't it.
I hear they found ribs and metal detectors validated the discovery. The Place of Eight and a gravestone where seven are walking away from the one that died. It is valid.
Never
Don't know you from ADAM so I totally buy what you're saying bro 🙈🤔🤗
You can tell by looking at the valley that water carved the landscape there at one point...imagine that area green and lush with life
Glacial melt pulses reached the Mediterranean area about 11,000 ya..a flooding event so massive it gave birth to ocean currents we use today...guaranteed you will find a submerged river running under that valley
"Persistent Holocene outflow from the Black Sea to the eastern Mediterranean Sea still contradicts the Noah's Flood Hypothesis: A review of 1997-2021 evidence and a regional paleoceanographic synthesis for the latest Pleistocene-Holocene" A.E. Aksu, R.N. Hiscott
COULD BE BUT THIS MEAN ITS ALIENS THAT TOLD HIM ABOUT IT NOT A GOD THAT DOES NOT EXIST
If there was a flood , the place of the ark it's in Himalayas...
the highest place of the planet..
""K4 sea level rise and fall simulation--world""
🔹by GPScycling
that place is not high enough...
but perhaps God didn't cover the whole planet with water...
The ark landed east of Shinar, and you are correct landed on the highest mountain on earth.
@@claudiapereira8514 Well... East of Shinar could be Himalaya Pakistan, but Turkye it's closer...
and the Bible mentions Ararat...
If you believe in the Bible the flood didn't cover totally the planet....
or ....
this happen before the Himalayas formation...
which it's very unlikely....
Do your own research don't listen to these trolls making comments, documentary videos here on CZcams. It looks like this is a legitimate archaeological site.
Any professional geologist would recognize that natural rock formation as a doubly plunging syncline and nothing more.
No, the Ark was round.
No. No it is not.
??? Maybe ❤
NOAHS ARK = 🛸
Crashed Goa'uld ship perhaps
No it is not. The remains of the ARK are up the side of Ararat in a crevasse. It has been seen from satellite and there have been visitors.
When are you going to Rachaiya Basin where Christian O'Brian identified the place of 'The Garden of Eden' in his books 'The Genius of the Few' & 'The Shining Ones'?
I wouldnt trust🤑 ron as far as i can throw him 😇
it Identifies as Noah's Ark
Non non non non !!!!!!!! L’arche n’avait pas la forme d’un bateau mais d’un coffre !!!!!!!!!!! 😡 le but de l’arche n’était pas de naviguer vers un lieu mais de préserver uniquement la vie des animaux et des humains !!!!!!!!!!!
Perhaps we are taking things too literally. It could have been a building that took the form of the natural features of the land and received the nickname of "ark" due to its boat shape.
Maybe it was the only building to survive a local disaster and the legend was warped over time?
Too dismiss all the evidence of human habitation because of the stigma around being an actual "boat" seems irresponsible and a shame.
Trying to paste warm and fuzzy excuses onto a natural rock formation is a shame.
it is clearly an ark. I mean, it looks like one. what else do you need
Drogue Stones
Those stones consist of locally available andesite, and could not have originated in Mesopotamia.
Question - why would there be crosses on Noah's "anchor" stones, highly doubt Noah was a Christian 🤷🏼♀️
Valid point.
Not only that, but those "anchor stones" consist of local andesite, and could not have come from Mesopotamia.
The crosses on the anchor stones were engraved on them much later in history.
@@Shiryone Logic seems to be absent in droves here!
There's one anchor stone, the largest in fact, which he didnt show that seems to depict noah and the correct number of sons looking up and his wife with her head down, meaning she had passed and it was used as a gravestone.
Turkish government promote this as Noah's Ark because it generates money. It's just a rock formation.
HELLO tourism $$$$$, especially from naive American evangelical tourists on a bible tour
The Bible doesn't say it would land on the mountain, it said it would land on the mountains.. With an S
No.
The only other amazing explanation would be the foot print of God.
That shape occurs frequently in nature.
Do grow up
There are even a few similar formations in that very same area.
First!!!!
The government said it was Noahs ark, so it must be true.
Turkey is a poor country and just wants to rake in tourist cash.
Turkey is interested in keeping the tourist cash flowing.
I dont think this is the 'Bible area', like Troy being in England because the 13 river names are still present and those involved traveled taking the knowledge of the battle (Possibly for the tin mines), the people could have brought their stories to the area we're calling 'Bible area' an they were written down in that place but not of that place. thoughts?
Boats in Noah's days we're not shaped like that, that boat shape wasn't necessary until we started crossing the oceans
Grifting off the gullible.
Noha's Arks Is total twaddle, If it could have contained as is claimed it would need to be bigger than Texas
Strangely enough the original version of the story from Sumer has Ziusudra collect the the _seed_ of all living beings, the story is so much older than the Bible.
even though it's probably not noah's ark, the story had to be based on something. it's cool that it fits the dimensions, so even though i don't believe the story is historically accurate, it would be fun to be there and imagine you're standing on the ark, and feel what it would be like.
it's symbolic but also representative of what actually happened
"Eden" was in Florida. the Carolina Bays etc and Appalachians show MASSIVE glacial flooding. and it takes 40 days to float across the ocean.
gobekli tepe likewise is on a potbelly the northern edge of where the waters stopped
@@Joe-sg9ll There is abundant evidence there was never a global flood. Such a flood would leave behind evidence contrary to what we see. For instance, why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a unique layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, and a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, yet no such evidence exists.
@@Joe-sg9ll Why is there no evidence of a global flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a unique layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, and a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, yet no such evidence exists.
@@plainsman have they looked
It's 100% Noah's Ark. If you people would go there you would believe it.
Why are we still talking about this??? It's NOT Noah's ark!! Let's move on!!
It is not Noah's Ark. It's gone rotted away many many many years ago , disintegrated. Wake up people. Nothing left . If there Ever was one to begin with.you all believe in fairytales.fairytale. u show me one boat today that would hold 2 of all the animals on earth. Plus people and enough food and water for 40 days and nights. Maybe then I will think about it
Any professional geologist would recognize that natural rock formation as a doubly plunging syncline and nothing more.
what do you gain by convincing ppl its fake? they want god and you dont? seems like a waste of time argument to me... plus i find most ppl who try to stomp on this stuff have done terrible shit irl lol... no sense in outing yourself else ppl start digging (usualy its just perverse sexual behavior that a bible dont condone that triggers the conquest... thats in your head... just do your thing and let others do theirs)
@@jacobhoffman2553 Since I've been an archeologist for 22 years, I don't feel a bit guilty of pointing out accurate science as well as arguable interpretations of scripture. Your own fumbling attempts at amateur psychiatric analysis was a stitch, though.
What a load of Turkish 😂
If the petrified wood could talk, it would settle the disputes.
It takes millions of years for wood to fossilize.
@@plainsman We each get to choose whose information/research we believe.
@@Shiryone Faith is the opposite of science, yet it is also one common element that you will always hear valued in religion. It is the number one most common excuse for holding peculiar superstitious beliefs in spite of the evidence against them, their violations of sense, and their foundation in wishful thinking and rhetorical vapor.
@@plainsman This is a view that you are totally entitled to have.
@@Shiryone Your replies are epic. Hit me with one. Here ill set up for it..
I'm another typical one of a billion religion haters and you sir, believe in fairytales. Science is the only true religion!
I call B S...manufacturedd evidence.. another visitor center..like the deal made at Gobeki Tepli???
The latest evidence indicates this is indeed the ark. A recent 2023 expedition (see Huriyat, et al, 2023) concluded the dimensions are correct but something happened to petrify all the wood used in the vessel and it’s speculated that it was caused by a prolonged lightning strike or energy discharge of some sort. Same phenomena as caused the Shroud of Turin.
Complete baloney, just like the bogus medieval shroud. This is nothing more than a doubly plunging syncline. Plus, a BIG problem is that the fossiliferous limestone, which cross cuts the syncline, preclude the structure from being Noah's Ark because these supposed "Flood" deposits are younger than the "Ark." And while we're at it, where is a peer reviewed research paper published in a reputable independent journal like Nature, Current Anthropology, or Archaeological Science?
When this "evidence" passes peer review and shows up in a reputable independent science journal like Nature, Current Anthropology, or Archaeological Science, let us know.
@@plainsman Everyone knows peer review is a joke and nothing more than a measure to control the narrative. Those who claim otherwise are… trying to control the narrative.
@@plainsmanlol you mad, buddy
Dont be so fricken gullible and stupid
logically it cant be " the arc "... since it is a story ....a pair of all animals in a boat is impossible ,how survived insects ,wild predators
to name a few ? government confirmed ? hahahahaha🤣
more mythological religion
The odds would have to be a billion to 1 that it wouldn't be Noah's Ark, in that location, in that formation, in that exact measurement of cubits. The only explanation that could explain that would be that historians from all over the world retold the same story that 1 person concocted thousands of years ago from seeing that geological formation. The more logical theory is that it is Noah's Ark, and the Geologists are liars.
Lidar it
Lidar doesn't penetrate rock.
@@plainsman no...but if there were fences/paddocks, trails, animal shelters, scattered around...maybe additional proof...??
@@eddieo6466 Once it got over the embarrassment of Galileo, Christianity has had a legacy of encouraging scientific research, building on the belief that all of nature is God’s creation. Through modern science, Christians have become increasingly aware of how their God crafted the universe around them. Hundreds of years of research in geology, paleontology, biology, and many other fields have produced abundant evidence that the earth is billions of years old and that fossils and geological features formed through many processes over eons of time. Also, the flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism of accurate science.
@@eddieo6466 Faith is the opposite of science, yet it is also one common element that you will always hear valued in religion. It is the number one most common excuse for holding peculiar superstitious beliefs in spite of the evidence against them, their violations of sense, and their foundation in wishful thinking and rhetorical vapor.
@plainsman yes, but if had a little evidence...all the better. I think
Here goes it 👽I will tell you how it all happened. 🤔. One day we waz bored so we landed on your earth in our spaceship 🛸and decided to make a ton of weird creatures in our replicator machine and leave them on your earth in 2's so they could go forth and multiply. 😊. Your story of Noah's ark is a made up flood story describing how life was saved on your earth. 🙄. The true story is we landed on your earth and sent out from our spaceship all life forms. 🙂. We gets bored ye see just flying about aimlessly. Have a good day. 👽.
Well, I guess this just absolutely proves that the Earth was created 3,000 years ago and that everything in the Bible is absolutely true. Yep. It’s all coming together now. I guess this must be a huuuuge disappointment to all those people who went to university for years and studied geology and history and archaeology and have spent their lives wandering around the planet finding concrete evidence that absolutely contradicts the possibility that the Bible is actually true.
Though I feel your pain, Academia's refusal to acknowledge the fact that all mythology contains bits of truth is just as frustrating to people like me. I have no dog in the fight. I'm an atheist. But modern "science" is looking more and more like dogmatic religion to me.
@@chrisnewbury3793amen
@@chrisnewbury3793 Either something is supported by empirical evidence or it isn't. Science illiterate persons have difficulties with that fundamental concept, and the fact that many aspects of science are counterintuitive to the "common sense" of laymen.
@@chrisnewbury3793 Science is concerned with empirical evidence, not anecdotes.
@@plainsman yes real science. But do most people really understand what science is?
Give up this nonsense. The perspective offered by hardcore creationists like Answers in Genesis forces people to choose between the Bible and modern science, and reinforces the harmful cultural stereotype that modern science and biblical Christianity cannot mix. Sadly, Answers in Genesis and their ilk are staking the authority of the entire Bible - and Christianity itself - on the view that a global flood is a viable alternative to abundant scientific evidence for a much longer chronology of creation. To do so, they must add in many speculative details not found in the biblical text, and they must rely on a theory of post-Flood animal evolution in which species diversify at rates many times faster than any known evolutionary mechanism. These theories, along with many others posited by young-earth creationists, are not based on any credible scientific evidence.
They found this years ago and they keep finding it like it's new. Well those of us that remember our history remember that the ricat structure is the imprint of the Spaceship Atlantis and we nuked it at the same time it landed but it phased out dimensionally and it also had demanded that we bring all animals two by two because they were confused about our sexual education and then maybe we tried to copy the round design in an actual boat I saw that. The real one is round and the design is mentioned in Sumerian lit. Not sure what happened after that probably a flood which is why God sent the ark in the first place which is caused by the pole shift due again this year.
There is abundant empirical evidence that there was never a global flood, and as a consequence no ark. It's just an allegorical story.
1ST...
Damn you
@@jakelloyd_inc🤣
Proof of rapture, if you are visual, ever catch on to information? The light comes down from above (Christ return) or you get caught up in to understanding (rapture) it's built in to the fabric of creation. Get caught up in a lie and it becomes a prison caught up in truth and you are free.
religion is a prison.
@@dmlevitt
Discover Biblical prophecy
@@1000YearsofPeaceplan read "god is not great" by Christopher Hitchens.
@@dmlevitt
Nothing in it
@@dmlevitt
1000 years from now... I am
Very likely, the ark was repurposed . Seek ye first the Kingdom of Heaven.
👍 APRIL FOOL ... oh, wait Look out, there's a snake behind you with some fruit!
My bet is, Not only NO but F NO
it is tho
@@Joe-sg9ll Wishful thinking and self-delusion.
Ok. Ive got the money im going. You might have to help me with the logistics and ordering but i believe in Ron Wyatt and this site. Ive gotta go. Gobekli Tepe is awesome and other sites but i wanna go to see this . Ive recently received the dough. I wanna go meet Hugh and Andrew. Count me in. But im going to need help signing up. Thanks
what a load of rubbish
Not one shred of truth to the noahs ark tale. The story can be poked so full of holes, it could be used as a seive.
No, it is not. The whole idea of Noah's Ark is absolutely stupid and literally impossible
Only when you add the details like bringing every animal on-board, and all of humanity coming from one bloodline. I don't think a massive flood in The Mediterranean with a refugee aristocracy landing in Turkey and establishing a new culture is so far-fetched.
@@chrisnewbury3793 I agree, but then that wouldn't be Noah's Arc.
@@ishmiel21 well it could be a mythologized version of something that was real. And Noah may be more of a title anyway. Obviously the Shemites and Hamites named themselves after somebody though.
@@chrisnewbury3793 Yup, all the more reason it's impossible to be Noah's Arc
Its a story thousands and thousands years old so you have to take it with a handfull of salt, but it is very probable that there lie some truth to it
The Number One problem with "research" is most use Subjective views instead of Objective views. Christianity suffers greatly from Subjective views in all aspects. It's unfortunate.