Discovering the Real Temple Mount Part 1
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 10. 2017
- Discovering the Real Temple Mount Part 1
Where is the location of Solomon's Temple today? Was the temple originally in the City of David? Does the Dome of the Rock stand on the original location of Solomon's Temple? Is the wailing Wall part of Solomon's Temple? What ever happened to the Roman Fortress Antonia that was connected to the temple and housed upwards of 10,000 people? Does the Gihon Spring offer clues to where the temple once stood? What about clues like the Ophel? Did Dr. Ernest Martin stumble onto profound information that could usher in Bible-Prophecy? Some say his views are paramount to a great temple hoax. Are his findings valid? If the real temple location is not on the traditional temple mount are the Jews free to build their new temple?
We hope you enjoyed the teaching: Discovering the Real Temple Mount Part 1
To subscribe to our CZcams channel:
/ yahwehsrestorationmini...
To continue your journey, please visit our extensive website:
www.yrm.org
Download our free mobile App for Apple or Android from the App Store. Search: Yahweh's Restoration Ministry
Join us on Roku! To find our channel search: Yahweh's Restoration Ministry
Watch live Sabbath services every Saturday at 1:30pm central. www.yrm.org/live
Find us on Social Media:
/ yrm.org
/ yrmministry
plus.google.com/+YahwehsResto...
/ yrministry
To link this video: • Discovering the Real T...
Knowing all that I know about this subject, which is nothing, I find this fascinating and wanting to know more....Thank you for lighting the fires of our faith to seek out understanding. And as always Randy you do a great job!
Thank you for your kind words! Randy worked very hard on these 2 messages. There will be more to come on this topic to be sure!
🔅
✈✈🚖🚖🚖🚷🚷🚷🚧🚧🏇🏇
John LaFleur
John LaFleur सिर्फ
"Everything hidden will be revealed" A quote from Yahshua Messiah. Praise Yahweh!
Amen brother
Amen
The Hebrew children missed the Messiah, do we think then they could miss the location of the Temple
ΤΗe prophecy fullfilled. City of David arise from dust .Praise Yahweh
I have been studying this topic for a long time, I even was privileged to enter into the city of David archeological site... I really believe the temple was there, the Lord may surprise us and bring to Light a tremendous discovery to show that THAT is the place. Shalom.
I believe all this is happening now because we are living in the end times and they will wake up and build the temple in the right spot in the city of David and that won't cause WW3!!!
This was presented very well and since I know very little of the Temple, this has given me a stepping stone into my studies concerning this subject. Thank you! And Shabbat Shalom
Very well expounded from Scripture, Archeology, and History. Well done. My husband and I were in Israel in 1988 and saw the City of David partially excavated , and so much has been further excavated. Also I have seen videos of the underground passage leading to the temple. These discoveries are so important.
i understand that the temple needed huge amount of water daily for their daily sacrifice and bathing requirements. so a close source of water, the gihon spring, would be a good indication of where it would have been built
Temple Mount means a mountain within the temple proper, and should not be confused with 'temple on a mount'. Thanks to you for this educating, and much corrections to errors I had once bought into.
I am a Christian and believed the archeologist is right on the location I am excited to see the 3rd temple in my lifetime so start building God bless 🙏🏻
Shalom aleichem! Thank you for sharing, this is exciting, my heart leaps for joy! For a long time, I have wondered how the 3rd Temple can be built with the dome of the rock still standing...until now, that is... I will be going to Jerusalem soon (my 1st trip) & have so looked forward to going to the "City of the Great King". Psalm 48:1,2 - "Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised in the city of our God, in the mountain of his holiness. Beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, is mount Zion, on the sides of the north, the city of the great King."
We agree, it is very exciting! Have a safe and blessed trip!
The third temple is blasphemy- they plan to bring back blood sacrifice in it-and it is one of the greatest deceptions in the church is the teaching that we are to support this false state of Israel because people just simply do not know their bible or blindly follow this belief. These lost Jews and others there who are Kabbalist' are preparing for "their coming Jesus" a different "christ"- the false christ- and we fully understand from God's word that their false christ that is coming is going to be none other than Satan himself-the great deceiver- Satan incarnate- who will declare himself God in this third temple. I am confused how any Jesus believer would support Israel- the false state of Israel- (The new covenant Israel is a spiritual Israel of all who believe in Christ Jesus- not a physical state)- and support the building of this blasphemous third temple- this false state of Israel is the enemy of Christ Jesus- their plans to bring back blood sacrifice is mocking Jesus death on the cross- it tramples the belief in our Savior Jesus Christ. Are you at the Yahweh's Ministry actually Jews who do not have a Messiah yet to support such practices?
Nope, we accept the Messiah's sacrifice. We are simply looking at the evidence and drawing conclusions based on that evidence. We are not pushing for a 3rd temple to re built. We are only looking at historical accounts and archaeological evidence and we believe that historically, the Temple stood in the city of David. It really is as simple as that.
Yahweh's Restoration Ministry there’s no evidence of a “third temple” anywhere in scripture. The 4 passages that are close to the mention amazingly used metaphorical temple words instead of the actual temple words and there’s a big reason both Paul and Daniel did this. However, there will be an altar , and That is going to be the focal point for everything to kick off for the great tribulation. Please research what I’m saying..you’ll be amazed at what you find.
Fantastic presentation and i believe he makes his case incredibly well
Thank you for sharing! I've been following this theory for some time and believe that the Haram is the Antonia. Hadrian was sure to expunge all parts of Jewish presence and plowed the site of the temple. People say Jews would never forget the site of their temple, yet they forgot the City of David! Its location has only been known recently, and archaeological digs to confirm it really only commenced with K. Kenyon mid 20th Century. I believe God has marked the Haram as Roman by placing the Roman inscription on the Southern wall (upside down!) in his sense of humor. Too many reasons to go into detail, but I think the temple will eventually be in its 'proper place' Jeremiah 30:18
God bless you!! Subsribed keep up the gd wrk!
@ 38:01 you are showing the top of the mountain rock of Mount Moriah where Abraham was told to build an altar and sacrafice his only son Isaac. Smooth also denotes flat, level, polished. Threshing floors are flat and porous like a mortar of the mortar and pestal. has to be porous to be able to grind the chaffe from the wheat. There is such a place on the Temple Mount under one of the Muslim cabannas. There is more under the surrounding floor around that cabanna. I suspect, for common sense reasons and having a belief and very meager understanding in Gods symbolic poetry that this could have been at the very entrance of the Temple to symbolize the shedding off of sin as you walk through the entrance.
2 Chronicles 5:2 records, "Then Solomon assembled to Jerusalem the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the leaders of the fathers' of the sons of Israel, to bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion." The words, "to bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion" indicate that Solomon moved the ark into the temple that he had completed, that temple being located "out of the city of David, which is Zion".
First seek our father in heaven and his justice and everything will be added
The 3rd Temple is coming soon! The best scenario is to have it built in the City of David. Logically, it all makes sense anyway. Fortress Antonio is the right dimension to house 6000 soldiers.
Will this presentation ever be available on DVD? I would love to have this for group study.
They are available on DVD now actually. yrm.org/dvd-archives/ it is near the top of the list!
Thank you @@YahwehsRestorationMinistry
You would think that people would start taking the Bible literally after seeing all of Ron Wyatt's discoveries!!!
He read the Bible and took it literally and he was able to discover a lot of his findings because of that and with God's help!!!
Thank you for this very informative video. It sure convinces me.
Then why not look on Mt. Zion for the temple?
I could not agree more. It’s amazing how much information is right there in the Bible. Biblically This location corresponds to what the Bible says and fort Antonia makes much less sense. This was location was posted at ithasbeenwritten.com at the bottom of the prophecy page.
Thank you for the presentation!
Well done thank you
All I can say is if I am going to build the most important Temple to honour my God I will build on the highest peak in the vicinity and not on a lower elevation.
Remember there were hewers of wood and drawers of water to truck in supplies to the Temple so there would be no need to build on site of Gihon ( since it is nearby and can be carried up ).
Also in the time of Jesus for the Water Festival the water had to be carried up the staircase from the Gihon to the Temple.
While the Tent of the Tabernacle was pitched in the City of David we must give Solomon credit for building the Temple and he would not build this magnificent Compound in am obscure location when the most visible location is a few hundred feet higher up.
He was king in command of a powerful kingdom and would spare no expense in building the Temple on the most prominent mount.
This is if I were Solomon, just saying.
GR8
thank you for sharing
It just doesn't make sense that Titus would have left anything standing when he was told--and Josephus agrees--to waste Jerusalem. Great topic and great research--thank you.
Thank you very much for your kind words, you are right it simply doesn't fit with the writings we have. (Both scriptural and historical).
Excellent presentation & looking forward to part 2. Of course, no need for animal sacrifice today after death & Resurrection of Yeshua. Nevertheless is very important for prophecy & End Times. I’m wondering how this might affect the site of Golgotha & the possible location of the Ark some 30 feet directly below supposedly located by Ron Wyatt.
No need for sacrifice today? Is all Isreal saved today? That's news to me.
@@noahark200 No need for any more blood sacrifices from animals. Yahshua's sacrifice covers all.
If we use the Bible as our ultimate authority, it tells us clearly that the temple was not in the City of David, but upon Mt. Moriah, where the Temple Mount is today.
David purchased the threshing floor from Araunah, the Jebusite
2 Samuel 24:24-25: However, the king said to Araunah, “No, but I will certainly buy it from you for a price; for I will not offer burnt offerings to the Lord my God that cost me nothing.” So David bought the threshing floor and the oxen for fifty shekels of silver. 25 Then David built there an altar to the Lord, and he offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. And the Lord responded to prayer for the land, and the plague was withdrawn from Israel.
The Temple Solomon built was on Mt. Moriah. The City of David is not Mt. Moriah.
2 Chronicles 3:1-2: Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where the Lord had appeared to his father David, at the place that David had prepared on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. 2 He began to build on the second day in the second month of the fourth year of his reign.
After Solomon built the temple, then he would bring up the Ark of the Covenant out of the City of David to the temple on Mt. Moriah
2 Chronicles 5:2: "Then Solomon assembled to Jerusalem the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the leaders of the fathers’ households of the sons of Israel, to bring up the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of the City of David, which is Zion."
Then from this point on, the Ark of the Covenant would reside permanently in the temple that Solomon built, which is also referred to as the house of the Lord.
2 Chronicles 6:10-11 Solomon states: “Now the Lord has fulfilled His word which He spoke; for I have risen in place of my father David and sit on the throne of Israel, as the Lord [e]promised, and have built the house for the name of the Lord, the God of Israel. 11 There I have placed the ark in which is the covenant of the Lord, which He made with the sons of Israel.”
These verses clearly state that the Ark of the Covenant was brought out of the City of David to be placed permanently in the House of the Lord that Solomon built upon Mt. Moriah.
One thing that I believe shows how true this is, is because I don't believe that God would allow a Muslim temple built on the site of his true temple!!!
INGATLAH POHON ARA INGATLAH AIR SUNGAI BERSIH ITULAH TEMPAT SUCI TEMPLE ..
Please diferenciate further between Mount Moriah and Mount Zion, In this following verse mount Moriah is refered as the place of temple. "Then Solomon began to build the house of the LORD at Jerusalem in mount Moriah, where the LORD appeared unto David his father, in the place that David had prepared in the threshingfloor of Ornan the Jebusite." Your exposition is sound but still needs to analyse Mount Moriah reference, Thank you. Every blessing
Samuel Esteves vv
Based on the fact Zion and Mount Moriah are both identified as the location of the temple, they must be the same or synonymous.
at the time of the caliph, there no longer was any temple. there could not have been any sacrifice offered as god commanded all sacrifices needs to be done at the temple, nowhere else.
I believe you are 100% correct.
The proof that you are correct is found below in the writings of the Roman historian Tacitus.
In section 12 below he describes a 'spring of never-failing water" in the temple.
The Jews
Book Five (1-13) of The Histories by Tacitus
11. So after encamping, as I have said, before the walls of Jerusalem, he paraded his legions in formation before the eyes of the enemy. The Jews, marshalled close under their walls, were in a position to venture further out if they were successful and had a place of refuge ready at hand in case of defeat. Titus sent against them cavalry and some cohorts in battle order, but the encounter was indecisive. Then the enemy gave ground, and for some days thereafter fought a succession of engagements just in front of the gates. Finally, repeated losses drove them behind the walls. The Romans then concentrated on an assault. After all, it seemed beneath them to wait for hunger to do its work on the enemy, and the troops actually asked to be allowed to risk their lives. Some did so because they had real courage, many from mere bravado and a desire for rewards. As for Titus, his imagination dwelt on Rome, wealth and pleasure: it would be long before these dreams were realized if Jerusalem were destined not to fall in the immediate future.
But the city occupied a commanding position, and it had been reinforced by engineering works so massive that they might have rendered even a flat site impregnable. Two lofty hills were enclosed by walls skilfully staggered and forming re-entrant angles designed to expose the flank of an attacker. At the edge of the crags was a sharp drop, and a series of towers dominated the scene, 105 feet high where the rising ground helped, and 135 or 120 feet high on the lower contours. (19) These presented an impressive appearance, and to the distant observer seemed to be on a level. There were further walls inside around the palace, and a conspicuous landmark was the lofty castle of Antonia, so named by Herod in honour of Mark Antony.
12. The Temple was like a citadel and had its own walls, which had been even more laboriously and skilfully constructed than the rest. The porticoes around it constituted in themselves an excellent defensive position. To these advantages must be added a spring of never-failing water, chambers cut in the living rock, and tanks and cisterns for the storage of rainwater. Its builders had foreseen only too well that the strange practices of the Jews would lead to continual fighting. Hence everything was available for a siege, however long. Moreover, after Pompey's capture of Jerusalem, fear and experience taught them many lessons. So taking advantage of the money-grubbing instincts of the Claudian period, they purchased permission to fortify the city, and in the days of peace built walls meant for war. Already the home of a motley concourse, its population had been swollen by the fall of the other Jewish cities, for the most determined partisan leaders escaped to the capital, and thereby added to the turmoil. There were three different leaders and three armies. The long outer perimeter of the walls was held by Simon, the central part of the city by John, and the Temple by Eleazar. John and Simon could rely on numbers and equipment, Eleazar on his strategic position. But it was upon each other that they turned the weapons of battle, ambush and fire, and great stocks of corn went up in flames. Then John sent off a party of men, ostensibly to offer sacrifice but in reality to cut Eleazar and his followers to pieces, thus gaining possession of the Temple. Hence-forward, therefore, Jerusalem was divided between two factions, until, on the approach of the Romans, fighting the foreigner healed the breach between them.
The following comes from Wars of the Jews, by Flavius Josephus, Book 5, Chapter 5, Section 8.
“8. Now as to the tower of Antonia, it was situated at the corner of two cloisters of the court of the temple; of that on the west, and that on the north; it was erected upon a rock of fifty cubits in height, and was on a great precipice; it was the work of king Herod, wherein he demonstrated his natural magnanimity. In the first place, the rock itself was covered over with smooth pieces of stone, from its foundation, both for ornament, and that any one who would either try to get up or to go down it might not be able to hold his feet upon it. Next to this, and before you come to the edifice of the tower itself, there was a wall three cubits high; but within that wall all the space of the tower of Antonia itself was built upon, to the height of forty cubits. The inward parts had the largeness and form of a palace, it being parted into all kinds of rooms and other conveniences, such as courts, and places for bathing, and broad spaces for camps; insomuch that, by having all conveniences that cities wanted, it might seem to be composed of several cities, but by its magnificence it seemed a palace. And as the entire structure resembled that of a tower, it contained also four other distinct towers at its four corners; whereof the others were but fifty cubits high; whereas that which lay upon the southeast corner was seventy cubits high, that from thence the whole temple might be viewed; but on the corner where it joined to the two cloisters of the temple, it had passages down to them both, through which the guard (for there always lay in this tower a Roman legion) went several ways among the cloisters, with their arms, on the Jewish festivals, in order to watch the people, that they might not there attempt to make any innovations; for the temple was a fortress that guarded the city, as was the tower of Antonia a guard to the temple; and in that tower were the guards of those three (14). There was also a peculiar fortress belonging to the upper city, which was Herod’s palace; but for the hill Bezetha, it was divided from the tower Antonia, as we have already told you; and as that hill on which the tower of Antonia stood was the highest of these three, so did it adjoin to the new city, and was the only place that hindered the sight of the temple on the north. And this shall suffice at present to have spoken about the city and the walls about it, because I have proposed to myself to make a more accurate description of it elsewhere.”
Where are the "broad spaces for camps" in the modern model of Fort Antonia?
The Jewish historian Josephus said Fort Antonia was built upon a gigantic rock, on the highest hill, and had passages that went “down” to the temple.
Josephus described it as a large structure, instead of what we find in Avi Yonah’s modern model of the fort.
Josephus also said the fort blocked the view of the temple on the north side. Therefore, we know it was higher than the temple.
In the passage below we find the Romans used Fort Antonia as the base to attack the temple during 70 AD.
They had previously gained access to the fort by attacking the foundation for seven days.
(Book 6, Chapter 2, Section 7)
The passage proves at least part of Fort Antonia remained intact on the day the Jewish temple was destroyed.
From War of the Jews, by Josephus, Book 6, Chapter 4, sections 4-5.
"4. Now it is true that on this day the Jews were so weary, and under such consternation, that they refrained from any attacks. But on the next day they gathered their whole force together, and ran upon those that guarded the outward court of the temple very boldly, through the east gate, and this about the second hour of the day. These guards received that their attack with great bravery, and by covering themselves with their shields before, as if it were with a wall, they drew their squadron close together; yet was it evident that they could not abide there very long, but would be overborne by the multitude of those that sallied out upon them, and by the heat of their passion. However, Caesar seeing, from the tower of Antonia, that this squadron was likely to give way, he sent some chosen horsemen to support them. Hereupon the Jews found themselves not able to sustain their onset, and upon the slaughter of those in the forefront, many of the rest were put to flight. But as the Romans were going off, the Jews turned upon them, and fought them; and as those Romans came back upon them, they retreated again, until about the fifth hour of the day they were overborne, and shut themselves up in the inner [court of the] temple.
5. So Titus retired into the tower of Antonia, and resolved to storm the temple the next day, early in the morning, with his whole army, and to encamp round about the holy house. But as for that house, God had, for certain, long ago doomed it to the fire; and now that fatal day was come, according to the revolution of ages; it was the tenth day of the month Lous, [Ab,] upon which it was formerly burnt by the king of Babylon; although these flames took their rise from the Jews themselves, and were occasioned by them; for upon Titus’s retiring, the seditious lay still for a little while, and then attacked the Romans again, when those that guarded the holy house fought with those that quenched the fire that was burning the inner [court of the] temple; but these Romans put the Jews to flight, and proceeded as far as the holy house itself. At which time one of the soldiers, without staying for any orders, and without any concern or dread upon him at so great an undertaking, and being hurried on by a certain divine fury, snatched somewhat out of the materials that were on fire, and being lifted up by another soldier, he set fire to a golden window, through which there was a passage to the rooms that were round about the holy house, on the north side of it. As the flames went upward, the Jews made a great clamor, such as so mighty an affliction required, and ran together to prevent it; and now they spared not their lives any longer, nor suffered any thing to restrain their force, since that holy house was perishing, for whose sake it was that they kept such a guard about it."
All of this provides tremendous evidence that the Dome of the Rock is the true location of Fort Antonia. Josephus said Fort Antonia was built upon a gigantic rock, and that rock is still there today under a dome.
If Fort Antonia remained on the day the temple was destroyed, please tell us the location of Fort Antonia today?
Where was Solomon anointed as King of Israel, and what is special about its water? Where was the "tabernacle" at that time?
1Ki_1:33 The king also said unto them, Take with you the servants of your lord, and cause Solomon my son to ride upon mine own mule, and bring him down to Gihon:
1Ki_1:38 So Zadok the priest, and Nathan the prophet, and Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, and the Cherethites, and the Pelethites, went down, and caused Solomon to ride upon king David's mule, and brought him to Gihon.
1Ki 1:39 And Zadok the priest took an horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon. And they blew the trumpet; and all the people said, God save king Solomon.
1Ki_1:45 And Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet have anointed him king in Gihon: and they are come up from thence rejoicing, so that the city rang again. This is the noise that ye have heard.
Where is the "castle" described below, from which 470 soldiers were sent to guard only one man?
Act_21:34 And some cried one thing, some another, among the multitude: and when he could not know the certainty for the tumult, he commanded him to be carried into the castle.
Act_21:37 And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek?
Act_22:24 The chief captain commanded him to be brought into the castle, and bade that he should be examined by scourging; that he might know wherefore they cried so against him.
Act_23:10 And when there arose a great dissension, the chief captain, fearing lest Paul should have been pulled in pieces of them, commanded the soldiers to go down, and to take him by force from among them, and to bring him into the castle. (Why did the soldiers go “down” to rescue Paul, and why did he speak to the crowd at the temple from the steps ?)
Act_23:16 And when Paul's sister's son heard of their lying in wait, he went and entered into the castle, and told Paul.
Act 23:23 And he called unto him two centurions, saying, Make ready two hundred soldiers to go to Caesarea, and horsemen threescore and ten, and spearmen two hundred, at the third hour of the night;
Act_23:32 On the morrow they left the horsemen to go with him, and returned to the castle:
to go with him, and returned to the castle:
During 73 AD the Jewish leader at Masada said the only thing left of Jerusalem was that which belonged to the Romans. Why would the Romans destroy their own fort, which was named for a Roman?
.
Read “Wars of the Jews”, Book 6, chapters 1-7, if you want to understand the temple, and Fort Antonia, and the cloisters that connected them.
www.gutenberg.org/files/2850/2850-h/2850-h.htm#link62H_4_0001
Praise Father Yahweh. I met you in mi Assembly of Yahweh.
Sam Graham
While this documentary sounds convincing, it’s not accurate
according to Scripture. Here are two verses that prove that the temple was not
in the City of David. Scripture says that at the dedication of the temple that
Solomon built, in 2 Chronicles 5, that the Ark of the covenant was brought, out
of the City of David to the temple: "Then Solomon assembled to Jerusalem
the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the leaders of the
fathers’ households of the sons of Israel, to bring up the ark of the covenant
of the Lord out of the City of David, which is Zion." If the Ark was
brought out of the City of David to the temple, then the temple could not have
been in the City of David. The second Scripture has to do with the great
misunderstanding of what Christ said about not one stone being left upon
another. He was talking about the buildings of the temple not the walls: Mark
13:1-2 clearly states that Jesus was referring to the stones of the buildings
on the temple mount, not the walls of the Temple Mount platform that would not
be left one upon another: "As He was going out of the temple, one of His
disciples said to Him, “Teacher, behold what wonderful stones and what
wonderful buildings!” 2 And Jesus said to him, “Do you see these great buildings?
Not one stone will be left upon another which will not be torn down.”
Additionally, there is so much evidence that the temple mount location is where
it is today that no reasonable scholar or archaeologist would say otherwise.
For example, do we really believe that somehow the Jews and the Christians
forgot where the temple was? In a modern comparison, it would be like saying
that New Yorkers will forget where the Twin Towers were located that fell on
9/11. I could go on and on about the evidence that proves that the Temple Mount
is exactly where it is today, but I think the strongest evidence is Scripture
itself. Once again, God says the Ark of the Covenant was brought out of the
City of David to the Temple. So, the Temple could not have been in the City of
David.
Jews forgot where the city of David was. Its only recently been found. Shoots your theory all to hell.
You seem to be forgetting that the temple HAD [according to Jewish law] to have a immediate living water source; and there is none nearby the temple mount. Jesus compares Himself to living water, so I feel that is rather significant! Why would the priests purify themselves and then walk 1/3 of a mile and defile themselves again?
The Temple was built at the site of the Threshing Floor. The current Temple Mount is not 3000 years old.
3/4 of New Yorkers (and americans in general) dont even know what the Holucast is and that was within 100 years; somehow you believe they will know and remember where the twin towers were 2000 years from now????? Okay then, we will let that be your story. They asked for a memorial to be placed at the site so, "They never forget!"
A question - people point to scripture that Solomon moved the Ark up and out of the city of david as proof that it went to the summit of Moriah or the Haram. How does that fit into the location of temple synonymous with the city?
2 Chronicles 5.2 really says that David took the Ark of the Covenant from the City of David. The Hebrew is מֵעִ֥יר literally 'from the city'. The Hebrew preposition used can mean either 'from or out of'. But in the context its likely to mean 'from' its location in the Tabernacle (which was then in Jerusalem) to the newly built Temple which was now adjoining the city.
Remember salomon land filled the milo so that he extended the citi of david and then in that fillin he build the temple and the ark was in a portable tent and they put it in the new templeafter croxing that small filling about 300 feet from David citi wall. Faindon google milo jerusalem and you will see. It was an extencion of the citi of david. at the time of king david the tradicional temple mount didnt exist.
Why do you delete my posts about the location of the Temple are you afraid of something?
What info would you like to share?
Ojalá pueda ser traducido
Lourdes Jaramillo ho Israel por favor
Why don't the Jews know this?
BECAUSE ITS INACCURATE.
If in referring to a mountain
You did not include it's summit, this might make sense. Watch Hillel Richman's video. As scripture says, " Let us go up to the House of the Lord." Be not deceived friends.
AMEN
People forget there were two houses built to the Lord, one in the City of David (the temple), and the one Ron Wyatt found at Skull Hill (the sanctuary) where the Ark is at this present moment!
Explain why the walls are standing. Fort Antonia was destroyed in 70AD.
your whole premise is flawed, I believe. Solomon built the temple, The Lord GOD told David that he would nod build his (Gods') temple for he (David) was a man of war, but that his (David's) son would be the one to build his (Gods') temple where he would dwell forever "high" above them. The Tent theme was with the Jewish people feorm at least the Exodus from Egypt.
Ancient authors were looking at a fountain of circulating water and likened it to a spring.
Secondly, Solomon did not “fill” Milo as you say. The bible says he built Milo, that is he re-edified the border wall that begins the City of David going inward and round about.
Thirdly, the reference to the City of David being tightly compacted is not a reference to it being connected and expanded northward with Ophel. Compacted simply means it was fortified round about as was done by David.
Your theory is egregiously wrong at every step! You literally have to read things into the text that just aren’t there.
Pls watch the God culture research, garden of eden found with concrete evidence
I am Abdus Samee
Unfortunately, this man is confused and right at the same time. The temple found near Gihon most likely was used by David! David’s palace was near Gihon, north of David’s palace would be Solomons Temple on the ophel, then The temple would have been built where Norma Robertson purposes. We forget that we are dealing with progressive time periods.
hebrews 12 22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.
25 See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven:
26 Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.
27 And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.
28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:
That l
Lets not forget that Yeshua (Jesus Christ) told the Disciples on the mount of olives
that the temple would be destroyed and that there would not be a stone left upon
another that would not be thrown down. Matthew 24:2 Jesus was saying that there
would be nothing left of the second temple not even the stones. I believe this is 100
% proof that the temple mount is not where the second temple once was built. I know
that I believe the Lord Yeshua the Messiah over any man. GODS blessings be upon
you all.
Seresta
How would it be possible for a Temple the size of the one Solomon built to fit within the City of David. The city was 9 acres in size.
The city isn't the temple but the temple is inside the city. and it was 20 cubic in size which is 0.016214 Acre feet.
Just go google this article out of Israel these days >>>
King David’s Jerusalem Wasn’t Where We Thought, New Study Argues
All I see is rock. I cannot get a sense of what the actual city looked like. Can you use a computer reconstruction so it will make sense? All I see is rubble and old stone walls in shambles. I cannot picture what the actual structures looked like that people could live in.
THIS THE WHOLE TRUTH NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP ME BIBLE✌
Rhetorical Question: Where Solomon's temple and Harrod's temple built in the same location?
Yes ..exactly the same ..in the city of David ...both were also destroyed on the same day ...the 9th of ov ...many years apart of coarse..!! This video is accurate.
What everyone today called the Temple Mount is actually the old Roman Fortress Antonio. The real Mount is gone, destroyed in 70 A.D. by the romans as Jesus prophesied.
I'm sure there a map or documents in the Vatican archives which shows where for antonio is located in Jerusalem.
It was outside of the city, in the old days. Not in the city.
This is very informative. Although, I can't help but wonder if you notice that the location of Ishtar, on the chart, is not where the heart is. At least, not according to my understanding of the human body. She represents the adultress, and the sons which she is connected to, are committing fornication with her.
I felt like you were trying to convince me the whole time, rather than educate me. I just can't help but believe what it says on 2 Chronicles 5: 2. I do believe you are wrong about the location. I guess we'll see in time though. Until then, God bless!!!
HE IS WRONG.
On m
Moi I
Where were the sacrifices done? The Jewish temple. Where was Jesus sacrificed? The spot where the Lost Jewish Temple is. There is no other place on Earth Jesus could have been sacrificed! It is obvious everybody, he was sacrificed at the exact spot where the original sacrifices were taking place inside the temple. It was torn to the ground so as not to be found by men but our Father knew where it was. It was turned into a dump by the Babylonians to desecrated come on people it's simple.
They would not have killed Jesus inside the Temple it would have defiled it. It was still be used when Jesus died. It had to be outside of the city, according to Jewish custom.
SHALOM BELOVED.
ANYTHING that is in opposition to THE REBUILDING OF THE 3rd TEMPLE MUST BE DESTROYED AND REMOVED!!!
I, CHOKMA/"WISDOM " SPEAKS... I EAGERLY WAIT FOR HIS TIMING TO BE JOINED WITH THE SHEEP OF HIS PASTURE/MY CHILDREN/THE REMNANT/12 STARS ON HER CROWN(12 TRIBES OF YISRAĔL), THE 144,000, HIS CHOSEN......
REJOICE AND BE GLAD...
ALL THAT IS WRITTEN MUST COME TO PASS....MORE TO COME...
IN THE NAME OF YAHSHUA, OUR ONLY SAVIOR...AMEIN AND AMEIN
HALLELUYAH..
Shalom,in the name of King David Dynasty who ruled Jerusalem to the Jewish people name since thousands years before BC according to the genetic and Jewish genealogy.
From my Sit-in open before Moroccan council of human rights near Qods committee Moroccan political file n° 34624/04 of Equity and reconciliation commission concerning obliterate identity and serious violation of human rights in the old and new testament against Moroccan state and his French tutelage
Since 23/10/2019 I m in my Sit-in open for protest against illegal tutor policeman number of Mossad and number of Moroccan independence party who falsify the judgment and Moroccan card identity n° H179440 experts on 2010 for Stoll my Jewish, legal and personal identity because my father is still alive???
For benefit Balushtian against me and Israel before international tribunal for depriving Jerusalem as capital of Balushtian to justify the organized criminal against me the childhood to his day
For this reason, I say to the enemies of Star David dynasty and his history, I m born only for liberate Jerusalem to the Arabic Islamic colonization??? Because my DNA confirmed that my blood group is O + and biological mention is K - and phenotype is CCDee belonged to dynasty King David not for Mohammed or Jesus according to the genetic and Jewish genealogy that embodies the biological links that define the juridical ties of Jewish people to Jerusalem as capital eternal of Israel.
I stand Mr. Natanyaheu by my DNA to be president of Israel for continued with Mr. Trump to liberate Israeli to the Arabic Islamic colonization for separation of the Dome on the Temple that built by my ancestors with their own money and to drop Jordanian tutelage on Jerusalem as capital eternal of Jewish people and to drop malicious decision of Qods committee Moroccan before international tribunal against me and Israel with regarded the autonomy of Balushtian as solutions to the end the conflict between my Jewish people and Arabic Islamic colonization
I m promise my family in Israel and the World do not give my Jewish identity to the Moroccan state and his French tutelage and Arabic Islamic colonialism as confirmed in the complaint addressed to Amnesty international under n° 19/2019 on 09/09/2019 for liberate my Jewish, legal and personal identity to the Moroccan state president of Qods committee and Arabic Islamic colonialism to return to Jerusalem land of my ancestors...
Shavua tov my friends and friends of Israel
2 Chronicles 5:2 records, "Then Solomon assembled to Jerusalem the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the leaders of the fathers' of the sons of Israel, to bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion." The words, "to bring up the ark of the covenant of the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion" indicate that Solomon moved the ark into the temple that he had completed, that temple being located "out of the city of David, which is Zion".
Only 3 people liked this amazing.
The threshing floor was NEVER on the top of Mt. MARIAH ...IMPOSSIBLE !! JAGGED ROCKS WITH NO ACCESS ..??? DO YOUR RESEARCH...!!