Velikost videa: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Zobrazit ovladače přehrávání
Automatické přehrávání
Přehrát
Good! you picked that LCX occlusion. could have been easily missed.
Yes sir
This 'invisible' stump problem is seen very commonly with LCx in my practice
Yes sir ..
Yes sir..
Plaque present in proximal lcx before the proximal stentSingle stent to cover the tight lesion in lcx (after the om) would have been enough
Yes sir correct
Inject Buble in lad
Stent overlap could have been away from origin of PLVB either proximally or distally
Not sure why you stented distal. The plaque rupture is proximal where the stump was. The rest was spasm.
There was lesion in distally also..it was full of thrombus there also..
Agree. Would have just stented prox. Hate putting 2.5 stents. But great case.
U have jailed a major om
Yes
Right strategy. It’s moderate sized.
Good! you picked that LCX occlusion. could have been easily missed.
Yes sir
This 'invisible' stump problem is seen very commonly with LCx in my practice
Yes sir ..
Yes sir..
Plaque present in proximal lcx before the proximal stent
Single stent to cover the tight lesion in lcx (after the om) would have been enough
Yes sir correct
Inject Buble in lad
Stent overlap could have been away from origin of PLVB either proximally or distally
Yes sir
Not sure why you stented distal. The plaque rupture is proximal where the stump was. The rest was spasm.
There was lesion in distally also..it was full of thrombus there also..
Agree. Would have just stented prox. Hate putting 2.5 stents. But great case.
U have jailed a major om
Yes
Right strategy. It’s moderate sized.