You are right. We cannot define God and its like dog trying to explain math. All the attributes of His creation in me and around me is visible and brings forth the glory of the Lord Examine your own body from head to toe, positions of our mennebers in the way they are, their mechanisms, their control over their functioning with defensive mechanisms, each member in our nody has a certain function. Take a look at the dentition in our oral cavity. They are held together FIRMLY for about 60 to 70 years and functions to grind the food we eat. Who told them and who gave the command for them to be so? The tongue has 4 kinds od taste buds located in different patterns in our tpngue and each one identifies a unique taste. Likewise many other members too. So all the matter came out of NOTHING IS A VERY VERY ARGUMENT... GOD IS THERE BEFORE WE ALL CAME IN...
@@indianchristian4u I think u really got a valid response to his argument. He starts live stream every saturday at 8pm IST, you can message him about ur argument he will let u join the live call. Hope this helps
problems with your stickman analogy, first thing, analogies can be helpful, but they have limitations. The stickman analogy assumes that just because something is beyond current understanding, it must have a spiritual or supernatural explanation. This isn't necessarily the case. furthermore, e existence of a higher dimension can be understood through scientific inquiry and reasoning. Similarly, understanding the universe and its origins should rely on scientific methods and evidence rather than assuming supernatural explanations. another thing, analogy is a hypothetical scenario meant to illustrate the possibility of other realms. However, it's important to distinguish between hypothetical illustrations and factual evidence. The analogy doesn't prove the existence of a spiritual realm.
Don't you think there is a différance between universe and speaker you think all everything has to have a creator but why? Why can't something just be there on its own. For example, did we create the earth we live on. It was formed by gravity which is a law of our universe, that doesn't necessarily mean someone has to create that law for it to exist, some laws can be created because our system required it to work, or it wouldn't be possible.
The worst argument of an atheist I have ever come across. Atleast learn to portray that you are an atheist. What universal law or how the law even exists without a law maker? 😂😂😂😂
12:53 the bigger problem is that instead of looking for the reason behind our universe's existence, you just accept and never question the flawed theories of religion because it is easier for you don't you think that if the god you say which is mighty but peaceful and loving would want you to expend your knowledge and find him on our own instead of just telling us in a book that this is true and if you don't believe it then you go to hell
Excellent explanation
You are right. We cannot define God and its like dog trying to explain math.
All the attributes of His creation in me and around me is visible and brings forth the glory of the Lord
Examine your own body from head to toe, positions of our mennebers in the way they are, their mechanisms, their control over their functioning with defensive mechanisms, each member in our nody has a certain function.
Take a look at the dentition in our oral cavity. They are held together FIRMLY for about 60 to 70 years and functions to grind the food we eat. Who told them and who gave the command for them to be so?
The tongue has 4 kinds od taste buds located in different patterns in our tpngue and each one identifies a unique taste.
Likewise many other members too.
So all the matter came out of NOTHING IS A VERY VERY ARGUMENT...
GOD IS THERE BEFORE WE ALL CAME IN...
can u please debate with Vimoh at his Livestream on Saturdays at 8:00pm ist.?
Sure. Let me know the details.
@@indianchristian4u I think u really got a valid response to his argument. He starts live stream every saturday at 8pm IST, you can message him about ur argument he will let u join the live call. Hope this helps
problems with your stickman analogy,
first thing, analogies can be helpful, but they have limitations. The stickman analogy assumes that just because something is beyond current understanding, it must have a spiritual or supernatural explanation. This isn't necessarily the case.
furthermore, e existence of a higher dimension can be understood through scientific inquiry and reasoning. Similarly, understanding the universe and its origins should rely on scientific methods and evidence rather than assuming supernatural explanations.
another thing,
analogy is a hypothetical scenario meant to illustrate the possibility of other realms. However, it's important to distinguish between hypothetical illustrations and factual evidence. The analogy doesn't prove the existence of a spiritual realm.
Don't you think there is a différance between universe and speaker you think all everything has to have a creator but why? Why can't something just be there on its own. For example, did we create the earth we live on. It was formed by gravity which is a law of our universe, that doesn't necessarily mean someone has to create that law for it to exist, some laws can be created because our system required it to work, or it wouldn't be possible.
The worst argument of an atheist I have ever come across. Atleast learn to portray that you are an atheist.
What universal law or how the law even exists without a law maker? 😂😂😂😂
12:53 the bigger problem is that instead of looking for the reason behind our universe's existence, you just accept and never question the flawed theories of religion because it is easier for you don't you think that if the god you say which is mighty but peaceful and loving would want you to expend your knowledge and find him on our own instead of just telling us in a book that this is true and if you don't believe it then you go to hell
Your argument doesn't exist at all. Please get better to defend your view.
Why do judges put a criminal in prison ? Just because he doesn't believe in constitution and law book ? Why don't you question the judge ?