Quantum physicists REanalyze GOFAST UFO video footage released by the US Navy and Pentagon
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- This is a follow up video to our previous analysis of the GOFAST video released by the US Navy showing a UFO/UAP (unidentified aerial phenomenon). The original video is here
• Quantum physicists ana...
This was filmed before the reports that were released to US congress, so no comments regarding that unfortunately.
The models created by The Cholla:
www.geogebra.o...
www.geogebra.o...
Mick West's analysis:
www.metabunk.o...
The mathematica notebook for the visualization is here
drive.google.c...
#ufo #usnavy #pentagon #ufovideos #uap
Why do I get the inkling that quantum physicists are THE EXACT people we want to pay attention to the phenomena 👀
As someone that misunderstood the tone of your previous video I greatly appreciate the work you guys have put into this and I think its an this type of unbiased analysis is desperately needed.
Glad we could sort out the misunderstanding! Appreciate the comment.
Physicists are the perfect people to analyze this type of data. Thanks again for creating this video, hope you come out with more.
Much obliged!
@@NYUQuantumTechnologyLab czcams.com/video/PLyEO0jNt6M/video.html debunked
Thanks for your analysis and calculations, im pretty sure, a lot of people will appreciate the fact than you take time for this kind of topic!
Someone from 🇧🇪
No problems! If there's demand, happy to do it.
Such a strange format: two presenters and three kids on the back seat watching Monsters Inc on DVD.
It's strange how little views this has considering the importance of the footage and its impact on society.
Why is it important? Because it confirms the debunking?
As a fellow physicist, I cant disagree with portions of your math but quite frankly the testimony of the pilots themselves (not only in these particular instances aka these 3 released videos by the DoD) but of ALL pilots who have come forward since cannot and should not be ignored.
Sounds great. Where can I hear from the actual pilots that recorded those three videos?
Awesome video love it (greetings from New Zealand!) - was hoping there was one on the Gimbal video - any plans to do that one?
Love to see content like this keep it up gentlemen!
Very happy you enjoyed it!
Awesome video. Well grounded. Thanks!!
Would love to see an analysis on the Gimbal Video from you guys.
Yes we are on a follow up!
Based on the length of the waves in the ocean, and the surmised altitude, can you give an approximate size of the object to rule out a bird or is the video? If it is not a bird then the size of the object becomes important to speculate what it might be. My recollection is that there was no heat signature when IR was briefly used.
Sorry I missed this video when it came out. I actually agree the velocity is more like 40-60 knots. I think it's most likely (90%) a balloon though, not a bird. Just moving at wind speed. The velocity being the wind differential between altitudes.
Actually, my nickname is "reaper", not "balloom". But if you wanna call me that way...
Hi Mick! Great to hear your thoughts and that we are agreement with the numbers!
and what if the wind speed that day was 15 knots? The goverment has to have meteorological data or they couldnt conduct modern warfare so they know exactly what the speed of the wind was and if the object is a balloon or not and the US governments official response was basically "we dont know what these videos show". Why would the goverment say that and literally no one since the video was taken bothered to look at the meteorological data to see if its possible this was an object floating in the wind or a bird?
A 90mph balloon… absolutely reaching with that 😂
@@jamest3093 The calculation implies 50mph, not 90mph, and 50mph wind speed differentials between different altitudes are incredibly common. Take a look at the external wind next time you're on an airliner (since a lot of them have that info in the seat displays on the moving map now) and you'll see winds of >50mph *all the time*.
Well done -- and I am adopting "That's heartbreaking, but thank you!" as a new catch phrase. So thanks for that. ^_^
thanks and glad you enjoyed!
Watch Mick West's videos explaining why these aren't UFO's/alien spacecraft. We've been lied to. It's always good to search out more information even when it's believable and coming from reputable sources. I was an F-16 Crew Chief for the USAF for 10+ years and I'm familiar with the systems, the targeting pods, aerodynamics, etc.
I think the videos released thus far are the very tip of the iceberg and the preliminary report concludes with a recommendation for a standardised reporting method. I'm hopeful this will be publicly accessible so analysis such as yours can be counted. More heads are better than a few.
Also would like to see a video on loop quantum gravity... It's my own personal area of research.
Thanks for the suggestion! Yes we plan on doing a few more videos on UFOs and quantum gravity too.
Bro, it's the tip of the tip of the iceberg. Buckle up.
Great job! This is what we need people who are able to analyze the data.
It's just a parallax effect, filming a weather balloon in the wind.
Does that comport with the 194mph minimum of speed for the F18 super hornet to maintain elevation and stay airborne?
We are talking about the speed of the UFO. Indeed if it were a plane it would be going extremely slowly.
Thank you for all your time for looking at this from a technical perspective. This helps with us that don't have the knowledge or skillset. I look forward to more videos like this.
Our pleasure.
@@NYUQuantumTechnologyLab Do your calculations take into account the minimum air speed of 194.7 mph for the f18 super hornet to maintain flight?
This guys seem so weird when they just stand there. Once they start talking and get in their flow they're so beautiful. Can't belive such minds exist. I hope you guys make it big!
One variable that makes a significant difference in whether the speed of the object is "fast" is the wind speed at its location. If it is at an altitude of around 4,000 meters as is supposed, it's likely that it is in a location with wind of at least 15 meters/second, which could be a factor in its speed relative to the ground.
How would you determine the wind speed from this footage?
@@williamrichardson2596 ... You wouldn't. You would have to use data showing the average wind speed at a given altitude. Obviously, the exact wind speed in this specific location can't be determined, but it is worth taking into account whether or not the object is moving at a speed consistent with what could be expected at its altitude.
I think would be nice if you guys address the temperature issue. Some pilots have been saying that the object is so much cooler than the ocean surface and the surroundings that would be impossible to be a bird or some whether balloon or any aircraft that we have. I couldn't find nobody addressing this point, so I think, if anybody, you guys definitely could explain this.
"cooler than the ocean surface and the surroundings that would be impossible to be a bird or some whether balloon or any aircraft that we have"
This is where your mistake in your reasoning lies. Yes, the bird is much colder than the ocean below it, but the bird is also flying at around 10,000 feet above said ocean. Yeah, it'd be weirder if a bird's feathers at 10,000 feet WEREN'T colder than the water at ground level. Of course it's going to be colder at that altitude than at ground level.
@@Dubanx Birds keep an average body temperature of 104 to 105.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Higher than mammals. Also their feathers are designed to reatain heat providing some insulation, this is why birds don't freeze even when flying at high altitudes. The UAP video was taken off the east coast of Florida, which in the winter has water temperatures as low as 55° and in the summer as high of 86°. The IR on the F18 is indicating the object is colder than the water. At the lowest water temp of 55° the air temp at 10,000 ft from mean sea level would be 19.35° . If this object was a bird and it couldn't maintain it's average body tempearture of around 104° under any weather conditions it would fall out the sky dead. If it was a bird the IR would see it as hotter and not colder than the surface water temperature. It's unlikely this was a bird.
@@waltermagana6720
Their body temperature may be warm, but that means nothing if there are feathers between said body and camera. Feathers are fluffy, there is A LOT of bulk air between the bird's body and the edge of their feathers.
What you're seeing is the temperature of the outermost tips of the feathers, which you would expect to be ambient. Not the warmth of the bird itself.
@@Dubanx Birds do not develop ice on their feathers when flying at high altitudes, if they did they would loose lift and drop out the sky. This indicates their feathers are not at ambient temperatures. It may not be same as core temperature but it is certainly not ambient temperature at 10,000 ft. We would also have to accept that if this was a bird our extremely expensive and highly trained F18 pilots using the most sophisticated sensors are incapable of discerning between a bird and other flying aircraft.
@@waltermagana6720
The pilots said they didn't know what it was, not that it was an aircraft of some sort. The resolution wasn't there for any real details, training be damned.
It's obvious they were only locking it up cause they found it interesting and not because they thought it was an attacking aircraft or anything...
Also, birds can't really fly when wet either. If it were as simple as body temperature keeping them dry (non frozen) then they will still drop from the sky when it rains. It doesn't have to do with temperature, their feathers don't accumulate moisture from the air readily.
At czcams.com/video/y5Uf4N-JkQY/video.html you mention using short range variables results in a speed of ~40kmh, but you moved on before giving a speed estimate assuming longer range. What was the maximum estimated speed if you assumed the object was flying at or near sea level?
If it was a bird, the mystery will never be resolved. Birds don’t keep very good records of their flights. It would be impossible to prove it was a bird, and impossible to prove it was not something else.
Without even watching this video yet:
Quantum Physicists deal with the very small and energy fields that do not behave like human scale objects.
Why would they analyze the Gofast object?
Why would you believe them?
do a video on the aguadilla, puerto rico uap video. that object enters the water without slowing down and then two objects emerge.
Great work guys
Thank you so much 😀
One year later and you guys still haven't explained how the UAP is breaking the laws of thermodynamics. It's cold. Very cold.
So, how come that other experts said that this thing was going over 24k miles per hour?
It's not something living since it was coming up as colder than its surroundings. I wonder if maybe it was a rogue balloon or something
The guy behind is wearing cool yellow/black/white wristbands... I wonder where did he get them...
When you say 50-70mph is "very fast", keep in mind that this bird is at 10,000 feet above the sea floor and likely using the trade winds to help its journey. A 30 knot tail wind, or even a 50 knot tail wind, is well within the realm of believable. These birds have almost certainly evolved to take advantage of these trade winds and find them effectively.
So the bird itself doesn't have to be going anywhere near that fast relative to the air around it. In all likelihood the migrating bird is simply gliding while the wind carries it at those speeds.
He was being sarcastic, given some of the insane speed estimates out there. Hint: they laughed after he said it.
It’s honestly just nice to see people with expertise in how things move look at these videos. I think Mick West is intelligent, but he’s not a physicist. This is nice to see.
Thanks for the watch!
Analyse the speed of the object as it leaves the view at the end of the video.
You have cherry picked the slowest movement of the object to analyse.
WHY WOULD THAT BE?
Thank you very much for the analysis. Not sure why you think the ball park speeds you've ascertained are fast. They are very slow by aeroplane speeds. And quite normal for a drone or uav. In fact your analysis of;
13,000 ft
30 - 70 knts
And 7 feet in size
Perfectly matches a drone/uav.
The only mysteries that I can see, are it's means of propulsion, it's endurance/fuel (given it's 100+ nm offshore and it's origin/destination.
This could easily be a submarine launched surveillance drone.
The main discussion was whether it was a balloon/bird, which was the theory put forth by Mick West. It sees a bit fast for these. The argument against aircraft is the temperature which appears to be cold. In this regard none of the candidates are a perfect match.
@@NYUQuantumTechnologyLab
The object is cold because it's at something like 10,000 feet. Just about anything at that altitude is going to be colder than the surface level water
and the speeds are fast because you aren't accounting for the potential wind speed at 10,000 feet of altitude. The bird isn't blasting through the air at 30-70knots. Its likely traveling sub 20 knots through 30-50 knot winds. Which is a perfectly believable wind speed at those altitudes.
When taking into consideration the wild range of speed estimates coming from various sources, some being up to a laughable mach 60, I think he was being sarcastic with that comment. They laughed right after it was said.
Can you guys analyze the 2013 aguadilla puerto rico video
an object flying across the sea at 100kmph? ..cant think of what it could be. Quack quack.
I'm an a pilot it's a AGM 84 Harpoon missile they are tracking.
I thought the UFO also dipped in and out the sea?
I dont understand what are they calculating???
Distance? Velocity?
Thats on the screen 🤷♂️
Dude on the left is giving me full metal jacket vibes in the beginning of this video lol
Gomer Pyle developing nuclear bombs? Just what the world needs😂
Me, in the back, only here for the extra credit.
Ps. While I do appreciate the thorough analysis, did we really need quantum physicists for this? Pretty sure nothing ascends past Newtonian physics here.
Why is Megamind staring into my soul
Rather interesting, considering the 3 newest UAPs the US has shot down in the last couple of days have been reported as slow moving, around 40mph
Indeed!
I was an M1A1 gunner during Desert Storm. We use thermal sights too. The UAP is registering as COLD. It's breaking the laws of physics. Thermodynamics. You guys have an explanation for that? I'd like to hear it.
Ok soooo… do they come in peace or what ?
Black holes was a joke until no more, i would love to hear some explanation about the other videos where these machines are flying without wings and no visible thrust, considering they were filmed by an equipment made only for that
Project blue beam?
Alien space vehicles use quantum physics with better probabilities. They can travel by teleporting faster than light, and through walls similar of quantum tunneling, and manipulate time into the temporary future like quantum entanglement of quantum superposition. Aliens fly 1ft diameter technology that look like orbs of scattering light safely through walls (and space rocks), freeze objects in time, and move nearby objects through gravity because gravity is what dilates the time. I think it’s them entering a quantum superposition while they appear frozen in time, and they must progress in time as if they froze it would stop the gravity interaction, and without gravitational time dilation they would unfreeze in their perspective. So they continue time dilation into seeing the future universe while existing in the past of the future universe, and in the other perspective they are simply frozen in time, then a time slip happens when time dilation ends, and they are looking at the present again, and the universe can measure them progressing in time again yet they have already altered the future from the present, and can alter it further with the future information they have.
That's quite a weekend you had there
@@NYUQuantumTechnologyLab lmao
please go tell a doctor the same thing you told us buddy :)
@@thesunman How about instead you stop using your computer since you think it’s practicing witchcraft every-time you use it. Also you should visit a doctor for your sadistic manipulative depressive tendencies, as it’s typically the bully who actually needs mental help, and the bully subconsciously reveals it.
5.6 to 10 million dollars. That's the cost to train the avg pilot in the United States military Not to mention they are the best in the world and that they fly more training than any other country says a lot in how excited these guys got about what they were seeing. These guys can identify Russian migs at 20 Miles out and fly constantly. The Commander Fravor story was just as impressive as he was a squad Commander and top gun grad with witnesses. Something is definitely going on, what I have no idea.
Fravor is plainly wrong in what he describes in the videos. Mick explains it well, and these guys more or less corroborate the math. When Fravor defended his views against Mick's theories he didn't even demonstrate an understanding of the theories, he straw manned them with some crap he heard from someone else.
That's 5.6 to 10 million dollars to be an obstinate fool.
You do realise that the UFO was travelling underwater before exiting the water at which point the sensors managed to lock onto it?
Im watching joe Rogan with Brian Keating, get this video to them STAT
So aliens are real! Thank you guys! 😂
I am not big on the value of a quantum physicist, but I have no doubt such people can do some math. Your findings hold weight with me. Kind of disappointed it was not more amazing but I will just have to live with that.
You insulted their discipline & then answered your own question as to their value. Consider revising your statement.
You suck ScottMana, you really do.
Soo it's highly likely its of an origin not of this world.
All respect gentelmen, until you physically witness one of these things go perform thete air show , your thoughts and energies ate meaningless.
If you stumble upon a math equation that makes you cry, and run as fast as your legs are capable if going, and maxes out your heart and lung capacities, and makes you talk non stop for a few hours….. your just pretending to be in the conversation.
agree
You guys are wrong on the speed there have been so many pilots who have confirmed these things are going supersonic or close to it.. somewhere in the range of like six or seven hundred miles an hour I know that's a little off. Just shows that you don't know what you're talking about and you haven't looked into the actual scientific or pilot analysis.
We would be happy to look at some actual analytical pilot analysis. Chris Lehto's anaysis is very qualitative and seems to just eyeball a speed, with no calculations. A scientific analysis would involve calculations using numbers and available data. That is exactly what we did.
You desperately want to believe in this so you ignore actual evidence and analysis in favor of a person going, "yeah I think it was going really fast" when he's just as subject to optical illusions as you yourself are, him being a pilot does not change that.
@@reddillon8425 I'm not sure if you are referring to me about desperately wanting to believe -I'm not sure what I believe be honest. A year ago I would have thought all this is BS probably like you do. That being said there's enough people who are intelligent staying educated people were saying this is real. Maybe not specifically this video but the phenomenal in general-at least some of them. Analysis related to the video was done at the tssci level or above including radar, likely satellite SIGINT ,ELINT etc I witness account and whatever it was it warranted this level of attention... These are not the type of systems that make mistakes-especially not across multiple mediums. Did the guys that know about this and analyze it they believe there's enough evidence suggest that it's something anomalous.. there's an overwhelming amount of evidence to suggest that there was some OBJECT. I have no clue what it was I don't think the people who tracked it know what it was and I don't think anybody who analyzed it as any idea what it is.. it's not a bird it's not a balloon it wasn't a drone and it's not a type of aircraft. The evidence is clear
@@NYUQuantumTechnologyLab You are missing so much critical data that your conclusions are meaningless. That’s not to say you couldn’t provide expert input. If you think you can help with the analysis contact Commander Fravor (he will speak to you). He can contact Joe Rogan and you three can analyze the Fravor encounter (West coast) and the Gimbal video (East) in a public platform. They are all interested in the truth. Thanks.
@@daytonagreg8765 Critical data such as what?
Who did the calculations for drag coefficient? I saw that that some of the objects were facing a strong headwind.
Gentlemen. Don’t worry about any negative comments as they will mostly come from the Dunning Kruger folks who have a third grade understanding of all things scientific.