Gandhi - who bizarrely told me that Nuclear weapons were "the future!" earlier in the game - has all his dreams come true. Game is Sid Meier's Civilization VI.
There is no shame in deterrence. Having a weapon is very different from nuking the shit out of you, and the latter is so much more fun. But words are wasted on you, you won't understand.
Ah civ. The game were everybody hates you. I get publicly mocked for having a small army. So I make more dudes. And then they are publicly saying I'm a war monger. I abstain. Then they declare war on me... why. What peace did you strive for?!!
I don't really get the point of demands, through all my time playing civ 6 I've never successfully made a demand, and have only accepted a demand once because of a misclick
Sometimes If you are strong enough and literally move many troops to their borders the AI will accept deamends (sometimes), but if you want from them a city, recources, relics, spies, then they will not accept only demand gold! (I might be not right because i wrote this on my game expirience)
If you're strong enough compared to them it can work, but honestly at that point its just easier to conquer them. So yea, im not really sure why the mechanic is in the game other than to give the AI another reason to hate the player for some arbitrary thing.
When i am considering war, place my troops in position and start making demands. Sometimes i just want to delay the invasion to spare myself the hassle of managing new cities for a while
@@omaregb They should make it so they will accept if they are in no place to fight a war. AE: If a demand is declined a war will start for that thing. Though it still doesn't seem like the best idea
Civilization logic is having Brazil declare war for absolutely no reason at all and then I get war monger penalties from attacking them back making everyone else declare war and ending my game. Civ can anger me sometimes.
@@RandomTomatoSoup They wanna try to take me over with the Arabs and disrupt my progression I’m gonna capture bordering cities, civilization has some flawed logic regarding warmonger penalties.
@@BloodInTheStrawberries He might have done some fucked ups here and there, but he's no war criminal heck imagine a universe where he actually caused a violent protest turned uprising in India.
@@arb1897 Specifically Civilization 6. Word of Warning: it's not actually all that great. It has a ton of issues. It's strategy is bare-bones. It's combat is weightless, the technology and culture systems are boring and unengaging, it's "diplomacy" system is a joke, all of the characters look like caricatures and ARE caricatures, specifically Ghandi. It's visuals are, in my eyes, quite ugly, and there is no sense of genuine progression. It's filled to the brim with micro-management, and the macro-management is awful. The player in question you see in the vid somehow managed to develop a nuclear submarine WITH nukes, meaning his playstyle was largely driven by technological progress. Which also means he likely never really engaged in the actual combat. Meaning he likely wasted hours of his time doing nothing but boring micro-management, and no real combat, as he would quickly be overpowered by more military-focused civilizations. Not to mention that games against other players are excrutiatingly slow, I'm talking about a single ONLINE campaign against multiple opponents lasting for days. The "custom" single player games are incredibly limiting and do not allow the player full freedom ( you ALWAYS have at least one AI Civilization opponent, for instance). And as for pure concept: time progresses anachronistically. You can be fighting the minister of Australia, while you yourself are Alexander, but you are in the middle of, say, the rennaissance. What is obviously intended as a "joke", simply wears off it's novelty after about 5 minutes. A more grounded approach would have worked better in my opinion, but it's up to taste. In my opinion, there are better strategy games than civ 6. But hey, I'm new to the series. Maybe I'm wrong and wasting an entire day clicking boxes and NOT engaging in combat is actually fun for some people.
In fact in these game, devs wanted Gandhi to be peaceful so they setted his agressivity variable to zero. However the game considered zero as the infinite value so he nuke asap he got a bomb. This was so fun the devs keeped it.
No it’s because when other factors reduced the aggressiveness some more it was reduced below zero which was not possible, causing an interference overflow that resulted in it becoming very high.
Close but not quite. It was in an earlier version of Civ and it was a bug. His aggression was set to a low non zero number. Making friends with any country lowers their aggression towards you. So let's say his aggro starts at 5 and it subtracts 6 aggro once friends. This would make it -1 but that's not how computer math works and it instead wraps back from the smallest number to the largest number the game has for that value and goes from there. It was a fun bug that the devs kept to some extent. I don't believe they made it work exactly in future installments though. Newer Ghadi's probably just aggro faster in reference to the bug.
@@DandyDeishu in civ 6 he doesn't actually have high aggression, but a 70% chance of having the "nuke happy" agenda, which means he likes people who make/use nukes, hates those who don't and won't hesitate to use them
@@DandyDeishu When they decided to incorporate the glitch, I bet that they made Gandhi never strike first. If you attack him, he retaliates with nuclear Hellfire.
I once had a map with two huge continents and one small. Across the ages, I unified through conquest my super continent and built some colonies in other islands and even the second continent. Counting me, there were like 5 civilizations in the world. It felt like a madman's glory when you press that button and launch all your arsenal, just so the Robots cross the seas by both sides and take the coast with tanks and troops right behind. It felt like playing DEFCON, but winning.
@@vpr17 It's called Mutually Assured Destruction. Never strike first, but stockpile so many nukes that if they hit you first, you respond by shooting the entire thing to destroy them. This is why he have not had a WWIII.
It was a glitch in the original game, whereby Ghandi’s nuclear option was 0, but when made to decrease went to the highest value for the rest of the game, so he responded with immediate nuclear action.
"the world is the problem, the atomic bomb is the solution" "there can be no violence is everyone is dead" "i am become death, the destroyer of worlds" -Gandhi
For context, Gandhi natural default pacifist atitudes blocks him out of declaring war himself. So this is literally the only way to unleash his nuclear loving AI he gets in the lategame. His nuclear behavior is a joke referencing how an overflow errror due to Gandhi extremly low agression in the first civiliciation made him go from 1-2/10=255/10 agression. Turning him into a nuclear menace if declare war to. In the modern games they have added this as a joke in some of his dialogues and in the way his AI works in the endgame intencionaly, because nuclear Gandhi is hilarious. IDK how many people will run into this without the context already but for those who did, I hope this was usefull.
Fun fact in this game they accidentally made Gandhi the most aggressive leader since they made his aggression less then 0 which made it max out some how so it would not be uncommon to have Gandhi nuke you.
I love how they converted the nuclear glitch into "MAD is the only option if you throw rocks at me". It somehow preserves "avoid violence at all costs" without removing him being nuke happy.
"If an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind then no one will see the war crimes I will commit"
Punished Gandhi
This comment is criminally underrated
this proverb just keeps on getting longer
Your profile pic tho ive seen it before but i dont remember where
That's what Gandhi should have done after the 'Radcliffe award!'
Is this a MGS 5 reference?
"The only way to achieve peace is through nukes"- Manhattan Gandhi.
"Manhattan Gandhi" has literally got me giggling harder than I should XD
There is no shame in deterrence. Having a weapon is very different from nuking the shit out of you, and the latter is so much more fun. But words are wasted on you, you won't understand.
@@u.v.s.5583 remove the u from your name and you can justify your comment 😂
I think he is right because if in a city there's no people left and all die it will be so peaceful and quiet xd
Manhattan Gandhi lmao this is the best comment
Gandhi's nuclear missile has now blinded me
Do you know this game is ban in India
@@ilikekids wait are you telling me that its banned in india or asking me if its banned in india?
@@deltumn5899 or asking if you know about the ban in India
it is not banned here in India i
@@satyampaswan3995 wait, are you saying YOU are banned in india, or where you accidentally cut off?
A nuke for a nuke however, results in extra eyes
Underrated XD
Underrated comment
…for the people who are still alive.
Oongerthedd😰🥺😣😓☠😩😟
ahh yes genetic mutation from the radaiation of the nuke causing an extra eyes instead of killing the victim instantly
MOVIE SCIENCE!!!
"Switching to a secondary weapon is much more efficient than reloading."
- Mohandas Gandhi
Wtf dude😂😂😂😂
Wth?! He is Mohandas Karamchand
@Yuvraj Sinha beat me to it
@@chandanadutta9962 who cares, gandhi wasnt even a good person, he was kinda racist
@@johnquincyadams1134 He never was racist. Fuck off
"Your ass is grass" - Nuclear Ghandi.
"And I got the weed whacker"
"Cower for I am the mower"
@@jackurokawa3838 All nice additions guys :') ha ha
Gandhi*
Water will become luke when i'll blow the nuke
Ah civ. The game were everybody hates you. I get publicly mocked for having a small army. So I make more dudes. And then they are publicly saying I'm a war monger. I abstain. Then they declare war on me... why. What peace did you strive for?!!
*Slams mag into boltgun*
Abandon reason, know only war
In Civ, Violence is never the Answer, it is the Question, and the Answer, is yes
As Gandhi would say, first they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you, and then you win.
Ah, politics...yeah, I hate how that's kinda accurate with what happened historically.
>And then they are publicly saying I'm a war monger.
And what are the little shitstains gonna do about it? Try and fight you?
Allow me to demonstrate how 'an eye for an eye' works.
*Drops nuke*
Warmonger penalty: moderate
The people who survive will become blind
@@montomotry5378 Dont worry they will develop their own 10th eye
Gandhi: "Forget the Hunger Strike. It's time for Nuclear Strike."
Best comment 👌😂
🤣🤣
I don't really get the point of demands, through all my time playing civ 6 I've never successfully made a demand, and have only accepted a demand once because of a misclick
Sometimes If you are strong enough and literally move many troops to their borders the AI will accept deamends (sometimes), but if you want from them a city, recources, relics, spies, then they will not accept only demand gold! (I might be not right because i wrote this on my game expirience)
If you're strong enough compared to them it can work, but honestly at that point its just easier to conquer them. So yea, im not really sure why the mechanic is in the game other than to give the AI another reason to hate the player for some arbitrary thing.
@@zsombor6728 you kinda gotta fuck em up in war a lot before theyll start accepting
When i am considering war, place my troops in position and start making demands. Sometimes i just want to delay the invasion to spare myself the hassle of managing new cities for a while
@@omaregb They should make it so they will accept if they are in no place to fight a war. AE: If a demand is declined a war will start for that thing. Though it still doesn't seem like the best idea
Civilization logic is having Brazil declare war for absolutely no reason at all and then I get war monger penalties from attacking them back making everyone else declare war and ending my game. Civ can anger me sometimes.
People won't get angry at you for defending yourself, only if you conquer their cities
@@RandomTomatoSoup They wanna try to take me over with the Arabs and disrupt my progression I’m gonna capture bordering cities, civilization has some flawed logic regarding warmonger penalties.
@@bruh-xb2uy Because you took some of their cities. That’s not flawed logic.
@@randombloke165 they started it
@@gameragamera656 The other civs don’t care who started it.
He legitimately declared war against Mahatma Gandhi, what a madlad
@firstname lastname
I'm convinced that is what gandhi was like in every universe except ours. We were lucky enough to have the good Gandhi.
@Bruhbou Bruhbrioo what's wrong with white supremacy?
@@lmao_lol_xd
With the stuff and accusations stacked up against Gandhi of late, you might want to check that statement again-
👀💋👀
@@BloodInTheStrawberries He might have done some fucked ups here and there, but he's no war criminal heck imagine a universe where he actually caused a violent protest turned uprising in India.
@@lmao_lol_xd Define good
"Having a weapon is not the same as using it"
Now let me show you how to use it with a live demonstration
Having a weapon is very different from actually having THE weapon.
He started it, not Ghandi.
Ghandi: "violence is a question, and the answer is yes"
I love Gilgamesh in this game. I dont even like his play style but seeing him in the top right with his smile makes my day
What game is this?
@@arb1897 civilization, very fun, but long game
@@thegoldenpeingun5820 oh....those strategy type games? Huh!
He has a very friendly vibe
@@arb1897 Specifically Civilization 6.
Word of Warning: it's not actually all that great. It has a ton of issues. It's strategy is bare-bones. It's combat is weightless, the technology and culture systems are boring and unengaging, it's "diplomacy" system is a joke, all of the characters look like caricatures and ARE caricatures, specifically Ghandi. It's visuals are, in my eyes, quite ugly, and there is no sense of genuine progression. It's filled to the brim with micro-management, and the macro-management is awful. The player in question you see in the vid somehow managed to develop a nuclear submarine WITH nukes, meaning his playstyle was largely driven by technological progress. Which also means he likely never really engaged in the actual combat. Meaning he likely wasted hours of his time doing nothing but boring micro-management, and no real combat, as he would quickly be overpowered by more military-focused civilizations.
Not to mention that games against other players are excrutiatingly slow, I'm talking about a single ONLINE campaign against multiple opponents lasting for days. The "custom" single player games are incredibly limiting and do not allow the player full freedom ( you ALWAYS have at least one AI Civilization opponent, for instance).
And as for pure concept: time progresses anachronistically. You can be fighting the minister of Australia, while you yourself are Alexander, but you are in the middle of, say, the rennaissance. What is obviously intended as a "joke", simply wears off it's novelty after about 5 minutes. A more grounded approach would have worked better in my opinion, but it's up to taste.
In my opinion, there are better strategy games than civ 6. But hey, I'm new to the series. Maybe I'm wrong and wasting an entire day clicking boxes and NOT engaging in combat is actually fun for some people.
"An eye for an eye makes the world blind but nukes make me smile"
-Gandhi -
😂
The goes blind part wasn't a methaphore for violence or that we literaly get our eyes out, it's because the flash of nuclear bombs makes you blind
"If you want peace, prepare for war" - Mahatma Gandhi
"Violence is the key the success"
-Gandhi Said CALMLY
HARRRRYYYYY POTTTERRRRRR!!!!!
"An Eye for an Eye"
Uchiha clan:"well yes"
But actually no
"An eye for an eye only makes the world blind" *said gandhi, resorting to nuclear missiles*
*random human is nuked Gandhi in civiliztion*
Me:Wait,that's illegal!
This sentence makes perfect sense
Cringe
What are you cyclops? You have a whole other eye
"An eye for an eye, SAY GOODBYE"
-Rickroller Gandhi
He finally got a taste of his own medicine
In fact in these game, devs wanted Gandhi to be peaceful so they setted his agressivity variable to zero.
However the game considered zero as the infinite value so he nuke asap he got a bomb.
This was so fun the devs keeped it.
No it’s because when other factors reduced the aggressiveness some more it was reduced below zero which was not possible, causing an interference overflow that resulted in it becoming very high.
Close but not quite. It was in an earlier version of Civ and it was a bug. His aggression was set to a low non zero number. Making friends with any country lowers their aggression towards you. So let's say his aggro starts at 5 and it subtracts 6 aggro once friends. This would make it -1 but that's not how computer math works and it instead wraps back from the smallest number to the largest number the game has for that value and goes from there. It was a fun bug that the devs kept to some extent. I don't believe they made it work exactly in future installments though. Newer Ghadi's probably just aggro faster in reference to the bug.
@@DandyDeishu in civ 6 he doesn't actually have high aggression, but a 70% chance of having the "nuke happy" agenda, which means he likes people who make/use nukes, hates those who don't and won't hesitate to use them
@@atocanboi409 everytime i get Gandhi he always has paranoid idk why
@@DandyDeishu
When they decided to incorporate the glitch, I bet that they made Gandhi never strike first. If you attack him, he retaliates with nuclear Hellfire.
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, but if I blind you first..." - Mahatma Gandhi
*The future is now, Old Man.*
holy war?
yup.
nuclear bomb?
*yup*
Ghandi without nukes: This world is made of *LOVE AND PEACE!!*
Ghandi with nukes: _The only thing they fear is you_ intensifies…
I once had a map with two huge continents and one small. Across the ages, I unified through conquest my super continent and built some colonies in other islands and even the second continent. Counting me, there were like 5 civilizations in the world. It felt like a madman's glory when you press that button and launch all your arsenal, just so the Robots cross the seas by both sides and take the coast with tanks and troops right behind. It felt like playing DEFCON, but winning.
To quote clone high “if Ghandi stands for anything it’s revenge”
"I'll take a lot more than your eye."
I can just imagine how many digital scam call centers were hit by that XD
Not enough.
He completely missed. They’re all in calcutta.
@@b-zar8912 harbour or arbor stil on gujarat tho?
loooooooool - did not see that comment coming. nice one!
You just insulted my entire race of people. But yes.
NGl, I wouldn't be surprised if Gandhi actually did this IRL.
@@luxinvictus9018 what
@@vpr17
It's called Mutually Assured Destruction. Never strike first, but stockpile so many nukes that if they hit you first, you respond by shooting the entire thing to destroy them.
This is why he have not had a WWIII.
Switching to your pistol is faster than reloading
- Gandhi
It was a glitch in the original game, whereby Ghandi’s nuclear option was 0, but when made to decrease went to the highest value for the rest of the game, so he responded with immediate nuclear action.
Ghandi don't fucks around, he goes from 0 to 65535 really quick
@@realdragon Everybody be gangsta until Gandhi takes a step back from 0.
"the world is the problem, the atomic bomb is the solution"
"there can be no violence is everyone is dead"
"i am become death, the destroyer of worlds"
-Gandhi
Gandhi in real life: "An eye for an eye, only makes the World blind"
Gandhi in Civilization: *EYE FOR AN EYE, SURRENDER OR YOU'LL FUCKİNG DİE☢️*
Actually you will surrender and fucking die from radiation poisoning!
Was half expecting the next turn to show one launching from each city back towards you.
"An eye for an eye only makes the world blind" Said Ghandi, calmly.
Did you or did you not put that nuke in my Delhi, Mohandas asked calmly and launched 20 nukes.
"Eye for an eye makes the world blind, because of the nuke flash"
Ghandi
i love how he hesitated for a second like:
"hmm, i gotta do what i gotta do"
0:18
0:qo
0:19
Xd
"an eye for an eye only makes the world blind"
Well, atleast my enemy will feel just as miserable as me!!
I half expect the next video to be Ghandi's revenge, where he glasses every city, settlement and town you have instantly.
“An eye for an eye only makes the world blind” Yo, Gandhi spitting straight bars
Drops nuke:
“Ok, your turn”
An eye for an eye makes two men half blind, but sit around waiting for a man to take your second eye and you won't be seeing nothin' no more lol
Well he sure blinded a lot of the world in my Civilization. XD
Something tells me that Ghandi probably wouldn't want to be in a game about nuclear weapons
Gandhi: Loves peace and trys to have world peace.
Also Gandhi: Has an entire nuclear arsenal
im so glad im not the only one who makes demands before declaring war
*How dare you use my own spells against me, Potter?*
I search about Gandi's dark secret and find this, what a guy.
For context, Gandhi natural default pacifist atitudes blocks him out of declaring war himself. So this is literally the only way to unleash his nuclear loving AI he gets in the lategame.
His nuclear behavior is a joke referencing how an overflow errror due to Gandhi extremly low agression in the first civiliciation made him go from 1-2/10=255/10 agression. Turning him into a nuclear menace if declare war to.
In the modern games they have added this as a joke in some of his dialogues and in the way his AI works in the endgame intencionaly, because nuclear Gandhi is hilarious.
IDK how many people will run into this without the context already but for those who did, I hope this was usefull.
At least it was Gandhi and not Khan Noonien Singh before he froze himself and flew off for the Cetus constellation...
"An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind. But so does looking at nukes."
Fun fact in this game they accidentally made Gandhi the most aggressive leader since they made his aggression less then 0 which made it max out some how so it would not be uncommon to have Gandhi nuke you.
No that was in of the old civ games, that's where the joke started from
Only one nuke?
I'll take more than one eye.
I love how Gandhi looks so pissed off
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" process to blind you with nuclear flash
"It's cause you're my world bro"
Well... You sent 1 nuke... you get 467263846263487628734687236426387 Nukes at all your cities
Virtual Gandhi: and eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind.
This guy: (just literally 9 seconds later) peace was never an option.
"An eye for an eye only makes world blind. So I will make sure only you loose an eye"
That's why you dont go for an eye, you go for the vitals so they can't hit back
Ghandi After you showed that nukes were on the table:
okay.... my turn. (PULLS OUT ALIEN TECHNOLOGY WEAPON)
You cut the part where Gandhi launches his entire nuke arsenal at you in retaliation.
💀
"I bring you peace my friend i mean rest in peace"-gandhi
"We do not need love and compassion for world peace; guns and bombs are all that are required"
-_Gandhi_
The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his eyes.
0:51 I don't want to set the world on fire... I just want to start a flame in your heart
"An eye for an eye only makes the world blind. Therefore, I shall blind them before they take anymore eyes."
"An eye for an eye only makes the world go blind" -Gandhi
YEAH BECAUSE YOU BOILED THE RETINAS OF A WHOLE CITY
City: Annihilated
Corn fields: *PATHETIC*
"Having weapons is very different from using them"
"Stop quoting random shit by using my name" -M.K Gandhi
A nuke for an eye only makes the enemy blind- MK Gandhi
An eye for an eye just leaves 2 people without depth perception
"An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. So let's just cut to the chase and cut everybody's eyes out."
-Gandhi, ostensibly
Ah yes, nuking the nuke master himself.
I'm still shocked that Hillary Clinton met this guy in a gas station.
When a glitch turns in to a meme then is turned in to part of the game you know it’s a good game.
“Nukes is like toys” - Nuclear Gandhi
“I am going to commit mass destruction via nuclear bombs.”
- Gandh
I was listening to lullaby of Resembool while watching this.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then you *nuke* them, then you win"
-Mohammed Gandhi, art of Nuke
"An eye for an eye only makes the world blind" says the Nuke Happy guy
"now, i will ask you ONE MORE TIME"
I love how they converted the nuclear glitch into "MAD is the only option if you throw rocks at me".
It somehow preserves "avoid violence at all costs" without removing him being nuke happy.
"Eye for an eye will only leave the whole world blind....
And I love it"
“Well then I guess I’m blind”
-This guy, probably
Ghandi looked really ready to throw them hands
"A small crime for 100 thermalnuclar bombs is justice"
-Ghandi
*Declares Holy War*
* 1 second later, nuclear submarine shows up... *
Me: Oh yeah holy war... Right...
"We have come to save you!
-Hurray, it's the catholics
-From yourselves!
-Oh no, it's the catholics"
Peace was never an option
I legit launched like 20 nukes in one turn one time… it was truly beautiful.
An eye for an eye makes no one blind. Just two people half blind.
Speaking of blind, so's everyone in Delhi's surroundings who looked at the blast.
Her: I bet he is cheating on me
Me and the bois: