True, but that's only if your opponent lets you have that knowledge, since it's their call which and how many monsters they keep and remove via this effect.
That's true. Your opponent could have hand traps they couldn't use, like nib, bystials added during their End Phase, effect veiler, etc. Cards added during the End Phase, by cards like Frozen Rose, or simply, cards they withheld to not over extend. Like Collins said, they do have to choose you to see it though.@@KeertikaAndFallenTree
Hand knowledge is nice + but not worth running the card for. There are other cards that give hand knowledge like Virus cards, TTT, etc, but have actually good returns too
Backrow heavy decks will make the best use of this since they tend to have just one or no monsters sometimes (so they can use it during opponent's turn)
I could see this being used in Dinomorphia, in a way. They like when your life points are low, so the chance to have your life points halved would be a good thing
I dont think theres a real chance of ever having your LP halved. There is no world where your opponent says "sending my entire board to the GY is worth halving my opponents LP, ill surely get him next turn!" Well, I guess maybe backrow decks. But why are you activating it against them?
@@baval5 depends on if you somehow give them 3 Lava Golems and they don't have enough life points to survive long enough to use them to their advantage. Or some other situation in which they're monsters are useful in anyway, like a Knightmare Iblee
The card read as: "Pay halve your life point to send all monster the opponent control" or "Your opponent gain 2000 LP and send all monster they control so they only control 1" which is pretty good ngl
At least you can give the opponent tokens to force an effect since they can't be sent to the GY because rulings shenanigans I'm not saying it's a *good* option or remotely consistent, but maybe someone's feeling goofy that day
You can't send tokens as a cost, but you can send them as an effect. The reason is that tokens sent to the GY never arrive, so the cost isn't paid. But you can still send them and they're gone. Think of sending a token like burning a dollar. You didn't pay for anything, but the dollar is still gone.
My opponent be like: “Okay I’ll keep only 2 monsters and I’ll banish my whole hand until the end of this turn, but it’ll be Apollousa with four negations, and a Baronne.” (His thoughts) “ I could negate it and honestly it’s kinda suck I have to banish my Ash from my hand, but atleast I gotta keep impermanence and other archetype-exclusive counter trap on my field so it’s not that bad.”
You want to use this card after the second summon. In that case it’s either bottomless trap hole or you end the opponents turn because they banish their hand. Basically instantly wins against combo heavy decks. Could even force people to set their backrow before committing to combo
I'll happily trade this for a baron negate or something similar 😂 and playing it in a go second deck and just setting it to activate it mid combo when they're going for a big link or a big negate is devastating
Correct me if I'm wrong but you can't send tokens to the grave so they can't be removed from the board by the effect meaning if you can set up 3 tokens on your opponents board then if thats the case maybe it can have some use as a tech card Edited to add: I just checked and i am correct meaning if you flood you opponents board with tokens the card is decent. As such i could see this card actually working in a monarchs deck that uses the herald monster.
Hot damn this card looks sick. Been waiting for a going second spell that actually lets you OTK afterwards. Lightning Storm and Droplets are nice, but this might be better than both since it's both a quicky and doesn't require resources to use.
It seems quite good if you go first with a big chungus deck (skystriker, arise-heart pass, borrelend pass?) Most decks will probably control 3 materials at some point of their combo and both the 3+ and 2+ effects ends turns midcombo. But it's really bad going second, they might not have anything left in hand and if you use it first they can keep the good negates, if you use it after evenly they just send the used negates.
I just thought about it, but what if I give this card to my opponent to trigger some specific effect. Like a bunch of cards that trigger when banished, or to halve my opponent's lp when I can easily recover.
@@cubiix1302 tokens can’t be banished face down, under a case like evenly matched, so if you had a token and got hit by Evenly you’d banish all but the token. However I believe sent to gy doesn’t have that effect on tokens and just sends them
Tokens can't be sent to the graveyard as a cost, because they never actually arrive in the graveyard and doing so is a requirement of being sent to the graveyard. However they can be sent to the graveyard as an effect, because the fact that they never arrive in the graveyard doesn't matter. Think of sending a token like burning a dollar bill. You can't use it to pay for something, but it's still gone.
No, they can just send the tokens. Tokens can't be sent as a cost because they never arrive and so the cost isn't paid but they can be sent as an effect to get rid of them.
@@Ramsey276one Even if it wasnt, you cant chain a spell in the middle of another spells resolution. Either you chain the token summoning card to the activation of this one and the tokens are on board already for the opponent to send, or you wait for after the card to resolve and then the tokens do nothing. You cant activate a token summoning card in between them sending their monsters and the card counting the number of monsters remaining.
@@mrharvy100 lab doesn’t have monsters until their traps activate so if they want to neuter a combo deck like snake eyes then use their traps they’ll have an easier time
I like the design, but I doubt it will be playable. It’s cool how your opponent can send their monsters to make the tax less harsh or potentially beneficial depending on how many they can afford to loose. At least it can bait Barrone.
@@jeffsanders5444 Yeah it is...but its also not really a going first card? What kind of board are you and your opponent making that your opponent has 2 more monsters than you but no negates?
banish your opponent's entire hand.....FACE UP while they control 2 monsters. if anything that is a lot of advantage for decks that want their cards banished. specifically kashtira, despia variants( banishing comedy and that golden tri-brigade bird) shiranui zombie decks(yeah irrelavent for now) and more
There's definitely some potential there. If your opponent has three or monsters, they *have* to answer this or *none* of their monsters are doing anything. Honestly, if not for the " at least 2 more monsters than you" restriction, this card would be kind of busted.
@@cameraredeye3115 Effect immunities are pretty rare. Even rarer on cards that have negates, which is what you want to hit. Destruction immunity is more common admittedly, but your opponent is just going to choose not to send their destruction immune card anyway if its important. There are 2 parts of this card that will virtually never happen: Your opponent chooses to send all their monsters, and your opponent chooses to leave 3+ monsters and doesnt negate the card. The only scenario where this card resolving ends up better than Raigeki is if nearly every card on your opponents field is destruction/effect immune.
@@cameraredeye3115 Not to mention you can't do damage after Dark Ruler No More. With this card, if they send all their monsters, your opponent should be dead. If they have 3+ monsters and they don't negate this, they're probably still dead, unless they have Spells or Traps to save them.
Okay, so your opponent can just sit there and sacrifice nothing, and I lose 4k... Sounds broken to me, ngl. If you commented trying to correct me before seeing this part, get pranked. I actually read the card and understand that it resolves on how many cards remain after the sacrifice(s).
Someone correct me if im wrong, isnt this card like decent? It makes your opponent BANISH THEIR WHOLE HAND, if they keep 2 mobsters, and THEY CANT USE THEIR MONSTERS IF THEY KEEP 3!
@@rishiranger7049 The issue is that it can be negated, so if your opponent has a full board chances are they have a negate, and guess what theyre gonna negate? If they dont have a negate on board, Raigeki is pretty much always superior.
@@baval5 ok ok I get what ur spitting. But 2 counter points: 1. Hey if they have a negate it eats one atleast. 2. This is a raigeki OR a Dark Ruler plus no handtraps. I wud say that's better than just raigeki. BONUS: it gives ur opponent a headache from reading it :)
@@rishiranger7049 1: Raigeki baits the negate too 2: The 2 effect isnt 2+. its only either Dark Ruler or No Handtraps. And your opponent is going to do whichever one is better for them, which is probably gonna be no handtraps. Bonus: You got me on that one.
@@baval5if they keep 3 or more monsters it's literally Dark Ruler AND no handtraps. And the fact that it's a one for one if negated just makes it fair.
I find it funny that this card's basically a -1 + -4k LP because who in their right mind will send at least one to gain 2k LP? Unless there's synergy Im missing? This card is garbage as a game piece but the lore masters will gobble this shit like it's rocky road!
You read it wrong and he literally went over how you read it wrong. Its not the number of monsters they send, its the number of monsters they still have after sending.
@@ren_suzugamori1427 Why did you think this card would literally punish players for sending their own monsters to the GY? In what world would that be a remotely playable card. "hmm, do I want to send 0 monsters and make my opponent lose half his LP, or do I want to send 3+ monsters and negate all my own effects for the turn. Decisions."
it being able to be negated literally does not matter. Going second I trade 1 for 1. Going 1st I set up full board and force my opponent to either board wipe OR they skip their turn
@@baval5 Snake-eyes/snake eye fire king currently often ends on 1 to 2 monsters on board while nearly every other deck in the meta, while it can get to that board, will end up in a place with 3-4 - Voiceless Voice almost always ends on 1-2 monsters - going rogue scareclaw kashtira is basically end on a link 3 and pass So going first there's already a number of decks that can easily use this that are already in the meta with some sort of popularity. Going second, as said before, even these decks end on 2 monsters.
@@baval5 That's still the same question, and also irrelevant entirely. I never mentioned the opponent wouldnt have any negates but that it would "trade 1 for 1" which is to force out a negate in a favorable position. but if you'd like me to elaborate on what each deck listed in my answer ends on typically I can do that, sure. - Snake eye fire king most popular board to end on is either Zealantis/flamberg or swampship/flamberg. Snake eyes and snake eyes fire king boast a board full of interactive and layered effects as opposed to setting up full negates. There are boards with baronne de fleur but this card forces that singular omni negate out of the way and you still have 5 cards left to play with. so. - Voiceless Voice will end on the new skull guardian which only has it's omni negate up when Lo is on the field. but if it has it's omni negate up then once again, you force that out. and have 5 cards left in hand. - I havent mentioned tenpai dragon yet but this could also be good against them as well since you will prevent them from OTKing you. As you can see the meta decks that this card would likely see play against are both good at using it, and can easily fall victim to it.
You still didn't answer. You just switched from a going first situation to a going second one and then answered that instead. When you go first and make your 2 monster board, what 4+ monster board is your opponent making that doesn't have a negate to stop this card. And don't give me "I'm just going 1 for 1 trading the negate" because literally any card can do that and taking your opponents negate on their turn isn't doing anything for you.
lol Evenly is just better. Both can be negated, but at least Evenly has the better reward when it works. Well this card technically can be better on turn 1, but it’s pretty crap even then
So... a card that lets your opponent choose how many it pops, doesn't limit them to sending at least 1. Bad enough as is. But it decided to make it worse by having effects that benefit your opponent if they just, choose to ignore the card, or have one monster they're okay to sack? Literally the only way this card works is if you're battling a literal idiot. Edit: Oh yeah, I see it now... still a really stupid card though. Because as long as your opponent can READ (which, I can't ATM due to "just woke up brain"), this card could just fuck you over instead or just get negated.
That's not how the card works. The effects are dependent on how many cards are left on the field after they send the monsters, not how many are sent. If they have 2 monsters left on the board, they banish their hand face down. If they have no monsters, your life is halved, etc.
You read the card wrong in the way that he literally went over in the video. It counts the number of monsters they have after sending, not the amount they sent. If they ignore the card then best case scenario if they only had 2 monsters they lose their hand, more likely all their effects are negated.
?? Which effect benefits them if they ignore it? If they leave 2 up, they get hand ripped. If they leave three up, they’re under Empen for every monster. The literal only beneficial one for your opponent is the gain 2k one. The halve your LP is the best effect… you’re at 4k but they have no monsters on field.
or if you cant read the card properly XD ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ eff happens based on how many monsters they have left after opp sends. so if they have 3+ monsters and dont send any it negs all effs. if they have 3 and send 1 you banish entire hand till ep. if they have 3 and send 2 ur opps gains 2k. if they have 3 and send 3 your lps get halfed.
Girsu: "Evenly matched?"
"No thanks, I'm good."
Girsu: "Understandable, have a nice day."
It’s a weird Deal or No Deal moment.
*⚠️TRADE OFFER⚠️*
Me, activating Vesper Girsu: "YEET!"
My opponent, leaving no monsters on a field: "NO YEET!"
Your opponent, having all their effects negated: "OH SHYEET!"
But that just means they cleared their own board lmao
@@sp00kimcskel48Doesn't matter if they have GY effects.
@cameraredeye3115 so only worry about zombie and fiend decks?
Me, activating mannadium reframing: NO YEET! FALCON KICK!
That banish hand effect is also just free hand knowledge.
I don’t think the hand knowledge is great when the most dangerous stuff is already on the field
True, but that's only if your opponent lets you have that knowledge, since it's their call which and how many monsters they keep and remove via this effect.
That's true. Your opponent could have hand traps they couldn't use, like nib, bystials added during their End Phase, effect veiler, etc. Cards added during the End Phase, by cards like Frozen Rose, or simply, cards they withheld to not over extend. Like Collins said, they do have to choose you to see it though.@@KeertikaAndFallenTree
Hand knowledge is nice + but not worth running the card for. There are other cards that give hand knowledge like Virus cards, TTT, etc, but have actually good returns too
Backrow heavy decks will make the best use of this since they tend to have just one or no monsters sometimes (so they can use it during opponent's turn)
But Yugioh players can’t read
I refuse to read
I read just fine but then again.. I’m actually good? Not championship good but actually learn
You can read.
@@bloodarcher7841 You just gotta dump money into the best deck and then cheat. Thats how you'll be championship good
Imagining comboing this with forbidden droplet in response to a negate. That'd be downright evil
This card also affected against unaffected monsters lol👻
I could see this being used in Dinomorphia, in a way. They like when your life points are low, so the chance to have your life points halved would be a good thing
I dont think theres a real chance of ever having your LP halved. There is no world where your opponent says "sending my entire board to the GY is worth halving my opponents LP, ill surely get him next turn!"
Well, I guess maybe backrow decks. But why are you activating it against them?
I agree, if they try and negate rexterm then they can chain girsu and their eff fizzles. I like it
@@baval5 depends on if you somehow give them 3 Lava Golems and they don't have enough life points to survive long enough to use them to their advantage. Or some other situation in which they're monsters are useful in anyway, like a Knightmare Iblee
But then why are you activating this card? Just let the 3 lava golems kill them.
@@baval5there is, if your opponent knows they can extend from it. Remember GY is second Hand for many Decks today.
Evenly Matched at home
The card read as: "Pay halve your life point to send all monster the opponent control" or "Your opponent gain 2000 LP and send all monster they control so they only control 1" which is pretty good ngl
It will see play. But I don't think it'll be a staple.
Yeah, Evenly is still a better going Second Boardbreaker while Droplet potentially can't be responded by anything negation.
Omg is that a madafakin world legacy reference???
At least you can give the opponent tokens to force an effect since they can't be sent to the GY because rulings shenanigans
I'm not saying it's a *good* option or remotely consistent, but maybe someone's feeling goofy that day
You can't send tokens as a cost, but you can send them as an effect.
The reason is that tokens sent to the GY never arrive, so the cost isn't paid. But you can still send them and they're gone.
Think of sending a token like burning a dollar. You didn't pay for anything, but the dollar is still gone.
My opponent be like:
“Okay I’ll keep only 2 monsters and I’ll banish my whole hand until the end of this turn, but it’ll be Apollousa with four negations, and a Baronne.”
(His thoughts) “ I could negate it and honestly it’s kinda suck I have to banish my Ash from my hand, but atleast I gotta keep impermanence and other archetype-exclusive counter trap on my field so it’s not that bad.”
Jajaja personally I think this card is culo 🤣
so true 😂
And what's new news is Baronne will be banned 😂
That didn't age well, Baronne is dead and Apollousa might be banned soon too by Konami as they're now banning generic omni negates lol.
@@datruthgt5609 lol! Konami read my comment and decided throw a tantrum!!
And they say only one person can’t make the difference xD
You want to use this card after the second summon.
In that case it’s either bottomless trap hole or you end the opponents turn because they banish their hand.
Basically instantly wins against combo heavy decks.
Could even force people to set their backrow before committing to combo
I'll happily trade this for a baron negate or something similar 😂 and playing it in a go second deck and just setting it to activate it mid combo when they're going for a big link or a big negate is devastating
Correct me if I'm wrong but you can't send tokens to the grave so they can't be removed from the board by the effect meaning if you can set up 3 tokens on your opponents board then if thats the case maybe it can have some use as a tech card
Edited to add: I just checked and i am correct meaning if you flood you opponents board with tokens the card is decent. As such i could see this card actually working in a monarchs deck that uses the herald monster.
"You know what to do, mate. Clear the board." John Consintine
Only now i realised it has Orcuat Girsu and Doll Ibe
John Witherspoon here made me happy 😂
Hot damn this card looks sick. Been waiting for a going second spell that actually lets you OTK afterwards. Lightning Storm and Droplets are nice, but this might be better than both since it's both a quicky and doesn't require resources to use.
I'm just glad he had a clip of John Witherspoon, rest in greatness
It seems quite good if you go first with a big chungus deck (skystriker, arise-heart pass, borrelend pass?)
Most decks will probably control 3 materials at some point of their combo and both the 3+ and 2+ effects ends turns midcombo.
But it's really bad going second, they might not have anything left in hand and if you use it first they can keep the good negates, if you use it after evenly they just send the used negates.
I just thought about it, but what if I give this card to my opponent to trigger some specific effect. Like a bunch of cards that trigger when banished, or to halve my opponent's lp when I can easily recover.
I was so excited that we got an Orcust card... but then it wasn't an Orcust card.
I was almost happy Konami, please never do that again.
We of the Archfiend Brotherhood welcome you.
U.A. Mates sending you our best regards
Wait so if I control no monsters I can use it when my opponents has two monsters or more?
Ojama trio synergy
Don’t the tokens have to be destroyed to deal burn damage though? Meaning your opponent would just send all the tokens away and halve your lp?
@@shadexvii3975 i thought we can't send or banish token?
I Not really know how the interaction gonna works tho
@@cubiix1302 tokens can’t be banished face down, under a case like evenly matched, so if you had a token and got hit by Evenly you’d banish all but the token. However I believe sent to gy doesn’t have that effect on tokens and just sends them
Tokens can't be sent to the graveyard as a cost, because they never actually arrive in the graveyard and doing so is a requirement of being sent to the graveyard. However they can be sent to the graveyard as an effect, because the fact that they never arrive in the graveyard doesn't matter.
Think of sending a token like burning a dollar bill. You can't use it to pay for something, but it's still gone.
And here I thought Runnick couldnt be more obnoxious to fight.
Format dependent side-deck card. Pretty decent.
I would if I could, but I can't. So 👍
I chain Threatening Roar and then send every monster I control to the GY so that this cuts your LP in half. Good luck.
does this card leak a new orcust/world chalice support?
A lot of people are missing the real application, this shit going 1st in decks that don't end on a lot of monsters is kinda broken
This aged well.
Ok so girsu is going iron man on the remaining guardragons with the aid of a cortana/navi galetea
Girsu has laser vision? Now I’ve seen everything
Can you Ojama your way to a good outcome?
(Not just Ojama cards, of course! I Mean chaining effects to manipulate the situation)
No, they can just send the tokens. Tokens can't be sent as a cost because they never arrive and so the cost isn't paid but they can be sent as an effect to get rid of them.
@@baval5 Yeah, I just realized that's a NORMAL Spell...
@@Ramsey276one Even if it wasnt, you cant chain a spell in the middle of another spells resolution. Either you chain the token summoning card to the activation of this one and the tokens are on board already for the opponent to send, or you wait for after the card to resolve and then the tokens do nothing. You cant activate a token summoning card in between them sending their monsters and the card counting the number of monsters remaining.
@@baval5 Yeah I was just brainstorming wildly at the moment
XD
Hey
This actually works for dinomorphia
The half part don't even matter
Asking Yugioh players to read is like telling some people in public to wash or wear deodorant. Someone should make that into a song. Oh wait they did.
It’s a very niche strategy card. I can see it being played, but I don’t think it’ll be a “STAPLE”.
No banlist stream?
This card is actually not bad
Works with terrors of the underroot
As an idiot in the yugioh community I am highly offended
crazy labrynth side deck to add to the set 5 + pass
Why would they run this over any normal trap?
@@mrharvy100 lab doesn’t have monsters until their traps activate so if they want to neuter a combo deck like snake eyes then use their traps they’ll have an easier time
I like the design, but I doubt it will be playable. It’s cool how your opponent can send their monsters to make the tax less harsh or potentially beneficial depending on how many they can afford to loose. At least it can bait Barrone.
Yeah but Raigeki can bait Barrone too and if it goes through its probably gonna do more damage.
@@baval5 raigeki can't be played going first. this a qp
@@jeffsanders5444 Yeah it is...but its also not really a going first card? What kind of board are you and your opponent making that your opponent has 2 more monsters than you but no negates?
This is some gimmicky Evenly Matched-esque card, Konami....... 😅😅😅😅😅😅
Ok but what if we played this in Dinomorphia? 🤔
This card seems interesting
banish your opponent's entire hand.....FACE UP while they control 2 monsters. if anything that is a lot of advantage for decks that want their cards banished. specifically kashtira, despia variants( banishing comedy and that golden tri-brigade bird) shiranui zombie decks(yeah irrelavent for now) and more
It sends to grave, not banish. Yugioh players just don't read i swear.
@@e-tan3911 It banishes the hand on the 2 monster effect, you were saying something about reading?
@@baval5 Touche, I got so used to people not reading the card that I did it myself...
Oh f..K this could be a problem
Getting the feeling nobody's playing this.
There's definitely some potential there. If your opponent has three or monsters, they *have* to answer this or *none* of their monsters are doing anything. Honestly, if not for the " at least 2 more monsters than you" restriction, this card would be kind of busted.
Would it though? Literally the same thing applies to Raigeki. And Dark Ruler does it without allowing them to answer it.
@@baval5Except this affects the player directly, unlike Raigeki. So it gets around any card effect immunities their monsters may have.
@@cameraredeye3115 Effect immunities are pretty rare. Even rarer on cards that have negates, which is what you want to hit. Destruction immunity is more common admittedly, but your opponent is just going to choose not to send their destruction immune card anyway if its important.
There are 2 parts of this card that will virtually never happen: Your opponent chooses to send all their monsters, and your opponent chooses to leave 3+ monsters and doesnt negate the card.
The only scenario where this card resolving ends up better than Raigeki is if nearly every card on your opponents field is destruction/effect immune.
@@cameraredeye3115 Not to mention you can't do damage after Dark Ruler No More. With this card, if they send all their monsters, your opponent should be dead. If they have 3+ monsters and they don't negate this, they're probably still dead, unless they have Spells or Traps to save them.
@@baval5 Furthermore, decks that end on an immune monster.....are usually by themselves so this card is never even live to begin with.
i feel this card will be used a lot by Dinomorphia players
Is this post banlist????
99-100 nice card why not
I had to read it a couple of times... ;/ I dunno if I actually like this card or not.
Okay, so your opponent can just sit there and sacrifice nothing, and I lose 4k... Sounds broken to me, ngl.
If you commented trying to correct me before seeing this part, get pranked. I actually read the card and understand that it resolves on how many cards remain after the sacrifice(s).
100% correct
Cards kinda ass in my opinion maybe I am missing something?
@@greninjaex4700 Nope, you're not missing anything. However, it may be a decent side deck option for Tenpai.
World legacy season 2?
Good thing they just banned 2 of the most meta relevant cards that could negate it
Another card these meta players will complain about and want banned
Wait,Is this actually a board breaker??!?!
It's situational. Your opponent can just keep 2 monsters that have live omni-negates and yeet their own hand until the EP.
@@cameraredeye3115 love caius 🥰, if they keep the omninegates at least you are sure opponent wont have hantraps
@@micha-elhorus5799good thing I get to keep my set imperm or other back role on field and keep my apollusa and Baronne
Were saying@@greninjaex4700?😊
@@cameraredeye3115were saying?😊
Hope Harbinger: No
Someone correct me if im wrong, isnt this card like decent? It makes your opponent BANISH THEIR WHOLE HAND, if they keep 2 mobsters, and THEY CANT USE THEIR MONSTERS IF THEY KEEP 3!
I don't think people are understanding what this says, this card is GOOD
@@rishiranger7049 The issue is that it can be negated, so if your opponent has a full board chances are they have a negate, and guess what theyre gonna negate?
If they dont have a negate on board, Raigeki is pretty much always superior.
@@baval5 ok ok I get what ur spitting. But 2 counter points:
1. Hey if they have a negate it eats one atleast.
2. This is a raigeki OR a Dark Ruler plus no handtraps. I wud say that's better than just raigeki.
BONUS: it gives ur opponent a headache from reading it :)
@@rishiranger7049
1: Raigeki baits the negate too
2: The 2 effect isnt 2+. its only either Dark Ruler or No Handtraps. And your opponent is going to do whichever one is better for them, which is probably gonna be no handtraps.
Bonus: You got me on that one.
@@baval5if they keep 3 or more monsters it's literally Dark Ruler AND no handtraps. And the fact that it's a one for one if negated just makes it fair.
I find it funny that this card's basically a -1 + -4k LP because who in their right mind will send at least one to gain 2k LP? Unless there's synergy Im missing? This card is garbage as a game piece but the lore masters will gobble this shit like it's rocky road!
You read it wrong and he literally went over how you read it wrong.
Its not the number of monsters they send, its the number of monsters they still have after sending.
@@baval5 another reason why I don't play Yugioh anymore. Convoluted af card effects.
@@ren_suzugamori1427 Bro it isn't convoluted, you just lack reading comprehension.
@@ren_suzugamori1427you’re just illiterate
@@ren_suzugamori1427 Why did you think this card would literally punish players for sending their own monsters to the GY? In what world would that be a remotely playable card.
"hmm, do I want to send 0 monsters and make my opponent lose half his LP, or do I want to send 3+ monsters and negate all my own effects for the turn. Decisions."
I’m I stupid? What if your opponent just does t send any monsters??? Than your lap is halved?? This card is ass?
it being able to be negated literally does not matter. Going second I trade 1 for 1. Going 1st I set up full board and force my opponent to either board wipe OR they skip their turn
What board are you and your opponent making that you set up a full board but also they have 2 more monsters than you but no negates.
@@baval5 Snake-eyes/snake eye fire king currently often ends on 1 to 2 monsters on board while nearly every other deck in the meta, while it can get to that board, will end up in a place with 3-4
- Voiceless Voice almost always ends on 1-2 monsters
- going rogue scareclaw kashtira is basically end on a link 3 and pass
So going first there's already a number of decks that can
easily use this that are already in the meta with some sort of popularity.
Going second, as said before, even these decks end on 2 monsters.
@@witheredunit8362 Yes. But its a two part question. What 4 monster board is your opponent building with 0 negates?
@@baval5 That's still the same question, and also irrelevant entirely. I never mentioned the opponent wouldnt have any negates but that it would "trade 1 for 1" which is to force out a negate in a favorable position. but if you'd like me to elaborate on what each deck listed in my answer ends on typically I can do that, sure.
- Snake eye fire king most popular board to end on is either Zealantis/flamberg or swampship/flamberg. Snake eyes and snake eyes fire king boast a board full of interactive and layered effects as opposed to setting up full negates. There are boards with baronne de fleur but this card forces that singular omni negate out of the way and you still have 5 cards left to play with. so.
- Voiceless Voice will end on the new skull guardian which only has it's omni negate up when Lo is on the field. but if it has it's omni negate up then once again, you force that out. and have 5 cards left in hand.
- I havent mentioned tenpai dragon yet but this could also be good against them as well since you will prevent them from OTKing you.
As you can see the meta decks that this card would likely see play against are both good at using it, and can easily fall victim to it.
You still didn't answer. You just switched from a going first situation to a going second one and then answered that instead.
When you go first and make your 2 monster board, what 4+ monster board is your opponent making that doesn't have a negate to stop this card.
And don't give me "I'm just going 1 for 1 trading the negate" because literally any card can do that and taking your opponents negate on their turn isn't doing anything for you.
I dont really see what is the upside of using this card.
lol Evenly is just better. Both can be negated, but at least Evenly has the better reward when it works. Well this card technically can be better on turn 1, but it’s pretty crap even then
Also the fact that the monsters go to the GY is cringe as hell. It should at least be shuffled or banished
So... a card that lets your opponent choose how many it pops, doesn't limit them to sending at least 1. Bad enough as is. But it decided to make it worse by having effects that benefit your opponent if they just, choose to ignore the card, or have one monster they're okay to sack? Literally the only way this card works is if you're battling a literal idiot.
Edit: Oh yeah, I see it now... still a really stupid card though. Because as long as your opponent can READ (which, I can't ATM due to "just woke up brain"), this card could just fuck you over instead or just get negated.
That's not how the card works. The effects are dependent on how many cards are left on the field after they send the monsters, not how many are sent. If they have 2 monsters left on the board, they banish their hand face down. If they have no monsters, your life is halved, etc.
You read the card wrong in the way that he literally went over in the video.
It counts the number of monsters they have after sending, not the amount they sent. If they ignore the card then best case scenario if they only had 2 monsters they lose their hand, more likely all their effects are negated.
?? Which effect benefits them if they ignore it? If they leave 2 up, they get hand ripped. If they leave three up, they’re under Empen for every monster.
The literal only beneficial one for your opponent is the gain 2k one. The halve your LP is the best effect… you’re at 4k but they have no monsters on field.
or if you cant read the card properly XD ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ eff happens based on how many monsters they have left after opp sends. so if they have 3+ monsters and dont send any it negs all effs. if they have 3 and send 1 you banish entire hand till ep. if they have 3 and send 2 ur opps gains 2k. if they have 3 and send 3 your lps get halfed.