A new breakthrough in wave energy!
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 03. 2024
- A new breakthrough in wave energy by CorPower Ocean!
Join the Exclusive Drillage Time Members Club: www.youtube.com/@drillagetime...
Follow our Socials
🔗 beacons.ai/drillagetime
Business Contact: drillagetime@gmail.com
#cleanenergy #greenenergy #energy #wavepower #hydroelectricity #hydropower #cleantech #ocean #renewableenergy - Věda a technologie
We are slowly getting there.
@@Kevlux86how would barnacles ruin this exactly?
I mean, even if that is the case, it seems like that would be a practical problem with plenty solutions.
Type 1 civilization
@@Kevlux86the main mechanism isn't in the water.
Anything worth doing will be figured out by someone, somewhere, sometime.
Look up kinetic energy guy from shark tank! He did not get any deal and sharks completely uninterested. They are holding us back big time.
Were doing everything possible to avoid nuclear, which still maintains as the safest and most efficient power source.
Nuclear is so expensive though
@someone-wh2rb it's a steep short term expense, but it's efficiency if adopted universally would make it a world apart in cost of maintenance, consumption, and material. Fun tidbit, coal plants can't be converted for various reasons. One of those reasons is that the radioactive waste production from coal plants exceeds EPA requirements for nuclear.
@JustinMShaw the largest prospective solar farm in the US, if built, would still only produce 3/4 the amount of energy as the smallest REACTOR in the US. Taking up exponentially more land maintenance cost. A full plant would have multiple reactors.
@JustinMShaw my dude that's bs and you know it. Fusion is still hundreds of years off and a single Powerplant has been shown time and time again to supply multiple counties with large cities
@@someone-wh2rbit’s not expensive actually! I did a research in school an nuclear was actually the cheapest option costing almost 10x less than other energy because nuclear cores last so long
It’s so revolutionary that it clips through the roof in the animations
Got a chuckle out of me, good catch
lmao thanks for pointing this out
nice catch ;)
I'm not seeing it clip anywhere in the animation unless you think that the entire top cylinder is the antenna and not a hollow casing.
@@Whitewing89look at the part where it's shown indoors
1 Nuclear plant > thousands of metal balls
space occupied by 1 nuclear plant < thousands of metal balls
Plant 1 nuclear plant < Plant thousands of metal balls
"Why build renewables when we could build nuclear and become dependent on Russia for the fuel?"
- Useful idiot
@@alphanumeric6582nuclear plants produce ridiculous amounts of electricity but the real problem with them is there expensive to build but if you decide to build thousands of metal ball is kind of ridiculous
@@Kalavani-vz2cz I favor nuclear tbh. My first one is a joke too
The problem with wave and tidal power is the sea is very destructive and will wreck near anything you can afford to build and maintain.
And let’s not forget salt water is corrosive.
He didn't forget it. You didn't see it, is all.
They’re likely built for that. Buoys are themselves pretty immune to damage because they move with the tides.
We already have a lot of cleaner things in the drawer but the lobby is going strong with coal xd
@@Dollapfin thats because buoys are not filled with tiny gears and electrical stuff to generate electricity….
Imagine seeing them in the ocean. Your ship is headed north and all you see is a minefield of floating yellow things that all say C-4 😂
😂 And in cas of war discovering that some of them are real mines 🤣
they will never be in the open ocean. the problem has never been power generation from water... the real issue is getting the power back to land without losing most of it. We can't even design a cable that gets power from Africa deserts back to Europe, no way we are able to transfer power from the middle of the ocean back to land
@@quistador7not to be rude, but most humans live within 100 miles of an ocean and these don't need to be that far out at sea. Which is much shorter than from Africa to Europe like you mentioned.
@quistador7 you're so wrong idek where to start.
First off, there's already high voltage lines going across oceans around the world just look up submarine power cables or under sea high voltage cables.
Secondly these would be placed at the surf drop off where the tides rise and fall the most due to the rise in terrain pushing the waves up higher, meaning close to land not actually in the ocean.
People like you are the reason we dont advance technologically because you use nonsense like what you said that isnt even true to sway people away from reality, then we have a bunch of people thinking the world is flat and we never landed on the moon and there are no undersea cables that we literally use to trade power from north america to china.
😭
I bet all those little gears just LOVE saltwater! :3
MICHEAL DONT LEAVE ME HERE
Salty
@@futureproof.health Of course I'm salty. I flunked out of college, and even I know there has to be a better way to build this thing.
We live in a world where everything is engineered just well enough to sell you another when the first one breaks... just like it was designed.
not only that there is also curious marine life and barnacles
@@jamesgizasson ships, submarines and other things are complex machines that endure saltwater for many years.
Wish all buoys in the world could be this productive
Nice pun
Fun fact, I know someone who works at a tidal power start up just like this, everyone there knows it’s a dead end but they don’t stop since they keep getting new investment.
you need to replace them constantly due to seawater corrosion and since they produce so little power and they have to be pretty far from the coast they lose a substantial chunk of what little power they make to line loss
That is corralate what we think in the indutry
Well it’s just like anything new in industry, takes time and trail and error to become more efficient, look at combustion motors 100 years ago compared to today. With the more work and investment and the right people in the right places they might get something good and efficient one day
@@hilranger_143sure…. But that has an energy density of gasoline to work with. That’s why that can work. You’re looking at something several orders of magnitude less energy dense.
@@hilranger_143 the only ways to make it more efficient are things that would also make every other power production method more efficient (eg. less resistant lines or miraculous new methods of electricity generation) which means all the others would still be superior.
Waves just don’t produce all that much movement all things considered especially in a way that is easy capture and scale. Like for a hydro plant for instance, you want more power? Use a bigger turbine. sure it takes a lot more force to turn but you have the weight of a whole river pushing on it. for this you only have buoyancy which means you have a hard (relatively small) limit to how big of a generator you can have before it requires too much force and the wave simply goes around it rather than pushing it up which even if it’s successful it’s only moving it a few feet every few seconds. So essentially this can only ever move a relatively weak generator relatively slowly which means the only way to scale it would be to add more and more and more potentially thousands to produce as much power as a single nuclear plant which, again need to be serviced extremely regularly and also would be a huge problem for wildlife have to navigate through all them.
In summary wind, hydro, and nuclear are better in every possible way and any money put into this would be much much better used there. Fossil fuel producers love “innovative ideas” like this because it diverts funding from actual viable alternatives which would affect their bottom line.
Or you could invest in a proven form of renewable energy… nuclear 😂
Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Not necessarily
Historically wave power always fail to profit, but someday it will work, after some other technology mature enough to support it.
Doesn't mean we shouldn't experiment with it today, because the journey to space brings us tons of useful invention, maybe this to will be.
Keyword probably, this ideal as an absolute will lead to the stagnant of progression.
@@BearMeOutThis thing is nothing more than a CGI made to squeeze the money from investors.
COAL POWER FOREVER!!!
*I say, lungs full of soot*
I like how they look like sea mines... our enemies will never know if it is or isn't one 😅
Its even conveniently labeled as an explosive!
Why is no one talking about how he said boowee
A good bit of moving parts in this mechanism, I wonder how long they will last before they need to be removed from service.
from what I have been reading they can't even make it to 5 years of use reliably and corrosion will kill them faster than you might expect.
That's called job security for the manufacturer ... capitalism. Love it but hate it all at once. lol
@@athelwulfgalland this is beyond the point of job security and straight into the territory of needlessly dangerous
Loving the 'test' footage. Especially where it clips thru the roof support. Now that's some great tech.
Right.....lol tf
Right the first thing we noticed
I'm so so glad I'm not the only one who noticed that
@DominoEffect2528
Props on the PfP btw
almost fooled me until i watched this
"Hey dude, I heard your power went out, you good?"
"Yeah, I’m good, I threw my beach ball in the pool."
Dude, yer gett'n a ball!
Electric!
Rock
on
Through...
JESUS IS COMING SOON. REPENT TODAY AND TURN AWAY FROM YOUR SINS🙏🙏
@@idehenebenezer802 I’m sorry but what in the eldritch horror’s name made you comment those specific words onto that specific comment?! 😂
Anyone who knows even a tiny bit about physics knows you "Can't turn the energy of a 1 meter wave into the energy from a 3 meter wave."
That's pure propaganda and is a "comparison" with some other wave power harnessing technology.
@@jandepaepe4262 it's a bot that goes around posting that everywhere. People need to start reporting these things - even religious people - because it's exploiting religion.
Maintenance alone from corrosion will make the electricity produced expensive.
Finally, harness the motion of the ocean.
Been doing that since the seventies man 🚬
Powers 1/20th of one house, only costs 50 million!
Imagine driving a tanker or any large ship through one of these minefields.
According to the manufacturer each one of these has a 300KW (~ 100 households) average rating with up to 700KW in ideal conditions. You would also obviously not put these anywhere near ports or shipping routes so no danger for tankers/cargo ships.
They are not a perfect solution or anything but could prove useful in certain scenarios where other power generation would be too costly or even impossible.
You have a better plan to stop Russian subs?
@@MrTP94not to mention that we already have plenty of offshore windparks on the coasts of Europe, and this would make a great addition to them.
No need to dedicate new areas to energy production, no need to waste more space + there is already electricity infrastructure present to use.
@@MrTP94dudes an idiot. Your talking to a wall
Ships operate in shipping lanes and would be able to bypass this, just like you probably don’t drive into a Walmart on your way to work
The marketing videos are always nice.
Especially that part where it clips through the ceiling.
JESUS IS COMING SOON. REPENT TODAY AND TURN AWAY FROM YOUR SINS🙏🙏
Coal farms: BURN😳💥🔥🔥
So much energy around us! This is great!
Every part of THIS, as much free energy as we can get THANKX!!!
Imagine being on a ship and you hear "C4!" Being shouted.
JESUS IS COMING SOON. REPENT TODAY AND TURN AWAY FROM YOUR SINS🙏🙏
@@idehenebenezer802 nah
@@idehenebenezer802No, I don't think I will
@@idehenebenezer802
it has been more than 2000 years, mate.
And plus didn't he died for our sin,
So by that logic I don't have any sin on me.
Boat seeing a 3 meter wave wash over it than seeing a giant yellow mass boutta fall on it.
Good point
It’s anchored to a point to the ground the wave can’t carry it high or move it anywhere
Harnessing the power of nature for clean energy generation so we can have a clean earth when our children have their children. 🌎
This should be on the national news
The problem with wave based hydropower is the complication behind turning linear movement into electricity, considering windmills, hydro dams, coal and CNG power plants, nuclear reactors, and concentrated solar power do the very simple thing of rotating a turbine, most directly heading steam to turn it. It’d be interesting to see how far from the traditional systems this tidal energy system will work, especially since that would put it next to the only other unique power source photovoltaic solar panels
Just need to connect the mechanism show in video to ratchet that is then connected to a flywheel and that to normal generator so that during the moments where mechanism is still (when it finished going up or down) the generator keeps working and voltage is somewhat smooth instead of going from 0 to 9 milion. The only issue would be when its down for maintenance because after, the flywheel would need to be spun manually with an engine till it gets into a proper rpm range.
Why do Americans call wind turbines windmills?
They aren’t milling anything.
@@martinhawes5647Same way you guys sadly call fries chips, and cookies biscuits 😂
@@martinhawes5647 Before electricity was “invented”, windmills were mechanically linked to saws and other comparable industrial applications. They were wind powered mills! Pretty cool stuff!
You literally just need a gear and a toothed rod, or a piston connected to the circumference of a wheel. That’s it. Pretty much one of the most basic mechanical linkages in existence that has been used since well before any of us were alive. Some examples of this type of linkage include jigsaws, trains, sewing machines, and even the engine of your car! They all turn linear movement into rotation or vice versa.
FINALLY, clean energy
As long as we make sure to not put down too much and make sure they stay out of boats way
They FEEL this will work.
"Alright guys, we've made the plains and rivers ugly enough with the turbines, let's do the ocean next"
Yup
so killing the entire gulf of mexico and alaskan coasts with crude oil was beautiful to you?
Conservatives: "we care about the kids"
conservatives when given a chance to make sure their kids have clean air and water at no expense to themselves: "We dont care about them THAT much"
Wind turbines aren’t particularly ugly, not compared with so many other structures we build.
@@rainbowevil no, they're quite the eyesore
@@jakehildebrand1824 no, they're fine.
I think a big problem with it is that everything is jiggling up and down. Having to ensure that nothing breaks or nothing leaks is gonna be a big pain in the ass. It would be simpler if it was a stationary pole that had something move up and down on it, while keeping most of the components out of water, but that would probably generate less energy. This technology doesnt seem very practical to make honestly
Corrosion from the salt water is unsolvable too isn’t it?
@@5GentleGiants there are technologies than minimize corrosion from saltwater too, saltwater corrosion is not a new problem at all
it's the size of a three story building
@@sirsanti8408 would those technologies negate the power generated by this device?
@@5GentleGiants nah, there are simple things like bolting zinc plates on or near exposed metal, coatings, or simply building it out of something that doesn't corrode like a strong plastic
I made a presentation on this idea as a kid,.love it that it's in use now 😊
with this maturing of technology we could see the same machines harnesing both wave as well as tidal!
This is actually brilliant! I actually can’t believe I never thought of something like this
It's been tried before, they've mostly been destroyed quite quickly
Wave energy has comparatively low potential energy production.
It's insanely inefficient. That's why he says even with large scale farms, only hundreds of thousands of homes...which is an insanely small amount for the World.
Because it's a stupid idea.
@@andrewmoirAre you kidding?? Waves have something like 10-20x the power density of wind and solar.
*some guy watching porn*
"This means something"
Mabie the electricity he's using to watch porn is provided by this bouy?
You're probably that porn guy
"it's just so energetic"
I remember reading about this in new scientist back 2006, was in R&D infancy but i been waiting for this.
I remember powerful waves smashing against the rocks as a child, and thought to myself "what a waste of such energy" someone will ofcourse on day invent something like this.
And another way that we could harness the ocean is by using the under water ocean currents with turbines.
Why not just skip the middleman and harness the wind that is creating the current....
The problem with tidal and sea turbine tech is its under salt water and alot of wear and tear.
I dont see this tech being turned into actual farms when more reliable and robust wind and solar is already miles cheaper and tried and tested.
@StonkSlayd water ocean currents are created from air currents and the air is from the earth spinning causing inertia and a coriolis effect of the air at the equater so we're harnessing the earth's rotation.
The water is tidaly locked to the moon we move in and out of that tidal bulge, it's not a current just a higher volume of water that we rotate into and out of.
It would require a lot more maintenance than a wind turbine and it would most likely hurt sea creatures in said currents
And barnacles me boy
iT was some food for thought, and now that it's been digested , iT would not be good for the life that feeds from those underwater currents ..
@halbertgonzalez6775 why not? It's not like the current would stop if turbines are using a fraction of the energy
That wind turbine was actually the coolest part.
Gay
@@GalaxyNewsRadio_Let's kiss
@@Mrow_Yae gay
@@GalaxyNewsRadio_ mwah
MASSIVELY BRILLIANT !! 👌👍
Aye, Captain! Wave power!
Will be a beautiful site to see coastal seas full of these buoys
Between corn fields covered in turbines, soybean fields covered in solar panels, and seacoasts speckled with a million bright yellow dots with warning strobes, the future is looking so environmentally fantastic.
Lol i had this idea when i was 8 years old the first time i used one of those silly shake flashlights 😂
congrats ur a genius 🏗️🦾 (or atleast smarter than many other ppl around here lmao)
🧢
So simple, yet absolutely genius to have thought of it.
Had ideas for this when I was a kid nice to see someone actually making these concepts
Just make sure to put them in an area that doesn’t have a lot of Boat Traffic.
Tests the skill of the captain and/or first mate. 😅
Why? that would increase energy production
Thanks genius I’ll bet nobody would have ever thought of that without you
if you don't see a two story lighted tower sticking out of the water...you shouldn't be piloting a boat
@@jamescuttler8047
It’s gotta be said.
Love the thought of clean energy, hate the thought of putting more things in the ocean.
Then I’m guessing you’re big on nuclear and nitrogen?
This is a lot of unnecessary over engineering to solve a problem that was solved almost 100 years ago now. Nuclear Energy is safe and abundant and yet a new power plant hasn’t been built in years, in fact democrats keep trying to shut them down.
The same goes for electric vs gas engines. If democrats really cared about the environment they would be pursuing nitrogen power, not electrically powered vehicles; which are arguably WORSE for the environment than gas.
It’s all grand standing and the world needs to wake up.
Tesla and many others can do it for free, but that would cause a loss in revenue for the corporate interest that lobby our government. The influencers that cause real change, lobbyists, are profit driven corporate entities that own the politicians. So don’t expect anything positive for the world to come out of green energy.
@@Mike-hp3etstop being blindfolded by parties. The government does not care about you, the politicians care about their pockets and lobbyists fill them to sway their decision. It has never been about parties, that is for the public to keep us divided and believing in this farce.
It's things like this that make me very optimistic for the future
I had an idea similer to this in a science class, never thought it would actually be accomplished
Seems temporary, just another toy in the bin.
Everything is temporary.
All powerplants have limited lifespans.
Tho it would be interesting to see how long all this lasts in saltwater.
@carlpanzram7081 There will be newer inventions to replace it. Sooner than we'll find something to replace power plants.
@@ghostlyelk333 nuclear fusion
yes... fusion.... for the closed minded.... lets just forget all about Teslas work 😅
There's better ways to secure far more power. Too bad society's just too far gone.
Whoever came up with this is one bright mind.
I really like how the little point on top clips through the rafters
This is just a proof of concept it doesnt exist in the real world yet
This could solve all our energy needs!
Let’s just fill the beaches with those! Lol what could go wrong?!? 😂
Nuclear power
Engineers will do literally anything but nuclear and it’s infuriating.
@@cripstopheriii3509That's because nuclear is the ultimate power source. It's better to invest in stuff that kinda works to make a good economy 😂
This guy gets it
but eventually nuclear material will run out just like fossil fuels since it is non-renewable. So... what do we do after all those reserves are depleted?
@@PrabhablyAGoodCZcamsrbro we can re use spent nuclear fuel, and we're transitioning to using thorium, go look up how many years it would take to deplete our thorium.
Edit: There are an estimated 12 million tons of thorium in the crust alone
This technology looks especially promising! The biology of anchors and buoys is well understood. This could be especially valuable for powering oceanic activity such as submerged research and industrial habitats. I can see these being very valuable in remote yet shallow locations where infrastructure is challenging.
Maintenance at those locations would be expensive.
@@JeffBilkins I would use swap-on-schedule maintenance, returning the units back to the manufacturer at some point well before the MTBF (mean time between failures). If the expected life cycle is 60 months and the tested MTBF is 93 months, then maybe schedule swaps at 60 as part of the purchase contract and refuse swaps past ~76 months (with a contract termination stipulation requiring mandatory safety salvage at 76 months). The manufacturer might elect only to lease the equipment in order to force compliance. Such models are not especially novel.
This technology isn't promising at all, and would be especially USELESS in shallow areas, ESPECIALLY in remote locations where infrastructure is challenging.
Furthermore, your idea of swap-on-schedule maintenance is simply not going to work for something like this. No manufacturer in their right mind would sign any sort of contract to replace that thing every few years, unless of course you plan on paying the full price for the new units when replacing the old ones every single time you replace them.
Would be infinitely smarter to go nuclear and invest in SMRs.
@@jakehildebrand1824 I suppose your knowledge and/or experience might surpass mine. I teach engineering and have no specific expertise in power or marine engineering. My post was my initial reaction only. Remote infrastructure is an established hard problem meanwhile nuclear power historically demands safety above almost anything else. Dangerous engineering in economically and politically unstable areas is foolhardy. The story of the Mayapuri Radiological Catastrophe is one great example of how a generally safe Co-60 system became a huge problem.
@@STEAMerBear Thats the beauty of SMRs (Small Modular Reactors).
They can be used practically anywhere, require very little fuel, and are almost completely incapable of a meltdown, and even in a worst case scenario the worst that could happen would be warping of the fuel rods which would require replacement.
Also, yeah cobalt-60 is some nasty stuff.
I'll praise it when it actually works at scale and doesn't come with some unforseen devastating environmental impact, but it is great that people are trying things like this.
Projects like this have been proposed before but never used because they’re. it super efficient
Nice!!! Carnegie started this with their Ceto system but hard to maintain due to sheer size of it. This design is awesome! Now let's get into some reverse osmosis desolation and start producing clean drinking water for coastal cities.
You obviously have no idea how much energy RO requires.
@@fredbugden6935 that's why I said let's get into it, still a long way to go. So go correct someone else
i'm good with using nuclear...but not near the ocean...we should know better
@@imperialpresence1173 totally agree. Everyone got so nervous about it after Chernobyl but there was so much quote "negligence" that went into that plant. To disastrous to be confidential because it deleted the world from a more sustainable energy source.
@@chongo7723 modern age reactors could fit on a rail car and power half the city...
It's really funny how we humans keep searching for clean energy, when Nuclear energy have been there for decades and It's safer and more reliable than any other method
What about the waste?
@@O2H796 I haven't looked into it much, but apparently the waste problem has been largely solved.
If you do any anount of tesearch you will find we sloved that a ling time ago. The only waste created these days in equipment like gloves and suits that has exceeded safe exposure levels. But eveb know wevare find new ways to decontamination that stuff. @O2H796
lol, so a nuclear meltdown is safer than a wind turbine breaking or one of these failing? Sure buddy. How much is big oil paying you to say that?
@@SanityTV_Last_Sane_Man_Aliveto be fair there has only been 2 meltdown events. One was Chernobyl, where they threw safety regulations out the window for some testing, and the other was Fukushima where an earthquake made their pumps fubar. So 2 accidents is pretty small compared to the amount of videos I've seen of wind turbines failing 😂 there is also less hazardous materials they could use like thorium.
I was one of the carpenters who made the foundations for their rigs to test everything before deployment to sea. Very cool stuff
Blimey thats some crazy engineering
Can you eleborate on how its connected to land? I studied a variety of wave power mechanisms and while there's so many functional and creative ideas, getting the power to the mainland and storing it is possibly the largest issue holding us back from this tech (and lack of funding).
While I'm talking about it, another sizable issue with wave power is engineering something with moving parts and electronics to exist at length in the ocean. It's an very harsh environment for even the toughest materials so simplicity in design and ease of mantinence is crucial. I'll give the bouy props in the simplicity department but the mechanics inside and the exterior shell need to be of quality construction and materials.
Bluetooth energy
Long cable
@@JamesKingfrum Nikola Tesla over here.
unicorn farts
this is what govs should be working together to bring not wars or more private organizations that own everything.
Infrastructure that has to withstand storm waves and can only be maintained using large ships must be reliable as _hell_ to be useful. Good that they try to optimize it that way
It doesnt have to stand storms. They could just pull it completely underwater and then its not effected. Also, what do you think storms already do to our infrastructure? Thats just oil company propaganda you're repeating.
That is actually brilliant
the ocean will consume all
It looks good. Not too complex, not confined to specific places. My next questions would be how expensive a unit is, how much maintenance costs, and how much power it generates.
This is gonna blow up
Okay thats awesome!
Who wouldve thought you could use waves for energy
Some smart cookie did and thank goodness to live with him and not against him.
Tf this person going to do if he were against the people, flood the sea with a bunch of inefficient yellow balls?
Worker 1: hey, where did you put the C4?
Worker 2: where you told me to *points at beach*
*BOOM*
Seriously who named it that?
Its been so long since ive seen an actualy worthy content. Thank you for sharing. I learned a new concept. Google concentrated solar power plant. This ideas seem very promissing.
Nice almost better then I could imagine
Please don't stop with helping the Earth & Universe
Energy generation buoys are easily deployable too, just manufacture them on the coast, drop them in the ocean and tow them to their anchor point near whatever city needs power. Pretty ingenious!
Cool. Let me know how it's going when the gears wear out in a few years and they need to be replaced. Or when sea debris clogs the mechanism. Hope the sacrificial anodes don't poison things too much.
every ocean wave/ current generator company has gone bankrupt, this technology has been around for a long long time
Facts doesn't stop the climate terrorists from trying to impose the WEF Reich.
I love learning stuff like this. It's just so interesting how mankind has made generators that maximize the power they generate.
It would be much safer than the bird blenders known as wind turbines. Hopefully, they don't produce noise that mess with whales like turbines do. Wave energy is all well and good to try to harness, but nuclear energy is by far the cleanest, most reliable energy sources currently in existence and should be greatly expanded.
a single oil spill kills thousands of times more birds than all of wind turbines combined... Hows trumps d taste down there?
“The c4 is attached to the ocean floor” we really trying to blow our way to Atlantis right now 💀
How about just under the water w/ a weight that pulls against the sea flooring. 250% more power 🔋 constant pulling both ways at the same time and spread out by fins and less storm damage
I can't even get a home and people out there be evolving the world
I thought about something like this when I was 19 in college 😂🎉🎉❤🎉😂
Together 😀 there's nothing we can't do if we would all have consideration for each other and our children 😢😮🙏💞🌞💞👍
You should have written a paper with emojis and everything.
@@KGisthename I didn't believe that presenting my ideas would go far, only because I don't have the money .. and I already got robbed the oldest idea patent helping company, they stole my idea and iT was on the market 10 years later.
About 7 years after I had thought about it, I found out that the main actor from the WATER WORLD movie had presented the idea. Great minds think alike.😑🙏
This phenomenon is called Multiple Discovery, where the same ideas come to separate people who are not connected. It often happens within the same block of time as well.
I totally believe you, actually. It seems like a natural idea.
@@halbertgonzalez6775so who would you recommend consulting for business ideas?
@@Gabriankle it's time for humanity to make some leaps .. but it's obvious that not everyone can drive the Ferrari without crashing and burning. It's going to be very interesting, how humanity will advance/evolve in the next 100 years. From the mountain top 100 years from now, we'll be able to see where the next 10,000 years will be like. If we have humans on the moon already iT wouldn't surprise me. I'm sure that they don't want just anybody that's primitive or destructive in the slightest way.. you know the saying "there goes the neighborhood"🤷😂😹🤣
The future of wave energy is here
Ever so slowly we will become a class one civilization
That big yellow buoy is clipping thru the ceiling of that building they didn’t even hire the best animators lmaoooo
This is photoshopped. The buoy goes through the beams on the roof.
that footage is a 3d animation proof of concept, you can see the real versions of the design in footage used later in the video
Ok so what's up with the sea floor? Won't it harm sea life with😅 its cables
Anchored to the seabed... Does it work in polluted waters,bwill it be installed over coral reeds etc
@@Michael-cb3uw I bet it gets fucked up by pollution
Now this is a method of hydroelectricity that completely went over my head.
Or just use tech we already have in nuclear and leave the oceans clear and beautiful. It’s clean and super efficient. This energy farming stuff is so dumb it hurts me. No one wants ugly wind, solar and ocean energy farming crap all over the place. This is ludicrous
Unfortunately many in the West are ignorant about nuclear, especially newer reactor designs like the ones that use thorium instead of uranium
Question: how often do you look out into to ocean and say “man look at all these oil rigs messing up the ocean”? The answer is of course never, because you don’t see any of them because they’re way too far away. And these things are even smaller, so they can be even closer to shore without being seen. Your point is meaningless
Well, they could paint them a more appealing color. If it provides energy to third world countries that is more important than your aesthetics.
@@xavierburval4128 beauty is not meaningless
@@mrreemann3739 third world countries burn wood and coal. Only first world countries build stuff like this.
I have a bad feeling about this, wind turbines are killing birds and harming sea life, such with whales, and this seems like it will also harm other sea life.
There's no way these things create more energy in their entire lifetimes than it did to create them.
That's actually pretty badass
Could always just build a nuclear plant but this is also pretty cool I guess
Its just way more expensive
@@2LittleZombie I guess clean and abundant energy isn't that important then
@@plebtile3347 you can have that with wind and solar. And for the Dunkelflaute H2 gas power plants. Nuclear and solar and wind dont go well together, because nuclear power plants are way to slow to react on weaker wind or solar. Gas plants are way more flexible. Look at the french power production in the last days. There was a lot of renewable power in the grid, but the nuclear power plants were not able to react properly and produced power as well. That power went abroad for way lower prices to be economical, but the nuclear power plants didnt have a choice. And this kind of situation is going to be way more often, with more wind and pv plants installed.
@2LittleZombie wind and solar is only ""affordable"" because governments are subsidizing it. It's wattage to income is so low most never pay for the production cost with out subsidies.
@@frogking5573 you seem to be stuck with your facts in the 2010s. PV is the cheapest way of producing power today. In sunny regions costs are around or below 1ct/kWh. That is fucking cheap. And if you look at Hinkley Point C in UK you get 14ct/kWh plus inflation until it will be ready sometimes after 2030
How is this energy fed to the national. grid??...
I'd guess undersea cables, like the fiber optic cables thst connect the world but with energy. Transmits to land based station and boom, energy
Ask Tesla, through WIFI 😅
Cables.
Same way as wind, AC/DC converters (to convert the variable frequency AC current to a stable DC current) -> DC/AC converters (tuned to the frequency of the grid) -> tranformers (to scale up the voltage to match the grid). Then the energy is ready to enter the grid.
@@puleraleaooa8110 hope your joking
Wave power, an obvious choice! ❤
Didn't realize how big they were until we saw the dudes working on it
Harnessing the movement ocean waves to create electricity has always seemed more preferable to me than sticking up wind turbines offshore❗️ ✌️
These actually makes sense and the buoys could replace channel markers to bring the power to shore
We should harness sound wave energy next. Converting ambient noise to renewable energy
I just had a revalation. If motion can be made to electricity, than would that mean ALL motion? Because think about this: Wind, ocean, ground, and steam. Pretty well known. Vibrations of giant vehicles, air plane taking off, helicoper taking off, fan blowing wind, speedboat turning at high speeds, a landslide, a tornado, a hurricane, a lightning strike hitting water making steam, blizzards, IT IS SO MANY MY BRAIN HURTD
What a great idea!!
Well this buoy seems to have had some explosive development.