Hinduism- Is There One God or Multiple Gods II Srimad Jagadguru Mahasannidam & Swami Mukundananda
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 03. 2022
- Srimad Jagadguru Mahasannidam & Swami Mukundananda Answer one of the most important and asked questions on Sanatana Dharma. Is there one God, or many Gods? At the end, Jagadguru answers the question : If there is one, then why do we see multiple forms?
Original Videos:
1)The Significance of Rudra Parayana
• Shaankara Pravachana M...
2)Discriminating between Shiva and Vishnu is a great sin.
• Shaankara Pravachana M...
3) One God, Infinite Forms - How? | By Swami Mukundananda
• Video
आकाशात् पतितं तोयं यथा गच्छति सागरम् |
सर्वदेवनमस्कार: केशवं प्रति गच्छति ||
"As the water that falls down in rain from anywhere in the sky finally reaches the Ocean, the worship of any divine aspect ultimately reaches the Supreme Being"
Just a kind request..I look forward your video bhashyams by the Mahasannidanams..please don't mix and match..one guru bhashyam at a time...even that is very difficult to comprehend..hope u understand.
Dhanyawadam🙏
KOTI KOTI KOTI SHASTANGA PRANAMS AT THE LOTUS FEET OF OUR JAGATGURUS 🙏🏻🌹🙏🏻🌹🙏🏻🌹
God is infinite he is beyond physical boundaries
Since he is infinite
He is the true logic
He is Satya,dharm,all good,all kind,all merciful,all loving,all beyond
And whatever you can think of he is
He is everything and not everything at the same time
All forms of god are worthy of worship by all people
All god's are everything that u can Imagine or think
Humble pranams to the Gurus who grace us with the wonderful pearls of wisdom. 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Om shree gurubhunamah
जय जय श्री गुरुदेव दत्त कोटि-कोटि प्रणाम गुरुदेव
Swami saranu 🙏
Please don't mix the video by such way...
....
ShankaracharyaJi's Level and Any other's level guru can't be matched anyways.... So please be careful
Namaste, Thank You for your comment! Here our goal is just to convey the truth and in no way compare level of anybody. We respect all the gurus and Sampradayas and are always present for the service of Jagadguru. But sure we will be more thoughtful next time, Dhanyawad 🙏
@@UnderstandingDharma Thank You
.....
Jaya Jaya Shankar
Hara Hara Shankar
@@UnderstandingDharma I agree with the commenter, please don't mix Jagadguru Shri Shankaracharya with anyone else, you may present the other guru's views , but do so in another video, no need to mix it with Shree Adi Shankaracharya's video. Namaste
0000: Purnamada Purnamida PurnadPurna Mudachyathe | Purnasya Purnamadaya Purnameva Vashisyathe ||
Inni satyalu Hinduism lo vundaga avi evariki andayi? Enduku maruguna padipoyayi. Prapanchanni save cheyyagaligedi ee Hinduisme. Prajalanu ithara mathala joliki pokunda chesthe thappa Desam bagupadadu. (Meerantha) Mahathumulu krishi chesthe thappa neti prajalaku avagahana radu. Schools lo 1st class nunchi compulsory ronoki two hours ayina eemanchi vishayalanu cheppadam entho manchidi. Ishtam lekapothe chaduvu manesi pommanali. Balavantham ga evarini chadivincheyalemu. Character is most important for every human being. Pranams.
theres only one god...and that is "YOU"... The ‘Tvam’ pada refers to the essential nature of the low cogizant individual soul, the ‘Tat’ pada is about the nature of the Supreme Brahman high cognizant supreme level and the ‘Asi’ pada affirms the oneness of Paramatma and the jivatma after attaining knowledge... and the need for guru(preceptor) is not needed (atleast in this modern times since none of the gurus qualify for that level of Sannyasin and preach.... Sannyasin, a Sanskrit word that describes someone who has reached the life stage of sannyasa, or "renouncement of material possession." (i can see many sanaysin still floating in Ultra luxurious lifestyle prescribed to a gruhasthan..
A sannyasin has turned away from all material possessions and emotional ties. They now live only to perfect their understanding of the spiritual world. This is seen as a state of sacrifice that leads to final liberation from the cycle of death and rebirth, or moksha. For many advanced yogis, becoming a sannyasin is the final stage of yoga practice. They can devote themselves wholly to the pursuit of the spiritual understanding that comes from yoga. SELF is the GURU...... no better teacher than life by itself...LIFE the greatest practical teacher
Sriman Narayan alone is Parbrahman Parmatma
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.
then go to Shankaracharya msth and refute him
at around 1:00 Sringeri acharya makes a comment that one who says Vishnu is the supreme etc is the biggest fool. So Madhvacharya, Ramanujacharya, Caitanya Mahaprabhu etc are all fools, only this person knows the truth, is perfect and correct. He can't call himself a fool.
Vedas say about one entity Brahman having different names and forms. No matter who the person is, Vishnu being different or greater than Shiva is false.
33 million is nonsense statement. Koti in Samskrutam also means types. There are only 33 types of vedic gods. This is repeatedly said by scholars, saints and acharyas. But the ignorant keep spreading Koti as a Crore. Of course one God, etc.
Shankaracharya himself calls the worshippers of other gods as ignorant, he recommended only vishnu supremacy and his worship.
Shankara Acharya?
Can you explain his reintroduction of Smarta tradition? Where 5 principle deities, Ganesha, Durga, Shiva, Vishnu and Surya, are worshiped as equal?
@@TharsyanJaderuby First of all in his Prasthanatrayi Bhashyas Adi Śankaracharya had always eulized Lord Vişnu as the Saguna Brahman and what is written in Sivananda and Soundarya Lahiri goes against Bhashyas and have a look at this. Adi Sankaracharya in his Bhashya of
his conclusions made in the Prasthanatrayi
Bhagawat Gita 6.47: रुद्र आदित्य आदि देवोंके ध्यानमें लगे हुए समस्त योगियोंसे भी जो योगी श्रद्धायुक्त हुआ मुझ वासुदेवमें अच्छी प्रकार स्थित किये हुए अन्तःकरणसे मुझे ही भजता है उसे मैं युक्ततम अर्थात् अतिशय श्रेष्ठ योगी मानता हूँ।
And today the follower's of shankaracharya have are corrupt and have concocted this stupid system of worshiping 5 deities Assuming them as equal.
yas tu nārāyaṇaṁ devaṁ brahma-rudrādi-daivataiḥ samatvenaiva vīkṣeta sa pāṣaṇḍī bhaved dhruvam
“A person who considers demigods like Brahmā and Śiva to be on an
equal level with Nārāyaṇa is to be considered an offender, or pāṣaṇḍī.”
- padma purāna svarga khanda 50.22 (also in uttara khanda 235.6)
@@Sunny-lc4vk
"ékaṃ sád víprā bahudhâ vadanty"
- To what is One, sages call it by many names.
Rigveda 1.164.46
And if you're getting you're sources on Padma Purana from ISKCON then there's a problem, because Brahma and Shiva are NOT demigods.
@@TharsyanJaderuby kindly do not pull out verses from out of context and twisting its meaning to benefit your favorite position. Ekam Sad vipra Bahuda vadanti.. Do you know the proper meaning of this verse is? You have to take into consideration shruti vAkyas like "nArAyaNAd rudro jAyate", "bhIShAsmAd vAtaH pavate", "eSha AtmA apahatapApmA", "angAni anya devatAH", "yo devAnAm nAmadhA eka eva", etc. to arrive at a meaning that is consistent with the entire Veda. Certainly, I presume you are not smarter than Shankara, Ramanuja, and Madhva who proclaim unanimously that the all the Vedas proclaim Sriman Narayana only, and that Rudra (Siva) and others are his vibhUtis (possessions under his control).
And padma purana reference I provided is completely correct, atleast we can call brahma as demigod because he is a jiva, isn't it?
I guess you are one of those neo-Hindus who are self-proclaimed custodians of 'Sanatana Religion'. Neo-interpretations such as these have nurtured a generation of people who just take pride in their 'Hindu identity', but have no real passion for the shAstras and lack bhakti. This has made them tame, helping the missionaries to convert them easily. Why is this so? Becuase you say that all gods are one and they are forms of paramAtmA... it then becomes easy for an abrahamic person to say that this paramAtmA is none but the holy spirit. Taking the position that 'worshiping a specific form', 'idolatry' is condemnable is easy if you say that none of the deities represent paramAtmA entirely.
@@Sunny-lc4vk correct to the 100th percent
There is no difference between Vishnu and Shiva that is true but according to Ramanujacharya Shiva is devotee and lord Vishnu is god. Vishnu and Shiva are one because Shiva came from Vishnu but Shiva is devotee and Vishnu is god in this way they are different. God cannot be shapeless. If god is shapeless how we will focus on his roop , qualities. If I say God is beautiful how is it possible that God is shapeless. Krishna is handsome how is it possible that krishna is shapeless.
That is the karunya of God. Eventhough he is infinite limitless and has no shape or form, he accepts and takes forms with various qualities which is perceptible to the mind of the Sadhaka. The true infinite form of the Lord is incomprehensible to the level of a human brain, and hence such questions arise. To a realized jnaani, he dwells in the infinite Brahman, for him neither the form nor the qualities of the infinite Brahman exist, it is only the true nature of Brahman that exists
@@AB-yp7nc nirguna means that god does not have any quality that is criticizable and shapeless does not means that he himself is shapeless but the light that emit from God is shapeless but god himself is not shapeless
@@AB-yp7nc brother if god will be shapeless then there will be no difference between us and Muslims and Christian 🤠
@@AB-yp7nc bhai aapki philosophy bilkul galat hai . Isiliye aap bhagwan se kabhi prem nhi kar paoge kyuki nirakar Brahm se koi kya pyar kargea , arrey prem toh ram ji k roop, govind ki leelao se kiya jata hai .
@@AB-yp7nc prahlad Maharaj dhruv Maharaj aur narad Muni ne kabhi nirakar consider nhi kiya bhagwan ko.. Brahm Jyoti se kya pyar karoge bhai 🙂
in Abrahamic religion there is one God, in hinduism therefore is only God. you call thousand God or trillion gods
God is only one, even shankaracharya said the same.
"ékaṃ sád víprā bahudhâ vadanty"
To what is One, sages call it by many names.
@@TharsyanJaderuby krishna is one, he is called by various names.
@@Sunny-lc4vk Be it Krishna, Vishnu, Shiva, Durga, etc.... All are different aspects, attributes, manifestations, names and forms of the same source of creation, and we call it *Para Brahman* .
@@TharsyanJaderuby krishna/vishnu are not equal to durga devi, shiva etc.
yas tu nārāyaṇaṁ devaṁ brahma-rudrādi-daivataiḥ samatvenaiva vīkṣeta sa pāṣaṇḍī bhaved dhruvam
“A person who considers demigods like Brahmā and Śiva to be on an
equal level with Nārāyaṇa is to be considered an offender, or pāṣaṇḍī.”
- padma purāna svarga khanda 50.22 (also in uttara khanda 235.6)
And krishna is not part of brahman, the brahman is the part of Lord krishna.
kindly do not pull out verses from out of context and twisting its meaning to benefit your favorite position. Ekam Sad vipra Bahuda vadanti.. Do you know the proper meaning of this verse is? You have to take into consideration shruti vAkyas like "nArAyaNAd rudro jAyate", "bhIShAsmAd vAtaH pavate", "eSha AtmA apahatapApmA", "angAni anya devatAH", "yo devAnAm nAmadhA eka eva", etc. to arrive at a meaning that is consistent with the entire Veda. Certainly, I presume you are not smarter than Shankara, Ramanuja, and Madhva who proclaim unanimously that the all the Vedas proclaim Sriman Narayana only, and that Rudra (Siva) and others are his vibhUtis (possessions under his control).
THE GREATEST FOOLS DISCRIMINATE ,
JAY SHANKAR NARAYANA
o jahilo,Rab sirf ek he uski koi forms ni hen,wo sab se buland he aur wo pak he us shirk se jo zalim log krtay hen.
Agaye Murkh buddhi vale 😂
Madrasachap bhag suar murkh ake comment section ganda kar raha ha
Sara Hindu ko Iya video dakna caiha Aka kul jaigi Nahi tho Iya pandit log baukuf banata rangga
czcams.com/video/cv5hB5Ku4sk/video.html
Bulbulla gulgulla lakh lakh terrorbilla 🤧💀
Yeh link ke video mein jo arguments aur references diye hai uske koi sar ya pair nai hai. Bas randomly dikhane ke liye, vedon se chun chun ke wohi sentences liye hai jinka literal translation daalkar video mein bataya jaa raha hai. Kis sandarbh mein likha hai, uska commentaries mein kya arth bataya hai, kuch bhi nai batayenge. The video itself was an epitome of directionless thinking. I genuinely expected ki ek basic logical basis ke saath batayenge, par inlog se itna bhi expect karna paap hai😂.... Compare that to the detailed and exhaustive explanation given by pujyapad shankarachacharya. Sri bharati teerth maha swami ko jitne languages aate hai utne tumare video wale ne life mein kabhi sune nai honge. We'll anyday take such a person as a reliable source of knowledge than your agenda driven directionless youtube link🧘
Bhaag mlecha idhar se ake comment section ko ganda kar diya chi