Atemi Aikido is 90% atemi
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- Talking about what "Aikido is 90% atemi" could possibly mean.
If you'd like to know who this Christopher Hein guy is:
www.aikidostude...
You can also find us on:
Facebook: / aikidofresno
Instagram: www.instagram....
Our Podcast: / user-697207805
Christopher Hein's Patreon: www.patreon.co... - Sport
Gozo Shioda said something similar in his book aikido shugyo. Though he was more focused on striking vital points in self defence
My interpretation of atemi in Aikido is that the primary purpose is preventing the opponent from gaining control of the center line. You move off the attacker's line but then you need to take control of the new line before the opponent can. So you put something in that empty space to occupy the opponent's attention. Whether the atemi hits or is blocked is secondary to controlling the line.
atemi is preemptive strike or strike before actual technique. we cant taisabaki forever from someone who wants to touch or hurt us.
In 1925, that is exactly what O-Sensei said that he did- and then realized the art of Aikido.
Yes, that's the best part of aikido. And always assuming that one hand grab is definitely a precursor to a stab from another hand
O sensei said : Aikido is irime and atemi....point
Interesting, or it could also mean that locks are much easier applied when opponent is stunned, from my experience of ninjutsu and okinawan bunkai karate, I can see hidden strike opportunities in every aikido lock technique. But I guess this is what people more commonly refer to as aikijitsu.
@@zachparade2791 yeah I'm not discarding his theories nor others as well until I'm firmly grounded in the style of aikido. Long way to go
@@zachparade2791 czcams.com/video/pLqovX4G8Z0/video.html
Looking at this awesome aikido it would explain 90% is atemi, and he got one arm and is twice his age
@@zachparade2791 bro no martial art is designed for combat sport, sumo wrestling arguably and the irony is that sumo wrestling is the root of aikido
@@zachb6342 yeah but all those arts were not originated as a sport, but yes they set up rules and competed in it, but the those arts were all originally self defense and I hope to see aikido have more randori so the practitioners can excel in their applications
@@zachparade2791 Definitely not suitable for sport which is competition, or combat, unless it was modified so that I could help you score more points than me. "Real Budo is the protection of all beings with a spirit of reconciliation. That means allowing the completion of everyone's mission."
Noar Nono is correct. Entering is key. Atemiplays several roles. It let's you know you have entered . If you can't hit your opponent you probably aren't in a good position. It is used for distraction and balance breaking ,among other things, where a technique can be done. Many of the techniques are to create openings for strikes . The other may hold true too, people forget that ukemi is 1/2 the training. They should be learning how to attack and escape not just mindless be there for nage to throw. The 90% though is foremost about the person applying techniques,, watch Saito and Shioda. Ukes in my opinion , when experienced should try and "hit", touch nage through out the techniques. Shows risk points in nages position, plus creates realistic energy so you learn to use ukes energy. Appreciate your videos.
It would be interesting to watch a video on how an Aikidoka would evade someone attempting a low-level, single-leg take down. I mention it because that is one of the common take downs seen in MMA.
That would be a good video...
Step back or to opposite side, l
one of the most interesting video about fighting / self defence principles i have seen....
Aikido is seen too much from the Tori's perspective.
I say all martial art are mix Martial Arts
Makes sense !
Aikido is strike too, sorry....
With the arms, aikido teachs strike the opponent. Why it will be deferent without weapon ?
If you were exceptionally good it might not make a difference- but for most of us, having a weapon makes a BIG difference!
@@ChuShinTani I see your point of view, and that is the fact that many dojos do not teach enough weapons and strikes because yes strikes are the basis of aikido. Taught aikido forgets this fact and that will change the game.
That all true though also use some to hit someone to help a technique work but maybe then aikido didn’t work at the same time.
Hi sensei, can you make a video about dealing with an attacker in a tight space??
If you are in a tight space- use Jujutsu.
@@ChuShinTani thanks for the reply sensei, but i was thinking maybe you can make a video on applying an aikido technique in a clinch perhaps? I think it would be very awesome sensei, maybe theres a way to incorporate joint locks from a clinch or iriminage or something :D
@@elangz9201 there are ways to apply the techniques- but it's what you find in Jujutsu. Aikido and Jujutsu use the same techniques with different emphasis- aikido to escape, Jujutsu to dominate.
Actually the true master that taught me said it was spiritual in fact there is no strikes at all the only reason I'm showing you a few strikes is for example the founder did not use strikes you would use empty space
Strikes aikido
🤣🤣🤣