Chess Tumblr Post
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- #shorts #tumblr #memes
---
Join my Membership to support me and get access to special perks:
/ @eclipsedvo
TikTok: / eclipsedvo
Twitch: / eclipsedvo
Twitter: / eclipsedvo
Discord: / discord
---
I don't own anything except my voice.
the King may, once a match, jump over another one of your pieces, moving two squares at once.
Only if the other piece is a rook, however, and only if neither piece has moved yet.
@@ragnkja did you mean pawn because even when you castle both the rook and the king move so it would be impossible for a king and a rook to meet without either moving.
@@zekiah2
I meant rook, because neither the king nor the rook in question is allowed to have moved before if you’re going to castle.
@@ragnkja but after casting both have moved, so the rule is completely useless
@@zekiah2
It’s not, because it prevents you from castling multiple times, or castling after moving one of the pieces from its starting square and back again.
A and H being able to capture foward is absolutely crazy, like revolutionary rule change
YEAH THAT'S A MASSIVE CHANGE. THAT'S BIGGER THAN CASTLING.
@@zackbuildit88 eh saying its bigger than castling is a little weird because its big because of castling to begin with
@@boop7441 it'd be big regardless, but you're right. i could probably have chosen a better comparative to use than one involving castling
Attacking chess would be terrifying
But it also kinda works because they usually only have one diagonal they can attack
"The knight is now known as the horsey, and if its ever refered to as the knight the opponent is given a free turn"
Go become a chess master
@@HiramP20 Yoooo that's crazy, no Zugzwang
"Every time you sacrifice a rook, you must go: 'and then I sacrifice, THE ROOOOOK!' and if you do not do this within ten seconds of the rook being sacrificed, two of your turns are skipped, and you have to give up your queen if it is alive."
Kings can, once per game, move like a knight.
That’s a really interesting rule. I expect players would continue to move as usual, but the existence of the rule would make forcing your opponent into checkmate more challenging.
That's like the Chinese variant with the "Flying General" move.
@@djedg10yeah, itd more or less be a "get out of jail free" card, though one that oculd potentially put you in a but if a dangerous position, assuming of course, the opponent hasn't somehow blocked ALL possible escape routes
But how does the knight move?
@@Sglagoomio L shape? You’ve never played chess?
To make things not go crazy when a new champion is crowned, they replace the rule the previous person made.
Well, it says the rule aplies only during the person that made it stays champion. So, if someone wants to change that caviat, they have to defeat the champion that made it.
@@kabalanstef9636 ah ok I must've missed that part.
No. Keep all of them. Let’s make this funny.
@@bachmanboi2016 It would end up being the most unruly game ever 🤣
theres a separate devision where all the rule changes apply tho
"small en passant level change" dont tell him how much that changed
@@shanecoyle3676 yeah, he should Google en passant
This would actually be a pretty good way to stop chess from being mathematically solved
This sounds like you know someone who’s really close to solving chess and you really don’t want them to do that
@@veniankween130 no, but the bots have solved it and it's only a matter of time until every game is the same if nothing changes
@@veniankween130 as they should
@@shoelacedobby3819 its not solved yet pretty sure
@@shoelacedobby3819 it's not truly solved yet as all the possible moves are still a very big number for modern computers to solve for. But yeah
Finally, Chess 17 (cause we have too many Chess 2s)
Chess: the prequal
What about:
_Chess: 2: 2_
New rule for chess 17: once per game if the room is either 1 or 4 spaces away from the king (diagonals count as 2 spaces not 1) and the king is in check the rook can push the king out of check because Valentine's day is the 14th and the rook is in love with the king
I love the thought that if there's like, a chess magazine, with a monthly subscription, whenever "the champions rule" is updated, subscribers to this theoretical international chess association magazine would receive a new piece designed for it:
The Soldier.
Carries all mechanics of the pawn, but can capture forwards as well as diagonally.
Replaces the pawns of the A and H files
Y'know what? Let's make more!
The archer:
Can capture without moving. But must choose whether to capture or move. Cannot do both in one turn.
Captures like a knight.
Moves like the king.
Replaces the knight.
From 'Shader's Chess'--where the board is layed out on diagonals with the kings in opposite corners. (Use of 2x2 boards is suggested to fit all pieces, especially with the optional extra row of pawns.):
'Assassin': Moves like the Queen, including through any (single) piece in the way, without capturing. Can't be captured immediately after moving. Moves like the King when capturing. (In other words, she can only capture if the other piece is one square away and she hasn't moved that turn.) Can checkmate the King by herself if moved next to the King and the King can't immediately move away.
'Wizard': Moves like the King. Only ranged piece. 'Fires' in all eight directions instead of moving. (Can't fire and move on same turn.) Can't capture other pieces. 'Kills' any hit piece within two squares. 'Stuns' any hit piece beyond that range. ('Stunned' piece is tipped over, can't move for the opponent's next turn, and is stood back up at the end of the opponent's next turn).
These are *VERY* different pieces with a lot of (carefully limited) power. Queen and King pieces with tape/elastic band/etc. around them can be used to represent them.
@@KeithOlson how would kill be different from capture
@@orionar2461 "how would kill be different from capture"
Capturing is when the friendly piece moves to and replaces the enemy piece, while killing is removing the enemy piece while the friendly piece stays in place.
@@KeithOlson that's only a distinction because ranged pieces dont yet exist. The wizard just captures at range
If the queen manages a checkmate then the winner must kiss the opponent to signify the move. This is continuous
Chess gerrymandering
As my new rule: I am the only person who can be elected chess champion.
@@zigzag321go All the pawns gather round with their hands behind their backs..
@@raspberryjam et tu, E pawn?
@@raspberryjamthought this was going in a fr*nch direction at first. Good
Flexible meta would be pretty interesting
If you manage to crown a new queen, you may do a celebratory dance in the middle of the match with no penalty. And you get a candy bar of your choice
Every time a piece is captured, both players must mimicry someone attacking and someone dying depending who's piece is being captured
The king can promote like a pawn, and once it does, the opponent can only win by capturing all of your pieces
:O like the king escaped
a lot more games would just end in draws
It's always funny watching the color leave a mid to high rank chess player when some low ELO starts with an unusual opening, rendering all of their memorization worthless.
@@songarakram me. I am that guy with that opening and it never stops...
I would always play fools mate, and just keep running with it. Everyone expects you to be an idiot if you play it, but the jokes on them, they're only half right!
You don't just memorize positions. You learn tactics. Even the weirdest opening shouldn't beat you if you're like 1000+ elo above your opponent
I once played against a anonymous player (he wasnt very good but he knew his shit, was trapping me left and right, trying to force me into bad trades) And i dont play much chess so I am not good at it. But basically he tried to pressure my Queen with his Queen, expecting me to move my Queen to avoid her being taken.
He of course had his Queen covered, but because I wanted to see what would happen, I just took his Queen and lost mine.
I dont know what really happened, but he stopped playing and I won cause he disconnected after 10 minutes.
I like to think that its because he just couldnt comprehend me just willingly trading my Queen.
@@kattkatt6961 100-200 elo difference is more than enough, if the players are not 800s... In that case, who knows😅
Tactical and positional knowledge, plus experience in the middlegame and endgame, are hugely different across rating cathegories.
“As my second decree, Kings are now allowed to move into spaces that would have put themselves in check, LET THE KINGS TOUCH”
Chess patch notes would be insane
there are changes within chess.
more of the technical side but still.
you should be allowed to put yourself in check and deal with the consequences afterwards
If you put yourself in check you immediately lose the next turn when they capture your king
Unless that's exactly what you wanted
Huh that sounds interesting but some limitations would need to be in place so things don’t go crazy
@@martinpat94 No, No Limitations so we can have Dark Reigns
@@c_p_t_cold7655 THE NEW KING HAS BANNED BISHOPS! WE MUST REBEL!
The rule would probably be overseen by experts to make sure they don't disrupt the normal rules. The implication also seems to imply they need to be very particular situations. An example that comes to mind is of course, if a king manages to capture 3 piece when it is the only piece remaining on the board, you automatically stalemate. Super situational and easy to avoid, but impactful.
The only limitation is that it has to apply to all players equally, no favoritism bulls#!t
no if one wishes to dethrone a tyrant they must become stronger then the tyrant
And then, in small tournaments maybe you can choose which version of chess you will be playing or better yet, which versions will not be added to the random decider for your game like in Pokemon tournaments.
@@baronvonbork2856 nah. Since the champion is crowned king, his word has to be law. So everyone should have to follow those rules strictly
Honestly this seems like a fun house rule. Whoever looses gets to make a simple change to a peice or tile, until yall decide that its too hectic and start over the only likitation is you cant change peices until the 4th round and cant change pawns until the 8th
Once per game, you can sacrifice three pawns to gain back any piece of your choosing except the king and queen
And if a rule ends up universally liked and maintained for 3 reigns it is added as a permanent rule.
i here by declare a pawn now promotes to a queen and becomes uncaptureable for 1 turn when preforming en passont
From now on, all knights at a corner of the board can, in addition to their normal moves, travel to the other corner
Fried liver gonna go nuts
the queen can move as a knight but cannot check or take as a knight.
That sounds fun.
Once per game, a bishop may move one space horizontally. It cannot capture with that move.
Now, the king is able to move in any way that any other piece moves, but only if you have that piece, and you have to sacrifice that piece to make the move.
Flexible chess meta was not something i expected on my fyp today
Black can now move first. However, only between the times of 6 and 8pm on Tuesdays.
En passant can be applied across the entire board/ and to capture any piece except the king.
Or pick between them. (Before and After the /)
That would be insanely fun, screws over all those people who memorize every move possible and know the exact counter to.
Once per match, you may sacrifice two pieces (must be a combination of a pawn and another piece like a knight or rook) for a third of a different kind.
Say you have 2 rooks, 1 bishop and a knight, you could sacrifice one of your pawns and a rook for another bishop in the same spot as the original piece (NOT THE PAWN)
And upon elimination that special piece you replaced gains your opponent that extra pawn you sacrificed in an pawnless file at its original starting position.
During the kings reign, everyone shall refer to the king piece with their name instead
New pieces shall be added! Archer’s: They attack like rooks but move like pawns, and shields: they can move one tile forwards backwards or to the sides and face the direction they moved and the side they face they can’t be captured from.
And I guess you get these pieces either through promotion or you can replace any of your knights, rooks, or bishops, with them before the game begins
That actually would really add to some interesting strategies.
agreed.
From 'Shader's Chess'--where the board is layed out on diagonals with the kings in opposite corners. (Use of 2x2 boards is suggested to fit all pieces, especially with the optional extra row of pawns.):
'Assassin': Moves like the Queen, including through any (single) piece in the way, without capturing. Can't be captured immediately after moving. Moves like the King when capturing. (In other words, she can only capture if the other piece is one square away and she hasn't moved that turn.) Can checkmate the King by herself if moved next to the King and the King can't immediately move away.
'Wizard': Moves like the King. Only ranged piece. 'Fires' in all eight directions instead of moving. (Can't fire and move on same turn.) Can't capture other pieces. 'Kills' any hit piece within two squares. 'Stuns' any hit piece beyond that range. ('Stunned' piece is tipped over, can't move for the opponent's next turn, and is stood back up at the end of the opponent's next turn).
These are *VERY* different pieces with a lot of (carefully limited) power. Queen and King pieces with tape/elastic band/etc. around them can be used to represent them.
"En passant levwl rule change"
Names a rule that would impact the game in an unforseen way, absolutely seitching the way the game itself is played
Ideas:
1. You can only promote to a Queen when you dont have a Queen on board.
2. The king can castle even when in check
3. The king is allowed to capture his own pawns to move out of check
4. Black can decide to switch his Kings and Queens position before the game starts
5. Capturing your bishop with a rook or rook with a bishop promotes the piece to a Queen
I think you're confusing the justice rule maker in courts with actual justice 😂
This could make chess interesting
I do think a few new rules to chess would be most welcome to spice up the game somewhat. Like, being able to bargain with the opponent for prisoners. If you come to an agreement, each of you returns one of your captured pieces (That you both agreed on) to their respective starting squares. They'd probably end up usually only trading knights, but I can see a pawn being bargained for more often than not, because you would be able to place a new pawn piece in any column that does not currently have one of your pawns.
Another interesting rule that I saw is capture chess, where if you capture a piece, the piece you used 'retains' the captured piece's information, and may use it up for a one-time move. Like if a pawn captures a knight, it then gains the one-time ability to move as a knight.
You know, anything to add further dimensions to chess, and make it less about memorizing board states and more about actual strategy.
Crowning someone King of Chess than letting them make a big move is very much not chess.
By rights, the champ's significant other gets to make whatever happen, informed or not
King may pull a piece adjacent to them and rotate them to any of the 8 squares surrounding the king provided there are no pieces blocking the rotation. Queens act as a pivot point for Rooks and Bishops. If the Rook is going forward and passes the Queen by touching its adjacent tiles, it may turn a 90 degree and continue, and Bishops can ricochet off the Queen.
Here's one, players can capture their own pieces( except their king)
Players should be able to capture their own king, but if they do, they immediately lose.
My rule would be that during their turn to move, players would be given the option to either make a move or to pass and not make a move. This would be limited of course, it would not be permitted for there to be, under any circumstances, two back-to-back passes, i.e. a player could not pass if an opponent has just passed during the prior turn, and it would not be permitted that any player pass for two consecutive turns.
I really like the idea of having something like this on the side. Especially since there's the worry about cheating with an AI, this can make things just unpredictable enough to slow it down. Maybe add the option to remove a previous ruler's rule instead of adding your own, but local rules can obviously just use whatever.
Every 10 turns, if the king and queen are next to each other, you can spawn a pawn at e7, killing any piece currently there. This opportunity goes away once either side chooses to do so. The pawn will also die in 5 turns due to disease. Any pieces that were next to the pawn will also get a 5-turn countdown before dying.
Fide has a chance to do the funniest shit rn
Yo that will actually be really freaking cool like have to core rules and the champion can change one or add one for his duration. That would probably make chess a little more popular and more engaging
This is actually a very interesting concept, we start a new organisation, we do 2 tournaments a year, the winner of each tournament can make a rule change after discussing it with the council, they get to announce the rule at the opening of the next tournament (which they can’t be a real player in because obviously they have advantage in their strategy, but they still get a ceremonial match against the new winner.).
Let’s see where this ends in a few years.
Chess 1.5 sounds incredible, gonna add that to the group games list
Fair that its a and h files
Still sounds kinda op. Maybe restrict to capturing pieces in the 3rd and 4th ranks, kinda like en passant
Still sounds kinda op. Maybe restrict to capturing pieces in the 3rd and 4th ranks, kinda like en passant
Still sounds kinda op. Maybe restrict to capturing pieces in the 3rd and 4th ranks, kinda like en passant
Still sounds kinda op. Maybe restrict to capturing pieces in the 3rd and 4th ranks, kinda like en pissant
Bishops can, once every other turn (not counting the opponents turn) and only 3 times per game, swap places with an opponent's bishop that is on the same color.
The knight can stop halfway if the board's edge doesnt let it finish its jump. So just a diagonal 1 tile movement
If you play your king to the same square as one of your knights, the knight can carry the king to safety. But the knight cannot jump over pieces while carrying the king
If a bishop captures a pawn that would reach the other side of the board with its next move you can choose to replace it to that square with one of your own captured pawns, it does not get promoted and can move as a pawn in the other direction. This is called a conversion.
Rules like this would be crazy. Being a chess fan, this would be too interesting to miss because any small change can have massive effects on the game.
There’d better be a season two because this was an incredible journey
This needs to be like a specific league or something. With specific records so people can play their favorite edition outside of official matches
The knight may whisk away the king or queen piece but there must be room for it in the exact same position they started in.
a game that has a rule change every time someone wins? cool
Pawns now can only promote to knights on the 8th rank, then bishops on the first, rooks on the 8th again, queens on the 1st once more, then upon moving that queen to the 8th rank, it becomes a king.
"Kings can move any number of spaces, in any direction, including straight up"
"Pawns can only capture forwards on the A and H files if the opposing pawn has less adjacent opponent pieces than you have adjacent pieces."
"Once per game, each player may move one of their pawns backwards. When they do this, their opponent can en passant if they are in position."
I love theory crafting :D
If you don't yell uno when the opponent has only one piece left, the opponent gets to revive 3 pieces of their choosing
Capturing a queen allows you to make a pawn at any square on your half of the board
If you have 3 pawns in a row, you can promote all 3 pawns into a single knight or bishop.
Alternatively, the king and queen may swap positions if neither have moved yet, like a different kind of castle, although this one can work while in check.
this guy is a GENIUS
This would actually be great for the chess community
Fun fact: this is how international sailboat racing works. Whoever wins the America's Cup race gets to set the rules for the next competition, so it's gone from really nice 19th century yachts to big sleak J Boats in the 20s and 30s to carbon fiber wingsail carrying catamarans that do 60mph on hydrofoils.
When Checked, the King may swap places with an allied piece that's within 1 square of the King's position.
If you preform en passant, you instantly win, not only the game, but also the entire tournament. You also gain 1000 elo.
Any piece that ends its turn directly behind the knight becomes captured because you spooked the horse and it bucked you. But when you move the knight, you have to choose which direction the night is facing.
Honestly, this would get WAY more people into chess than any grandmaster play or video could.
Thousands of people from around the globe playing to put their own twist
each royal decree will replace the former royal decree, this system is to allow this great game to evolve and thus never stagnate.
Pawns can now promote to a king, and the opponent must capture all but one of the kings and then checkmate the last king to win. As long as you have at least two kings, you can ignore check or checkmate.
If two Knights are directly across from each other, you may initiate a duel. Both of you roll d20s. Whoever wins gets to keep their Knight.
It's probably just gonna turn into anarchy chess and I love it
My first decree would be creating a board state where your opponent has no legal moves is a win, not a draw
my rule would be "if two of your pieces are on adjacent squares, the pieces could swap places as long as the move is legal for both pieces"
You know this is actually a little genius. It would change the rules slightly every few years resulting in variation. The openings could be completely different (one of the main complaints being how chess is all memorization). There could be new tricks. The end games might be played differently. Of course, it would somewhat undermine the chess's prestige but maybe there could be two tournaments, one normal and one with special rules
You may now allow your king to mount your knight, allowing him the moves of both
Bobby Fischer did this and people play his ruleset at a professional level. That's why he's the greatest.
If a king is captured while the queen is still in play and a pawn remains in the 2 or 7 rank, the game does not end, and the pawn may be promoted to king
If you're gonna change pawns on the a & h files you gotta allow them to warp capture each other as if adjacet
A crazy mode where all of them are kept forever would be cool
Unlike almost every modern competitive game, chess doesn’t need constant rule changes and power creep to stay popular
I imagine 100 years from now there would be separate chess tournaments for the particularly good rules and people constantly argue over with is the best
The only change i want is, if you're not in check, but there is no legal move you can make without putting the king in check, it's a stalemate. NO! If the king is so tightly cornered that he can't move without being captured, that's not a tie, you lost. Let the game play out until the king is captured.
The king has a crossbow and is able to take out a single chess piece within a straight line of his position as if he were a queen but without moving, he can choose to aim for his own pieces to set up advantageous moves for his other pieces.
The Queen can only move a maximum of 4 spaces in any direction
The king can move one square any direction or uses the same movements as a knight
You know what the only true valid change would be? On the first move of both sides, the king can castle - swap positions - with the king's pawn. Instant, perfect bong-cloud.
A second board may be added to any side if not enough space
During your first turn, the kind may move directly forward, capturing the pawn in his way.
Honestly, this would be a cool rule. Would ne equally neat that rules stack to three. So a fourth chanpion would replace the first champions rule. Would add a ton chaos.