Malaysia's palm oil industry struggles to comply with EU regulations âą FRANCE 24 English
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 21. 06. 2024
- A new EU regulation aims to ban the import of several products, including palm oil, that come from plantations linked to deforestation. While the bloc hails the law as an important way to protect the world's forests, Southeast Asian countries say it threatens their livelihoods and is difficult to implement. Malaysia is one the world's top palm oil producers and farmers there are worried they could lose out on earnings. Our team reports from the island of Borneo.
#Malaysia #palm oil #environment
Read more about this story in our article: f24.my/AQFS.y
đ Subscribe to France 24 now: f24.my/YTen
đŽ LIVE - Watch FRANCE 24 English 24/7 here: f24.my/YTliveEN
đ Read the latest International News and Top Stories: www.france24.com/en/
Like us on Facebook: f24.my/FBen
Follow us on X (Twitter): f24.my/Xen
Browse the news in pictures on Instagram: f24.my/IGen
Discover our TikTok videos: f24.my/TKen
Get the latest top stories on Telegram: f24.my/TGen
Europe already lost 97% of old-growth forests in Europe & now trying to lecturer others in deforestation đ
Regulations means I don't want to trade with you.
Sunflower oils & legumes oils need more lands (deforest) to produce a big batch of oil, only in single harvest season. While a palm tree fruits all year round & need less land to produce oils excessively.
Europe cut fown their forest burn millions of tonnes of coal and oil to Industrialize, but when other people to keep their forest and stay poor :D
What happened to the forest in Europe?
Gone and their crops only lasts for 3 mths a year whilst palm oil would produced all year round.
@@Ameng3471 6-9mt cpo / ha at 365days for 20-25 years/palnting cycle đ
this is what EU oil & fats industry is afraid to compete with, superior oil production of the global south
Sunflower oils & legumes oils need more lands (deforest) to produce a big batch of oil, only in single harvest season. While a palm tree fruits all year round & need less land to produce oils excessively.
The EU keeps changing or imposing new rules as soon Msia was about to be able to comply with the old ones. Smart tactic EU
barely smart, low effort protectionism đ
6-9mt cpo/ha at 365 days for 20-25 year planting cycle đ EU stands no chance to compete with palm oil.
What's wrong with Europe??
Greed and jealousy đ
The hypocrisy of EU
What happened to the forest in Europe đ€
Enjoy your expensive olive oil in europe! I expected fish n chips to be sold at 50 pounds per plate.
Sunflower oils & legumes oils need more lands (deforest) to produce a big batch of oil, only in single harvest season. While a palm tree fruits all year round & need less land to produce oils excessively.
Sunflower oils & legumes oils need more lands (deforest) to produce a big batch of oil, only in single harvest season. While a palm tree fruits all year round & need less land to produce oils excessively.
Palm oil save human food.. cheap oil than olive oil. Zero hunger thank to Farmers
Not all palm oil produced in malaysia subject to eudr rules. Most of palm oil estates in malaysia was established before 2020 and doesnt subject to eudr rules.we could easily segregates rhe palm oil production falls to eudr rules and vice versa. Thus we still could sell palm oil planted since 50 years ago to eu and the palm oil planted after 2020 to non eu market. We are wiser in that sense đȘđȘđȘ
To simplify further, palm oil produced in peninsular malaysia mostly will not subject to eudr whilst in borneo will be subject to eudr. But every single drop of palm oil in malaysia is properly audited so we would know which one is which. Just dont ask low level worker and end consumer.
Time to forget about EU & US trade. BRICS+ represents plenty of consumers.
Being hypocrite and still relying on russia LNG
Welcome to doing business with business-friendly Europe đ
Modern Colonization ....
How will you address the problem of deforestation when the world population is expected to increase resulting in feeding a large number of people, the consequences of which will result in forest land to be used to build residential areas and also be converted into farm land to cultivate more food for the rising population. Worldwide forest cover has declined and is projected to decline further in the future resulting in biodiversity loss and species losing their habitat and on the brink of extinction.
Why didn't they say: palm oil contributed to cheaper edible oil production cost and bring economic development to lift the lower income group of people into improved living conditions.
Well, it won't have to now it is in BRICS and it can sell to a far greater market than the 18% of the world called the West.
Western manufacturing has always known that the threat to their economies would initially come from countries that can make the same goods far cheaper due to lower costs of labour.
In the future outside of BRICS the west will be outpriced unless they themselves become a market for cheap labour, not what the citizens want to hear, however that is not their problem as those jobs are now done by machines anyway and don't need human labour
The logical conclusion for the West's future would lead to all goods being fully machine manufactured and the population becomes mere consumers paid for by the state to do nothing other than consume. Good luck with that future in what is not in a post-scarcity civilisation.
Palm oil is not extracted from the white part of the fruit, but from the orange mesocarp. palm kernel oil is extracted from the white part. Deforestation can only be reduced by reducing consumption. Europe's consumption of vegetable oils for food and biodiesel are the direct cause of deforestation. If Europe would be serious in reducing deforestation it should change its consumption patterns.
EU need to prove that money used in dealing wasn't inherited from the colonialism. Second the consumer need to live in forest only.
Good going, EU! Everybody else, deal with it
It is a balancing act. Forest vs palm oil.
EU is doing the right thing to protect the forest and wild life.
Really?
Haha EU donât have forest anymore
EU impose new rules ... provide financial aid to 'help' address compliance issues ... in the process re-establish influence in former colonies ...
The EU can just eat industrial oils and leave alone the palm oil, coffee, cocoa, tea and vegetables which come from the global south. Let them print their food and drinks with 3D printers đ
Why did you attack this country,palm oil ,race religion issues. Why? Why?
Biased.
I am Malaysian and I support this. Excessive use of land for oil palm is bad and we need less oil palm and more paddy fields đ. Thanks France for the reminder đđ»
Paddy fields require forest to be cut down too. The issue here is deforestation which involve more than just palm oil
@@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko why we canât turn oil palm into paddy field??????????????????????????????
@@hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 Paddy fields require lots of water all year round so it make sense to cultivate near areas with water supply. However, it may also strain the water supply for neighboring villages as the paddy fields use lots of it during the hotter times of the year.
In terms of ownership, private estates accounted for 3.61 million hectares or 61.1% of the total planted area. So if the government want more paddy fields, they must purchase lands from private owners first. Finally, the reason why Malaysia imports more rice from India is because it is cheaper than producing it ourselves. Are you willing to pay more for Malaysian rice?
@@ViolentCabbage-ym7ko when you said paddy field requires a lot of water, then how do you think our paddy field is currently managed? Of course we invest in water reservoir first e.g. terusan.
Paddy field is always owned by the farmers and not government. We need a program to encourage farmers to grow paddy fields instead of palm oil. Your argument is valid but solvable.
@@hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 It's solvable but at a cost. As I have mentioned, paddy fields can cause the water supply to strain during the hotter months of the year and the yield is not competitive against the cheaper alternatives from overseas. Why should Malaysians buy rice from local farmers when the alternative is cheaper especially when inflation is causing groceries and other essential items to increase in price?
Palm oil has many uses from biofuels, cosmetics, food products and even soap and shampoo. It makes no economic sense to trade palm oil lands for paddy fields. What Malaysia should do is invest in companies that manufacture goods using palm oil in Malaysia instead of only selling it as raw materials.
Malaysian language is funny đ
At least don't condemn if some say French sounds funnier, aye?
French is much more funny than the language itself...hahaha
@@sekokqedaus4377 i dont think he/she are eropean anyway. might be our neighbour country.