Ever since betting has become a thing advertised by the league the refs have been absolutely horrendously dog shit. I refuse to believe it’s a coincidence
I feel bad for his apparent speech issues recently. He is still good but he gets real tongue tied lately. Nothing like Biden, jack’s brain and memory still work.
That was a lucky bounce goal that would have almost certainly jump-started the Bruins on a comeback trail. But no, it just HAD to get disallowed. I think the Bruins hold the record for most challenged-then-overturned goals. Also, the clock got rewinded back 17 seconds after the overturn. There needs to be a limit as to how many seconds pass between potential offsides then a goal scored.
Was at this game, was right behind the St. Louis goal. What a joke. Love Brazzeau's game though. Big mfer and he throws it around and goes toward the net.
refs r morons, krug brings in it, the funny thing is is that the bruins had a goal that counted in the finals against the blues that was this exact same thing.
Yeahhh I'm gonna have to agree with the linesmen here. Brazeau is obviously offside, and while Krug touches it last, it's not in a way that he controlled the puck into the zone. It's not simply who touches it last. Sometimes, these calls fall your way. Sometimes, they go against you. I was in Minnesota last season when we had 2 go our way. I bet we weren't complaining about offside reviews that day.
Straight from the NHL rulebook: "If a player legally carries, passes or plays the puck back into his own defending zone while a player of the opposing team is in such defending zone, the off-side shall be ignored and play permitted to continue. " The rule makes no mention of "controlling the puck." Krug does play the puck back into his own defending zone. This should have been a good goal based on the rule as written.
They can't challenge when they've made a decision on review. The Linesmen aren't going to change their mind after watching the replays and making a decision anyways.
@@angushiltz4880no but in this case, the bruins should have challenged that krug brought the puck into the zone himself. If that was taken account of in the first challenge, then that’s fucked they called no goal, but if not the bruins totally could’ve challenged that
@@zim857 you can only challenge for offsides and goalie interference as far as know. Edwards and Brickley later in the game said the NHL released a statement that the Linesmen determined that it wasn't brought in by Krug. And that Krug only deflected the puck and caused the offsides. And I'm sure that is what was said to the coaches.
If you go by the actual rule, they weren’t wrong. It went off of the Boston players stick and hit Krug’s stick, Krug didn’t intentionally bring it in the zone..I love all you homers who think you know everything. If Krug brought it in the zone, it’s offside. It deflected off his stick.
If you think that’s “hitting Krug’s stick” then you have no idea how skilled hockey players are. Krug is clearly pushing that puck away from Brazeau. Krug was intentionally knocking the puck away from Brazeau and it went into the zone which means Krug intentionally brought it into the zone.
@lordexorr Intentionally knocking it away from another player's stick doesn't mean he had control of it to bring it back into the zone. You have to have control of the puck, whether that's carrying it or making a backward pass, for offsides to be negated.
@@bmil38 "If a player legally carries, passes or plays the puck back into his own defending zone while a player of the opposing team is in such defending zone, the off-side shall be ignored and play permitted to continue. " Krug plays the puck back into his own zone. By the text of the rule, this negates the offsides.
Would love to know why offsides even matters after all players from both team are fully in the zone and they defensive team has touched the puck. Shits stupid as fuck
Just as you're wondering if he's ok, the man posts again! Hard hitting title to boot.
Best/Most Accurate CZcams video title in history!!
Well said. Soft spoken 😂
Thats not offside. The blues player plays the puck back into his defensive zone.
you think that they forgot Torey Krug isn't a Bruin anymore
I've never been a conspiracy theory guy, but these last 3-4 years, I truly believe the Refs are intentionally this bad. NFL, NBA, and NHL all 3.
They have gotten much worse.
Ever since betting has become a thing advertised by the league the refs have been absolutely horrendously dog shit. I refuse to believe it’s a coincidence
this quality is amazing where can i watch vod?
Wow he did get screwed. He's a great addition, keep him in the lineup
Sorry but at 0:15 did Edwards say "Shitty game going on"?
Lol I think he did
LOL yeah. At least it was cable.
"Shinny" game (I know, hate to be THAT guy)
I feel bad for his apparent speech issues recently. He is still good but he gets real tongue tied lately. Nothing like Biden, jack’s brain and memory still work.
Mastery title
That was a lucky bounce goal that would have almost certainly jump-started the Bruins on a comeback trail. But no, it just HAD to get disallowed. I think the Bruins hold the record for most challenged-then-overturned goals.
Also, the clock got rewinded back 17 seconds after the overturn. There needs to be a limit as to how many seconds pass between potential offsides then a goal scored.
LOL, That's Not Fair!😂😂😅🤣
Do you put a filter on your videos or is this what nesn actually looks like ?
This is not the video I expected based on the title.
I was there for that game
YEP
Was at this game, was right behind the St. Louis goal. What a joke. Love Brazzeau's game though. Big mfer and he throws it around and goes toward the net.
refs r morons, krug brings in it, the funny thing is is that the bruins had a goal that counted in the finals against the blues that was this exact same thing.
WTF??
That should of been a good goal but the referees decided to be stupid 😡😡😡🤬 i hate the referees for that
Yeahhh I'm gonna have to agree with the linesmen here. Brazeau is obviously offside, and while Krug touches it last, it's not in a way that he controlled the puck into the zone. It's not simply who touches it last.
Sometimes, these calls fall your way. Sometimes, they go against you. I was in Minnesota last season when we had 2 go our way. I bet we weren't complaining about offside reviews that day.
Straight from the NHL rulebook:
"If a player legally carries, passes or plays the puck back into his
own defending zone while a player of the opposing team is in such
defending zone, the off-side shall be ignored and play permitted to
continue. "
The rule makes no mention of "controlling the puck." Krug does play the puck back into his own defending zone. This should have been a good goal based on the rule as written.
the nhl sucks, man
Blame Boston's coaching staff. Even though the play had been reviewed, they should have challenged the reversal
They can't challenge when they've made a decision on review. The Linesmen aren't going to change their mind after watching the replays and making a decision anyways.
@@angushiltz4880no but in this case, the bruins should have challenged that krug brought the puck into the zone himself. If that was taken account of in the first challenge, then that’s fucked they called no goal, but if not the bruins totally could’ve challenged that
@@zim857 you can only challenge for offsides and goalie interference as far as know. Edwards and Brickley later in the game said the NHL released a statement that the Linesmen determined that it wasn't brought in by Krug. And that Krug only deflected the puck and caused the offsides. And I'm sure that is what was said to the coaches.
@@zim857 You can't challenge w/e you want like the NFL. NHL has rules on what can be challenged.
If you go by the actual rule, they weren’t wrong. It went off of the Boston players stick and hit Krug’s stick, Krug didn’t intentionally bring it in the zone..I love all you homers who think you know everything. If Krug brought it in the zone, it’s offside. It deflected off his stick.
If you think that’s “hitting Krug’s stick” then you have no idea how skilled hockey players are. Krug is clearly pushing that puck away from Brazeau. Krug was intentionally knocking the puck away from Brazeau and it went into the zone which means Krug intentionally brought it into the zone.
Yep. Sometimes, these calls don't go your way. I don't see any way Krug had control of the puck to bring it into the zone.
@lordexorr Intentionally knocking it away from another player's stick doesn't mean he had control of it to bring it back into the zone. You have to have control of the puck, whether that's carrying it or making a backward pass, for offsides to be negated.
@@bmil38
"If a player legally carries, passes or plays the puck back into his
own defending zone while a player of the opposing team is in such
defending zone, the off-side shall be ignored and play permitted to
continue. "
Krug plays the puck back into his own zone. By the text of the rule, this negates the offsides.
Would love to know why offsides even matters after all players from both team are fully in the zone and they defensive team has touched the puck. Shits stupid as fuck