Walkaround of Sikorsky’s Raider X Compound Helicopter for US Army's FARA Contract at AUSA 21
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 10. 2021
- Bill Fell, the principle test pilot at Lockheed Martin’s Sikorsky unit, with a walkaround of the company’s Raider X compound helicopter at the Association of the United States Army’s 2021 conference and tradeshow in Washington, DC. The novel aircraft, with two coaxial rotor blades and a single pusher propeller, is competing for the US Army’s Future Armed Reconnaissance Aircraft contract.
Love this aircraft and love how the technology is scalable. The Raider, the Defiant, and who knows where it could go.
The Leviathan next...😏
Mi 6
Not really that scalable. Those fixed rotors create a lot of vibration.
The raider can get away with it because it only has to deal with one engine. The defiant destroys its transmission and anything bigger would be a death trap. Who knows if Sikorsky can fix it but I wouldn’t make that bet.
@n I would be interested in a source for that information. Lockheed says that new material science and computing power have beaten the vibration. Fifty years ago, the Cheyenne had vibration problems, but material science and computing power have changed a bit since then.
It looks formidable and high tech. Very cool!
Thank you for this walk around I’ve always wondered how big the aircraft is and it’s technical aspects so thanks again!!!
In every engineer game I play where you can make a helicopter, I always make a compound coaxial, it’s just so cool to engineer. First I tried a tilt rotor like the V-22 Osprey but it was super unsafe and just not reliable, then my grandfather told me about the compound coaxial since I wanted something fast with VTOL and the ability to hover around a target like a helicopter. I can’t wait to see these replace regular helicopters because they are so much cooler and basically just do everything better.
In what game is that?
@@fred.flintstone4099 AUTOCAD duh
What a great looking bird! I remember the ABC where it all started from.
Thanks you ,For the video!n
Super....Nais !.
I like this and the bell design
Thanks Vargs.
Dang with the whole tail setup and kamov like dual rotors I bet thats a dream to fly! What a cool setup. Clean unique engineering all the way! Ole Igor is smiling down from heaven alright.
Nice !
Awesome!!!! Now this is the real Airwolf! I'll take one! I look forward to seeing more of your videos! You just earned a new subscriber! :)
Thank you locate Martin
It would look so much cooler if it had the slender streamline shape like the AH-1Z Viper, or RAH-66 Comanche.
SUPER COOL
So many simply new aircraft! Good!!
A beautiful helicopter proudly made in Connecticut and Florida !!!
Please, give us a glimpse of this puppy, from a maintainers standpoint.
The cyclic is on the left side for the left seat but on the right for the right seat?
One word - awesome!
Neat idea, lets see if it fulfills the promises. Charles
How does the pilot push in the circuit breaker for the MFD once it's been pulled?
what colors can we choose think i will go urban with parking lines and asphalt grey maybe paint fire hydrant on side and no parking on the top good job well done and all that big raises coming to the team
Forget the F-22, I want one of these! Beautiful aircraft.
does it have youtube premium for musics?
Damn, solid state circuit breakers. Fancy haha
beautiful.
Love
It looks like something out of an action movie!
I think I want one of those.
Most of us do honestly this are awesome and modern not only that but they are also fast
its a game changer
Neat!
Quanto consuma ?
Il cannoncino si può montare ?
Looks like so much fun to fly.
Will this be commercially available?
Interesting. I have to say I would prefer hard switches for some key functions rather than simply integrating everything.
QUE LUJO DE HELICOPTERO
Great Job Sikorsky aviators!
S97, is it name of speaker or heli?
I just want to know the safety gare..
Okay so is this some sort of cross between a blackhawk and a littlebird? Because this isn't a large aircraft.
Isn’t the collective normally on the left hand side of the pilot? Any reason why Sikorsky reversed it in the Raider?
Helo pilots normally sit right seat, but guessing you know that. The copilot needs to learn to reverse hands, but, yeah, kinda odd that they could not just parallel the hand controls like most helps. Probably the engineers getting too cute and not thinking of actual combat necessity. I'd change it
to normal joystick between the knees and collective on left and probably could shave off a foot at least in width.
100% like
Need to get rid of the opposite side sticks. Pick a side for each to be on otherwise you’ll have a hard time switching pilots from seat to seat.
0:34 yikes that gap between the rudder/aelieron and the fuselage,
Couple of questions?
The shell or body I'm guessing is aluminum?(What about Carbon Fiber?)(Blades as well)
How's the Radar Cross Signature that it leaves behind on radar?(Any Radar absorbing material?)
How does this fair in comparison with Anti Aircraft Artillery?
How does this do in extreme weather flights?
Has anyone ever done a stress test or a destructive test on 1 of these?(Just to see where the failure mode is at)
What about against an EMP as well?
What about the payload or missiles it can carry?
Golden Retriever signing off...…
All built to protect you and America.....mKay
Bust in design, need to phase this idea 💡 into Blackhawk design.🤔🇬🇧👍🙏
So badass.
Can anyone comment on whether it is difficult to fly a helicopter with the stick being controlled by the left hand? I am a fixed wing pilot who has never flown with a stick but am a bit uncomfortable using my left hand on a yoke. It is weird using the left hand stick?
I fly helicopters and that is a serious no for me. The collective works in the left hand because you can only move it up or down. The cyclic controls pitch and roll and requires much more sure touch. The shared collective between the pilots also irritates me.
Can anyone tell me how this chopper can be transported in C-17?
You have the propeller at the back end of the helicopter. Why not install a small jet engine at the back to give it a bii more power.
That left handed cyclic and shared collective is the Devil's work.
those seats re cramped up..almost no room for accidental safety...! woow
But if a circuit breaker or two trip, and the screens are down, are there parachutes?
Everything is redundant in modern aircraft.
What's its flight ceiling?
where do i place an order
Sikorsky should have contacted the media company Bellisario over the rights for the name ‘Airwolf’……. Because how cool would that have been? Having a futuristic attack helicopter that actually is called Airwolf!!!
Love the technology, hate the side-by-side seating. An attack helicopter/rotorcraft needs tandem seating. It's a smaller target to frontal enemy fire and it can go faster due to less flat-plate drag.
You named it the Raider even though the N-21 is also called the Raider???
Oh Yeah,,,,, How does it turn in hover mode???????
It has a great design, it is like F35 of helicopters.
Ever heard of bell 360 invictus
The F-35 Urg, bleah! Quite the opposite, the Raider X is a fast hot rod, where as the F-35 tops out at Mach 1.6 which pretty pedestrian by any standard--admittedly much faster than a Harrier or A-10 I guess.
Also, we used to talk about Supercruise capability as being a 6th gen capability, well I'm afraid you need to look elsewhere.
I'd rather say the Raider X is the F-22 of helicopters but with the 1990 avionics and computers brought up to date.
@@Ppadira The Bell 360 Invictus looks better, but I don't know how it can justify its existence, when there are drones that do the same thing.
At least the Raider X can be used as a transport, as well as recon/attack helicopter.
@@scratchy996
Well that doesn't mean drones can replace attack choppers anytime soon . May be in future when unmanned choppers wont be a just mere a paper drawing
@@Ppadira Drones are already replacing attack helicopters.
One of the most advanced helicopters in the world sporting cutting edge compound thrust technology and it’s got a discontinued Garmin GNS 430 in the panel.
Probably a placeholder for what normally goes there to avoid leaking classified systems to public/etc I would assume.
OMG the fact that we just brushed past the fact that it has side sticks and a shared collective in the middle is mind boggling. I get that they do that in airplanes but that’s gotta be difficult in helicopters no?
I worked on these helos and never heard bill or any of the other pilots complain about it. I always wondered myself, but I guess with a little training its not a problem.
Want one... Is it good for fishing trips?
Left seat has to deal with left side cyclic
is it still better to use right hand side cyclic cauz for most of the chopper pilots they've been dealing with right hand stick for so long the transition has to be tough for all
Needs an ice chest lil table on the inside with a 20inch tv and way more leather to sell civilian market.
Ill buy one!
There is hand brake?🤔
Price ?
6 troops only?
What a beauty!
That passenger bay reminds me of the Hind-D. Adding fuel or additional counters against MANPADS seems a better choice...
180 knots, seems a little slow. I believe the Defiant-X is ~ 280 knots.
this guy's makin big bucks
Two pilots sharing one collective? Is that right?
Flying from the left seat has got to be a confusing transition.
Wonder how much power it pulls at OGE hover in higher density alt.
bout 3.50 said Mr. Lochness Monster, Lockheed Martin Design Engineer.
probably pretty good, also no LTE potential at high DA either.
Long live America 🌏🦅🇺🇸🦁👌👈✌😍🥰😘💐👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
If you don't show it flying, does it actually fly?
There are videos on You Tube showing the Raider in Full & Fast Flight
What happens if one of those flat screens breaks?
There is probably redundancy with the other screens
Now my country, Colombia, which is the 4th largest operator of Blackhawks in the world and has the largest military helicopter fleet in Southamerica by far, could start thinking on changing to this new platform. Our own attack version of the Blackhawk, the Arpia IV (Harpy) armed to the teeth with long range NLOS Spike missiles, is an awesome view to behold. They all look as if the Blackhawks were breeded with the Mantis to create the Arpia IV. Just imagine what we could do with a fleet of new Raider X. 🥰
It's better the attack heli , than attack version of medium transport heli like the Blackhawk.
Those are: AH-1 Viper, AH-64 Apache, AW Leonardo T-129, Rooivalk, TAI T-129, Airbus Tiger...
@@serdradion4010 Yeah, but first, each cost triple than the Blackhawk (15 ~ 17 million); second, when we aproached the US to purchase the Apache (45 millions) they said NO.
At the time (the start of the millenium) our transport helos were being shot during the landings and suffered heavy loses because we didn't have heavy close aerial protection, the landings were extremly difficult in the middle of dense high mountain jungles so the only clear spots to disembark the commandos were few and the commuist guerrillas were there waiting for them. We urgently needed a heavy gunned helo to cover our transports landings. We thought the Apache or even the Super Cobra were the answer but the US negative gave us no much choice so in a stroke of creativity we decided to transform the Blackhawk into a heavy armed gunship to protect our troops and thats what we did.
The Arpia I project started almost 20 years ago and today we got the 4th iteration with the heavyly armed Arpia IV packing a huge array of Gatling machin guns, Spike NLOS anti-tank missiles with a range of 25 kilometers, and even the capability to launch the Delilah cruise missile manufactured by Israel Military Industries (IMI). This of course gave us a much greater capability and more options to move from irregular battle scenarios to use the Arpia in conventional warfare against armored vehicles and main battle tanks, and even in anti-ship rol.
@@pixsilvb9638
Leonardo T-129, ex Agusta-Westland costs around 30 mil $, the most economic one and no limits to sell.
Russian MI-35, Chinese Z-10 are even more economic, but probably they don't fit.
@@serdradion4010 Nothing like the Blackhawk Bro. Is simply the best utilitarian helo in the world. Plus is battle tested and is super reliable. In Colombia proved its quality. You ask the colombian armed forces and they could not praise this helo more. We even got a bunch that have been downed twice. Mechanics repaired them and in matter of weeks they are back flying over the combat zones.
Why? Who Colombia plan to fight? Wouldn't you rather have 5 older helicopters than one of this Raider X. You can buy second handed helis from the US at cheap price and your country will be fine. A $100K stinger in a wrong hand can take down one of this and what do you have? Back to square one.
Am I missing something here? Co pilot must be left handed? Shared collective?
going to be a LOT of cross training accidents
This is a remake of the Cheyenne, which was also an attack helicopter with a pusher prop, nut it was cancelled in favor of the Cobra which was a serious downgrade, so there is a lot of people who believe that there was some under the table shenanigans that caused the Cheyenne to be dropped. Nice to see the technology being reintroduced, as it really was a loss that Cheyenne wasn't chosen as America's attack Helicopter.
The Cheyenne also had the problem of being a single rotor helicopter with a pusher. Nothing to offset the torque of that single rotor seems like it'd be a problem.
@@zachhoefs9543 the Cheyenne had a third rotor for offsetting the torque. It couldn't fly otherwise.
@@AurumFaber I don't see one.
@@zachhoefs9543 the helicopter in this video isn't the Cheyenne if that's what you mean. This one has two main rotors so that they cancel each other's torque by rotating in opposite directions.
The AH-56A Cheyenne was the helicopter that was scrapped for suspicious reasons.
@@zachhoefs9543 the cheyenne had two tail rotors, one as a prop, much like the raider, and other to offset the torque and turn the aircraft, much like any traditional helicopter design.
The cheyenne also had a built-in gyroscope for balance while that coaxial rotor does the same job for the raider.
The cheyenne had a serious problem with vibration that seems to plague the defiant. Let's hope Sikorsky get at least the raider figured out.
Hello yes, Brother well to with me tonight about new model number and inside or outside please. Thanks.
it's awesome!. I think being able to seat 8-10 soldiers would make it a lot more useful
He did say this one was designed more as a recon/attack craft. Not really designed as a troop carrier, but it can carry 6 if-needed.
I think the thought process was the deployment or extraction of small reconnaissance squads. Or being able to quickly pick up a down helicopter crew. The SB-1 Defiant has the troop carrying capacity at least on par with a Blackhawk
This is meant to replace the Kiowa scout helicopter, not a transport.
You are thinking of the Defiant X which is a version of this that would replace the blackawk helicopter. This is meant for recon mission with attack capability. I do admit that the 6 seats for quick pickup and deploying is a big benefit of this design. Have a recon heli there and need a quick extraction, you dont need to call in a blackhawk or little bird and can use this to get them out of there.
와~ 상당히 좋아보인다.. +________+
does it support android auto and apple car play ?
No, but it supports Android Kinetics and Apple Enemy go away
Awesome machine
Cool 9ver 200
I like that machined mast too.
anyone else see this and get the airwolf theme in their head
เฉียบๆ
Hard to know how well it's going to work.
- It's easy to be gee-whiz over the tech innovations.
- It's also easy to be crabby over them, and insist that - especially in combat - the old and proven way is the only way. (Its main competitor for the contract is a very traditional design.)
But how much of an improvement over a traditional design will it be? How reliable will it be? These are questions we don't know the answers to yet.
go see for yourself watch the test flight videos of this lmao wtf you people smoking this has passed alot of flight tests already and has done pretty damn well by all the accounts ive seen idk where some of you are getting this idea that it will never fly and be some paper weight lol wtf yall on
Old and proven helicopters are falling out of the sky over Ukraine right now. Helicopters need to evolve if they want to be able to survive the increased lethality of the types of weapons a modern country can employ against them.
@@Rampant16 exactly
@@Rampant16 To use a Devil's Advocate argument:
Quite a few of the helis "falling out of the sky over Ukraine" are Kamovs with coaxial rotors, which are hardly an old and proven design. Sure, Kamov's been making them that way for some sixty years. But they started doing so under the USSR - so it only would have taken the advocacy of one top general wowed by the Gee-Whiz Factor to get their ball rolling, then a well-connected factory manager could keep it rolling. And no one else builds them that way, which argues against any kind of superiority for the design.
I'm thinking of a bigger raider-X type platform designed around a Gau-8 Avenger with an abundance of external hard-points.
GAU-8 is massive and heavy. That would be a huge waste of time and resources
@@Cplblue Yeah, just too big. There are 20mm versions that might be better.
Where's vargo ?
Sikorsky has the S-97 Raider compete with the Bell+Textron 360 Invictus in the AAS / FARA (armed scout) program.
Meanwhile, the Sikorsky+Boeing SB-1 Defiant competes with the Bell+Lockheed V280 Valor for the FVL (long-range lift) program.
Given how the US defense industry works, it is likely that both companies get one contract each, to keep every factory running, everybody employed.
So if you like both Sikorsky or both Bell designs, get ready for a disappointment.
The Raider has troop capacity while the Invictus does not, but that gives the Invictus better stealth properties, just like the Boeing-Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche had. Not sure why they abandoned that design. Just to push a common scout and transport design when they know it's not very likely they'll get both contracts?
The V280 seems to be the more mature design, faster and longer range. But the SB-1 might offer better handling and safety, as it is not a tilt rotor. And it's smaller, closer to the Blackhawk size. This might really go both ways.
Love this design.
Wonder how this compares with the Osprey.
and of course expensive in maintenance, technology is expensive which mean it will only be buyed in limited numbers (foreign countries)
Quite an old design so see come back in to the light, what makes it more applicable now ? It didn't pass the bar in 1967 so why now ? seems like it still has the same issues and only has the same advantages which aren't exactly sought after w
💝
Amazing technology
Bill Fell… the test pilot…