Cirrus Vision Jet G2 Flight Trial
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 12. 2019
- The $2.75 million Cirrus Vision Jet G2, for second-generation, remains in a class by itself because it's the only certified single-engine turbofan-powered personal airplane, and it has the Cirrus CAPS whole-airplane parachute. For 2020, the Vision Jet has a few sizable changes including RVSM compliance for a 31,000-foot operating ceiling, increased payload, a 1200-mile max range, Safe Return Emergency Autoland (which is currently being certified and to be standard equipment), plus autothrottle. In this video Aviation Consumer Editor Larry Anglisano takes a close look at the Vision Jet G2 with Cirrus' Matt Bergwall. Read the full report in the January 2019 Aviation Consumer magazine.
- Auta a dopravní prostředky
Thanks for this video! Would you let me know what's your setup for recording cockpit audio?
I think there's a Vision G1 for rent on Long Island, NY at KFRG, Nassau Flyers.
il just keep dreaming of buying this beauty
Wow, have them do another demo in CT! Would love to go for a ride. KHVN!
The major sell here is safety. The parachute system has already saved lives. I expect the price to go down as more orders are filled and production is more streamlined.
this aircraft have no wiper ?
I like the V-tail. My favorite aircraft to fly has that and handles like nothing else in the air, except hopefully this!
this is the perfect transition from cesnass to a jet and then to embraer 145 or crj200
very expensive transition
Does the Safe Return feature have 'Go-Around' if the conditions change on approach etc?
This is a great question. I doubt it
Well since you are squawking 7700, and it sends out a declaration to tower. You’ll get granted clearance first
Самолет просто космос!
Like the music
Now the TBM 940 is getting E-Autoland, called HomeSafe in that plane.
What's the range of one of these at MTOW?
"or if a Vision Jet is longer a part of their future"
What a beautiful piece of corporate talk.
yeah
$$$$$ , buy a bigger faster one.
More likely speculators buying early slots so they can price gouge once demand soars.
If had this kind of money to spend, this is a toy I would love to own.
@Kelp Farming 😄.. they would still starve if i didnt..
The passenger is not landing the airplane, the computer is landing the airplane.
The real question is who gets to log it? Garmin? lol
@@tonyunderwood9438 of course and Garmin will log it as PIC. lol
@@tonyunderwood9438 obviously Jarvis
id love to ride in one of these
How many miles can this fly
Commenters who claim the airplane is a poor value versus competing planes may be right. If so, I'd be interested to understand why there's already 500 orders.
Harvey Cohen because cirrus is good at marketing... and they can up sell existing customers who are flying sr-22s
This is a very strange question. Put a bitten apple on the fuselage and there'd be 5000 orders.
Just saw two of these fly over the house today on their way to Lancaster, PA.
I don’t see the value in this over any of the higher end turbo props. The load and range specs don’t fit my typical mission profile, and operating costs are higher.
Although it may not meet your needs, it does have some unique features, that are not available (to my knowledge) on any turbo prop. BRS (like them or not), they are a USP for Cirrus aircraft. Add the latest flight control electronics that can auto land the aircraft (initiated by a passenger), in case of an incapacitated pilot. The closest aircraft I can think of that has such an easy starting system is the PC12 (latest version), although that is a lot more expensive and larger.
Clive Sinclair and it’s got a parachute
The Auto-land system might allow some with certain disabilities/medical conditions to fly safely again. Great *innovation* Cirrus! 👍🏾
Unlikely. Just because the jet can land safely doesn't mean that the FAA is going to approve that pilot to fly. I don't think the FAA would approve a pilot to fly a jet and no other type of aircraft due to a medical issue.
Yeah but the FAA won't
No, you still need a valid medical.
this might be a dumb question but what if a bird flys into this port 4:42 ? it burns out the engine and crash land???
With any single engine plane (turbine or otherwise) the pilot has the option to attempt an emergency landing in the event of an engine failure, but with both Cirrus piston and jet aircraft the pilot also has the option to pull the chute to get on the ground safely.
It has parachute
I'd like to see Niko upgrade to one of these.
He has a great tdm already that’s more mission ready to his needs that turboprop he has is amazing
Farther: measurable distance
Further: progress
Cirrus will sell the shit out of these I'm sure.
hell yes!!
300 kts., FL310, 60 gal./hr., 3 pax, Takeoff distance 2,500ft., $2.75M
I guess one of my objections to the Vision Jet is the Vee Tail similar to the old Bonanzas. The Bonanzas suffered from fish tailing and often made rear passengers air sick after a time. I assume this is the same problem with the Vision Jet although perhaps a good yaw damper might help. The sound level still seems a bit loud with the engine placement atop the Fuselage. Not sure I would be a candidate for a Vison Jet purchase. I guess I would need a flight test to be sure.
Not an issue in this airplane. It has yaw stability augmentation, and the autopilot's yaw servo automatically engages on the initial climb. No tail wag.
On top with one vs two on the side. Doesn’t seem to me like it would be that big of a difference?
That’s why the tail is as tall as the Empire State Building, to get ride of that.
When Dogecoin goes to the Moon, I might get one of these, since it'll fit in my 42' wide hangar.
when ADA touch 100 dollar i will buy a cirrus and tmb 940 e.e
I fly this on 9- X plane 11!
It’s a g1 in x plane 11 as far as I’m aware.
It would be an awesome plane to own...
is this safer than a cesna?
I think so since it has a particular deployment
If only there was a sound measuring device, to really help us understand how much noise reduction they've done. Guess we'll just have to take their word for it. I mean they wouldn't talk about a negligible improvement just to sell million dollar plane, now would they.
The real costs will be fuel costs, hangar costs, maintenance etc… you need to earn about 2M a year with 5-10M in liquid net assets in order to own one. Otherwise it makes more sense to use something like netjets card etc.. and just pay per use.
What this jet will do is open up private jet travel to more people since it will make fractional use more affordable.
60 gallons an hour is impressive nice cut in fuel expense.
4:00 checklist 10 oxy master on,, but its not,,, i caught ya lol
The rep said you just passed 300 kts but the PFD says 226 kts. My TAS/KTAS Calculator says 214 kts but my OAT Estimation Calculation might be off a bit. I'd consider a Citation Mustang and upgrade the G1000 to NXi before I bought this turkey. It flys faster and higher with more room and seats inside plus a Lav and twin engine redundancy and would cost over a million dollars less. No contest.
Negative. The B-roll you saw was lagged a touch with the actual standup audio, and the frame shows the aircraft's speed just after level-off from the long climb. When the autopilot trimmed it and the airplane settled into cruise, it made 303 true.
@@AVweb Ok, thanks, it just didn't show.
@NonyaBusiness! If you have the cash..... That's the thing. If you pony up close to 3 million dollars for a plane (including taxes and sales commissions) a few hundred dollars an hour is nothing. Keep in mind the million-plus you save buying used. Those savings will easily buy many thousands of gallons of JetA with very generous amounts left over for a paint job and an overhaul or two. Look at many of the used small jets for sale and you'll notice that few have any significant hours on them. You are looking at toys for the wealthy who become bored or no longer willing to invest time into remaining current and move on to the next adventure. Remember, there are a lot of people who can purchase these things with no more financial strain that you would have buying a Happy Meal.
Your not going to talk about the "Autobrake"????
Sure we could. The braking mode was disabled in this airplane when we flew it last fall. The company made the decision to not demo the braking when the airplane was away from its home-base test environment.
@@AVweb I did the first annual inspection on that SF50 you were flying. Right after the inspection it went back to cirrus to get the executive center console thing and the "fly me home safe" system installed.
This is what cracks me up about all of these aircraft- 14 seats but if so loaded, then you will be able to carry enough fuel to get you to the hold short line of your desired runway. Seriously, don't effin' say that the plane can carry 5 "Adults" and 2 kids if your fuel load will only get you 100 miles.
I’m training at KHFD.
Honda Jet all the way !
As a curious layman (not a pilot), are there certain conditions that you cannot fly in? Such as high winds - it being such a small craft.
IF they can every get this aircraft to carry 5 pax at 200 pounds each, and 3-4 hours of fuel, it would make the perfect air taxi .
The number one reason this thing sells is the ability of its owners to tell people they have a jet.
Exactly...........many such cases
SE Jet.. but it's turbo prop speeds. For a lot less money you can get clean early model TBM.
Of course you can. But this one is new and a lot of people like to buy new panes.
& Headphone Jack fire.........Cirrus..........get Serious about Quality.........
MMM...Jet Noise!!!
Note the big size high contrast buttons and text on all screens.
Where the rubber meets the road and speed/accuracy/safety count they don't do tiny fonts with light-gray text on a white background like the crappy apps on Android and iOS
My offer: $2.6 million, not a penny more.
If you're super rich this is a better way to spend your money than a Bugatti.
Seems like you’re just a passenger in your own plane. Hardly pilot’s aircraft.
Its about getting for a to b safely not hand flying around the lake on a Sunday. They dont want too many GA knuckleheads crashing them
Jésus 😍😍😍
"more easier"
If only that emergency autoland are on big jets , hahaha xD
Good point and of course the problem with a passenger plane is its enormous mass. The airframe basically *falls* out of sky to land. There is no such thing as a *controlled descent* in a commercial plane.
Andrew Doolittle that’s...absolutely not true in the slightest 😂
Some commercial jets are already implementing/implemented this concept for emergencies when the pilot and copilot are disabled from landing or flying the aircraft
@@clickenpie also false but okay
@@v1_rotate638 airbus a220 has already achieved cat 3 autoland. So they are already STARTING to implement this. Concepthyper never said it was fully in the systems.
👏👏👏❤❤❤
Nice update. I'd still go for the TBM or PC12 I think. I just don't like single engine turbo fans and the Vision Jet just seems like a toy plane to me.
I go back and forth with the TBM and the Vision Jet as our next one. Number one reason the Cirrus Jet is still in the discussion is the chute. Momma really likes the chute and momma gets what momma wants. ;-)
Tony Underwood I’m on the sAme page Tony. Having a chute on to- of having auto land... there is no comparison for he safety for me and my loved ones. Rugs technology will be forced into higher end jets in the future
Who's the BABE in the back?
If they used raw carbon fiber for the center and instrument console it'd look way better and not look so cheap plasticky.
У девчонки глаза разбегаются
Она всеми силами пытается снимать, но ей явно не до того
Но она очень милая
Craneman да)))
Особенно, когда сама не может осознать происходящего, будто первый раз в самолете)))
@@liamhygge Я согласен, она выглядела нервной и растерянной.
Craneman а ты потерянным и запутавшимся. Ибо что ты делаешь в этом видосе? Это ж надо его найти и попасть на просмотр еще
Tumusiime joesph
3 people ........pretty loaded Up.......
16g/h that's awesome
60 gallons/h on cruise, Not even many pistons do 16/h gallons on high speed cruise and this is a turbofan.
Unless she did not want it, you should have also credited the employee in the back doing the camera work. Given her young age, maybe she is only an intern, but still, she should be credited.
Something about the CAPS, the auto landing...I just don't care for it.
How does an average person own one of these??
By marrying a non-average person
The average person doesn't.
Rather have a king air
glishskiii same
Mismatched b-roll and poor grammar from the rep selling a $2.75m aircraft made this grating to watch. Maybe try more than one take and don’t have the intern do the editing on the next one.
Centerline for takeoff is just for professional pilots I guess. 😉
Too heavy
1 Bitchin jet 😋😁
You mean the first version was so noisy for passengers they had to wear headsets in the back, what the fk. That’s definitely not what anyone wants when they ride in a jet.
The only reason it's noisy in the cabin is because the aircraft is so small, the engine is soo close to cabin to the cabin. Plus, it's one of the cheapest jets you could buy, they don't put thick 100% noise reducing walls in the aircraft. They use whatever material is best for the price.
he should've practiced his little speech infront of a mirror or something, it was bad
$20,000 plane parachutes or so stupid, expensive and heavy.
Never take off without a back-pack parachute $1,500.
When things go south, pick up everything that can be used to ID you.
Climb out on the wing. Spray paint over plane ID as best you can...…….. *THEN JUMP!*
Dumb as hell try that at the wrong altitude and see don’t you pass out disabling you from pulling the chute, or worse you get sucked into an engine or killed by a turboprop.
You’re not a genius there are reasons people aren’t just carrying parachutes 🪂 stop watching so many movies.
@@WattsUpDev Dumb? Really? There's several hundred 737 max passengers that would have took that option if given the chance. 3,000 more who worked in WTC.#1 & #2
Commercial Plane Seat cushions should be back -pack parachutes with a snack, drink, and blow-up flotation devise inside. 138 IQ is closer to genius, than moronic dumb ass.......A lot closer.
@Stool Postssubstantiate that claim
rayism 24b Stupidity is something you can’t debate with.
@@WattsUpDev Don't see "stupid" nor "debate" mentioned in this thread. Why would you?
This jet has the shittiest specs out of all jets.
Xperim and lowest price
@NonyaBusiness! You can get a Eclipse 550 for around $2.5 million.
@@Xperim... if you do some research the eclipse alot of negatives. The theory of the airframe and ownership mision is great but in reality their production is limited by lack of funds, they have two projects (kestrel turboprop and eclipse canada) that have been on the books for years and neither have shown much progress, again due to lack of money. The company is basically seen as on the verge on bankruptcy most the time by many in the industry. As for the current or older aircraft they have a history of issues including the avidyne avionics suite being tempermental to say the least.
Who else is planning to buy a jet because of the pandemic?
While, the young lady in the back is only doing as instructed........ What a Joke !! You need a much better system to hold the camera steady other than someone with a cell phone held at arms length. LOL. Try a short tripod that can be set up on the floor of the back seat area. Other than comedy central from the back, an informative video. And for the young lady in the back... Post your resume, you need a better job.
Please don't fly on busy airports... Take-off performances are so poor... Atc here.
Specifics?
Ugly plane. Ugly cabin. Stratos, Diamond D ducted engine look so much better.
Eclipse 400 and Epic Victory look better
Piper Jet looks worse.
You just mentioned a bunch random jets that either no longer exist or lack certification
I wish if kobe Bryant had this type of cirrus, he wouldn't have died , this cirrus is very ok because of its parachute deployment
RIP to Kobe, Gianna and all the other people who passed on that day. But this wouldn't have worked for Kobe, because he needed the helicopter to be able to take off and land anywhere like his backyard, daughters gym, his doctor's office the bank etc... You can't do that with a jet.