Its funny that hes going around asking sheikhs for their "best argument" to "convert people" with, like hes writing them down so he could refute only the best arguments and leave it at that. Such a lazy way to to something, like the rest of the culture he probably came from lol.
Ibrahim al-Nakha, one of the prominent companions, may God have mercy on him, said 96 after the migration: “I fear for this nation the tribulation of the murji’ah greater than the tribulation of the Azariqah, (the worst sect of the khwaarij) .” Book of the Sunnah - Ahmed bin Hanbal Saeed bin Jabri, may Allah have mercy on him, said in the year 95 after the Hijrah: Murji’ah are jews of the Kaaba. Book of the Sunnah - Ahmad bin Hanbal Ahmed bin Hanbal said: “The Murji’ah innovate opinions, so I fear them for the nation.” Their evil is great, so be very wary of them.” He also said, “I do not know of a people more foolish in their opinions than these Murji’ahs, whose opinion regarding rulers is not accepted.” Raqbah bin masqalah (129H) “As for the Murji’ah, they are upon the religion of the kings” (Al ibanah as sughrah - 216) Shiekh Al Islam Ibn taymiyyah said “And the way of the Murji’ah and other like them are those who follow a path of obedience to the leaders completely, even if they are not righteous” (Mahmut fatawa- Vol 28/Page508) Ibn taymiyyah stated “when the people of falsehood want to arouse doubts about the people of haqq, they accuse them or describe them as khwaarij/khariji” (Majmoo al fatawah Ibn taymiyyah vol 23 p. 325) An nadar bin shumail: I entered upon Al ma’mun and he said, ‘how have you been oh nadar’ I said ‘fine, oh leader of the believers’ he said ‘what is irjah?’ I said ‘a religion that suits the kings by which they gain of it from their dunyah and they fall short of their religion’ he the caliph said ‘you are truthful’ (Al bidayah wan Nihayah 10/276) Muhanna said: I asked Ahmed bin Hanbal about Ibrahim bin Musa Al-Harawi? Ahmed bin Hanbal said: A dirty man. I said: Why is he dirty? Ahmed bin Hanbal replied and said: Whoever follows the rulers and judges is an abominable man, and so is following their scholars and imams. Hanad bin Al-Sari narrated in Al-Zuhd on the authority of Ubaid bin Umair, may Allah be pleased with him, that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: “Whenever a man gets closer to the Sultan/ruler he increases his distance from Allah Almighty.” Ahmed / Al-Tirmidhi The closer you are to these rulers, the farther you are from Allah ta’Ala Those supporting and protecting the kufr of their rulers are murji’ah These kuffar are better than you murjiah who worship the shayateen tyrants
Prophet Muhammad forbade disobeying Muslim rulers even if they are evil/tyrants. As long as they are Muslim, we have to obey them in things that don't go against Islam. Shaikh Al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) said: “Being patient with the tyranny of the rulers is a fundamental principle (aṣl) from the fundamentals of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah.” (Majmooʿ Al-Fatāwa 28/179) The Messenger of Allāh (salallāhu ʿalaihi wassallam) made it explicitly clear that it is forbidden to speak openly against the Muslim ruler, but rather to advise him in private, regardless of his tyranny: “Whosoever wishes to advise the Ruler, let him not do so openly. Rather he should take him by his hand and take him into seclusion [and advise him]. So if he accepts that from him it is in his favour, and if he does not accept, then at least he has fulfilled his duty.” (Authentically reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad, no. 15359, as-Sunnah, no. 1097 with al-Albānī’s checking) The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ʿalaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” .
May Allaj Bkess You Sheikh!
Human blood sacrifice is pure paganism.
May Allah curse the ones who insult prophet Muhammad ﷺ
AMEEN
May Allah bless you ameen
Love you for the sake of ALLAH....
Isnt this caller the same black guy who was talking to Muhammad Hijab for hours? When he said DO YOU GIVE UP? 🤣
You can just call him a guy instead of involving a persons skin color
What vid is that?
@@thiounea68 Calling someone black to describe/specify who the person you're talking about, isn't wrong.
@@AdrianMuslim it isn’t wrong but it’s just the way he says it
assalamualaikum
Its funny that hes going around asking sheikhs for their "best argument" to "convert people" with, like hes writing them down so he could refute only the best arguments and leave it at that. Such a lazy way to to something, like the rest of the culture he probably came from lol.
Sa✝️anism
hey why can allah not raise muhammad, but God of Israel raise Jesus? because Israel too strong?
Ibrahim al-Nakha, one of the prominent companions, may God have mercy on him, said 96 after the migration: “I fear for this nation the tribulation of the murji’ah greater than the tribulation of the Azariqah, (the worst sect of the khwaarij) .” Book of the Sunnah - Ahmed bin Hanbal
Saeed bin Jabri, may Allah have mercy on him, said in the year 95 after the Hijrah: Murji’ah are jews of the Kaaba. Book of the Sunnah - Ahmad bin Hanbal
Ahmed bin Hanbal said: “The Murji’ah innovate opinions, so I fear them for the nation.” Their evil is great, so be very wary of them.” He also said, “I do not know of a people more foolish in their opinions than these Murji’ahs, whose opinion regarding rulers is not accepted.”
Raqbah bin masqalah (129H) “As for the Murji’ah, they are upon the religion of the kings” (Al ibanah as sughrah - 216)
Shiekh Al Islam Ibn taymiyyah said “And the way of the Murji’ah and other like them are those who follow a path of obedience to the leaders completely, even if they are not righteous” (Mahmut fatawa- Vol 28/Page508)
Ibn taymiyyah stated “when the people of falsehood want to arouse doubts about the people of haqq, they accuse them or describe them as khwaarij/khariji” (Majmoo al fatawah Ibn taymiyyah vol 23 p. 325)
An nadar bin shumail: I entered upon Al ma’mun and he said, ‘how have you been oh nadar’ I said ‘fine, oh leader of the believers’ he said ‘what is irjah?’ I said ‘a religion that suits the kings by which they gain of it from their dunyah and they fall short of their religion’ he the caliph said ‘you are truthful’ (Al bidayah wan Nihayah 10/276)
Muhanna said: I asked Ahmed bin Hanbal about Ibrahim bin Musa Al-Harawi? Ahmed bin Hanbal said: A dirty man. I said: Why is he dirty? Ahmed bin Hanbal replied and said: Whoever follows the rulers and judges is an abominable man, and so is following their scholars and imams.
Hanad bin Al-Sari narrated in Al-Zuhd on the authority of Ubaid bin Umair, may Allah be pleased with him, that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: “Whenever a man gets closer to the Sultan/ruler he increases his distance from Allah Almighty.” Ahmed / Al-Tirmidhi The closer you are to these rulers, the farther you are from Allah ta’Ala
Those supporting and protecting the kufr of their rulers are murji’ah
These kuffar are better than you murjiah who worship the shayateen tyrants
Prophet Muhammad forbade disobeying Muslim rulers even if they are evil/tyrants. As long as they are Muslim, we have to obey them in things that don't go against Islam.
Shaikh Al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah’s mercy be upon him) said: “Being patient with the tyranny of the rulers is a fundamental principle (aṣl) from the fundamentals of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah.” (Majmooʿ Al-Fatāwa 28/179)
The Messenger of Allāh (salallāhu ʿalaihi wassallam) made it explicitly clear that it is forbidden to speak openly against the Muslim ruler, but rather to advise him in private, regardless of his tyranny: “Whosoever wishes to advise the Ruler, let him not do so openly. Rather he should take him by his hand and take him into seclusion [and advise him]. So if he accepts that from him it is in his favour, and if he does not accept, then at least he has fulfilled his duty.” (Authentically reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad, no. 15359, as-Sunnah, no. 1097 with al-Albānī’s checking)
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ʿalaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.”
.