Just by watching this one video i already know that i will be using these videos throughout year 12 and 13 This was great help in understanding Aristotle, thank you so much
Please could you explain why Christian’s not liking Aristotle’s prime mover is a weakness? I would say just becuase something isn’t liked doesn’t mean it lacks logic/is unconvincing as a counter but what would I say to begin with? Thank you!!
I guess it's not really a weakness just am argument against it, if you wish to say it is similar to the concept of God which is a well argued perspective :)
Thank you so much for saving lives 💗. Quick question please: if I am talking about how senses is fallible, is it ethical to give an example of how people that are colour blind see different colours, or how people with mental illness may see things that are not there? Thanks you
Great question! I would definitely criticise senses for being fallible using the colour blind example or how they deceive us when we are poorly. You could also link to people who are deaf but I would avoid mental illness as harder to link. Hope this helps :)
This was super helpful for going over the topic, so thank you. What key scholars would you recommend we use to defend or argue against Aristotle? Also, I agree that Gerkins are delicious.
I'm really pleased my video helped ☺️ easiest way to support Aristotle is with empiricists who have a similar approach to the world e.g Hume whereas critics would be rationalists/a priori e.g Plato, Descartes even Kant and Anselm differ in their approach :)
Hi Alex, I will be doing predication videos at some point but I think either prime move for Aristotle or a compare Plato and Aristotle question. I go into a little more detail of possible questions in the video on past questions and gaps :)
Hi Thankyou so much for these videos honestly I don't know where I would be without them. Just one question to criticises rationalism can you you Jackson Marys room to argue you need empiricism as well?
What a fantastic question, especially since I have never come across Jackson Mary's Room before! After doing some quick research (even though philosophically it is quite complex so I probably have not done it justice) I would say that it does suppport empiricism to an extent, just like you can know everything about a pinapple but don't knwonit fully until you have tasted it...I.e empiricism is needed. However the argument seems to go further into more emotivism and how it is a feeling beyond physicality so not just empiricism. Hope this makes sense...very interesting!! :)
got philosophy tomorrow trying to cram all the topics in the day before your videos are saving me at this point thank you 🙏🤣
Hope your revision is going really well, I'm pleased my videos are helping 🙂
14:45 is the time stamp for anyone searching for the pickle story! I love your videos thank you so much :))
I can't remember the pickle story but knowing me it will be quite random 😂 good luck in tomorrow's exam!
you're videos are single handedly getting me through revision- I love them and they are so helpful! thank you so much :)
You are very welcome :)
Thank you. This is super helpful!
So pleased I can help Alia ☺️
Just by watching this one video i already know that i will be using these videos throughout year 12 and 13
This was great help in understanding Aristotle, thank you so much
You are welcome, I am pleased my videos help :)
my hero
Pleased I could help :)
true godsend
Pleased I can help Margot :)
the hot revision goat
Hope the videos are helping :)
Please could you explain why Christian’s not liking Aristotle’s prime mover is a weakness? I would say just becuase something isn’t liked doesn’t mean it lacks logic/is unconvincing as a counter but what would I say to begin with? Thank you!!
I guess it's not really a weakness just am argument against it, if you wish to say it is similar to the concept of God which is a well argued perspective :)
absl lifesaver for mocks
So pleased I can help Margot. Good luck in your mocks :)
Thank you so much for saving lives 💗. Quick question please: if I am talking about how senses is fallible, is it ethical to give an example of how people that are colour blind see different colours, or how people with mental illness may see things that are not there? Thanks you
Great question! I would definitely criticise senses for being fallible using the colour blind example or how they deceive us when we are poorly. You could also link to people who are deaf but I would avoid mental illness as harder to link. Hope this helps :)
@@IThinkThereforeITeach yes, it does. Thank you so much for all you do.
This was super helpful for going over the topic, so thank you.
What key scholars would you recommend we use to defend or argue against Aristotle?
Also, I agree that Gerkins are delicious.
I'm really pleased my video helped ☺️ easiest way to support Aristotle is with empiricists who have a similar approach to the world e.g Hume whereas critics would be rationalists/a priori e.g Plato, Descartes even Kant and Anselm differ in their approach :)
do you have any predictions for the type of question they will ask on plato and Aristotle in 2022 exams?
Hi Alex, I will be doing predication videos at some point but I think either prime move for Aristotle or a compare Plato and Aristotle question. I go into a little more detail of possible questions in the video on past questions and gaps :)
Good luck for tomorrow everyone!
Good luck to you too Simran :)
Thanks simran you too!
@@IThinkThereforeITeach thank you so much for the predictions, it saved me
Hi Thankyou so much for these videos honestly I don't know where I would be without them. Just one question to criticises rationalism can you you Jackson Marys room to argue you need empiricism as well?
What a fantastic question, especially since I have never come across Jackson Mary's Room before! After doing some quick research (even though philosophically it is quite complex so I probably have not done it justice) I would say that it does suppport empiricism to an extent, just like you can know everything about a pinapple but don't knwonit fully until you have tasted it...I.e empiricism is needed. However the argument seems to go further into more emotivism and how it is a feeling beyond physicality so not just empiricism. Hope this makes sense...very interesting!! :)
@@IThinkThereforeITeach Thankyou so much for everything
please suggest some readings
Aristotle's Metaphysics but it is pretty brain bamboozling:)