Technical Comparison CANbus, CAN FD & Ethernet

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 6. 07. 2016
  • Technical Comparison CANbus, CAN FD & Ethernet explained by Kent Lennartsson - Research Manager & Founder - Kvaser AB
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 12

  • @kesicicutter
    @kesicicutter Před 3 lety

    perfect explanation, thanks for video.

  • @manikandanj1233
    @manikandanj1233 Před 6 lety +1

    Hi sir.. Nice explanation :) very informative video

  • @juspetful
    @juspetful Před 2 lety +1

    Since the video TSN ethernet has emerged and it provides realtime and safety capabilities beyond CAN. Plus the higher bandwidth, flexibility and co-existence of best effort and realtime messages

  • @user_uif_ghg_wer_das
    @user_uif_ghg_wer_das Před 8 měsíci

    From scope looks the header of the CAN FD has the standard bit rate but the payload has higher bit rate.

  • @bennguyen1313
    @bennguyen1313 Před 4 lety

    Very Clear!

  • @alokpradhan9523
    @alokpradhan9523 Před 2 lety

    Best explanation

  • @batho-peleinnovations172

    DOES CAN HAVE I.P ADDRESS?

    • @BoBaH_BoBaHoB
      @BoBaH_BoBaHoB Před 6 lety +3

      No. All traffic is broadcasted.

    • @simonbyholm7460
      @simonbyholm7460 Před 5 lety +4

      Messages in CAN have an ID identifying the contents/meaning of the message in the contol system. In some higher layer protocols, like J1939, the ID may also identify both the sender and the intended recipient of the message.

    • @rafraph_0
      @rafraph_0 Před 4 lety

      @Tomás Franco acctually i cant explain why, but its many different. in CAN bus there isnt master and slave for exemple

    • @sriyapradhan2692
      @sriyapradhan2692 Před 2 lety

      @Tom Franco CAN basically relies on arbitration ID, whereas I2C has slave ID and then comes the data or the message