Love that he was willing to change v-sycn and under lock the frames on sodium plus but not change the render distance from 32 down to 12 like all the others were running. but out of the box is it shouldn't be set at 32 that is bad on the mod makes.
@@Raheem-fun-facts It won't make any difference, most of the mods will be replaced by the version of the other modpack and those few that don't repeat themselves will stay there, it won't make practically any difference.
Correction: When using the F3 menu to see FPS you actually lose some FPS so it's better to use a 3rd-party application to check the FPS! Also when chaging the GUI scale to something higher it actually increases the FPS, and if fullscreen is on then you lose some FPS! I hope you do a part 2 explaining this and maybe re-doing the test! EDIT: My orginal comment was me saying you should make your own modpack but then I see you did so yeah 😅 I just putting my second thought that was a video correction!
Windows actually has a tool that shows fps, press windows key + G key and you will see some helpful tools, but there's a preference tool, pin it so it show when you close the menu and but it somewhere in the screen
F3 actually kills FPS a lot, so I'd recommend testing these mods on your own using a mod like FPS Display or Sodium's builtin FPS display. Also, set your settings to the ones you use in each modpack you test. Great video Kasai!
Ye cause Minecraft is bad and renders the f3 menu at max fps, even though f3 menu only updates like every second lol At least from my limited knowledge idk
@@leafee9611 the fps goes up if after a while of loading the world, also why would you suspect that he is lying? There's literally no reason for this at all, you can literally just test the modpack at any time you want
I have M1 Macbook Air 2020 base model. I tested the latest Performium on default settings without any background apps running. I got max 450 fps, avg 350 fps... I get the same amount with my own combination with only 13 mods. Just wanted to say this for someone having M1 macbook Air like me. I won't be using Performium, cause my own combination work the same. FYI: Minecraft was running on latest native Arm version with Java 21 Arm version.
@@EvanOM1ghtyy i am not the same guy but i use sodium, indium, badoptimisation (that is the name lol), clumps, enhancedblockentities, entity culling, c2me, ferritcore, fps reducer (this optimises the cpu and gpu use so it doesnt have frame drops), immediately fast, lithium, (i am windows btw so some mods might not work) hope that helped :D
I understand why you wanted to compare these modpacks using the default settings since a lot of people don't bother changing the settings. However, it's definitely unfair not to set the view distance and simulation distances to the same values. I bet if every setting were the same, the FPS difference would be a lot less. Also, not every optimization mod focuses solely on improving world generation speed or culling stuff out of the player's view. Some of them improve particle rendering, entity rendering, mob ai and redstone mechanics. Some modpacks might provide more stable overall FPS while actually playing the game. There is no meaningful difference between 1000fps and 1100fps. Lastly, the F3 menu significantly reduces FPS and is not a reliable way to check your FPS.
Of course, if every settings were the same, the FPS difference would be a lot less. A big part of an optimization Modpack, is the settings though. A lot of optimization packs are using the same mods. What makes them different, is the different configuration of the developer. That's what inspired the video. But I get your point and I'll keep them in mind for a future, maybe more in-depth comparison. Where this were just a casual feature overview and FPS check
If there are typos in my sentences, just note I’m I am using dictation right now since right now my hands are caught up with a few projects. I’m working on and I can’t type things into places at once so these are one of my options.
what about remarkably optimized? (its made by a youtuber, and you cant find it in modrinth) also would be nice if you compare performium with remarkably optimized since i get 1.2k fps easily with it
The f3 meniu eats your fps and the last mod was swt by default to 32 chuncks for both render and shadow distance which puo it at a dissadvantage compaired to the other modpacks that wore running 13 chuncks
W video kasai. Can make a video about Fabric VS Paper for Servers, paper is optimized but fabric has a lot of optimization mods... another question, do Paper x Fabric exists?
Hey Kasai! I own and manage my own optimization + QOL modpack, and if you are planning on doing a follow-up video on your optimization modpacks, i think you might be surprised. On my computer, it gets upward of 2.5K fps +, with the other modpacks only getting about 2K. The only difference is that mine comes with 40 mods, compared to the average 20. If you are interested, let me know!
I have a problem, I have so many optimization mods that they're starting to slow down the game 😅 I bet I have a bunch of mods that try to optimize an area of the game, that's already optimized by another optimization mod, and this of course slows down my game 🙄
I used Fabulously Optimized for a while, and I thought it's the best alternative to Optifine. But after this video, I decided to check out Performium modpack, and it did really well ! even better than Fabulously Optimized. My fps was 50 - 70 in Fabulously Optimized, with Performium I went to 60 - 90, and even sometimes more than 90......... If you asked why is that, I think because Performium has more optimization mods, like c2me and noisium, that Fabulously Optimized doesn't have for some reason......
I noticed that Fabulously Optimized modpack uses the cpu less compared to the first one. I guess the 2nd one provides less heating which is good for long sessions.
I try Performium modpack and keep all the setting as it is and only got to 300 fps and that was in fullscreen but my gpu is not good but i have not try anyother modpack
Sodium + got low fps because the render distance and shadow distance at 32 Chunks and 12 chunks on simulation distance. might try sodium + to see how much fps I can get though
I used to be all over getting the most fps but now i realize it doesnt matter because i make sure it stays above 120 Fps because u wont even notice a difference dependjng on ur monitors refresh rate
Absolutely facts. Everything above 120 does not matter. These optimisation packs are mostly for those with low end systems, so they can get a playable framerate
hmm can u make ur modpack for 1.20.1 bcz its the most used version for pvp and smp players (aka the players that want more fps for better gameplay)😊😊 nice vid BTW
@@Satwr Yeah, in Modpacks it sucks but if I wanna play vanilla it is great because my cpu sucks and Vulkan has a setting that uses the cpu less and the gpu more but I see your pov
This video is really useful, but having a modpack for forge would be better so that if there's a mod on forge someone wants to play with a potato pc they can
Love that he was willing to change v-sycn and under lock the frames on sodium plus but not change the render distance from 32 down to 12 like all the others were running. but out of the box is it shouldn't be set at 32 that is bad on the mod makes.
it isnt set to 32 by default
@@JashXD Well, clearly this video was to promote the modpack itself and say that the others are inferior.
What if I download all of them at once?
@@Raheem-fun-facts It won't make any difference, most of the mods will be replaced by the version of the other modpack and those few that don't repeat themselves will stay there, it won't make practically any difference.
Correction: When using the F3 menu to see FPS you actually lose some FPS so it's better to use a 3rd-party application to check the FPS! Also when chaging the GUI scale to something higher it actually increases the FPS, and if fullscreen is on then you lose some FPS! I hope you do a part 2 explaining this and maybe re-doing the test!
EDIT: My orginal comment was me saying you should make your own modpack but then I see you did so yeah 😅 I just putting my second thought that was a video correction!
In my case full screen mode increases 25 fps
@@ahsan.rasool full screen should increase the fps but small window (something like 50% of the screen) is even better
@@AAdielperetz 50% screen maybe increase the fps but it reduce the experience
@@ahsan.rasool right
Windows actually has a tool that shows fps, press windows key + G key and you will see some helpful tools, but there's a preference tool, pin it so it show when you close the menu and but it somewhere in the screen
F3 actually kills FPS a lot, so I'd recommend testing these mods on your own using a mod like FPS Display or Sodium's builtin FPS display. Also, set your settings to the ones you use in each modpack you test. Great video Kasai!
no? I have it on right now, says 2230 fps, turned it off, still says 2230 fps
i think that's sodium extra, not sodium
@@pI4yr You might be right, not sure
Ye cause Minecraft is bad and renders the f3 menu at max fps, even though f3 menu only updates like every second lol
At least from my limited knowledge idk
@@SethXB it does, but i think gui scale might have an affect on it too
Hi, I actually use fabulously optimized with some extras I added
is it the best one
@@pngtuan If you want shaders and extra features, not just optimization then yes
Fabulously optimized = optimization with shaders.
Simply optimized = purely optimization without shaders.
@@Random_MCrafter What extras do you have??
@@zzyy1934 It supports Optifine features like dynamic lighting, animated textures, zoom, custom models, shaders, cape...
5:57 wonder what are you trying to tell us by using this seed
👀👀👀
Didn't expect Performium to have these epic numbers! Izen did a brilliant work and perfectly surpassed the most famous ones out there. Great video!
He didn't use the f3 menu so ofc he has more fps
@@F1nley_X actually Performium is great, and kasai didn't know that the f3 menu takes that much fps
My only question is why the fps is around 200-300 when he joins the world and only goes up After a cut in the video
@@leafee9611 the fps goes up if after a while of loading the world, also why would you suspect that he is lying? There's literally no reason for this at all, you can literally just test the modpack at any time you want
@@ali_the_grass_block Never said I thought he was lying, he isn't if you ask me. I was just wondering about that lmao
I have M1 Macbook Air 2020 base model. I tested the latest Performium on default settings without any background apps running. I got max 450 fps, avg 350 fps... I get the same amount with my own combination with only 13 mods. Just wanted to say this for someone having M1 macbook Air like me. I won't be using Performium, cause my own combination work the same. FYI: Minecraft was running on latest native Arm version with Java 21 Arm version.
@@Khiladi-12911 WHATS YOUR COMBOINATION PLEASE?? I’m a content creator who plays on a m3 Mac and get nowhere near that
@@EvanOM1ghtyy i am not the same guy but i use sodium, indium, badoptimisation (that is the name lol), clumps, enhancedblockentities, entity culling, c2me, ferritcore, fps reducer (this optimises the cpu and gpu use so it doesnt have frame drops), immediately fast, lithium, (i am windows btw so some mods might not work) hope that helped :D
I understand why you wanted to compare these modpacks using the default settings since a lot of people don't bother changing the settings. However, it's definitely unfair not to set the view distance and simulation distances to the same values. I bet if every setting were the same, the FPS difference would be a lot less. Also, not every optimization mod focuses solely on improving world generation speed or culling stuff out of the player's view. Some of them improve particle rendering, entity rendering, mob ai and redstone mechanics. Some modpacks might provide more stable overall FPS while actually playing the game. There is no meaningful difference between 1000fps and 1100fps. Lastly, the F3 menu significantly reduces FPS and is not a reliable way to check your FPS.
Of course, if every settings were the same, the FPS difference would be a lot less. A big part of an optimization Modpack, is the settings though. A lot of optimization packs are using the same mods. What makes them different, is the different configuration of the developer. That's what inspired the video. But I get your point and I'll keep them in mind for a future, maybe more in-depth comparison. Where this were just a casual feature overview and FPS check
WOW GOOD AD xD
for you're new modpack :)
smart play
I just compared it, the Modpack promoted itself xD
@@KasaiSora it WORKED THO almost 900 downloads :O
9:54 look at these trees bro ;-;
Indeed, thanks for pointing that out. I'll work on them in the future to make them look better.
@@maybeizen thanks
I demand another video using something like msi afterburner for the fps instead of the f3 screen or some mod
When testing optimization mod packs i always set render, simulation and shadow distance to 12 and make ever setting equal to the other modpacks
you use the first 2 with d3 open and that make a 200 - 450 fps different
yeah... the reason its so high is because the f3 menu lowers ur fps while just having the fps showing gives u more
I used preformium on the steam deck, and I went from 80 fps to a stable 600 fps with a max of 900.
Amazing to hear mate!
26 seconds and no comments how!!!???
If there are typos in my sentences, just note I’m I am using dictation right now since right now my hands are caught up with a few projects. I’m working on and I can’t type things into places at once so these are one of my options.
gui scale can impact framerate actually
pretty heavily too, the gui in minecraft is extremely unoptimized.
really?
@@JFenixGG yeah. the smaller your gui scale, the higher your framerate.
what about remarkably optimized? (its made by a youtuber, and you cant find it in modrinth)
also would be nice if you compare performium with remarkably optimized since i get 1.2k fps easily with it
Good video, wish the ad was reviewed more neutrally though
Thanks for making a video on this Kasai. I love you ❤
I love you too for the frames lol! You are an amazing developee with hidden abilities! ❤
Much love back mate!
The f3 meniu eats your fps and the last mod was swt by default to 32 chuncks for both render and shadow distance which puo it at a dissadvantage compaired to the other modpacks that wore running 13 chuncks
W video kasai.
Can make a video about Fabric VS Paper for Servers, paper is optimized but fabric has a lot of optimization mods... another question, do Paper x Fabric exists?
Hey Kasai! I own and manage my own optimization + QOL modpack, and if you are planning on doing a follow-up video on your optimization modpacks, i think you might be surprised. On my computer, it gets upward of 2.5K fps +, with the other modpacks only getting about 2K. The only difference is that mine comes with 40 mods, compared to the average 20. If you are interested, let me know!
+1
What’s your mod pack?
@@sonicthomasgamer CornCobs BareBones, on modrinth
Imo I use Additive but only because I like the OptiFine extra features
No joke I was just comparing different mod packs the day this video came out
This video was amazing
I am about to try out your optimization mod
So i hope it fixes my average 45 fps
Whats the difference between performium and simply smoother? They seem just copy pasted with a few text changes here and there
Different mods and configurations. Also, Simply Smoother is not related at all to KasaiSora. To be fair, I did copy the descriptions.
@@maybeizen Which one do you think is better for performance?
@@HelperGuy Performium 100%
@@maybeizen does nvidium work with it
Is it possible to use a performance modpack, then use another modpack?
9:03 wow didn't know that was a thing
Yeah it's really cool! I made a full video about it on my channel too!
@@KasaiSora dang really is it a old video or am i just blind
@@TheOstyle you're probably blind
i wish adrenaline and additive were in this list, i've been using additive for so long now and i always got super stable performance
you forgot to make a chapter for sodium plus
I am really sorry but you didn't check chunk render distance and because of that your comparisin is not accurate
It is. The whole goal of this comparison was comparing the packs at default settings. Without changing anything
I have a problem, I have so many optimization mods that they're starting to slow down the game 😅
I bet I have a bunch of mods that try to optimize an area of the game, that's already optimized by another optimization mod, and this of course slows down my game 🙄
I used Fabulously Optimized for a while, and I thought it's the best alternative to Optifine.
But after this video, I decided to check out Performium modpack, and it did really well ! even better than Fabulously Optimized.
My fps was 50 - 70 in Fabulously Optimized, with Performium I went to 60 - 90, and even sometimes more than 90.........
If you asked why is that, I think because Performium has more optimization mods, like c2me and noisium, that Fabulously Optimized doesn't have for some reason......
That’s incredible to hear mate! Glad the pack works great for you!
Bro simply optimized is using more gpu then fabulously optimized
i used performium
went from 240 fos in windows mod to 240 fs in fullscreen with xtra features
THANKYOU
I noticed that Fabulously Optimized modpack uses the cpu less compared to the first one. I guess the 2nd one provides less heating which is good for long sessions.
I do got me a good pc. 1400+ fps with only sodium on the f3 screen with default settings
My bro, how i install de perfomium mod? when i download the mod the archive is .mrpack, do i have to put it in the mods carpet?
Wow!!! I was Getting 60 stable fps with “YOUR MODPACK (PERFORMIUM) IM GETTING 90-160 Fps 200% Recomended!”
Letsgoo incredible to hear!
Performium is crazyyy
It even blew me away 😱
Izen cooked
@@ali_the_grass_block real
I try Performium modpack and keep all the setting as it is and only got to 300 fps and that was in fullscreen but my gpu is not good but i have not try anyother modpack
@@KasaiSora32 chucks on sodium plus🥲
im doin somthin wrong it turned my 50fps to 30fps on performium how do i fix it
Nvidium does heavy lifting for Simply Optimized 💪
I got 12k fps in windows 10 G50-80 Lenovo laptop ❤
Wtf I have same laptop and I get 70-100 fps 😢😢
@@corrupted_waves because he is lying
WOAH. If you can get 1,300 with Performium, then I wonder what it's like with Nvidium... I might have to try it out xD
Bro You are the best foreign minecraft tutorial youtuber I've ever seen
Sodium + got low fps because the render distance and shadow distance at 32 Chunks and 12 chunks on simulation distance. might try sodium + to see how much fps I can get though
I used to be all over getting the most fps but now i realize it doesnt matter because i make sure it stays above 120 Fps because u wont even notice a difference dependjng on ur monitors refresh rate
Also I use Remarkably Optimized just go search on yt for the video
Absolutely facts. Everything above 120 does not matter. These optimisation packs are mostly for those with low end systems, so they can get a playable framerate
bro doesnt know about input latency.....
hmm can u make ur modpack for 1.20.1 bcz its the most used version for pvp and smp players (aka the players that want more fps for better gameplay)😊😊 nice vid BTW
Simple lunar +FO-some mods(the ones that dont work on lunar it is like 3 un important once)
You should turn on fps show in the settings so that you dont need to open f3 because f3 eats much fps
What if I download all of them at once?
Performium is absolutely awesome!! I just tried it!
Great to hear!
Could you make a video on testing Forge optimization modpack, please
I can definitely give it a shot!
We need tutorial how to use modpacks
btw when i checked performium mod pack i got around 1500 fps while moving around
plz tell me your shader that your using your game looks so smooth man❤
Can Performium be added to a came already in process or do I have to start an entirely new game?
Vulkan mod works best for me, please try it out!
being incompatible with Basicaly 99% of Mods does't rlly makes it a rlly Good Optimization Mod...
@@Satwr Yeah, in Modpacks it sucks but if I wanna play vanilla it is great because my cpu sucks and Vulkan has a setting that uses the cpu less and the gpu more but I see your pov
I made a custom modpack for max fps
Performium is an amazing mod. I used it and it was amazing
can you use modrinth modpacks and add them onto lunar client?
Seems like I found A new fav modpack, Great Job On Making Performium. I Will use that with a some extra tweeks :)
Zedyakh modpack in curseforge is best of them all but it's really underrated
😢 i missed 2 videos😭😭
No worries at all!
@@KasaiSora❤
Earlier 👀
Thankyouuuu!
is the 180 hrz monitor watching btw?
the ressource pack in the first of the video plz
Optimalsation is the fastest modpack from both first and third party benchmarks yet you excluded it?? Can I ask why?
The good ones are in fabric:
OptiFine:What about me?😥😢
@@dread-ful-persian optifine isn't that good
Optifine after 1.17 isnt good anymore.
Would you also test my modpack out?
This video is really useful, but having a modpack for forge would be better so that if there's a mod on forge someone wants to play with a potato pc they can
I might look into what great packs for Forge are
@@KasaiSora I like Divine Journey 2, I'm pretty sure it's only Forge. I know forge doesn't have too much optimization tho
pls update your modpack to older versions like 1.20.3 down to 1.20!!
What are your PC Specs?
Edit: Nevermind I just saw your GPU and CPU on the right side of the screen.
Wonder if when I don't download sodium it still boost my fps?
those are modpack, and all of them have sodium init
Kasai : 50 fps difference is nothing.
Le me: sitting on 50 fps with all the 180 mods installed
Bro conveniently used f3 menu for the first 2 modpacks and not for 3rd so it will show his modpacks having more fps 😂
exactly! such bs
Could we get Performium for other older versions like 1.19.4?
Kasai, when will you have your own server?
wth when i downloaded performium it didnt give me a file it took me to the notebook
wat do i do
How did you not cover Kami Chan?
For me in the future. USE THIS 7:59
Hey can you do a tutorial on how to these modpacks?
0:59 is fabric more optimised than forge so it has more optimisation mods or is fabric more optimised than forge bc it has more optimisation mods?
first option, also, fabulously is better
he has no view bobbing when reviewing his own modpack. (he said, he'd use default settings)
That is the default setting
@@maybeizen no, not really. It does change your settings.
How do I enable modpacks??
i have java 17 and its not downloading as a jar file??
What is this texture pack
Bare Bones in the intro/outro
Lag because 32 chunks
how do i make the .mrpack thing work ????
Without showing your FPS without any modpacks these results while sounding impressive are rather meaningless.
Can u PLS make a tutorial for phoenixlobby how u get the database.db in your mysql ?
Guys anyone know the shader he is using and the resos pack pls?
Hello bro how to use your performium modoack
You can download it with the Modrinth client or other clients that support Modrinth Modpacks
On sodium + you are using the 32 chunks to render unlike others
either way it's still going to have the worst performance since it has distant horizons
@@orcvs6297 But you can turn that off no?
@@DeSch0ft yeah but the point is they're using the default settings of the modpack
Now do on forge!
Hello! I'm eating, but, after that, I'll just play with your modpack.
Thanks for this video. ❤ Road to 100k! 🎉
Can I get a hello from the goat??
Hellooooo
@@KasaiSora YOOOOO :D