The lack of debris removal and/or protection was obvious. This was neither 'record' rainfall nor record river flows. But the minute this is pointed out, one is called a denier. This was the least expensive way of removing 15 million cubic yards of contaminated sediment. Speaking of which, how are things looking/smelling down river? It's about time questions are asked instead of simply reciting government press releases.
The lack of debris removal and/or protection was obvious. This was neither 'record' rainfall nor record river flows. But the minute this is pointed out, one is called a denier. This was the least expensive way of removing 15 million cubic yards of contaminated sediment. Speaking of which, how are things looking/smelling down river? It's about time questions are asked instead of simply reciting government press releases.
Excellent. But getting the county to admit fault? Goodluck! Excellent reporting though.